Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T18:10:19.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Precipitation and anti-solvent crystallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Alison Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Marcelo Seckler
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Herman Kramer
Affiliation:
Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands
Gerda van Rosmalen
Affiliation:
Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Why this chapter is important

Precipitation processes are important in a number of different fields, including extractive metallurgy, where the high recovery (i.e. recovered mass/initial mass in solution) is exploited to recover valuable metals; water treatment, where the same high recovery is exploited to cause high levels of removal of contaminants; pharmaceuticals, where a high recovery of product is important; and nano-precipitation, where the small particle size and a monodisperse crystal size distribution are important.

What is precipitation?

The distinction between crystallization and precipitation is often based on the speed of the process, with precipitation usually being defined as a fast process that results in rapid solid formation of extremely small crystals (Jarvenin,8). However, a more scientific definition of precipitation is the fact that the product is formed by a chemical reaction. Thus, precipitation is often referred to as “reactive crystallization.”

In precipitation processes, two soluble reactants are mixed to form a sparingly soluble product. What makes it unique is that often, especially in high-recovery precipitation, the reagent streams are highly concentrated and thus very high supersaturations, especially local supersaturations, are created (Figure 11.1). Because of the high supersaturation, the conversion of the solutes into solid particles is (in contrast to crystallization) usually a very fast process.

What makes it unique?

Precipitation is used for sparingly soluble substances (solubility in the range 0.001−1 kg m−3) for a number of reasons, but mostly because of:

  1. a. the requirement for a high recovery of the product;

  2. b. the requirement for a high degree of removal of a species;

  3. c. other techniques not being suitable. For example, cooling crystallization is not suitable if the compound has a flat or retrograde solubility curve, whilst evaporative crystallization is too expensive due to the volume of the water to be evaporated.

