Agawu, V. K., “Structural ‘Highpoints’ in Schumann’s Dichterliebe,” Music Analysis 3 (1984), pp. 159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agawu, V. K., “Theory and Practice in the Analysis of the Nineteenth-Century Lied,” Music Analysis 11 (1992), pp. 3–36Google Scholar

Agawu, V. K., “Ambiguity in Tonal Music: A Preliminary Study,” in Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music, ed. Pople, A., Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 86–107Google Scholar

Agawu, V. K., Music as Discourse: Semiotic Adventures in Romantic Music, Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar

Appel, B. R., Robert Schumanns “Album für die Jugend”: Einführung und Kommentar, Atlantis Musikbuch-Verlag, 1998; Mainz: Schott, 2010Google Scholar

Appel, B. R., Vom Einfall zum Werk: Robert Schumanns Schaffensweise, Mainz: Schott, 2010Google Scholar

Bahr, R., “‘Dreiklang = Zeiten. Terz vermittelt Vergangenheit und Zukunft als Gegenwart’: Kadenzharmonik bei Robert Schumann und Moritz Hauptmanns harmonische Dialektik,” in Musiktheorie im Kontext: 5. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie, Hamburg 2005, ed. Sprick, J. P., Bahr, R., and von Troschke, M., Berlin: Wiedler Buchverlag, 2008, pp. 275–288Google Scholar

Bak, C.-Y., “An Eclectic Analysis and Performance Guide of Robert Schumann’s First Two Violin Sonatas, Opus 105 in A and Opus 121 in D,” Ph.D. diss., New York University, 2000Google Scholar

Bartoli, J.-P., L’harmonie classique et romantique (1750–1900): Éléments et évolution, Paris: Minerve, 2001Google Scholar

Bischoff, B., “Robert Schumanns Klaviertrio g-Moll op. 110: Einstehung – Rezeption – Analyse,” in Schumann in Düsseldorf: Werke-Texte-Interpretationen: Bericht über das 3. Internationale Schumann-Symposion am 15. und 16. Juni 1988 im Rahmen des 3. Schumann-Festes, Düsseldorf, ed. Appel, B. R., Mainz: Schott, 1993, pp. 221–248Google Scholar

Burkhart, C., “Departures from the Norm in Two Songs from Schumann’s Liederkreis,” in Schenker Studies, ed. Siegel, H., Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 146–164Google Scholar

Burstein, L. P., “Unraveling Schenker’s Concept of the Auxiliary Cadence,” Music Theory Spectrum 27 (2005), pp. 159–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cadwallader, A., “Form and Tonal Process: The Design of Different Structural Levels,” in Trends in Schenkerian Research, ed. Cadwallader, A., New York: Schirmer Books, 1990, pp. 1–21Google Scholar

Carey, N., “An Improbable Intertwining: An Analysis of Schumann’s Kreisleriana I and II, with Recommendations for Piano Practice,” Theory and Practice 32 (2007), pp. 19–50Google Scholar

Dommel-Diény, A., L’analyse harmonique en exemples de J.-S. Bach à Debussy: Contribution à une recherche de l’interprétation: Schumann, Paris: Éditions Delachaux & Niestlé, 1967Google Scholar

Elias, A., “Zwei Klavierstücke aus Schumanns ‘Album für die Jugend’,” Der Dreiklang: Monatsschrift für Musik 7 (1937), pp. 161–164Google Scholar

Ferris, D., Schumann’s Eichendorff Liederkreis and the Genre of the Romantic Cycle, Oxford University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferris, D., “‘Was will dieses Grau’n bedeuten?’: Schumann’s ‘Zwielicht’ and Daverio’s ‘Incomprehensibility Topos’,” The Journal of Musicology 22 (2005), pp. 131–153Google Scholar

Finson, J. W., Robert Schumann: The Book of Songs, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007Google Scholar

Forte, A., “Schenker’s Conception of Musical Structure,” Journal of Music Theory 3 (1959), pp. 1–30; reprinted in Readings in Schenker Analysis and Other Approaches, ed. M. Yeston, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977, pp. 3–37Google Scholar

Goldenberg, Y., “‘Negative Texture’ and the Prolongation of Seventh Chords,” Theory and Practice 29 (2004), pp. 95–123Google Scholar

Goldenberg, Y., Prolongation of Seventh Chords in Tonal Music, 2 vols., Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 2008Google Scholar

Hatten, R. S., “Performing Expressive Closure in Structurally Open Contexts: Chopin’s Prelude in A minor and the Last Two Dances of Schumann’s Davidsbündlertänze,” Music Theory Online 20/4 (2014)Google Scholar

Hoeckner, B., “Paths through Dichterliebe,” 19th-Century Music 30 (2006–2007), pp. 65–80Google Scholar

Hunt, G., “‘How Much is Enough?’: Structural and Formal Ramifications of the Abbreviated Second A Section in Rondo Finales from Haydn to Brahms,” Journal of Schenkerian Studies 8 (2014), pp. 1–48Google Scholar

Kaminsky, P. M., “Aspects of Harmony, Rhythm and Form in Schumann’s Papillons, Carnaval and Davidsbündlertänze,” Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester, 1989Google Scholar

Kaminsky, P. M., “Principles of Formal Structure in Schumann’s Early Piano Cycles,” Music Theory Spectrum 11 (1989), pp. 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Komar, A., “The Music of Dichterliebe: The Whole and Its Parts,” in Dichterliebe, by Schumann, R., ed. Komar, A., New York: W. W. Norton, 1971, pp. 63–94Google Scholar

Kopp, D., Chromatic Transformations in Nineteenth-Century Music, Cambridge University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Kopp, D., “Intermediate States of Key in Schumann,” in Rethinking Schumann, ed. Kok, R.-M. and Tunbridge, L., Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 300–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krebs, H., Fantasy Pieces: Metrical Dissonance in the Music of Robert Schumann, Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Krebs, H., “Sentences in the Lieder of Robert Schumann: The Relation to the Text,” in Formal Functions in Perspective: Essays on Musical Form from Haydn to Adorno, ed. Vande Moortele, S., Pedneault-Deslauriers, J., and Martin, N. J., University of Rochester Press, 2015, pp. 225–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krummacher, F., “Zur Kompositionsart Mendelssohns: Thesen am Beispiel der Streichquartette,” in Das Problem Mendelssohn, ed. Dahlhaus, C., Regensburg: Bosse, 1974, pp. 169–184; as “On Mendelssohn’s Compositional Style: Propositions Based on the Example of the String Quartets,” trans. D. Seaton, in The Mendelssohn Companion, ed. D. Seaton, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001, pp. 551–568Google Scholar

Krummacher, F., Mendelssohn der Komponist: Studien zur Kammermusik für Streicher, Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1978Google Scholar

Laufer, E., “Voice-Leading Procedures in Development Sections,” Studies in Music from The University of Western Ontario 13 (1991), pp. 69–120Google Scholar

Lerdahl, F., Tonal Pitch Space, Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Lester, J., “Substance and Illusion in Schumann’s ‘Erinnerung,’ Op. 68: A Structural Analysis and Pictorial (geistliche) Description,” In Theory Only 4 (1978), pp. 9–17Google Scholar

Lester, J., “Robert Schumann and Sonata Forms,” 19th-Century Music 18 (1994–1995), pp. 189–210Google Scholar

Lewin, D., Studies in Music with Text, Oxford University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Malin, Y., “Review of Schumann’s Dichterliebe and Early Romantic Poetics: Fragmentation of Desire by Beate Julia Perrey,” Music Theory Spectrum 28 (2006), pp. 299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, N., Schumann, Fantasie, Op. 17, Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar

Marston, N., “Schumann’s ‘Gesänge der Frühe’, op. 133: A ‘False Dawn’?,” in “Le ultime opera di Robert Schumann: Analisi dei Gesänge der Frühe per pianoforte op. 133 (1853),” ed. Rostagno, A., Rivista di analisi e teoria musicale 16/2 (2010), pp. 29–49Google Scholar

Martin, N. J., “Schumann’s Fragment,” Indiana Theory Review 28 (2010), pp. 85–109Google Scholar

McCreless, P., “Song Order in the Song Cycle: Schumann’s Liederkreis, op. 39,” Music Analysis 5 (1986), pp. 5–28Google Scholar

Meeùs, N., “Robert Schumann: Quatre Lieder du Dichterliebe op. 48,” Analyse musicale 21 (1990), pp. 23–35Google Scholar

Michaelsen, R., Der komponierte Zweifel: Robert Schumann und die Selbstreflexion in der Musik, Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 2015Google Scholar

Morgan, R. P., “Dissonant Prolongation Again: Nontonic Extensions in Nineteenth-Century Music,” Journal of Music Theory 60 (2016), pp. 1–21Google Scholar

Moßburger, H., Poetische Harmonik in der Musik Robert Schumanns, Sinzig: Studio Verlag, 2005Google Scholar

Moßburger, H., “Poetische Harmonik,” in Schumann Handbuch, ed. Tadday, U., Stuttgart: Metzler, 2006, pp. 194–211Google Scholar

Moßburger, H., “Robert Schumanns frühe und späte Fantasien,” in Der späte Schumann, ed. Tadday, U., Munich: Boorberg, 2006, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar

Moßburger, H., Ästhetische Harmonielehre: Quellen, Analysen, Aufgaben, 2 vols., Wilhelmshaven: Florian Noetzel Verlag, 2012Google Scholar

Neumeyer, D., “Organic Structure and the Song Cycle: Another Look at Schumann’s Dichterliebe,” Music Theory Spectrum 4 (1982), pp. 92–105Google Scholar

Neumeyer, D., “Synthesis and Association, Structure, and Design in Multi-Movement Compositions,” in Music Theory in Concept and Practice, ed., Baker, J. M., Beach, D. W., and Bernard, J. W., University of Rochester Press, 1997, pp. 197–216Google Scholar

Oinas, C., “Toward a Performer-Oriented Analysis: Communication between Analysis and Performance in Schumann’s D-minor Piano Trio,” Res musica 3 (2011), pp. 134–145Google Scholar

Perrey, B. J., Schumann’s Dichterliebe and Early Romantic Poetics: Fragmentation of Desire, Cambridge University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Ponce, A., “Form, Diversity, and Lack of Fulfillment in the First Movement of Schumann’s Fantasie op. 17,” Music Theory Online 20/3 (2014)Google Scholar

Pousseur, H., Schumann, le poète: Vingt-cinq moments d’une lecture de Dichterliebe, Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck, 1993Google Scholar

Pousseur, H., “Schumann ist der Dichter,” Intersections: Canadian Journal of Music 25 (2005), pp. 7–22Google Scholar

Rapoport, E., Mendelssohn’s Instrumental Music: Structure and Style, Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2012Google Scholar

Reiman, E., Schumann’s Piano Cycles and the Novels of Jean Paul, University of Rochester Press, 2004Google Scholar

Reti, R., The Thematic Process in Music, New York: Macmillan, 1951Google Scholar

Reynolds, C. A., Motives for Allusion: Context and Content in Nineteenth-Century Music, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Roesner, L. C., “Schumanns ‘Parallel’ Forms,” 19th-Century Music 14 (1990–1991), pp. 265–278Google Scholar

Rosen, C., The Romantic Generation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995Google Scholar

Rothgeb, J., “A Structural Function of Dynamics in Schumann’s ‘Ich grolle nicht’,” In Theory Only 5/2 (1979), pp. 15–17Google Scholar

Rothstein, W., Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music, New York: Schirmer Books, 1989Google Scholar

Salzer, F., Structural Hearing: Tonal Coherence in Music, 2 vols., New York: Boni, 1952; reprint edn, New York: Dover, 1962Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “Rhythm and Linear Analysis: Aspects of Meter,” Music Forum 6/1 (1987), pp. 1–59; reprinted in Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis, ed. J. N. Straus, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 79–117Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “The Triad as Place and Action,” Music Theory Spectrum 17 (1995), pp. 149–169; reprinted in Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis, ed. J. N. Straus, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 161–183Google Scholar

Schachter, C., “Che Inganno! The Analysis of Deceptive Cadences,” in Essays from the Third International Schenker Symposium, ed. Cadwallader, A., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2006, pp. 279–298Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Der Tonwille: Flugblätter zum Zeugnis unwandelbarer Gesetze der Tonkunst, einer neuen Jugend dargebracht, 2 vols., Vienna: A. J. Gutmann, Leipzig: F. Hofmeister, 1921–1924; as Der Tonwille: Pamphlets in Witness of the Immutable Laws of Music, Offered to a New Generation of Youth, ed. W. Drabkin, trans. I. Bent et al., Oxford University Press, 2004–2005Google Scholar

Schenker, H., Der freie Satz: Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien III, Vienna: Universal, 1935; rev. edn, ed. O. Jonas, Vienna: Universal, 1956; as Free Composition, trans. and ed. E. Oster, New York: Longman, 1979; reprint trans. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 2001Google Scholar

