Book contents
- Immaterial Texts in Late Medieval England
- Immaterial Texts in Late Medieval England
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations, Quotations and References
- Chapter 1 Prologue
- Chapter 2 ‘Hele alle maner of schabbis’
- Chapter 3 ‘Who by prudence Rule him shal’
- Chapter 4 ‘Þe leef torned’
- Chapter 5 ‘Rede … and ʒe may se’
- Chapter 6 ‘This is the copy’
- Chapter 7 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- List of Manuscripts
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 May 2022
Book contents
- Immaterial Texts in Late Medieval England
- Immaterial Texts in Late Medieval England
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations, Quotations and References
- Chapter 1 Prologue
- Chapter 2 ‘Hele alle maner of schabbis’
- Chapter 3 ‘Who by prudence Rule him shal’
- Chapter 4 ‘Þe leef torned’
- Chapter 5 ‘Rede … and ʒe may se’
- Chapter 6 ‘This is the copy’
- Chapter 7 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- List of Manuscripts
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Immaterial Texts in Late Medieval EnglandMaking English Literary Manuscripts, 1400–1500, pp. 240 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
John the Blind Audelay: Poems and Carols, ed. Susanna Fein (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokenham, Osbern, Legendys of Hooly Wummen, ed. Serjeantson, Mary S., EETS os 206 (Oxford University Press, 1938).Google Scholar
Bowers, John M., ed., The Canterbury Tales: Fifteenth-Century Continuations and Additions (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 1992).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey, The Canterbury Tales, in Benson, Larry D., ed., The Riverside Chaucer (Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Clarke, Mark, ed., The Crafte of Lymmyng and the Maner of Steynyng: Middle English Recipes for Painters, Stainers, Scribes, and Illuminators, EETS os 347 (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, and Wood, Sarah, eds., Richard Morris’s ‘Prick of Conscience’: A Corrected Edition, EETS os 342 (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Higden, Ranulph, Polychronicon, trans. Trevisa, John, ed. Babington, Churchill and Lumby, J. Rawson, Rolls Series, 41, 9 vols. (London: Longman, Green, 1865–86).Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas, Complaint and Dialogue, ed. Burrow, J. A., EETS os 313 (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas, Minor Poems, ed. Furnivall, F. J., EETS es 61 (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1892).Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas, ‘My Compleinte’ and Other Poems, ed. Ellis, Roger (Exeter University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas, The Regiment of Princes, ed. Blyth, Charles R. (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 1999).Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas, Thomas Hoccleve: A Facsimile of the Autograph Verse Manuscripts, ed. Burrow, J. A. and Doyle, A. I., EETS ss 19 (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Michael P., Kuczynski, ed., A Glossed Wycliffite Psalter, 2 vols., EETS os 352–3 (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Langland, William, Piers Plowman: The B Version, ed. Kane, George and Donaldson, E. Talbot (repr. 1975; London: Athlone, 1988).Google Scholar
Langland, William, Piers Plowman: The C Version, ed. Russell, George and Kane, George (London: Athlone, 1997).Google Scholar
Littlehales, Henry, ed., The Prymer; or, Lay-Folks’ Prayer Book, EETS os 105, 109 (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1895–97).Google Scholar
Lydgate, John, Fall of Princes, ed. Bergen, Henry, EETS es 121–4, 4 vols. (London: Oxford University Press, 1924–27).Google Scholar
Lydgate, John, Life of Our Lady, ed. , Joseph A. Lauritis, Ralph A. Klinefelter, and Gallagher, Vernon F., Duquesne Studies: Philological Series, 2 (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Lydgate, John, The Siege of Thebes, ed. Edwards, Robert R. (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydgate, John, Troy Book, ed. Bergen, Henry, EETS es 97, 103, 106, 126, 4 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1906–35).Google Scholar
Manly, John Matthews, Edith Rickert, et al., eds., The Text of the Canterbury Tales: Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts, 8 vols. (University of Chicago Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Mirk, John, Festial, ed. Powell, Susan, EETS os 334–5, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2009–11).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., and Beadle, Richard, eds., Poetical Works: A Facsimile of Cambridge University Library MS Gg. 4.27, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Brewer, 1979–80).Google Scholar
Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century, ed. Davis, Norman, Beadle, Richard and Richmond, Colin, 3 vols., EETS ss 20–2 (Oxford University Press, 2004–5).Google Scholar
Rolle, Richard, The Psalter or Psalms of David and Certain Canticles, ed. Bramley, H. R. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884).Google Scholar
Scrope, Stephen, The Dicts and Sayings of the Philosophers, ed. Bühler, Curt F., EETS os 211 (Oxford University Press, 1941).Google Scholar
Steinmann, Martin, ed., Handschriften im Mittelalter: Eine Quellensammlung (Basel: Schwabe, 2013).Google Scholar
John Trevisa’s Translation of the Polychronicon of Ranulph Higden, Book VI, ed. Waldron, Ronald A., Middle English Texts, 35 (Heidelberg: Winter, 2004).Google Scholar
Vinsauf, Geoffrey of, Poetria nova, in Edmond Faral, Les arts poètiques du XIIe et du XIIe siècle (Paris: Champion, 1958), 194–262.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ed., Revolting Remedies from the Middle Ages (Oxford: Bodleian Library, 2017).Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward, with Wakelin, Daniel, eds., A Middle English Translation from Petrarch’s Secretum, EETS os 351 (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas, Anglo-Saxon and Old English Glossaries, ed. Wülcker, Richard Paul, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (London: Trübner, 1884).Google Scholar
Wright, W. Aldis, ed., Generydes, EETS os 55, 70, 2 vols. (London: Trübner, 1873, 1878).Google Scholar
Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources, ed. Latham, R. E. et al. (Turnhout: Brepols, 2015), www.dmlbs.ox.ac.uk/web/welcome.html.Google Scholar
The Digital Image Archive of Medieval Music, www.diamm.ac.uk.Google Scholar
The Digital Index of Middle English Verse, ed. Mooney, Linne R. et al., www.dimev.net/.Google Scholar
Index of Middle English Prose, ed. Edwards, A. S. G. et al., http://imep.lib.cam.ac.uk/Google Scholar
Late Medieval English Scribes, ed. Mooney, Linne, Horobin, Simon and Stubbs, Estelle, www.medievalscribes.com.Google Scholar
The Middle English Compendium, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cme/.Google Scholar
The Middle English Dictionary, ed. Kurath, Hans et al. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1952–), http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/med/.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary, ed. Simpson, John A. et al. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989–), http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl.Google Scholar
Vocabulaire codicologique, ed. Muzerelle, Denis et al., with English translations by Doyle, A. I., http://codicologia.irht.cnrs.fr/.Google Scholar
Ádam, Ágnes, Liszewska, Weronika and Szlabey, Györgyi, ‘The Changes in Parchment Restoration’, in Fellows-Jensen, Gillian and Springborg, Peter, eds., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 10 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2008), 60–70.Google Scholar
Agati, Maria Luisa, ‘Qualche riflessione relativa agli strumenti di rigatura. Solo un problema di terminologia?’, GLM, 51 (2007), 30–6.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. J. G., Medieval Illuminators and Their Methods of Work (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Alexander, J. J. G., and Binski, Paul, eds., Age of Chivalry: Art in Plantagenet England 1200–1400 (London: Royal Academy of Arts, 1987).Google Scholar
Andrén, Anders, Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective, trans. Crozier, Alan (New York: Plenum Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Sara, ed., The Designer Says: Quotes, Quips, and Words of Wisdom (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bahr, Arthur, ‘Miscellaneity and Variance’, in Johnston, Michael and Van Dussen, Michael, eds., The Medieval Manuscript: Cultural Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2015), 181–98.Google Scholar
Bahr, Arthur, and Gillespie, Alexandra, ‘Medieval English Manuscripts: Form, Aesthetics, and the Literary Text’, ChRev., 47 (2013), 346–60.Google Scholar
