Works Cited

Arash Abazari

doi:10.1017/9781108877329.008

Abazari, Arash. “Marx’s Conception of Dialectical Contradiction in Commodity,” Hegel-Bulletin, 1–21. doi:10.1017/hgl.2018.29, 2019.Google Scholar

Albrecht, Wolfgang. Hegels Gottesbeweis: Eine Studie zur Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar

Allen, Amy. “Feminist Perspectives on Power,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/feminist-power.Google Scholar

Angehrn, Emil. Freiheit und System bei Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1977.Google Scholar

Backhaus, Hans-Georg. Dialektik der Wertform: Untersuchungen zur Marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Freiburg: Ça ira, 1997.Google Scholar

Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex, trans. H. M. Parshley. New York: Vintage Books, 1989 [1952].Google Scholar

Bell, John R. Capitalism and the Dialectic: The Uno–Sekine Approach to Marxian Political Economy. London: Pluto Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bensaïd, Daniel. Marx for Our Times: Adventures and Misadventures of a Critique. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Berlin, Isaiah, Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–217, 2002 [1969].Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 4th Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 1998.Google Scholar

Bordignon, Michela. “Contradiction or Non-contradiction? Hegel’s Dialectic between Brandom and Priest,” Verifiche XLI (1–3), 2012.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. “The Structure of Desire and Recognition: Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1): 127–50, 2007.Google Scholar

Burbidge, John W. Hegel’s Systematic Contingency. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science: 1300–1800. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar

Carver, Terrell. “Introduction” to Karl Marx: Texts on Method, trans and ed. Terrell Carver. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1975.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 (1, Winter): 3–33, 1983.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Croce, Benedetto. What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel. New York: Garland, 1984 [1915].Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. Suicide: A Study in Sociology, trans. John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1952 [1897].Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Fink-Eitel, Hinrich. Dialektik und Sozialethik: Kommentierende Untersuchungen zu Hegels Logik. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1978.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Lorna. An Introduction to Feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age,” New Left Review No. 212: 68–149, 1995.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel. Redistribution or Recognition: A Political–Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar

Fulda, Hans Friedrich, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Theunissen, Michael. Kritische Darstellung der Metaphysik: Eine Diskussion über Hegels Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar

Furth, Peter. “Asymmetrische Gegensätze in der Sprache der Politik,” in Troja hört nicht auf zu brennen: Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1981 bis 2004. Berlin: Landtverlag, 2006 [1991].Google Scholar

Geras, Norman. “The Controversy about Marx and Justice,” Philosophica 33 (1): 33–86, 1984.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Goodfield, Eric Lee. Hegel and the Metaphysical Frontiers of Political Theory. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Gray, John. Liberalism, 2nd Edition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Green, T. H., Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1895.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Labor and Interaction: Remarks on Hegel’s Jena Philosophy of Mind,” in Theory and Practice, trans. J. Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 142–69, 1973.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hardimon, Michael. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Klaus. Die Marxsche Theorie: Eine philosophische Untersuchung zu den Hauptschriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1970.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Klaus. “Die ontologische Option,” in Die ontologische Option, ed. Hartmann, Klaus. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1–30, 1976.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Klaus. Hegels Logik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. The Limits to Capital. London: Verso, 2006.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx’s Capital: Volume One. London: Verso, 2010.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. “History versus Theory: A Commentary on Marx’s Method in Capital,” Historical Materialism 20 (2): 3–38, 2012.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx’s Capital: Volume Two. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Michael. “Abstrakte Arbeit,” in Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, ed. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. Hamburg: Argument, 1994.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Michael. Die Wissenschaft vom Wert: Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1999.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Michael. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Michael. Wie das Marxsche Kapital lesen? Teil 2. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Michael. “Grundbegriffe der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie,” in Marx Handbuch: Leben, Werk, Wirkung, ed. Quante, Michael and Schweikard, David. Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Johannes. Die Logik der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bonn: Bouvier, 1974.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Hegels Theorie über den Zufall,” in Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 157–86, 1971.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Hegels Logik der Reflexion,” in Die Wissenschaft der Logik und die Logik der Reflexion, Hegel-Tage Chantilly 1971, Hegel-Studien, Beiheft 18. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 203–324, 1978.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Logische Form und reale Totalität,” in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 428–519, 1982.Google Scholar