Type
Chapter
Information
Industrial Crystallization
Fundamentals and Applications
, pp. 234 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoun, M., Plasari, E., David, R. and Villermaux, J. 1999. A simultaneous determination of nucleation and growth rates from batch spontaneous precipitation. Chemical Engineering Science, 54, 1161–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiqullah, M., Hassan, M. M. and Beg, S. A. 1993. Micromixing effects on a parallel reaction in flow reactors. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 16, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J. 1989a. Simplification of micromixing calculations. I. Derivation and application of new model. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 42, 83–92.Google Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J. R. 1989b. Simplification of micromixing calculations. I. Derivation and application of new model. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 42, 83–92.Google Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J. R. 1989c. Simplification of micromixing calculations. II. New applications. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 42, 93–101.Google Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J. R. 1990. The effect of micromixing on parallel reactions. Chemical Engineering Science, 45, 907–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J. R. 1992. Interactions between mixing on various scales in stirred tank reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 47, 1839–1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J. R. 1999. Turbulent Mixing and Chemical Reactions, Wiley.Google Scholar
Baldyga, J., Bourne, J. R. and Hearn, S. J. 1997. Interaction between chemical reactions and mixing on various scales. Chemical Engineering Science, 52, 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldyga, J. and Orciuch, W. 2001. Barium sulfate precipitation in a pipe – an experimental study and CFD modelling. Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 2435–2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 2000. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batra, R. C. 2006. Elements of Continuum Mechanics, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, J. R. and Dell'Ava, P. 1987. Micro- and macro-mixing in stirred tank reactors of different sizes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 65, 180–186.Google Scholar
Bramley, A., Hounslow, M., Newman, R., Paterson, W. and Pogessi, C. 1997. The role of solution composition on aggregation during precipitation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 75, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozewith, C. and Busko Jr., M. 1989. Design correlations for mixing tees. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 28, 1521–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, R. 2001. General rules for prediction of the intensity of micromixing effects on precipitations. Powder Technology, 121, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, R., Marchal, P., Klein, J.-P. and Villermaux, J. 1991a. Crystallization and precipitation engineering – III. A discrete formulation of the agglomeration rate of crystals in a crystallization process. Chemical Engineering Science, 46, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, R. and Villermaux, J. 1975. Micromixing effects on complex reactions in a CSTR. Chemical Engineering Science, 30, 1309–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, R., Villermaux, J., Marchal, P. and Klein, J.-P. 1991b. Crystallization and precipitation engineering – IV. Kinetic model of adipic acid crystallization. Chemical Engineering Science, 46, 1129–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, M. C., Falk, L. and Villermaux, J. 1996. A new parallel competing reaction system for assessing micromixing efficiency: experimental approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 51, 5053–5064.Google Scholar
Gebrehiwet, T. A., Redden, G. D., Fujita, Y., Beig, M. S. and Smith, R. W. 2012. The Effect of the CO2−3 to Ca2+ ion activity ratio on calcite precipitation kinetics and Sr2+ partitioning. Geochemical Transactions, 13, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gösele, W. and Kind, M. 1991. Versuche zum Einfluß der Vermischung auf die Qualität eines kontinuierlich gefällten Produktes. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 63, 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. 2002. Understanding and modeling crystallizer mixing and suspension flow. In: Handbook of Industrial Crystallization, 2nd edn., Allan, S. M. (ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Houcine, I., Plasari, E., David, R. and Villermaux, J. 1997. Influence of mixing characteristics on the quality and size of precipitated calcium oxalate in apilot scale reactor. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 75, 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hove, M., Van Hille, R. P. and Lewis, A. E. 2008. Mechanisms of formation of iron precipitates from ferrous solutions at high and low pH. Chemical Engineering Science, 63, 16261635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvenin, G. 2008. Precipitation and Crystallization Processes. Short course: Introduction to Nuclear Chemistry and Fuel Cycle Separations, Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, December 16–18 2008, CRESP (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation).
Jones, A., Rigopoulos, S. and Zauner, R. 2005. Crystallization and precipitation engineering. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 29, 1159–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, C., Schöll, J., Vicum, L., Mazzotti, M. and Brozio, J. 2007. L-glutamic acid precipitation: agglomeration effects. Crystal Growth and Design, 8, 224–237.Google Scholar
Marchal, P., David, R., Klein, J. P. and Villermaux, J. 1988. Crystallization and precipitation engineering–I. An efficient method for solving population balance in crystallization with agglomeration. Chemical Engineering Science, 43, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersmann, A. 2001. Crystallization Technology Handbook, Marcel Dekker.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. and Chuahan, M. 2008. Spherulitic Growth, Honours Level Project, Crystallization and Precipitation Research Unit, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Mullin, J. W. 2001. Crystallization, Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Nienow, A. W. 1997. On impeller circulation and mixing effectiveness in the turbulent flow regime. Chemical Engineering Science, 52, 2557–2565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, D. 2011. Supersaturation: driving force for crystal nucleation and growth [Online]. Mettler Toledo. Available: http://blog.autochem.mt.com/2011/03/supersaturation-driving-force-for-crystal-nucleation-growth/ (accessed February 2015).
Oldshue, J. Y. 1983. Fluid Mixing Technology, Chemical Engineering.Google Scholar
Post mixing. 2013. Optimisation and solutions: impellers [Online]. Available: http://www.postmixing.com/mixing forum/impellers/impellers.htm (accessed March 2014).
Rice, R. W. and Baud, R. E. 1990. The role of micromixing in the scale-up of geometrically similar batch reactors. AIChE Journal, 36, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivallin, M., Benmami, M., Kanaev, A. and Gaunand, A. 2005. Sol-gel reactor with rapid micromixing: modelling and measurements of titanium oxide nano-particle growth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelands, C. P. M., Derkson, J. J., Ter Horst, J. H., Kramer, H. J. M. and Jansens, P. J. 2002. Mixing time scale analysis for the measurement of nucleation rate of concomitant polymorphs. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 1, 29–34.Google Scholar
Seckler, M., Bruinsma, O. and Van Rosmalen, G. 1995. Influence of hydrodynamics on precipitation: a computational study. Chemical Engineering Communications, 135, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Succi, S. 2001. The Lattice Boltzmann Equation: For Fluid Dynamics and Beyond, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Torbacke, M. and Rasmuson, Å. C. 2001. Influence of different scales of mixing in reaction crystallization. Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 2459–2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl, V. W. and Gray, J. B. 1966. Mixing: Theory and Practice, Volume 1, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, M. L. J. 1998. Precipitation and Mixing. PhD Thesis, University of Delft.
Van Leeuwen, M. L. J., Bruinsma, O. S. L. and Van Rosmalen, G. M. 1996a. Influence of mixing on the product quality in precipitation. Chemical Engineering Science, 51, 2595–2600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, M. L. J., Bruinsma, O. S. L. and Van Rosmalen, G. M. 1996b. Three-zone approach for precipitation of barium sulfate. Journal of Crystal Growth, 166, 1004–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteeg, H. K. and Malalasekera, W. 2007. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Vicum, L., Mazzotti, M. and Baldyga, J. 2004a. Modeling of Stirred Tank Mixing-Precipitation Processes. Swiss Symposium on Crystallization and Precipitation, Zurich|Switzerland.
Vicum, L., Ottiger, S., Mazzotti, M., Makowski, L. and Baldyga, J. 2004b. Multi-scale modeling of a reactive mixing process in a semibatch stirred tank. Chemical Engineering Science, 59, 1767–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, J. 1986. Macro and micromixing phenomena in chemical reactors. In: Chemical Reactor Design and Technology, Springer.Google Scholar
Yu, S. 1993. Micromixing and Parallel Reactions, Doctoral and habilitation thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000897454 (accessed February 2015).CrossRef
Zauner, R. and Jones, A. G. 2000. Scale-up of continuous and semibatch precipitation processes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 39, 2392–2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×