Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T23:23:49.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Competition and institutional change in U.S. electric power regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2010

Richard J. Gilbert
Affiliation:
University of California Energy Institute
Edward P. Kahn
Affiliation:
University of California Energy Institute
Richard J. Gilbert
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Edward P. Kahn
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Part I. Historical background and evolution of the U.S. electric power sector

Brief history of the origins of the system

The U.S. electricity system has been, and continues to be, a patchwork of state and federal regulations in a system with private, municipal, and other government ownership. In this section we give a brief survey of the origin and early history of the activities of the public and private sectors.

Private sector activities

The nineteenth-century origins of the U.S. electricity system involved substantial technological rivalry between incompatible systems (Hughes, 1983). The technical configuration first promoted by Edison and his associates and used in the famous Pearl Street Station (1882) was based on direct current (dc). Westinghouse and others, starting later and with less financial backing, promoted alternating current (ac) primarily to achieve longer transmission and distribution distances. The technical advantage of ac was due to the comparative ease of transforming voltage to levels high enough that resistance losses from transmission were small. The dc technology was not able to achieve high-voltage transformation for decades. Therefore, in the early development of the electricity industry, each technology had natural market niches. The dc systems prevailed in dense urban areas, where they supplied lighting and power for electric railways (traction); the ac systems dominated smaller cities and towns, where their advantage in transmission over longer distances was clear.

By the early 1890s, an interface technology, the rotary converter, made it possible to blend the two technologies into a single coherent system. Eventually ac systems dominated because of their advantage in transmission.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×