Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Accountability, informed consent and clinician performance information
- Part I Accountability
- Part II Informed consent
- Part introduction
- 7 Informed consent and surgeons' performance
- 8 The value and practical limits of informed consent
- 9 Against the informed consent argument for surgeon report cards
- 10 Trust and the limits of knowledge
- 11 Surgeons' report cards, heuristics, biases and informed consent
- 12 Report cards, informed consent and market forces
- Part III Reporting performance information
- Index
- References
7 - Informed consent and surgeons' performance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Accountability, informed consent and clinician performance information
- Part I Accountability
- Part II Informed consent
- Part introduction
- 7 Informed consent and surgeons' performance
- 8 The value and practical limits of informed consent
- 9 Against the informed consent argument for surgeon report cards
- 10 Trust and the limits of knowledge
- 11 Surgeons' report cards, heuristics, biases and informed consent
- 12 Report cards, informed consent and market forces
- Part III Reporting performance information
- Index
- References
Summary
Risk and disclosure
In order to qualify as an instance of informed consent, a patient's decision to consent to an operation needs to be grounded on an adequate basis of relevant information. Without such a basis of relevant information, a patient's decision to consent to an operation is not an effective informed consent, and is not, therefore, sufficient to authorize that operation. Because many of the categories of information that inform effective decisions by patients to consent to an operation are categories of specialist medical information, patients must rely on the disclosure of such information by medical professionals. A patient must receive an adequate disclosure of a variety of categories of information that are relevant to their decision to undergo an operation, as a precondition to the provision of effective informed consent.
Exactly which categories of information should be disclosed, for the purposes of providing informed consent, is in dispute. What is not disputed by any commentators who accept a doctrine of informed consent is that a necessary component of disclosure, for the purposes of informed consent, is disclosure of the reasonably foreseeable risks of an operation. In this chapter, we argue that disclosures made for the purposes of obtaining patients' informed consent to an operation ought to include material information about a subcategory of risk information: that is, information about the ability of available surgeons to perform the operation in question.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Informed Consent and Clinician AccountabilityThe Ethics of Report Cards on Surgeon Performance, pp. 111 - 133Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
, and (1987). Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Professional misconduct: the Bristol case. Medical Journal of Australia, 169, 369–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Caplan, A. L. (1988). Is there an obligation to participate in biomedical research? In The Use of Human Beings in Research, with Special Reference to Clinical Trials, ed. , , and Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappel v Hart, High Court of Australia HCA 55, 2 September 1998, 195 CLR 232.
, and (1996). Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 394–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001). Informed consent in medicine in comparison with consent in other areas of human activity. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 39, 169–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in New York State 1997–1999 (2002). New York State Department of Health.
Dare, T. (1998a). The secret courts of men's hearts: legal ethics and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird. In Ethical Challenges to Legal Education and Conduct, ed. . Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
(1998b). Mass immunisation programmes: some philosophical issues. Bioethics, 12, 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy built on Myth. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1998). The new NHS performance tables 1997/98. Available: http://www.performance.doh.gov.uk/tables98/index.htm.
Duckett, S., Casemix Consulting and Hunter, L. (1999). Health Services Policy Review: Final Report, Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Available: http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/ahs/archive/servrev/.
(1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2000). The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1976–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyers, T. (2003). Teaching trainee surgeons how to operate. Master of Bioethics research paper, Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics.
and (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Materiality of risk and proficiency assessment: the onset of report cards? Journal of Law and Medicine, 6, 313–18.Google Scholar
(1989). Clinical judgement, clinical training and professional experience. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2002). Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
and (1995). Report cards on cardiac surgeons – assessing New York State's approach. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 1229–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1997). Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: ‘What do New York State cardiologists think of it?’American Heart Journal, 136, 1120–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Pushing the limits of informed consent: Johnson v Kokemoor and physician-specific disclosure. Wisconsin Law Review, 1079, 1083.Google Scholar
Lambert, B. (2002). Infected doctor told to get patients' consent. The New York Times, April 19th.
, , , and (2000). Dying to Know: Public Release of Information about Quality of Health Care. Los Angeles: RAND Corporation/Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
New York State Department of Health (2002). Coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State 1997–1999. Available: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/heart/1997-99cabg.pdf.
New York State Department of Health (2003). Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in New York State 1998–2000. Available: http://newyorkhealth.gov/nysdoh/reports/pci_1998-2000.pdf#search=%22Percutaneous%20coronary%20interventions%20(PCI)%20in%20New%20York%20State%201998%E2%80%932000%22.
NHS (2003). Extending choice for patients – heart surgery: your guide to your choices. Available: http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/36/17/04073617.pdf.
and (2001). Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (2000). Pennsylvania's Guide to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery 2000. Available: http://www.phc4.org/reports/cabg/00/.
, and (1998). The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32, 993–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quality Information Management Corporation, The Greater Cleveland Consumer Report of Hospital Performance, Cleveland, Ohio (1998). Discussed at http://www.insightsandoutcomes.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?article_id=55.
(1994). Rethinking informed consent. The Yale Law Journal, 103, 899–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1988). Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeon's dexterity on laparoscopy simulator. The Lancet, 352, 1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Available: http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/index.htm.
Veatch, R. M. (1985). The physician as stranger: the ethics of the anonymous patient–physician relationship. In The Clinical Encounter, ed. . Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
(1998). Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence within Healthcare, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar