Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T17:56:49.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - God and Infinity: Theological Insights from Cantor's Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2011

Robert John Russell
Affiliation:
The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, United States
Michael Heller
Affiliation:
Pontifical University of John Paul II
W. Hugh Woodin
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Western monotheism begins with the fundamental assertion that God is Absolute Mystery, the incomprehensible ground and source of being itself, and that we can speak about God only because God first speaks to us in revelation received in faith and understood always inadequately through reason, tradition, and experience. Theology as self-critical reflection on revelation and religious experience starts with what we do not understand before it seeks to say something about that which we understand at least in part. In the long traditions of Western monotheism, the way of unknowing leads, and the way of knowing follows behind. These ways have come to be called the via negativa (the negative way of denial) and the via positiva (the positive way of affirmation), respectively. This means, in turn, that when we talk about God we should begin by attempting to say something about those divine attributes that we only know by negation, that is, by their utter contrast with our experience of ourselves and our universe. We should begin with what are called “apophatic” statements, from the Greek αποφατικος for “negative” or “denial.” With this we return full circle to the fundamental assertion that the most inclusive divine attribute is the incomprehensibility of God. But this incomprehensibility, too, tells us something inestimably important about God's relation to the world: it is only by being incomprehensibly different from this world that God can be the source of this world and its final home.

Type
Chapter
Information
Infinity
New Research Frontiers
, pp. 275 - 289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cantor, G. 1980. Gesammelte Abhandlungen Mathematischen und Philosophischen Inhalts. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 1979. The Kalam Cosmological Argument. New York: Barnes & Noble.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galileo, Galilei. 1954. Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. Translated by Crew, H. and Salvio, A.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hahn, H. 1956. Infinity. In The World of Mathematics, vol. 3, Newman, J. R.(ed.), pp. 1593–1611. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
McKeon, R. (ed.). 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, W. 1991. Systematic Theology, vol. 1. Translated by G. W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, W. 1994. Systematic Theology, vol. 2. Translated by Bromiley, G. W.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, W. 1998. Systematic Theology, vol. 3. Translated by Bromiley, G. W.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Pennings, T. J. 1993. Infinity and the Absolute: Insights in our world, our faith and ourselves. Christian Scholar's Review 23 (2): 159–80.Google Scholar
Rucker, R. 1983. Infinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the Infinite. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Russell, R. J. 2008. Cosmology from Alpha to Omega: Theology and Science in Creative Mutual Interaction. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Stoeger, W. R., Ellis, G., and Kirchner, U. 2005. Multiverses and cosmology: Philosophical issues. astro-ph/0407329v2.
Templeton, J. M. (ed.). 1997. How Large Is God? The Voices of Scientists and Theologians. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Woodin, W. H. 2001. The continuum hypothesis, part I. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 48 (6): 567–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×