Baker, Eleanor, ‘Metaphors of Textual Materiality in Late Medieval Middle English Sermons’, Studies in Philology, 118 (2021), 641–65.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S., Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bart, Patricia R., ‘Intellect, Influence and Evidence: The Elusive Allure of the Ht Scribe’, in Calabrese, Michael A. and Shepherd, Stephen H. A., eds., Yee? Baw for Bokes: Essays on Medieval Manuscripts and Poetics in Honor of Hoyt. N. Duggan (Los Angeles, CA: Marymount Institute Press, 2013), 219–43.Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard, ‘Geoffrey Spirleng (c.1426–c.1494); A Scribe of the Canterbury Tales in His Time’, in Robinson, Pamela and Zim, Rivkah, eds., Of the Making of Books: Medieval Manuscripts, Their Scribes and Readers: Essays Presented to M. B. Parkes (Aldershot: Scholar, 1997), 116–46.Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard, ‘Some Measures of Scribal Accuracy in Late Medieval English Manuscripts’, in Gillespie, Vincent and Hudson, Anne, eds., Probable Truth: Editing Texts from Medieval Britain (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013), 223–40.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter, A Dictionary of English Manuscript Terminology 1450–2000 (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bennett, A. R., ‘The Ecology of Art-iculation and Aggregate Reading’, PMLA, 131 (2016), 356–63.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. R., ‘What Do the Numbers Mean? The Case for Corpus Studies’, in Brown, J. N. and Rice, N. R., eds., Manuscript Culture and Medieval Devotional Traditions (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 2021), 48–81.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael, and Laing, Margaret, ‘Translations and Mischsprachen in Middle English Manuscripts’, in Benskin, Michael and Samuels, M. L., eds., So meny people, longages and tonges: Philological Essays in Scots and Mediaeval English Presented to Angus McIntosh (Edinburgh: privately printed, 1981), 55–106.Google Scholar
Benson, C. David, and Blanchfield, Lynne S., The Manuscripts of Piers Plowman: The B Version (Cambridge: Brewer, 1997).Google Scholar
Benson, C. David, and Windeatt, Barry A., ‘The Manuscript Glosses to Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde’, ChRev., 25 (1990), 33–53.Google Scholar
Binski, Paul, ‘The Rhetorical Occasions of Gothic Sculpture’, Collegium Medievale, 30 (2017), 7–31.Google Scholar
Binski, Paul, ‘A “Softer Glory”: An Afterword on Alabaster and the New Aesthetics’, in Brantley, Jessica, Perkinson, Stephen and Teviotdale, Elizabeth C., eds., Reassessing Alabaster Sculpture in Medieval England (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020), 265–88.Google Scholar
Binski, Paul, Zutshi, Patrick and Panayotova, Stella, Western Illuminated Manuscripts: A Catalogue of the Collection in Cambridge University Library (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Blake, N. F., ‘Chaucer, Gamelyn and the Cook’s Tale’, in Matsuda, Takami, Linenthal, Richard A. and Scahill, John, eds., The Medieval Book and a Modern Collector: Essays in Honour of Toshiyuki Takamiya (Woodbridge: Brewer, 2004), 87–98.Google Scholar
Blatt, Heather, Participatory Reading in Late-Medieval England (Manchester University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia, ‘Annotation in Some Manuscripts of Troilus and Criseyde’, English Manuscript Studies, 5 (1995), 1–17.Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia, Manuscript and Print in London c. 1475–1530 (London: British Library, 2012).Google Scholar
Boudalis, Georgios, The Codex and Crafts in Late Antiquity (New York: Bard Graduate Center, 2018).Google Scholar
Bowers, John M., Chaucer and Langland: The Antagonistic Tradition (University of Notre Dame Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Bowers, John M., ‘Hoccleve’s Two Copies of Lerne to Dye: Implications for Textual Critics’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 83 (1989), 437–72.Google Scholar
Boyd, David Lorenzo, ‘Reading through the Regiment of Princes, Hoccleve’s Series and Lydgate’s Dance of Death in Yale Beinecke MS 493’, Fifteenth-Century Studies, 20 (1993), 15–34.Google Scholar
Bozzolo, Carla, and Ornato, Ezio, Pour une histoire du livre manuscrit au Moyen Âge (Paris: Editions du CNRS, 1983).Google Scholar
Brantley, Jessica, ‘Forms of Reading in the Book of Brome’, in Tonry, Kathleen and Gayk, Shannon, eds., Form and Reform: Reading across the Fifteenth Century (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2011), 19–39.Google Scholar
Brantley, Jessica, Reading in the Wilderness: Private Devotion and Public Performance in Late Medieval England (University of Chicago Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Catherine, ‘Remember the Hand: Bodies and Bookmaking in Early Medieval Spain’, Word and Image, 27 (2011), 262–78.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas, ‘The New Materialism in Renaissance Studies’, in Perry, Curtis, ed., Material Culture and Materialisms in the Middle Ages and Renaissance (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), 225–38.Google Scholar
Bühler, Curt F., ‘A New Lydgate-Chaucer Manuscript’, Modern Language Notes, 52 (1937), 1–9.Google Scholar
Burgess, Anika, ‘The Artful Imperfection of Medieval Manuscript Repair’, Atlas Obscura, www.atlasobscura.com/articles/medieval-manuscripts-embroidery.Google Scholar
Butler, Shane, The Matter of the Page: Essays in Search of Ancient and Medieval Authors (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Butterfield, Ardis, ‘Mise-en-Page in the Troilus Manuscripts: Chaucer and French Manuscript Culture’, HLQ, 58 (1996), 49–80.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Ardis, and Deeming, Helen, ‘Editing Insular Song across the Disciplines: Worldes blis’, in Gillespie, Vincent and Hudson, Anne, eds., Probable Truth: Editing Medieval Texts from Britain in the Twenty-First Century (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013), 151–66.Google Scholar
Byrne, Donal, ‘Manuscript Ruling and Pictorial Design in the Work of the Limbourgs, the Bedford Master, and the Boucicaut Master’, Art Bulletin, 66 (1984), 118–36.Google Scholar
Cains, Anthony, ‘The Vellum of the Book of Kells’, The Paper Conservator, 16 (1992), 50–61.Google Scholar
Camille, Michael, ‘The Très Riches Heures: An Illuminated Manuscript in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, Critical Inquiry, 17 (1990), 72–107.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher, ‘Form’, in Strohm, Paul, ed., Middle English (Oxford University Press, 2007), 177–90.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher, and Rubery, Matthew, ‘Introduction to “Aurality and Literacy”’, PMLA, 135 (2020), 350–6.Google Scholar
Careri, Maria, ‘A chacun ses erreurs … Versi e prosa: problemi di copia’, in Croizy-Naquet, Catherine and Szkilnik, Michelle, eds., Rencontres du vers et de la prose: Conscience poétique et mise en texte (Paris: Presses Sorbonnes Nouvelles, 2017), 81–92.Google Scholar
Careri, Maria, ‘Per una tipologia dei copisti della Chanson d’Aspremont. Con una riflessione sulle modalità di copia dei testi in versi’, in Luca, Paolo di and Piacentino, Doriana, eds., Codici, testi, interpretazioni: studi sull’epica romanza medievale (Università degli studi di Napoli, 2015), 9–22.Google Scholar
Careri, Maria, ‘Raccogliere errori nei manoscritti romanzi’, in Malato, Enrico and Mazzucchi, Andrea, eds., La critica del testo (Roma: Salerno, 2019), 415–38.Google Scholar
Careri, Maria, et al., Album de manuscrits français du XIIIe siècle: Mise en page et mise en texte (Rome: Viella, 2001).Google Scholar
Carroll, Ruth, et al., ‘Pragmatics on the Page: Visual Text in Late Medieval English Books’, European Journal of English Studies, 17 (2013), 54–71.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary, The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cerquiglini, Bernard, Éloge de la variante: Histoire critique de la philologie (Paris: Seuil, 1989).Google Scholar
Chaganti, Seeta, ‘Choreographing Mouvance: The Case of the English Carol’, Philological Quarterly, 87 (2008), 77–103.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger, On the Edge of the Cliff: History, Language and Practices, trans. Cochrane, Lydia G. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger, Inscription and Erasure: Literature and Written Culture from the Eleventh to the Eighteenth Century, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Cheese, Edward, ‘From Pelt to Painted Page: Western Medieval Manuscript Parchments’, in Panayotova, Stella, ed., The Art and Science of Illuminated Manuscripts: A Handbook (Turnhout: Brepols, 2021), 73–94.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. P., ‘Boccaccio and the Poetics of the Paratext: Rubricating the Vernacular’, Le Tre Corone, 6 (2019), 69–106.Google Scholar
Clarke, Mark, ‘Recipes and Reception: Late Medieval English Colour Recipes and Amateur Illuminators’, in Panayotova, Stella and Ricciardi, Paola, eds., Manuscripts in the Making: Art and Science: II (London: Harvey Miller, 2018), 54–65.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Christopher, ‘Rediscovering Parchment: The Nature of the Beast’, in Hadgraft, Nicholas and Swift, Katherine, eds., Conservation and Preservation in Small Libraries (Cambridge: Parker Library Publications, 1994), 75–96.Google Scholar
Clemens, Raymond, and Graham, Timothy, Introduction to Manuscript Studies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Coldiron, A. E. B., Printers without Borders: Translation and Textuality in the Renaissance (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Cole, Andrew, ‘The Call of Things: A Critique of Object-Oriented Ontologies’, The Minnesota Review, 80 (2013), 106–18.Google Scholar
Coleman, Joyce, ‘Lay Readers and Hard Latin: How Gower May Have Intended the Confessio Amantis to Be Read’, SACh., 24 (2002), 209–35.Google Scholar
Coleman, Joyce, Public Reading and the Reading Public in Late Medieval England and France (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Condren, Edward I., The Numerical Universe of the Gawain-Pearl Poet: Beyond ‘Phi’ (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2002).Google Scholar
Connolly, Margaret, Sixteenth-Century Readers, Fifteenth-Century Books: Continuities of Reading in the English Reformation (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen, ‘Textual Tradition and the Alliterative Tradition: Canterbury Tales I.2602–2619, the D-Group and Takamiya MS 32’, in Matsuda, Takami, Linenthal, Richard A. and Scahill, John, eds., The Medieval Book and a Modern Collector: Essays in Honour of Toshiyuki Takamiya (Woodbridge: Brewer, 2004), 71–80.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. Lisa, Artisans and Narrative Craft in Late Medieval England (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Cooper, H. Lisa, and Denny-Brown, Andrea, ‘Introduction’, in their Lydgate Matters: Poetry and Material Culture in the Fifteenth Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 1–11.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew B., The Case for Working with Your Hands, or Why Office Work Is Bad for Us and Fixing Things Feels Good (London: Penguin, 2010).Google Scholar
Crick, Julia, and Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Reading and Understanding Script’, in Da Rold, Orietta and Treharne, Elaine, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Medieval British Manuscripts (Cambridge University Press, 2020), 49–75.Google Scholar
Crow, Martin M., ‘John of Angoulême and His Chaucer Manuscript’, Speculum, 17 (1942), 86–99.Google Scholar
Danbury, Elizabeth, ‘Décoration et enluminure des chartes royales anglaises au Moyen Âge’, Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes, 169 (2011), 79–107.Google Scholar
Danbury, Elizabeth, ‘The Decoration and Illumination of Royal Charters in England, 1250–1509: An Introduction’, in Jones, Michael and Vale, Malcolm, eds., England and Her Neighbours, 1066–1453: Essays in Honour of Pierre Chaplais (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1989), 157–80.Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A., ‘On the Shadowy Existence of the Medieval Pricking Wheel’, Scriptorium, 50 (1996), 13–21.Google Scholar
Da Rold, Orietta, ‘Materials’, in Gillespie, Alexandra and Wakelin, Daniel, eds., The Production of Books in England 1350–1500 (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Rold, Orietta, Paper in Late Medieval England: From Pulp to Fiction (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Da Rold, Orietta, ‘The Significance of Scribal Corrections in Cambridge, University Library MS Dd.4.24 of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales’, ChRev., 41 (2007), 393–438.Google Scholar
Deetz, James, In Small Things Forgotten: An Archaeology of Early American Life, rev. ed. (New York: Anchor, 1996).Google Scholar
de Hamel, Christopher, Glossed Books of the Bible and the Origins of the Paris Booktrade (Cambridge: Brewer, 1984).Google Scholar
DeMarrais, Elizabeth, Gosden, Chris and Renfrew, Colin, eds., Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World (Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2004).Google Scholar
Denny-Brown, Andrea, ‘The Provocative Fifteenth Century’, Exemplaria, 29 (2017), 267–79.Google Scholar
Derolez, Albert, Codicologie des manuscrits en écriture humanistique sur parchemin, Bibliologia 5–6, 2 vols. (Turnhout: Brepols, 1984).Google Scholar
Derolez, Albert, ‘Masters and Measures: A Codicological Approach to Books of Hours’, Quaerendo, 33 (2003), 83–95.Google Scholar
Derolez, Albert, ‘Quelques observations à propos d’un récent manuel de codicologie’, GLM, 19 (1991), 33–5.Google Scholar
Di Majo, Anna, Federici, Carlo and Palma, Marco, ‘Indagine sulla pergamena insulare (secoli vii–xvi)’, Scriptorium, 42 (1988), 131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormer, Peter, The Art of the Maker: Skill and Its Meaning in Art, Craft and Design (London: Thames and Hudson, 1994).Google Scholar
Doyle, A. I., and Parkes, M. B., ‘Palaeographical Introduction’, in Ruggiers, Paul G., ed., The Canterbury Tales: A Facsimile and Transcription of the Hengwrt Manuscript (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1979), xix–xlix.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. I., and Parkes, M. B., ‘The Production of Copies of the Canterbury Tales and the Confessio Amantis in the Early Fifteenth Century’, in Parkes, M. B. and Watson, Andrew G., eds., Medieval Scribes, Manuscripts and Libraries: Essays Presented to N. R. Ker (London: Scolar Press, 1978), 163–210.Google Scholar
Drimmer, Sonja, The Art of Allusion: Illuminators and the Making of English Literature 1403–1476 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Drimmer, Sonja, ‘The Manuscript as an Ambigraphic Medium: Hoccleve’s Scribes, Illuminators, and Their Problems’, Exemplaria, 29 (2017), 175–94.Google Scholar
Driver, Martha W., ‘“Me fault faire”: French Makers of Manuscripts for English Patrons’, in Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn et al., eds., Language and Culture in Medieval Britain: The French of England c. 1100–c. 1500 (York Medieval Press, 2009), 420–43.Google Scholar
Driver, Martha W. ‘Pageants Reconsidered’, in Meale, Carol M. and Pearsall, Derek, eds., Makers and Users of Medieval Books: Essays in Honour of A. S. G. Edwards (Cambridge: Brewer, 2014), 34–47.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna, Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Dukan, Michèle, ‘De la difficulté à reconnaître des instruments de réglure: Planche à régler (mastara) et cadre-patron’, Scriptorium, 40 (1986), 257–61.Google Scholar
Durling, Nancy Vine, ‘Bookmarks and Birthmarks: The Example of a Thirteenth-Century French Anthology’, Exemplaria, 16 (2004), 73–94.Google Scholar
Durling, Nancy Vine, ‘British Library MS Harley 2253: A New Reading of the Passion Lyrics in Their Manuscript Context’, Viator, 40 (2009), 271–307.Google Scholar
Dutschke, Consuelo, Guide to Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the Huntington Library, 2 vols. (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1989).Google Scholar
Echard, Siân, ‘Glossing Gower in English, in Latin, and in absentia: The Case of Bodleian Ashmole 35’, in Yeager, R. F., ed., Re-Visioning Gower (Asheville, NC: Pegasus Press, 1998), 237–56.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân, ‘Pre-Texts: Tables of Contents and the Reading of John Gower’s Confessio Amantis’, Medium Ævum, 66 (1997), 270–87.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân, and Fanger, Claire, The Latin Verses in the Confessio Amantis: An Annotated Translation (East Lansing, MI: Colleagues Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘Beinecke MS 661 and Early Fifteenth-Century English Manuscript Production’, Yale University Library Gazette, 66 (1991), 181–96.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘The Canterbury Tales and Gamelyn’, in Cannon, Christopher and Nolan, Maura, eds., Medieval Latin and Middle English Literature: Essays in Honour of Jill Mann (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2011), 76–90.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘Gower in the Delamere Chaucer Manuscript’, in Matsuda, Takami, Linenthal, Richard A. and Scahill, John, eds., The Medieval Book and a Modern Collector: Essays in Honour of Toshiyuki Takamiya (Woodbridge: Brewer, 2004), 81–6.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes: A Further Manuscript’, Edinburgh Bibliographical Society Transactions, 5.i (1978), 32.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘John Lydgate, Medieval Antifeminism and Harley 2251’, Annuale Medievale, 13 (1972), 32–44.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘Lydgate’s “Fall of Princes”: Unrecorded Readings’, N&Q, 214 (1969), 170–1.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ‘The Manuscripts and Texts of the Second Version of John Hardyng’s Chronicle’, in Williams, Daniel, ed., England in the Fifteenth Century: Proceedings of the 1986 Harlaxton Symposium (Woodbridge: Boydell, 1987), 75–84.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., and Pearsall, Derek, ‘The Manuscripts of the Major English Poetic Texts’, in Griffiths, Jeremy and Pearsall, Derek, eds., Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1475 (Cambridge University Press, 1989), 257–78.Google Scholar
Eggert, Paul, ‘Brought to Book: Bibliography, Book History and the Study of Literature’, Library, 7th ser., 13 (2012), 3–32.Google Scholar
Fiddyment, Sarah, et al., ‘Animal Origin of 13th-Century Uterine Vellum Revealed Using Noninvasive Peptide Fingerprinting’, PNAS, 112 (2015), 15066–71.Google Scholar
Figuet, Jean, ‘Corrections, par languettes collées sur des grattages, dans la Bible de Saint-Jacques (BNF lat. 16719–16722)’, Scriptorium, 53 (1999), 334–9.Google Scholar
Fisher, Matthew, Scribal Authorship and the Writing of History in Medieval England (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Flannery, Mary, ‘Et cetera: Obscenity and Textual Play in the Hengwrt Manuscript’, SACh., 42 (2020), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Juliet, ‘Changed Opinion as to Flowers’, in Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise, eds., Renaissance Paratexts (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 48–64.Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet, Cultural Graphology: Writing after Derrida (University of Chicago Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet, Graffiti and the Writing Arts of Early Modern England (London: Reaktion, 2001).Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet, ‘How to Look at a Printed Flower’, Word and Image, 22 (2006), 165–87.Google Scholar