Herzog, Lisa. Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. Die Absolute Form: Modalität, Individualität und das Prinzip der Philosophie nach Kant und Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Eine Propädeutik. Wiesbaden: Marixverlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Recognition as Ideology: The Connection between Morality and Power,” in The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 75–97, 2012.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hösle, Vittorio. Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. Hamburg: Meiner, 1998.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. “Necessity and Contingency in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” The Owl of Minerva 27 (1): 37–49, 1995.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. “Essence, Reflexion and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” in A Companion to Hegel, ed. Houlgate, Stephen and Bauer, Michael. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 139–58, 2011.Google Scholar

Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Millican, Peter F., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Iber, Christian. Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität: Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln von Hegels Wesenslogik. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, Rahel. “Was ist Ideologiekritik?,” in Was ist Kritik?, ed. Jaeggi, Rahel and Wesche, Tilo. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 266–95, 2009.Google Scholar

Jaeschke, Walter. “Äußerliche Reflexion und immanente Reflexion: Eine Skizze der systematischen Geschichte des Reflexionsbegriffs in Hegels Logik-Entwürfen,” Hegel-Studien 13: 85–118, 1978.Google Scholar

Jaeschke, Walter. Hegel-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Schule. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2003.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. “Konkurrenz,” in Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, ed. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. Hamburg: Argument, Band 7/II: pp. 1542–63, 2010.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Political Writings, trans. Hans Siegbert Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Laplace, Pierre Simon. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, trans. Frederick Truscott and Frederick Emory. New York: Dover Publications, 1951.Google Scholar

Lask, Emil. Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte, Sämtliche Werke, Band I. Jena: Scheglmann, 2002 [1902].Google Scholar

Lebanidze, Giorgi. Hegel’s Transcendental Ontology. London: Lexington, 2019.Google Scholar

Lenin, Vladimir. Collected Works, Volume 38: Philosophical Notebooks. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961 [1916].Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Georg. Indifferenz und Gesellschaft: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Marx. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. Essays über Realismus. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 1948. [Essays on Realism, trans. David Fernbach. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980.]Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics, trans. Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin, 1975 [1948].Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. The Ontology of Social Being: Hegel, trans. David Fernbach. London: Merlin Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Luxemburg, Rosa. Reform or Revolution and Other Writings. New York: Dover Publications, 2012.Google Scholar

Macherey, Pierre. Hegel or Spinoza, trans. Susan M. Ruddick. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 32–45, 1987a.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine. “Desire and Power,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 46–62, 1987b.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Majetschak, Stefan, Die Logik des Absoluten: Spekulation und Zeitlichkeit in der Philosophie Hegels. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Mandel, Ernest. “Introduction” to Marx, Karl. Capital: Volume Two. London: Penguin Books, 1978.Google Scholar

Mandel, Ernest. “How to Make No Sense of Marx?,” in Analyzing Marxism: New Essays on Analytical Marxism, ed. Ware, Robert and Nielsen, Kai, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 15, The University of Calgary Press, pp. 105–32, 1989.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. Boston: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975.Google Scholar

Megill, Allan. Karl Marx: The Burden of Reason (Why Marx Rejected Politics and the Market). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1): 77–92, 2010.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Menke, Christoph. “Das Nichtanerkennbare: Oder warum das moderne Recht keine Sphäre der Anerkennung ist,” in Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, ed. Forst, R., Hartmann, M., Jaeggi, R., and Saar, M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 87–108, 2009.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty, ed. Bromwich, David and Kateb, George. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Morishima, Michio. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Moseley, Fred. “Marx’s Reproduction Schemes and Smith’s Dogma,” in The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital, ed. Arthur, C. J. and Reuten, G. A.. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Moyar, Dean. “Thought and Metaphysics: Hegel’s Critical Reception of Spinoza,” in Spinoza and German Idealism, ed. Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak Y.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–213, 2012.Google Scholar

Mure, G. R. G. A Study of Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Brian. Adorno. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Peperzak, Adriaan. Modern Freedom: Hegel’s Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar

Patten, Alan. Hegel’s Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. “The Doctrine of Necessity Examined,” The Monist 2 (3): 321–37, 1892.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. German Philosophy, 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. “Recognition, the Right, the Good,” in The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph and Zurn, Christopher F.. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. “Hegel’s Ethical Rationalism,” in Idealism and Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 417–50, 1997.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. “Recognition and Reconciliation: Actualized Agency in Hegel’s Jena Phenomenology,” in Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, ed. van den Brink, Bert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–78, 2007.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. “Individualism versus Collectivism,” in Popper Selections, ed. Miller, David. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 338–44, 1983.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. The Poverty of Historicism, 2nd Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2012 [1957].Google Scholar

Postone, Moishe. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Priest, Graham. Beyond the Limits of Thought, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Quante, Michael. “Schichtung oder Setzung? Hegels Reflexionslogische Bestimmung des Natur–Geist-Verhältnisses,” Hegel-Studien 37: 107–21, 2002.Google Scholar

Rand, Sebastian. “What’s Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality,” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1): 68–86, 2015.Google Scholar

Robinson, Joan. An Essay on Marxian Economics, 2nd Edition. London: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar

Roncaglia, Alessandro. The Wealth of Ideas: A History of Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Rosen, Michael. On Voluntary Servitude: False Consciousness and the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ruben, David-Hillel. The Metaphysics of the Social World. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar

Rubin, Isaak Illich. Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value, trans. Fredy Perlman and Miloš Samardžija. Delhi: Aakar, 2008 [1923].Google Scholar

Ruda, Frank. Hegel’s Rabble: An Investigation into Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self,” Political Theory 12 (1): 81–96, 1984.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandkaulen, Birgit. “Die Ontologie der Substanz, der Begriff der Subjektivität und die Faktizität des Einzelnen: Hegels reflexionslogische „Widerlegung“ der Spinozanischen Metaphysik,” in Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5: 235–75, 2007.Google Scholar

Schick, Friedrike. “Die Lehre vom Begriff: Erster Abschnitt. Die Subjectivität,” in Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik, ed. Quante, Michael and Mooren, Nadine. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 457–558, 2018.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Gerhart. “Das Spiel der Modalitäten und die Macht der Notwendigkeit: Zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik,” in Hegel in der Sicht der neueren Forschung, ed. Fetscher, Iring. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 188–206, 1973.Google Scholar

Schnädelbach, Herbert. “Was ist Ideologie? Versuch einer Begriffsklärung,” Das Argument 50: 71–92, 1969.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Sekine, Thomas T. The Dialectic of Capital: A Study of the Inner Logic of Capitalism. Tokyo: Yushindo, 1984.Google Scholar

Smith, Tony. The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Smith, Tony. “Hegel, Marx and the Comprehension of Capitalism,” in Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic: A Reexamination, ed. Mosley, Fred and Smith, Tony. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Smith, Tony. Beyond Liberal Egalitarianism: Marx and Normative Social Theory in the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar

Sraffa, Piero. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael. “Krise der Macht: Thesen zur Theorie des dialektischen Widerspruchs,” in Hegel Jahrbuch. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain Verlag, pp. 319–29, 1974.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael. Sein und Schein: Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael. “Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts,” in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 317–81, 1982.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael. “Begriff und Realität: Hegels Auffassung des metaphysischen Wahrheitsbegriffs,” in Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels, ed. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 324–59, 1989 [1975].Google Scholar

Vieweg, Klaus. Das Denken der Freiheit: Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Wallace, Robert M. Hegel’s Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Wieland, Wolfgang. “Das Individuum und seine Identifizierung in der Welt der Kontingenz,” in Denken der Individualität: Festschrift für Josef Simon zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Hoffmann, Thomas Sören and Majetschak, Stefan. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 3–25, 1995.Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael. Der Begriff des Widerspruchs: Eine Studie zur Dialektik Kants und Hegels. Königstein im Taunus: Hain, 1981.Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael. “Über Hegels Lehre vom Widerspruch,” in Probleme der Hegelschen Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 107–28, 1986.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen. The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Yeomans, Christopher. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Yeomans, Christopher. “Power as Control and the Therapeutic Effects of Hegel’s Logic,” Hegel Bulletin 36 (1): 33–52, 2015.CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “Recognition of Love’s Labor: Considering Axel Honneth’s Feminism,” in Recognition and Power, pp. 189–212, 2007.Google Scholar

Zelený, Jindřich. The Logic of Marx, trans. Terrell Carver. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar