Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T00:56:45.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

38 - Major disaster planning

from Part V - Different treatment settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Geoffrey Lloyd
Affiliation:
Priory Hospital, London
Elspeth Guthrie
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the last few decades there have been a number of high-profile disasters, memories of which can be evoked by the mention of a place name. For example, Zeebrugge, Lockerbie, Bradford, Bali, New York and Madrid. Disasters affect many people. Victims and their families, survivors, witnesses and the personnel of agencies involved in the emergency response are perhaps the most obvious groups, but disasters often affect whole communities, countries and, as we have seen following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, the whole world.

Emergency plans

There have been criticisms regarding the unplanned and uncoordinated nature of psychosocial input following several disasters, leading to calls for the creation of multiagency planning groups that include mental health professionals to plan appropriate responses before disasters occur (Bisson 2003). Every local authority in England and Wales has an emergency planning officer whose key role is to develop an emergency plan. The emergency planning officer co-ordinates the Disaster Management System, a multiagency, multiprofessional partnership with the emergency services (ambulance, fire and police) being central to it. Other agencies including the local authority, social services, health services and voluntary agencies support the emergency services. In order for their input to be effective this support should be delivered in a preplanned co-ordinated manner integrated into the central plan.

Disaster plans often include a well-developed ‘non-psychological’ emergency response but little, if any, detail about the psychological response, perhaps reflecting the Home Office's (1998) Dealing with Disasters document that merely states ‘victims of disasters should be offered psychological support’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adshead, G., Canterbury, R. and Rose, S. (1994). Current provision and recommendations for the management of psychosocial morbidity following a disaster in England. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 4, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andre, C., Lelord, F., Legeron, P., et al. (1997). Controlled study of outcomes after 6 months to early intervention of bus drivers of aggression. Encephale, 23, 65–71.Google Scholar
Bisson, J. I., Jenkins, P. L., Alexandra, J., et al. (1997). Randomised controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of acute burn trauma. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. and Macho, G. (2003). The Cardiff traumatic stress initiative: an evidence-based approach to early psychological intervention following traumatic events. Psychiatric Bulletin, 27, 145–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, J. I., Shepherd, J. P., Joy, D., et al. (2004). Early cognitive-behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after physical injury. Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?American Psychologist, 59, 20–8.Google Scholar
Bordow, S. and Porritt, D. (1979). An experimental evaluation of crisis intervention. Social Science and Medicine, 13, 251–6.Google Scholar
Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B. and Valentine, J. D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brom, D., Kleber, R. J. and Hofman, M. C. (1994). Victims of traffic accidents: incidence and prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 131–40.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, R. A., Harvey, A. G., Dang, S. T., et al. (1998). Treatment of acute stress disorder: a comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counselling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 862–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, R. A., Sackville, T., Dang, S. T., et al. (1999). Treating acute stress disorder: an evaluation of cognitive behavior therapy and supportive counselling techniques. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1780–6.Google Scholar
Bunn, T. and Clarke, A. (1979). Crisis intervention: an experimental study of the effects of a brief period of counselling on the anxiety of relatives of seriously injured or ill hospital patients. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T. and Hollins, S. C. (1991). Psychiatric response to the Clapham rail crash. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campfield, K. M. and Hills, A. M. (2001). Effect of timing of critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) on posttraumatic symptoms. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlon, L., Fahy, T. J. and Conroy, R. (1999). PTSD in Ambulant RTA Victims: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Debriefing. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., et al. (2002). Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 982–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galea, S., Vlahov, D., Resnick, H., et al. (2003). Trends of probable post-traumatic stress disorder in New York after the September 11 terrorist attacks. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 514–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, Y., Gal, R., Freedman, S., et al. (2001). Translating research findings to PTSD prevention: results of a randomised controlled pilot study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 773–80.Google Scholar
Guthrie, E., Wells, A. and Pilgrim, H. (1999). The Manchester bombing: providing a rational response. Journal of Mental Health, 8, 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, M., Mayou, R., Harrison, B., et al. (1997). A randomised trial of psychological debriefing for victims of road traffic accidents. British Medical Journal, 313, 1438–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Office, (1998). Dealing with Disasters. Livepool: Brodie Publishing.
Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., et al. (1995). Post-traumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1048–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavender, T. and Walkinshaw, S. A. (1998). Can midwives reduce postpartum psychological morbidity? A randomized trial. Birth, 25, 215–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C., Slade, P. and Lygo, V. (1996). The influence of psychological debriefing on emotional adaptation in women following early miscarriage: a preliminary study. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 69, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayou, R. A., Ehlers, A. and Hobbs, M. (2000). Psychological debriefing for road traffic accidents: three-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 589–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellman, T. A., Bustamante, V., David, D., et al. (2002). Hypnotic medication in the aftermath of trauma. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63, 1183–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. T. (1983). When disaster strikes … the critical incident debriefing process. Journal of Emergency Medical Services, 8, 36–9.Google Scholar
North, C. S., Nixon, S. J., Shariat, S., et al. (1999). Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 755–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., et al. (2002). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, R. K., Altman, B., Greenwald, E., et al. (1991). Psychiatric complications during flooding therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder. Jounal of Clinical Psychiatry, 52, 17–20.Google Scholar
Pitman, R. K., Sanders, K. M., Zusman, R. M., et al. (2002). Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 189–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S., Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., et al. (1999). A randomised controlled trial of individual psychological debriefing for victims of violent crime. Psychological Medicine, 29, 793–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S., Bisson, J. and Wessely, S. (2003) A systematic review of single-session psychological interventions (‘debriefing’) following trauma. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 72, 176–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, G., Briegel, J., Roozendaal, B., et al. (2001). The effect of stress doses of hydrocortisone during septic shock on posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 978–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, R., Lumley, J., Donohue, L., et al. (2000). Midwife-led debriefing to reduce maternal depression following operative birth: a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 321, 1043–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens Hobbs, M. and Adshead, G. (1996). Preventive psychological intervention for road crash survivors. In The Aftermath of Road Accidents: Psychological, Social and Legal Perspectives, ed.Mitchell, M.. London: Routledge, pp. 159–71.
Yule, W., Bolton, B., Udwin, O., et al. (2000). The long-term psychological effects of a disaster experienced in adolescence: I: the incidence and cause of PTSD. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 503–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zatzick, D. F., Roy-Byrne, P., Russo, J. E., et al. (2001). Collaborative interventions for physically injured trauma survivors: a pilot randomized effectiveness trial. General Hospital Psychiatry, 23, 114–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×