Freeman, Carol, ‘Feathering the Text’, in Van Dyke, Carolynn, ed., Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 33–48.Google Scholar
Frow, John, ‘Matter and Materialism: A Brief Pre-History of the Present’, in Bennett, Tony and Joyce, Patrick, eds., Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn (London: Routledge, 2010), 25–37.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert, ‘Old Restorations and Repairs in Manuscripts’, in Fellows-Jensen, Gillian and Springborg, Peter, eds., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 6 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2002), 224–41.Google Scholar
Galey, Alan, ‘The Human Presence in Digital Artefacts’, in McCarty, Willard, ed., Text and Genre in Reconstruction: Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviours, Products and Institutions (Cambridge: Open Book, 2010), 93–117.Google Scholar
Galloway, Andrew, ‘Gower’s Confessio Amantis, the Prick of Conscience, and the History of the Latin Gloss in Early English Literature’, in Urban, Malte, ed., John Gower: Manuscripts, Readers, Contexts (Turnhout: Brepols, 2009), 39–70.Google Scholar
Galloway, Andrew, ‘John Lydgate and the Origins of Vernacular Humanism’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 107 (2008), 445–71.Google Scholar
Gameson, Richard, ‘The Material Fabric of Early British Books’, in Gameson, Richard, ed., The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain: Volume I: c. 400–1100 (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 13–93.Google Scholar
Gameson, Richard, The Scribe Speaks? Colophons in Early English Manuscripts, Chadwick, H. M. Memorial Lectures, 12 (University of Cambridge, Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse, and Celtic, 2001).Google Scholar
Gasnault, Pierre, ‘Supports et instruments de l’écriture’, in Weijers, Olga, ed., Vocabulaire du livre et de l’écriture au moyen âge (Turnhout: Brepols, 1989), 20–33.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred, Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret, ‘Carolingian Glossed Psalters’, in Gameson, Richard, ed., The Early Medieval Bible: Its Production, Decoration and Use (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gilissen, Léon, ‘Un élément codicologique trop peu exploite: La réglure’, Scriptorium, 23 (1969), 150–62.Google Scholar
Gilissen, Léon, Prolégomènes à la codicologie (Ghent: Éditions Scientifiques Story-Scientia, 1977).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Kenneth, Uncreative Writing: Managing Language in the Digital Age (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Sarah, ‘A Conversation with Bob Stein from the Institute for the Future of the Book’, in De Bondt, Sara and Muggeridge, Fraser, eds., The Form of the Book Book (London: Occasional Papers, 2009), 63–8.Google Scholar
Gould, Karen, ‘Terms for Book Production in a Fifteenth-Century Latin-English Nominale (Harvard Law School Library MS. 43)’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 79 (1985), 75–100.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, La page de l’antiquité à l’ère numérique: Histoire, usages, esthétiques (Paris: Éditions du Louvre, 2012).Google Scholar
Green, R. F., ‘Notes on Some Manuscripts of Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes’, British Library Journal, 4 (1978), 37–41.Google Scholar
Griffin, Carrie, ‘Instruction and Inspiration: Fifteenth-Century Codicological Recipes’, Exemplaria, 30 (2018), 20–34.Google Scholar
Griffin, Carrie, Instructional Writing in English, 1350–1650: Materiality and Meaning (London: Routledge, 2019), 78–95.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jane, Diverting Authorities: Experimental Glossing Practices in Manuscript and Print (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jane, ‘“In bookes thus written I fynde”: Hoccleve’s Self-Glossing in the Regiment of Princes and the Series’, Medium Aevum, 86 (2017), 91–107.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jeremy, ‘Book Production Terms in Nicholas Munshull’s Nominale’, in Fisher, Carol Garrett and Scott, Kathleen L., eds., Art into Life: Collected Papers from the Kresge Art Museum Medieval Symposia (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1995), 49–71.Google Scholar
Grindley, Carl James, ‘Reading Piers Plowman C-Text Annotations: Notes toward the Classification of Printed and Written Marginalia in Texts from the British Isles 1300–1641’, in Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn and Hilmo, Maidie, eds., The Medieval Professional Reader at Work: Evidence from Manuscripts of Chaucer, Langland, Kempe, and Gower (University of Victoria Press, 2001), 73–141.Google Scholar
Gumbert, J. P., ‘Codicological Units: Towards a Terminology for the Stratigraphy of the Non-Homogenous Codex’, Segno e Testo, 2 (2004), 17–42.Google Scholar
Gumbert, J. P., ‘Ruling by Rake and Board: Notes on Some Late Medieval Ruling Techniques’, in Ganz, Peter, ed., The Role of the Book in Medieval Culture, Bibliologia, 3 and 4, 2 vols. (Turnhout: Brepols, 1986), 51–4.Google Scholar
Gumbert, J. P., Words for Codices: A Codicological Terminology in English, an unpublished handlist, 2nd state (Lopik: privately printed, 5 May 2009).Google Scholar
Guyotjeannin, Olivier, ‘Le vocabulaire de la diplomatique’, in Weijers, Olga, ed., Vocabulaire du livre et de l’écriture au moyen âge (Turnhout: Brepols, 1989), 120–34.Google Scholar
Haines, John, ed., The Notory Art of Shorthand (Ars notoria notarie) (Leuven: Peeters, 2014).Google Scholar
Hamburger, Jeffrey F., Ouvertures: La double page dans les manuscrits enluminés du Moyen Âge (Lyon: Les presses du réel, 2010).Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, ‘Booklets in Medieval Manuscripts: Further Considerations’, Studies in Bibliography, 39 (1986), 100–11.Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, The English Manuscripts of Richard Rolle: A Descriptive Catalogue (Exeter University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, Introducing Medieval English Book History (Liverpool University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, ‘Miscellaneity and Vernacularity: Conditions of Literary Production in Late Medieval England’, in Nichols, Stephen G. and Wenzel, Siegfried, eds., The Whole Book: Cultural Perspectives on the Medieval Miscellany (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996), 37–52.Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, Patient Reading/Reading Patience: Oxford Essays on Medieval English Literature (Liverpool University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, ‘The Scribe of Huntington HM 114’, Studies in Bibliography, 42 (1989), 120–33.Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, and Edwards, A. S. G., ‘Rotheley, the De Vere Circle, and the Ellesmere Chaucer’, HLQ, 58 (1995), 11–35.Google Scholar
Harnett, Benjamin, ‘The Diffusion of the Codex’, Classical Antiquity, 36 (2017), 183–235.Google Scholar
Harris, Anne F., ‘From Stone to Statue: The Geology and Art of English Alabaster Panels’, in Brantley, Jessica, Perkinson, Stephen and Teviotdale, Elizabeth C., eds., Reassessing Alabaster Sculpture in Medieval England (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020), 37–63.Google Scholar
Harris, Carissa M., ‘Inserting “a grete tente, a thrifty, and a long”: Sexual Obscenity and Scribal Innovation in Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales’, Essays in Medieval Studies, 27 (2011), 45–60.Google Scholar
Hartnell, Jack, ed., Continuous Page: Scrolls and Scrolling from Papyrus to Hypertext (London: Courtauld Institute Online Publication, 2020).Google Scholar
Heng, Geraldine, The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Higl, Andrew, Playing the Canterbury Tales: The Continuations and Additions (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Holsinger, Bruce, ‘Parchment Ethics: A Statement of More than Modest Concern’, New Medieval Literatures, 12 (2010), 131–6.Google Scholar
Holsinger, Bruce, ‘Of Pigs and Parchment: Medieval Studies and the Coming of the Animal’, PMLA, 124 (2009), 616–23.Google Scholar
Horobin, Simon, ‘Compiling the Canterbury Tales in Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts’, ChRev., 47 (2013), 372–89.Google Scholar
Horobin, Simon, ‘The Scribe of Bodleian Library, MS Digby 102 and the Circulation of the C Text of Piers Plowman’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 24 (2010), 89–112.Google Scholar
Hudson, Anne, Doctors in English: A Study of the Wycliffite Gospel Commentaries (Liverpool University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Hughes, Andrew, Medieval Manuscripts for Mass and Office: A Guide to Their Organization and Terminology (University of Toronto Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Hussey, Matthew T., ‘Anglo-Saxon Scribal Habitus and Frankish Aesthetics in an Early Uncial Manuscript’, in Wilcox, Jonathan, ed., Scraped, Stroked, and Bound: Materially Engaged Readings of Medieval Manuscripts (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013), 15–37.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim, Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Jackson, H. J., Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Jackson, Steven J., ‘Rethinking Repair’, in Gillespie, Tarleton, Boczkowski, Pablo J. and Foot, Kirsten A., eds., Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014), 221–39.Google Scholar
