Aaronson, Susan Ariel and Leblond, Patrick, “Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and Its Implications for the WTO” (2018) 21(2) Journal of International Economic Law 245.Google Scholar

ACCC, “Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report” (July 26, 2019).Google Scholar

ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority), “Supporting Australian Stories on Our Screen: Options Paper” (March 2020).Google Scholar

Ala’i, Padideh, “From the Periphery to the Center? The Evolving WTO Jurisprudence on Transparency and Good Governance” (2008) 11(4) Journal of International Economic Law 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alemanno, Alberto, “Is There a Role for Cost–Benefit Analysis beyond the Nation-State? Lessons from International Regulatory Co-operation” in Livermore, Michael A. and Revesz, Richard L. (eds), The Globalization of Cost–Benefit Analysis in Environmental Policy (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Allen, Henry et al., “Media Pluralism: What Matters for Governance and Regulation?” (2017) 30(2) Journal of Media Economics 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Robert D. et al., “Competition Policy, Trade and the Global Economy” World Trade Organization Working Paper (2018).Google Scholar

APEC, “Privacy Framework” (2017).Google Scholar

APEC, “Study on APEC’s Non-binding Principles for Domestic Regulation of the Services Sector” (2021).Google Scholar

Arner, Douglas W. et al., “The Future of Data-Driven Finance and Regtech: Lessons from EU Big Bang II” (2020) 25 Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance 245.Google Scholar

Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), “Australia-Singapore Digital Economy Agreement, Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties” (September 25, 2020).Google Scholar

Australian Fair Trade & Investment Network, “Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on the Plurilateral Negotiations on Trade-Related Aspects of Electronic Commerce” (February 2020).Google Scholar

AVIA (Asia Video Industry Association), “OTT TV Policies in Asia” (2018).Google Scholar

Baccarne, Bastiaan et al., “The Television Struggle: An Assessment of Over-the-Top Television Evolutions in a Cable Dominant Market” (2013) 92(4) Communications & Strategies 43.Google Scholar

Baiker, Laura et al., “Services Domestic Regulation: Locking in Good Regulatory Practices” WTO Working Paper ERSD-2021-14 (September 17, 2021).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard, The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Bambauer, Jane, “Is Data Speech?” (2014) 66 Stanford Law Review 57.Google Scholar

Barker, Chris, Television, Globalization and Cultural Identities (Open University Press 2000).Google Scholar

Batura, Olga, Universal Service in WTO and EU Law: Liberalization and Social Regulation in Telecommunications (Springer 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, Stuart M., Telecommunications Law and Policy (Carolina Academic Press 2012).Google Scholar

Benjamin, Stuart M. and Speta, James, Internet and Telecommunication Regulation (Carolina Academic Press 2019).Google Scholar

BEREC (The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications), “Draft BEREC Report on the Internet Ecosystem” BoR (22) 87 (June 9, 2022).Google Scholar

BEREC (The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications), “Report on Harmonized Definitions for Indicators Regarding Over-the-Top Services” BoR (21) 127 (September 30, 2021).Google Scholar

Berman, Ayelet et al., “Rethinking Stakeholder Participation in Global Governance” in Pauwelyn, Joost et al. (eds), Rethinking Participation in Global Governance: Voice and Influence after Stakeholder Reforms in Global Finance and Health (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar

Black, Julia and Baldwin, Robert, “When Risk-Based Regulation Aims Low: A Strategic Framework” (2012) 6(2) Regulation & Governance 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, Janet, International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Bonnett, Thomas, Telewars in the States: Telecommunications Issues in a New Era of Competition (Council of Governors’ Policy Advisors 1996).Google Scholar

Brenner, Daniel L., “Creating Effective Broadband Network Regulation” (2010) 62 Federal Communications Law Journal 13.Google Scholar

Breznitz, Dan and Murphree, Michael, “The Rise of China in Technology Standards: New Norms in Old Institutions” (2016) Research Report Prepared on Behalf of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.Google Scholar

Brownsword, Roger and Somsen, Han, “Law, Innovation and Technology: Before We Fast Forward – A Forum for Debate” (2009) 1 Law, Innovation and Technology 1.Google Scholar

Burk, Dan L., “Algorithmic Legal Metrics” (2021) 96 Notre Dame Law Review 1147.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, Marcus et al., “Introduction” in Burkhardt, Marcus et al. (eds) Interrogating Datafication: Towards a Praxeology of Data (Transcript Publishing 2022).Google Scholar

