Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:24:06.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Housing, feeding, and maintenance of rodents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

Robert W. Kemp
Affiliation:
AstraZeneca Inc. Alderley Park Macclesfield SK10 4TF UK
Turgut Tatlisumak
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Marc Fisher
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Article 5 in Directive 86/609 of the Council of the European Communities states:

All experimental animals shall be provided with housing, an environment, at least some freedom of movement, food, water and care which are appropriate to their health and well being:

any restriction on the extent to which an experimental animal can satisfy its physiological and ethological needs shall be limited to the absolute minimum; …

Animal needs are summarized in a report on farm animals by the Brambell Committee which referred to the provision of “Five Freedoms.” These were reported as:

  1. Freedom from malnutrition;

  2. Freedom from injury and disease;

  3. Freedom from thermal and physical discomfort;

  4. Freedom from fear and stress;

  5. Freedom to express most normal patterns of behaviour.

These freedoms are not confined solely to farm animals but are applicable to all animals maintained in captivity, including those kept within laboratories as breeding stock or for experimental use.

The scientist and the animal technician must be constantly aware that animals housed in the laboratory either for breeding or scientific studies lack the self-sufficiency of their wild counterparts. They are completely dependent on him, or her, for all these physiological and ethological needs; they have a limited ability to vary or improve their environmental conditions by seeking warmer or cooler areas, are unable to vary their food or seek out additional supplies should they become depleted, and have no control over access to liquid as this is usually from a single source; and the space in which they exercise, mate, and socialize is controlled and confined.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Experimental Neurology
Methods and Techniques in Animal Research
, pp. 19 - 32
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Council Directive (86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986) on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals for experimental and other scientific purposes. OJ L358/29, 18 December 1986.
Harrison, R. Special address. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988, 20: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats. Anim. Welfare 1997, 6: 95–103.Google Scholar
Berdoy M. The Laboratory Rat: A Natural History. (Film, 27 min.), 2002. Available online at http://www.ratlife.org
Key, D. Environmental enrichment options for laboratory rats and mice. Lab. Anim. Europe 2004, 4: 30–38.Google Scholar
Chamove, AS. Environmental enrichment: a review. Anim. Technol. 1989, 40: 155–178.Google Scholar
Cubitt, S. Environmental enrichment for rats. Reg. Anim. Technic. 2, 1992.Google Scholar
Oruk-Edem, E, Key, D. Response of rats (Rattus norvegicus) to enrichment objects. Anim. Technol. 1994, 45: 25–30.Google Scholar
Chmeil, D Jr, Noonan, M. Preference of laboratory rats for potentially enriching stimulus objects. Lab. Anim. 1996, 30: 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskola, S, Kaliste-Korhonen, E. Effects of cage type and gnawing blocks on weight gain, organ weights and open-field behaviour in Wistar rats. Scand. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 25: 180–193.Google Scholar
Brain PF. Rodents. In O'Donaghue, PN (ed.) International Workshop on the Accommodation of Laboratory Animals in Accordance with Animal Welfare Requirements, Berlin 17–19 May 1993. Bonn, Germany: Bundersministerium fur Erahrung, Landwirtschat und Forster, 1995, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Home Office. Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals in Designated Breeding and Supplying Establishments. London: The Stationary Office, 1996.
Report of the rodent refinement working party. Lab. Anim. 1998, 32: 233–239.CrossRef
Patterson-Kane, EC, Harper, DN, Hunt, M. The cage preferences of laboratory rats. Lab. Anim. 2001, 35: 74–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlingmann, F, Rijk, SHLM, Pereboom, WJ, Remie, R. Light intensity in animal rooms and cages in relation to the care and management of albino rats. Anim. Technol. 1993, 44: 97–107.Google Scholar
Wadsworth M, Priest D. A comparison of conventional caging materials with respect to light level intensities. Poster at the Institute of Animal Technology Congress, Jersey, 1998.
Key, D, Hewett, A. Developing and testing a novel cage insert, the “Mouse House”, designed to enrich the lives of laboratory mice without adversely affecting the science. Anim. Technol. 2002, 1: 55–64.Google Scholar
Applebee, K. Rodent environmental enrichment: animal welfare or human feel-good factor? Anim. Technol. 2002, 1: 65–69.Google Scholar
Eskola, S, Lauhikari, M, Voipio, H-M, Laitinen, M, Nevalainen, T. Environmental enrichment may alter the number of rats needed to achieve statistical significance. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 1999, 26: 134–144.Google Scholar
Manser, CE, Morris, TH, Broom, DM. An investigation into the effects of solid or grid cage flooring on the welfare of laboratory rats. Lab. Anim. 1995, 29: 353–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manser, CE, Elliot, H, Morris, TH, Broom, DM. The use of a novel operant test to determine the strength of preference for flooring in laboratory rats. Lab. Anim. 1996, 30: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, C, Gillaspy, S. Assessing laboratory life for Golden Hamsters; social preference, caging, selection and human interaction. Lab. Anim. 1994, 23: 34–37.Google Scholar
Schlingmann, F, Weerd, HA, Blom, HJM, Baumanns, V, Zutphen, LFM. Behavioural differentiation of mice housed on different cage floors. 5th FELAS Symposium: Welfare and Science, 1993, pp. 355–357.Google Scholar
Olfert, ED, Cross, BM, McWilliam, AA. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1993.Google Scholar
Council of Europe European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental or other Scientific Purposes. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe, 1986.
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, 2nd edn, 2 vols. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1993.
Bantin, GC, Sanders, PD. Animal caging: is big necessarily better? Anim. Technol. 1989, 40: 45–54.Google Scholar
Clough, G. Environmental factors in relation to the comfort and well-being of laboratory rats and mice. In Standards in Laboratory Animal Management. Potters Bar, UK: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, 1984, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Flynn RJ. Notes on ringtail in rats. In Conalty, ML (ed.) Husbandry of Laboratory Animals, 3rd International Symposium of the International Committee on Laboratory Animals. London: Academic Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Young, RW. Renewal systems in rods and cones. Ann. Opthalmol. 1973, 5: 843–854.Google ScholarPubMed
Weihe WH. The effect of light on animals. In: McSheehy, T (ed.) Control of the Animal House Environment. London: Laboratory Animals Ltd, 1976, pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
Clough, G, Donnelly, HT. Light intensity influences the oestrous cycle of LACA mice. Proceedings UFAW/LASA Joint Symposium on Standards in Laboratory Animal Management, 1983, p. 60.Google Scholar
Weihe, WH, Schidlow, J, Strittmatter, J. The effect of lighting intensity on the breeding and development of rats and golden hamsters. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1969, 13: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaff, J, Stecker, M. Loudness level and frequency content of noise in the animal house. Lab. Anim. 1976, 10: 111–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×