James-Maddocks, Holly, ‘The Illuminators of the Hooked-g Scribe(s) and the Production of Middle English Literature, c. 1460–c. 1490’, ChRev., 51 (2016), 151–86.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa, and Grafton, Anthony, ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past & Present, 129 (1990), 30–78.Google Scholar
Jervis, Ben, ‘Making-Do or Making the World? Tempering Choices in Anglo-Saxon Pottery Manufacture’, in Jervis, Ben and Kyle, Alison, eds., Make-Do and Mend: Archaeologies of Compromise, Repair and Reuse (Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 2012), 67–79.Google Scholar
Jervis, Ben, Pottery and Social Life in Medieval England: Towards a Relational Approach (Oxford: Oxbow, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnston, Edward, Formal Penmanship and Other Papers, ed. Childs, Heather (London: Lund Humphries, 1971).Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael, ‘Copying and Reading The Prick of Conscience in Late Medieval England’, Speculum, 95 (2020), 742–801.Google Scholar
Juchauld, Frédérique, Bonnenberger, Philippe and Komenda, Alexis, ‘Identification de l’espèce animale des cuirs de reliure et des parchemins’, in Bat-Yehouda, Monique Zerdoun and Bourlet, Caroline, eds., Matériaux du livre médiéval, Bibliologia, 30 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2010), 13–28.Google Scholar
Kato, Takako, Caxton’s Morte D’Arthur: The Printing Process and the Authenticity of the Text, Medium Ævum Monographs ns 22 (Oxford: Society for the Study of Medieval Languages and Literature, 2002).Google Scholar
Kato, Takako, ‘Corrected Mistakes in Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27’, in Connolly, Margaret and Mooney, Linne R., eds., Design and Distribution of Late Medieval Manuscripts in England (York Medieval Press, 2008), 61–87.Google Scholar
Kay, Sarah, Animal Skins and the Reading Self in Medieval Latin and French Bestiaries (University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Kay, Sarah, ‘Legible Skins: Animals and the Ethics of Medieval Reading’, postmedieval, 2 (2011), 13–32.Google Scholar
Kay, Sarah, ‘Original Skin: Flaying, Reading, and Thinking in the Legend of Saint Bartholomew and Other Works’, JMEMS, 36 (2006), 35–73.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas Forrest, The Roll of the Scroll: An Illustrated Introduction to Scrolls in the Middle Ages (New York: Norton, 2019).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Kathleen, ‘Reintroducing the English Books of Hours, or English Primer’, Speculum, 89 (2014), 693–723.Google Scholar
Ker, N. R., Books, Collectors and Libraries: Studies in the Medieval Heritage, ed. Watson, Andrew G. (London: Hambledon, 1985).Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, ‘Professional Readers of Langland at Home and Abroad: New Directions in the Political and Bureaucratic Codicology of Piers Plowman’, in Pearsall, Derek, ed., New Directions in Later Medieval Manuscript Studies (York Medieval Press, 2000), 103–29.Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, Hilmo, Maidie and Olson, Linda, Opening up Middle English Manuscripts: Literary and Visual Approaches (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Kline, Barbara, ‘Scribal Agendas and the Text of Chaucer’s Tales in British Library MS Harley 7333’, in Prendergast, Thomas A. and Kline, Barbara, eds., Rewriting Chaucer: Culture, Authority, and the Idea of the Authentic Text, 1400–1602 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999), 116–44.Google Scholar
Kooper, Erik, ‘The Case of the Cutting Copyist’, in Connolly, Margaret and Radulescu, Raluca, eds., Editing and Interpretation of Middle English Text: Essays in Honour of William Marx (Turnhout: Brepols, 2018), 109–31.Google Scholar
Korn, Peter, Why We Make Things and Why It Matters: The Education of a Craftsman (Boston: Godine, 2013).Google Scholar
Králová, Daniela, and Vnouček, Jiří, ‘Parchment during the Process of Manufacture’, in Larsen, René, ed., Improved Damage Assessment of Parchment, IDAP Assessment, Data Collection and Sharing of Knowledge (Brussels: European Commission, 2007), 23–6.Google Scholar
Krauß, Anna, Leipziger, Jonas and Schücking-Jungblut, Friederike, ‘Material Aspects of Reading and Material Text Cultures’, in Krauß, Anna, Leipziger, Jonas and Schücking-Jungblut, Friederike, eds., Material Aspects of Reading in Ancient and Medieval Cultures: Materiality, Presence and Performance, Materiale Textkulturen, 26 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020), 1–8.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘Broidery on a Medieval Page’, http://erikkwakkel.tumblr.com/post/52258862048/broidery-on-a-medieval-page-holes-in-the-pages-of.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘Classics on Scraps: Classical Manuscripts Made from Parchment Waste in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries’, in Kwakkel, Erik, ed., Manuscripts of the Latin Classics 800–1200 (Leiden University Press, 2015), 107–30.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘Commercial Organization and Economic Innovation’, in Gillespie, Alexandra and Wakelin, Daniel, eds., The Production of Books in England 1350–1500 (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 173–91.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘Decoding the Material Book: Cultural Residue in Medieval Manuscripts’, in Johnston, Michael and Van Dussen, Michael, eds., The Medieval Manuscript: Cultural Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2015), 60–76.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘Discarded Parchment as Writing Support in English Manuscript Culture’, English Manuscript Studies, 17 (2012), 238–61.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘Halloween (4): Stabbed, Cut and Stitched Back Together’, http://erikkwakkel.tumblr.com/post/65552828979/halloween-4-stabbed-cut-and-stitched-back.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, ‘A New Type of Book for a New Type of Reader: The Emergence of Paper in Vernacular Book Production’, The Library, 7th ser., 4 (2003), 219–48.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik, and Thomson, Rodney, ‘Codicology’, in their The European Book in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2018), 9–24.Google Scholar
Langdell, Sebastian, Thomas Hoccleve: Religious Reform, Transnational Poetics, and the Invention of Chaucer (Liverpool University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Lavinsky, David, The Material Text in Wycliffite Biblical Scholarship: Inscription and Sacred Truth (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2017).Google Scholar
Lawton, Lesley, ‘The Illustration of Late Medieval Secular Texts, with Special Reference to Lydgate’s Troy Book’, in Pearsall, Derek, ed., Manuscripts and Readers in Fifteenth-Century England: The Literary Implications of Manuscript Study (Cambridge: Brewer, 1983), 41–69.Google Scholar
Lemaire, Jacques, Introduction à la codicologie (Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut d’Études Médiévales, 1989).Google Scholar
Lepape, Séverine, Huynh, Michel and Vrand, Caroline, eds., Mystérieux coffrets: Estampes au temps de La Dame à la Licorne (Paris: Musée de Cluny, 2019).Google Scholar
Liira, Aino, Paraxtextuality in Manuscript and Print: Verbal and Visual Presentation of the Middle English Polychronicon (University of Turku, 2020).Google Scholar
Liuzza, Roy Michael, ‘Scribal Habit: The Evidence of the Old English Gospels’, in Swan, Mary and Treharne, Elaine M., eds., Rewriting Old English in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 143–65.Google Scholar
Lochmann, Arthur, La vie solide: La charpente comme éthique du faire (Paris: Payot, 2019).Google Scholar
Luxford, Julian, ed., The Medieval Book as Object, Idea and Symbol (Donington: Tyas, 2021).Google Scholar
Lynch, Deirdre Shauna, Loving Literature: A Cultural History (University of Chicago Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Magnani, Roberta, ‘Queer Skin in the “Wife of Bath’s Prologue” and Its Manuscript Glosses’, in Nyffenegger, Nicole and Rupp, Katrin, eds., Writing on Skin in the Age of Chaucer (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018), 195–219.Google Scholar
Magnani, Roberta, and Watt, Diane, ‘On the Edge: Chaucer and Gower’s Queer Glosses’, postmedieval, 9 (2018), 269–88.Google Scholar
Manguel, Alberto, ‘Turning the Page’, in Stoicheff, Peter and Taylor, Andrew, eds., The Future of the Page (University of Toronto Press, 2004), 27–35.Google Scholar
Maniaci, Marilena, ‘Alla fine della riga divisione delle parole et continuità del testo nel manoscritto bizantino’, Scriptorium, 51 (1997), 189–233.Google Scholar
Maniaci, Marilena, Archeologia del manoscritto: Metodi, problemi, bibliografia recente (Rome: Viella, 2002).Google Scholar
Maniaci, Marilena, ‘La pergamena nel manoscritto bizantino dei secoli XI e XII: caratteristiche e modalità d’uso’, Quinio, 2 (2000), 63–92.Google Scholar
Maniaci, Marilena, Terminologia del libro manoscritto (Rome: Istituto centrale per la patrologia del libro, 1996).Google Scholar
Mann, Jill, ‘Chaucer’s Meter and the Myth of the Ellesmere Editor of The Canterbury Tales’, SACh., 23 (2001), 71–108.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah, Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Marzec, Marcia Smith, ‘The Latin Marginalia of the Regiment of Princes as an Aid to Stemmatic Analysis’, Text, 3 (1987), 269–84.Google Scholar
Mattison, J. R., ‘Books in Books: The Idea of the Book in the Fifteenth-Century English Visual Imagination’, Book History, 24 (2021), 267–96.Google Scholar