Schenker, H., The Oster Collection: Papers of Heinrich Schenker, New York Public Library, Lincoln Center, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Schmalfeldt, J., In the Process of Becoming: Analytic and Philosophical Perspectives on Form in Early Nineteenth-Century Music, Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Harmonies Heard from Afar: Tonal Pairing, Formal Design, and Cyclical Integration in Schumann’s A-minor Violin Sonata, op. 105,” Theory and Practice 34 (2009), pp. 47–86Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Associative Harmony, Tonal Pairing, and Middleground Structure in Schumann’s Sonata Expositions: The Role of the Mediant in the First Movements of the Piano Quintet, Piano Quartet, and Rhenish Symphony,” in Rethinking Schumann, ed. Kok, R.-M. and Tunbridge, L., Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 235–264Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “The Drama of Tonal Pairing in Chamber Music of Schumann and Brahms,” in Expressive Intersections in Brahms: Essays in Analysis and Meaning, ed. Platt, H. and Smith, P. H., Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011, pp. 252–290Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Tonal Pairing and Monotonality in Instrumental Forms of Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, and Brahms,” Music Theory Spectrum 35 (2013), pp. 77–102Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Schumann’s Continuous Expositions and the Classical Tradition,” Journal of Music Theory 58 (2014), pp. 25–56Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Hausmusik for Cognoscenti: Some Formal Characteristics of Schumann’s Late-Period Character Pieces for Instrumental Ensemble,” Music Theory Spectrum 37 (2015), pp. 51–70Google Scholar

Smith, P. H., “Schumann’s A-minor Mood: Late-Style Dialectics in the First Movement of the Cello Concerto,” Journal of Music Theory 60 (2016), 51–88Google Scholar

Stein, D., “Introduction to Musical Ambiguity,” in Engaging Music: Essays in Music Analysis, ed. Stein, D., Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 77–88Google Scholar

Struck, M., “Beziehungs-Probleme: Zum Verhältnis der Komponisten Schumann und Brahms, dargestellt am Beispiel von Violinsonaten,” in “Neue Bahnen”: Robert Schumann und seine musikalischen Zeitgenossen: Bericht über das 6. Internationale Schumann-Symposion am 5. und 6. Juni 1997 im Rahmen des 6. Schumann-Festes, Düsseldorf, ed. Appel, B. R., Mainz: Schott, 2002, pp. 294–347Google Scholar

Suurpää, L., “Schumann, Heine, and Romantic Irony: Music and Poems in the First Five Songs of Dichterliebe,” Intégral 10 (1996), pp. 93–123Google Scholar

Suurpää, L., “Cover Tone in Brahms’s Immer leiser wird mein Schlummer op. 105, no. 2 and Mendelssohn’s Lied ohne Worte op. 67, no 1,” in A Composition as a Problem III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Music Theory, Tallinn, March 9–10, 2001, Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Music, 2003, pp. 109–121Google Scholar

Suurpää, L., “The Undivided Ursatz and the Omission of the Tonic Stufe at the Beginning of the Recapitulation,” Journal of Schenkerian Studies 1 (2005), pp. 66–91Google Scholar

Suurpää, L., “Schumann’s ‘Das ist ein Flöten und Geigen’: Conflicts between Local and Global Perspectives,” in Structure and Meaning in Tonal Music: Festschrift in Honor of Carl Schachter, ed. Burstein, L. P. and Gagne, D., Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2006, pp. 173–178Google Scholar

Suurpää, L., “The Fourth Piece of Schumann’s Kreisleriana, Op. 16, As a Musical Fragment: Discontinuity and Unity Intertwined,” Rivista di analisi e teoria musicale 19/1 (2013), pp. 7–24Google Scholar

Taylor, B., Mendelssohn, Time and Memory, Cambridge University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Thomas, M., Das Instrumentalwerk Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdys: Eine systematisch-theoretische Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der zeitgenössischen Musiktheorie, Göttingen: Hubert, 1972Google Scholar

Tunbridge, L., Schumann’s Late Style, Cambridge University Press, 2007Google Scholar

Vitercik, G., “Mendelssohn the Progressive,” Journal of Musicological Research 8 (1988–1989), pp. 333–374Google Scholar

Vitercik, G., The Early Works of Felix Mendelssohn: A Study in the Romantic Sonata Style, Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach, 1992Google Scholar

Vitercik, G., “Mendelssohn as Progressive,” in The Cambridge Companion to Mendelssohn, ed. Mercer-Taylor, P., Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 71–88Google Scholar

Wadsworth, B. K., “Directional Tonality in Schumann’s Early Works,” Music Theory Online 18/4 (2012)Google Scholar

Waldura, M., Monomotivik, Sequenz und Sonatenform im Werk Robert Schumanns, Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei & Verlag, 1990Google Scholar

Webster, J., “Ambivalenzen um Mendelssohn: Zwischen Werk und Rezeption,” in Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Kongreß-Bericht Berlin 1994, ed. Schmidt, C. M., Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1997, pp. 257–278Google Scholar