Mattison, J. R., ‘“Longe stories a woord may not expresse”: Tables of Contents in Lydgate’s Fall of Princes’, HLQ, 83 (2020), 1–31.Google Scholar
Mazhuga, Vladimir I., ‘Les instruments d’écriture dans les représentations des évangélistes pendant le haut Moyen Age’, in Hubert, Marie-Clotilde, Poulle, Emmanuel and Smith, Marc H., eds., Le statut du scripteur au Moyen Age (Paris: École des Chartes, 2000), 113–19.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, Maria Antoniette Casagrande, and Ornato, Ezio, ‘Elementi per la tipologia del manoscritto quattrocentesco dell’Italia settentrionale’, in Busonero, Paula et al., eds., La fabbrica del codice: Materiali per la storie del libro nel tardo medioevo (Rome: Viella, 1999), 207–87.Google Scholar
McCormick, Sir William, with Heseltine, Janet E., The Manuscripts of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales: A Critical Description of Their Contents (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar
McHenry, Elizabeth, Forgotten Readers: Recovering the Lost History of African-American Literary Societies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, ‘Two Unnoticed Interpolations in Four Manuscripts of the Prick of Conscience’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 77 (1976), 63–78.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F., Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Mikics, David, Slow Reading in a Hurried Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Minnis, A. J., Translations of Authority in Medieval English Literature: Valuing the Vernacular (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. Allan, ‘Transmedial Technics in Chaucer’s Treatise on the Astrolabe: Translation, Instrumentation, and Scientific Imagination’, SACh., 40 (2018), 1–41.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., ‘A Holograph Copy of Thomas Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes’, SACh., 33 (2011), 263–96.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., ‘A Scribe of Lydgate’s Troy Book and London Book Production in the First Half of the Fifteenth Century’, in Horobin, Simon and Nafde, Aditi, eds., Pursuing Middle English Manuscripts and Their Texts: Essays in Honour of Ralph Hanna (Turnhout: Brepols, 2017), 19–42.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., ‘Vernacular Literary Manuscripts and Their Scribes’, in Gillespie, Alexandra and Wakelin, Daniel, eds., The Production of Books in England 1350–1500 (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 192–211.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., and Matheson, Lister M., ‘The Beryn Scribe and His Texts: Evidence for Multiple-Copy Production of Manuscripts in Fifteenth-Century England’, The Library, 7th ser., 4 (2003), 347–70.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., and Stubbs, Estelle, Scribes and the City: London Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375–1425 (York Medieval Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Moreland, John, ‘Archaeology and Texts: Subservience or Enlightenment’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 35 (2006), 135–51.Google Scholar
Mosser, Daniel W., and Mooney, Linne R., ‘The Case of the Hooked-g Scribe(s) and the Production of Middle English Literature, c. 1460–c. 1490’, ChRev., 51 (2016), 131–50.Google Scholar
Muzerelle, Denis, ‘L’approche analytique des schémas de réglure. D’après l’exemple des manuscrits humanistiques’, GLM, 59 (2012), 41–63.Google Scholar
Muzerelle, Denis, ‘Les propriétés arithmétiques de la linéation dans les manuscrits humanistiques’, GLM, 55 (2009), 20–30.Google Scholar
Nafde, Aditi, ‘Hoccleve’s Hands: The Mise-en-Page of the Autograph and Non-Autograph Manuscripts’, JEBS, 16 (2013), 55–83.Google Scholar
Nafde, Aditi, ‘Stanza Markers in MSS Arundel 38 and Harley 4866 of Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes’, N&Q, 61 (2014), 15–18.Google Scholar
Nichols, Stephen G., ‘What Is a Manuscript Culture? Technologies of the Manuscript Matrix’, in Johnston, Michael and Van Dussen, Michael, eds., The Medieval Manuscript: Cultural Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2015), 34–59.Google Scholar
Nolan, Maura, ‘Medieval Habit, Modern Sensation: Reading Manuscripts in the Digital Age’, ChRev., 47 (2013), 465–76.Google Scholar
Noonan, Sarah, ‘Bodies of Parchment: Representing the Passion and Reading Manuscripts in Late Medieval England’ (doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St Louis, 2010).Google Scholar
Nyffenegger, Nicole, and Rupp, Katrin, ‘Introduction’, in their Writing on Skin in the Age of Chaucer (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018), 1–15.Google Scholar
Orlemanski, Julie, ‘Who Has Fiction? Modernity, Fictionality, and the Middle’, New Literary History, 50 (2019), 145–70.Google Scholar
Ornato, Ezio, ‘Exigences fonctionnelles, contraintes matérielles et pratiques traditionnelles dans le livre médiéval: Quelques réflexions’, in Rück, Peter, ed., Rationalisierung der Buchherstellung im Mittelalter und in der frühen Neuzeit, Elementa Diplomatica, 2 (Marburg an der Lahn: Institut für Historische Hilfswissenschaften, 1994), 7–31.Google Scholar
Ouy, Gilbert, ‘Charles d’Orléans and His Brother Jean d’Angoulême in England: What Their Manuscripts Have to Tell’, in Arn, Mary-Jo, ed., Charles d’Orléans in England, 1415–1440 (Cambridge: Brewer, 2000), 47–60.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., ‘Patterns of Scribal Activity and Revisions of the Text in Early Copies of Works by John Gower’, in Beadle, Richard and Piper, A. J., eds., New Science Out of Old Books: Studies in Manuscripts and Early Printed Books in Honour of A. I. Doyle (Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1995), 81–121.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Pause and Effect, Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West (Aldershot: Scolar, 1992).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Scribes, Scripts and Readers: Studies in the Communication, Presentation and Dissemination of Medieval Texts (London: Hambledon, 1991).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Their Hands before Our Eyes: A Closer Look at Scribes (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen, ‘Designing the Page’, in Gillespie, Alexandra and Wakelin, Daniel, eds., The Production of Books in England 1350–1500 (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 79–103.Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen, ‘Glosses in the Manuscripts of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales: An Edition and Commentary’ (PhD dissertation, Harvard University, 1992).Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen, ‘Minding the Gaps: Interpreting the Manuscript Evidence of the Cook’s Tale and the Squire’s Tale’, in Edwards, A. S. G., Gillespie, Vincent and Hanna III, Ralph, eds., The English Medieval Book: Studies in Memory of Jeremy Griffiths (London: British Library, 2000), 51–85.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, ‘Beinecke MS 493 and the Survival of Hoccleve’s Series’, in Babcock, Robert G. and Patterson, Lee, eds., Old Books, New Learning, Essays on Medieval and Renaissance Books at Yale (New Haven, CT: Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 2001), 80–92.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek, ‘The Organisation of the Latin Apparatus in Gower’s Confessio Amantis: The Scribes and Their Problems’, in Matsuda, Takami, Linenthal, Richard A. and Scahill, John, eds., The Medieval Book and a Modern Collector: Essays in Honour of Toshiyuki Takamiya (Woodbridge: Brewer, 2004), 99–112.Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti, ‘Guidelines for Consumption: Scribal Ruling Patterns and Designing Mise-en-Page in Later Medieval England’, in Cayley, Emma and Powell, Susan, eds., Manuscripts and Printed Books in Europe 1350–1550: Packaging, Presentation and Consumption (Liverpool University Press, 2013), 14–31.Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti, ‘Tables of Lections in Manuscripts of the Wycliffite Bible’, in Poleg, Eyal and Light, Laura, eds., Form and Function in the Late Medieval Bible (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 351–78.Google Scholar
Pennell, Sara, ‘Mundane Materiality, or, Should Small Things Still Be Forgotten? Material Culture, Micro-Histories and the Problems of Scale’, in Harvey, Karen, ed., History and Material Culture: A Student’s Guide to Approaching Alternative Sources, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), 221–39.Google Scholar
Perkins, Nicholas, The Gift of Narrative in Medieval England (Manchester University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Perkins, Nicholas, Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes: Counsel and Constraint (Cambridge: Brewer, 2001).Google Scholar
Perkinson, Stephen, ‘The Making of “Mynding Signes”: Copying, Convention, and Creativity in Late Medieval English Alabasters’, in Brantley, Jessica, Perkinson, Stephen and Teviotdale, Elizabeth C., eds., Reassessing Alabaster Sculpture in Medieval England (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020), 65–97.Google Scholar
Pound, Scott, ‘Kenneth Goldsmith and the Poetics of Information’, PMLA, 130 (2015), 315–30.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas A., and Rosenfeld, Jessica, ‘Introduction: Failure, Figure, Reception’, in their Chaucer and the Subversions of Form (Cambridge University Press, 2018), 1–18.Google Scholar
Price, Leah, How to Do Things with Books in Victorian Britain (Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Price, Leah, What We Talk about When We Talk about Books (New York: Basic Books, 2019).Google Scholar
Purdie, Rhiannon, ‘King Orphius and Sir Orfeo: Scotland and England, Memory and Manuscript’, in Putter, Ad and Jefferson, Judith A., eds., The Transmission of Medieval Romance: Metres, Manuscripts and Early Prints (Cambridge: Brewer, 2018), 15–32.Google Scholar
Ragnard, Isabelle, ‘Quelques aspects codicologiques des manuscrits de musique profane dans la première moitié du XVe siècle’, GLM, 38 (2001), 14–26.Google Scholar
Reynhout, Lucien, Formules latines de colophons, Bibliologia, 25, 2 vols. (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006).Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Artur, ‘Against Object Agency 2. Continuing the Discussion with Sørensen’, Archaeological Dialogues, 26 (2019), 39–44.Google Scholar
Richardson, Malcolm, Middle Class Writing in Late Medieval London (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2011).Google Scholar
Robertson, Kellie, ‘Materiality and the Hylomorphic Imagination’, in Crocker, Holly A. and Smith, D. Vance, eds., Medieval Literature: Criticism and Debates (New York: Routledge, 2014), 367–75.Google Scholar
Robertson, Kellie, ‘Medieval Materialism: A Manifesto’, Exemplaria, 22 (2010), 99–118.Google Scholar
Robertson, Kellie, Nature Speaks: Medieval Literature and Aristotelian Philosophy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Robinson, P. R., ‘The “Booklet”: A Self-Contained Unit in Composite Manuscripts’, in Gruys, A. and Gumbert, J. P., eds., Codicologica, 4 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 1976–80), iii, 46–69.Google Scholar
Root, Robert Kilburn, The Textual Tradition of Chaucer’s Troilus (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1916).Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Randall, ‘“Pricking Wheels”: Their Physical Characteristics and Recorded Uses’, GLM, 37 (2000), 18–25.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Randall, ‘Tools for Producing Books and Documents in Roman Antiquity and the Middle Ages: A Summary List of Classes’, Scriptorium, 56 (2002), 156–76.Google Scholar
Rouse, Richard, and Rouse, Mary, ‘Ordinatio and Compilatio Revisited’, in Jordan, M. D. and Emery, K., eds., Ad litteram: Authoritative Texts and Their Medieval Readers (University of Notre Dame Press, 1992), 113–34.Google Scholar
Rudy, Kathryn, ‘Dirty Books: Quantifying Patterns of Use in Medieval Manuscripts Using a Densitometer’, Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art, 2 (2010), 1–26.Google Scholar
Rudy, Kathryn, Postcards on Parchment: The Social Lives of Medieval Books (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Rundle, David, The Renaissance Reform of the Book and Britain: The English Quattrocento (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Rust, Martha Dana, Imaginary Worlds in Medieval Books: Exploring the Manuscript Matrix (New York: Palgrave, 2007).Google Scholar
Ruzzier, Chiara, ‘Le rôle du parchemin dans la miniaturisation de la bible au XIIIe siècle’, GLM, 63 (2017), 64–78.Google Scholar
Ryley, Hannah, Re-using Manuscripts in Late Medieval England (York Medieval Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Sargan, J. D., ‘Scribal Readers: Reading in the Variants of Poema Morale’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 120 (2021), 381–405.Google Scholar
Sargent, Michael G., ‘What Do the Numbers Mean? Observations on Some Patterns of Middle English Manuscript Transmission’, in Connolly, Margaret and Mooney, Linne R., eds., Design and Distribution of Late Medieval Manuscripts in England (York Medieval Press, 2008), 205–44.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Daniel, ‘Missing Books in the Folk Codicology of Later Medieval England’, The Mediaeval Journal, 7 (2019), 103–32.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Daniel, ‘Page Numbers, Signatures, and Catchwords’, in Duncan, Dennis and Smyth, Adam, eds., Book Parts (Oxford University Press, 2019), 137–49.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Daniel, Reading English Verse in Manuscript, c. 1350–c. 1500 (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Sawyer, Daniel, ‘Verse Craft, Editing, and the Work: Shadows of Orfeo’, RES, 73 (2022).Google Scholar
Schibanoff, Susan, ‘The New Reader and Female Textuality in Two Early Commentaries on Chaucer’, SACh., 10 (1988), 71–108.Google Scholar
Schieberle, Misty, ‘A New Hoccleve Literary Manuscript: The Trilingual Miscellany in BL, MS Harley 219’, RES, 70 (2019), 799–822.Google Scholar
Schiegg, Markus, ‘Scribes’ Voices: The Relevance and Types of Early Medieval Colophons’, Studia Neophilologica, 88 (2016), 129–47.Google Scholar
Schipke, Renate, Das Buch in der Spätantike: Herstellung, Form, Ausstattung und Verbreitung in der westlichen Reichshälfte des Imperium Romanum (Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2013).Google Scholar
Schlotheuber, Eva, ‘Diskussionsforum: Historische Grundwissenschaften und die digitale Herausforderung’ (last updated 15 November 2015), H-Soz-Kult, www.hsozkult.de/text/id/texte-2890.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Beste, Thomas, and Vorholt, Hanna, ‘Mise-en-Page in Choirbooks, ca. 1450–1550’, GLM, 55 (2009), 31–42.Google Scholar
Sciacca, Christine, ‘Stitches, Sutures, and Seams: “Embroidered” Parchment Repairs in Medieval Manuscripts’, in Netherton, Robin and Owen-Crocker, Gale R., eds., Medieval Clothing and Textiles: Volume 6 (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2010), 57–92.Google Scholar
Scott, Kathleen, The Mirroure of the World: Ms Bodley 283 (England c. 1470–1480) (Oxford: Roxburghe Club, 1980).Google Scholar
Scott, Kathleen, ‘Past Ownership: Evidence of Book Ownership by English Merchants in the Later Middle Ages’, in Meale, Carol M. and Pearsall, Derek, eds., Makers and Users of Medieval Books: Essays in Honour of A. S. G. Edwards (Woodbridge: Brewer, 2014), 150–77.Google Scholar
Scott, Kathleen, ‘Representations of Scribal Activity in English Manuscripts c. 1400–c. 1490’, in Gullick, Michael, ed., Pen in Hand: Medieval Scribal Portraits, Colophons and Tools (Walkern: Red Gull Press, 2006), 115–49.Google Scholar
Scott, Kathleen, et al., An Index of Images in English Manuscripts from the Time of Chaucer to Henry VIII, c. 1380–c. 1509. Bodleian Library, Oxford, 3 vols. (Turnhout: Brepols, 2000–2).Google Scholar
Seidel, Kurt Otto, ‘Tres digiti scribunt totum corpusque laborat: Kolophone als Quelle für das Selbstverständnis mittelalterlicher Schreiber’, Das Mittelalter, 7 (2002), 145–56.Google Scholar
Seymour, M. C., A Catalogue of Chaucer Manuscripts, 2 vols. (Aldershot: Scolar, 1995).Google Scholar
Seymour, M. C., ‘A Literatim Trevisa Abstract’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 93 (1992), 185–91.Google Scholar
Seymour, M. C., ‘The Manuscripts of Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes’, Edinburgh Bibliographical Society Transactions, 4.vii (1974), 255–97.Google Scholar
Sherman, Claire Richter, Imaging Aristotle: Verbal and Visual Representation in Fourteenth-Century France (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Sherman, William H., Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Slights, William E., Managing Readers: Printed Marginalia in English Renaissance Books (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Smith, D. Vance, ‘The Shadow of the Book: Piers Plowman, the Ilchester Prologue, and Inhumane Revision’, in Calabrese, Michael A. and Shepherd, Stephen H. A., eds., Yee? Baw for Bokes: Essays on Medieval Manuscripts and Poetics in Honor of Hoyt. N. Duggan (Los Angeles, CA: Marymount Institute Press, 2013), 203–18.Google Scholar
Smith, J. J., and Samuels, M. L., ‘The Language of Gower’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 82 (1981), 295–304.Google Scholar
Smith, Lesley, The Glossa Ordinaria: The Making of a Medieval Bible Commentary (Leiden: Brill, 2009).Google Scholar
Smith, Margaret M., ‘Imposition in Manuscripts: Evidence for the Use of Sense-Sequence Copying in a New Fragment’, in Brownrigg, Linda, ed., Making the Medieval Book: Techniques of Production (Los Altos, CA: Anderson-Lovelace, 1995), 145–56.Google Scholar
Smyth, Adam, Material Texts in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Sobecki, Sebastian, ‘Communities of Practice: Thomas Hoccleve, London Clerks, and Literary Production’, JEBS, 24 (2021), 51–106.Google Scholar
Sobecki, Sebastian, ‘The Handwriting of Fifteenth-Century Privy Seal and Council Clerks’, RES, 72 (2021), 253–79.Google Scholar
Sobecki, Sebastian, ‘“The writyng of this tretys”: Margery Kempe’s Son and the Authorship of Her Book’, SACh., 37 (2015), 257–83.Google Scholar
Solopova, Elizabeth, Latin Liturgical Psalters in the Bodleian Library: A Select Catalogue (Oxford: Bodleian Library, 2013).Google Scholar
Solopova, Elizabeth, ‘Manuscript Evidence for the Patronage, Ownership and Use of the Wycliffite Bible’, in Poleg, Eyal and Light, Laura, eds., Form and Function in the Late Medieval Bible (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 333–50.Google Scholar
Solopova, Elizabeth, Manuscripts of the Wycliffite Bible in the Bodleian and Oxford College Libraries (Liverpool University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Somerset, Fiona, Feeling Like Saints: Lollard Writings after Wyclif (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Sørensen, Tim Flohr, ‘Hammers and Nails. A Response to Lindstrøm and to Olsen and Witmore’, Archaeological Dialogues, 23 (2016), 115–27.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. Leith, English Preaching in the Late Middle Ages (Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter, ‘Books and Scrolls: Navigating the Bible,’ in Andersen, Jennifer and Sauer, Elizabeth, eds., Books and Readers in Early Modern England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), 42–79.Google Scholar
Steel, Karl, How to Make a Human: Animals and Violence in the Middle Ages (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Stinson, Timothy, ‘Counting Sheep: Potential Applications of DNA Analysis to the Study of Medieval Parchment Production’, in Fischer, Franz, Fritze, Christiane and Vogeler, Georg, eds., Kodikologie und Paläographie im Digitalen Zeitalter 2, Schriften des Instituts für Dokumentologie und Editorik, 3 (Norderstedt: BoD, 2011), 191–207.Google Scholar
Stoicheff, Peter, and Taylor, Andrew, ‘Architectures, Ideologies, and Materials of the Page’, in their The Future of the Page (University of Toronto Press, 2004), 3–25.Google Scholar
Strand, Augusta, ‘The Examination and Conservation of a Medieval Manuscript with Embroidered Repairs’, in Fellows-Jensen, Gillian and Springborg, Peter, eds., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 8 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2005), 113–22.Google Scholar
Strohm, Paul, ‘Jean of Angoulême: A Fifteenth Century Reader of Chaucer’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 72 (1971), 69–76.Google Scholar
Suarez, Michael F., and Woudhuysen, H. R., eds., The Oxford Companion to the Book (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, ‘Exclamations in Late Middle English’, in Fisiak, Jacek, ed., Studies in Middle English Linguistics (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997), 573–608.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, ‘Narrative Patterns of Affect in Four Genres of the “Canterbury Tales”’, ChRev., 30 (1995), 191–210.Google Scholar
Takagi, Masako, ‘The Printer’s Copy at Caxton’s Print Shop: Some Observations on Huntington MS HM 136’, Kyorin University Review, 30 (2018), 67–85.Google Scholar
Teeuwen, Mariken, The Vocabulary of Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages, Études sur le vocabulaire intellectuel du moyen âge, 10 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003).Google Scholar
Tegnestål, Håkan, ‘Medieval Writing Equipment’, in Fellows-Jensen, Gillian and Springborg, Peter, eds., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 7 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2003), 73–83.Google Scholar
Thaisen, Jacob, ‘The Merchant, the Squire and Gamelyn in the Christ Church Chaucer Manuscript’, N&Q, 253 (2008), 265–9.Google Scholar
Treharne, Elaine, et al., unpublished white paper for National Endowment for the Humanities Project HJ-50187-14 (2017).Google Scholar
Tschichold, Jan, The Form of the Book, trans. Hadeler, Hajo (London: Lund Humphries, 1991).Google Scholar
Tschichold, Jan, How to Draw Layouts, trans. McLean, Ruari (Edinburgh: Merchiston, 1991).Google Scholar
Turner, Nancy K., ‘The Materiality of Medieval Parchment: A Response to “The Animal Turn”’, Revista Hispánica Moderna, 71 (2018), 39–67.Google Scholar
van Haelst, Joseph, ‘Les origines du codex’, in Blanchard, Alain, ed., Les débuts du codex, Bibliologia, 9 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1989), 13–36.Google Scholar
Varila, Mari-Liisa, In Search of Textual Boundaries: A Case Study on the Transmission of Scientific Writing in 16th-Century England, Anglicana Turkuensia, 31 (University of Turku, 2016).Google Scholar
Verweij, Michiel, ‘La matérialité des manuscrits. Conséquences pour l’histoire et pour les éditions critiques’, in Hemelryck, Tania van and Hoorebeeck, Céline van, eds., L’écrit et le manuscrit à la fin du Moyen Âge (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006), 367–77.Google Scholar
Vézin, Jean, ‘Observations sur l’emploi des réclames dans les manuscrits latins’, Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes, 125 (1967), 5–33.Google Scholar
Vézin, Jean, ‘La réalisation matérielle des manuscrits latins pendant le haut Moyen Âge’, in Gruys, A. and Gumbert, J. P., eds., Codicologica, 4 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 1976–80), ii, 15–51.Google Scholar
Vézin, Jean, and Mellot, Jean-Dominique, ‘Réclame’, in Fouché, Pascal et al., eds., Dictionnaire encyclopédique du livre, 3 vols. (Paris: Éditions du Cercle de la Librarie, 2002–11), iii, 465–8.Google Scholar
Vinaver, Eugène, ‘Principles of Textual Emendation’, in Studies in French Language and Mediæval Literature Presented to Professor Mildred K. Pope (Manchester University Press, 1939), 351–69.Google Scholar
Vnouček, Jiří, ‘The Conservation of the Niebuhr Bible’, in Driscoll, M. J., ed., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 11 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2009), 21–41.Google Scholar
Vnouček, Jiří, ‘The Manufacture of Parchment for Writing Purposes and the Observation of the Signs of Manufacture Surviving in Old Manuscripts’, in Fellows-Jensen, Gillian and Springborg, Peter, eds., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 8 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2005), 74–92.Google Scholar
Vnouček, Jiří, ‘The Prague Sacramentary: From Manuscript Folia Back to Animal Skin’, in Driscoll, M. J., ed., Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 13 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2012), 235–66.Google Scholar
Vnouček, Jiří, ‘Typology of the Damage of Parchment in Manuscripts of the Codex Form’, in Larsen, René, ed., Improved Damage Assessment of Parchment: IDAP Assessment, Data Collection and Sharing of Knowledge (Brussels: European Commission, 2007), 27–30.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Caxton’s Exemplar for The Chronicles of England?’, JEBS, 14 (2011), 75–113.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, Designing English: Early Literature on the Page (Oxford: Bodleian Library, 2018).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, Humanism, Reading and English Literature 1430–1530 (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Instructing Readers in Late Medieval Poetic Manuscripts’, HLQ, 73 (2010), 433–52.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Medieval Holograph Manuscripts: Immaterial Traces of Authorship’, in Beloborodova, Olga and Van Hulle, Dirk, eds., Toward a Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2022).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘A New Age of Photography: “DIY Digitization” in Manuscript Studies’, Anglia, 139 (2021), 71–93.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Not Diane: The Risk of Error in Chaucerian Classicism’, Exemplaria, 29 (2017), 331–48.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Redesigning the Medieval Book’, in Brookman, Helen and Robinson, Olivia, eds., Creative and Critical Encounters in Teaching Early English: Making New (London: ARC Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Scholarly Scribes and the Creation of Knyghthode and Bataile’, English Manuscript Studies, 12 (2005), 26–45.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘Urinals and Hunting Traps: Curating Fifteenth-Century Pragmatic Books’, New Medieval Literatures, 20 (2020), 216–54.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel, ‘When Scribes Won’t Write: Gaps in Middle English Books’, SACh., 36 (2014), 249–78.Google Scholar
Waldron, Ronald, ‘The Manuscripts of Trevisa’s Translation of the Polychronicon: Towards a New Edition’, Modern Language Quarterly, 51 (1990), 281–317.Google Scholar
Walker Bynum, Caroline, Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe (New York: Zone Books, 2011).Google Scholar
Wall-Randell, Sarah, The Immaterial Book: Reading and Romance in Early Modern England (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Warner, Lawrence, Chaucer’s Scribes: London Textual Production 1384–1432 (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Warner, Lawrence, The Lost History of Piers Plowman: The Earliest Transmission of Langland’s Work (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Watt, David, The Making of Thomas Hoccleve’s Series (Liverpool University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Weiskott, Eric, Meter and Modernity in English Verse, 1350–1650 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Weiss, Rachel, ‘Between the Material World and the Ghosts of Dreams: An Argument about Craft in Los Carpinteros’, Journal of Modern Craft, 1 (2008), 255–70.Google Scholar
Whalley, Joyce Irene, Writing Implements and Accessories from the Roman Stylus to the Typewriter (Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1975).Google Scholar
White, Tom, ‘Textile Logics of Late Medieval Romance’, Exemplaria, 28 (2016), 297–318.Google Scholar
Wirth, Jean, et al., Les Marges à drôleries des manuscrits gothiques (1250–1350) (Paris: Droz, 2008).Google Scholar
Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn, et al., eds., The Idea of the Vernacular: An Anthology of Middle English Literary Theory, 1280–1520 (University of Exeter Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Wood, Sarah, ‘Non-Authorial Piers: C-Text Interpolations in the Second Vision of Piers Plowman in Huntington Library, MS HM 114’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 114 (2015), 482–503.Google Scholar
Wood, Sarah, ‘Two Annotated Piers Plowman Manuscripts from London and the Early Reception of the B and C Versions’, ChRev., 52 (2017), 274–97.Google Scholar