Burri, Mira, “EU External Trade Policy in The Digital Age: Has Culture Been Left Behind?” (2022) Trade Law 4.0 Working Paper Series University of Lucerne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burri, Mira, “Interfacing Privacy and Trade” (2021) 53 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 35.Google Scholar

Burri, Mira, “The Global Digital Divide as Impeded Access to Content” in Burri, Mira and Cottier, Thomas (eds), Trade Governance in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burri, Mira, “Towards a New Treaty on Digital Trade,” (2021) 55(1) Journal of World Trade 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burri, Mira, “Trade Law 4.0: Are We There Yet? (2023) 26(1) Journal of International Economic Law 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter, The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Buyya, Rajkumar and Dastjerdi, Amir (eds), Internet of Things: Principles and Paradigms (Elsevier 2016).Google Scholar

Candeub, Adam, “Reading Section 230 as Written” (2021) 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 139.Google Scholar

Carrilloa, Arturo J., “Having Your Cake and Eating It Too? Zero-Rating, Net Neutrality, and International Law” (2016) 19 Stanford Technology Law Review 364.Google Scholar

CASBAA (Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia), “A Titled Playing Field: Asia-Pacific Pay TV and OTT” (2012).Google Scholar

Cashore, Benjamin et al., “Private Authority and Public Policy Interactions in Global Context: Governance Spheres for Problem Solving” (2021) 15 Regulation & Governance 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaisse, Julien and Matsushita, Mitsuo, “China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications” (2018) 52 Journal of World Trade 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chander, Anupam and Schwartz, Paul, “Privacy and/or Trade” (2023) 90(1) University of Chicago Law Review 49.Google Scholar

Chander, Anupam and Sun, Haochen, “Sovereignty 2.0” (2021) Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2021).Google Scholar

Chander, Anupam, “Section 230 and the International Law of Facebook” (2022) 24 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 393.Google Scholar

Chi, Carmody, “When Cultural Identity Was Not at Issue: Thinking About Canada – Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals” (1999) 30 Law & Policy of International Business 231.Google Scholar

Ciuriak, Dan and Fay, Robert, “The Digital Economy Partnership Agreement: Should Canada Join?” (2022) 171 Centre for International Governance Innovation Policy Brief.Google Scholar

Ciuriak, Dan, “The Challenge of Updating Institutions for Digital Trade” (2021) Opinion, Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar

Claussen, Kathleen, “Trade’s Security Exceptionalism” (2020) 72 Stanford Law Review 1097.Google Scholar

Cohen, Harlan Grant, “Nations and Markets” (2020) 23(4) Journal of International Economic Law 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Julie E., Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of the Informational Capitalism (Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Julie E., “Law for the Platform Economy” (2017) 51 U.C. Davis Law Review 133.Google Scholar

Condron, Sean M., “Getting It Right: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure in Cyberspace” (2007) 20(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 403.Google Scholar

Cory, Nigel and Dascoli, Luke, “How Barriers to Cross-Border Data Flows Are Spreading Globally, What They Cost, and How to Address Them” Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) (July 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Cossy, Mirelle, “Cross-Border Supply of Services – Pattern of Specific Commitments” (April 28–29, 2005), WTO Symposium on Cross-Border Supply of Services.Google Scholar

Couldry, Nick and Mejias, Ulises A., The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism (Stanford University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Creutz, Katja, “Law versus Codes of Conduct: Between Convergence and Conflict” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Cunningham, McKay, “Next Generation Privacy: The Internet of Things, Data Exhaust, and Reforming Regulation by Risk of Harm” (2014) 2(2) Groningen Journal of International Law 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delev, Christian, “A Moral Stretch? US–Tariff Measures and the Public Morals Exception in WTO Law” (2021) World Trade Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, “Concluding the WTO Services Negotiations on Domestic Regulation: Hopes and Fears” (2020) 9(4) World Trade Review 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity, Transparency and Regulatory Diversity (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Dickinson, Gregory M., “Rebooting Internet Immunity” (2021) 89 George Washington Law Review 347.Google Scholar

Dorobantu, Cosmina et al., “Source Code Disclosure: A Primer for Trade Negotiators” in Borchert, Ingo and Winters, Alan (eds), Addressing Impediments to Digital Trade (CEPR Press 2021).Google Scholar

Ducci, Francesco, Natural Monopolies in Digital Platform Markets (Cambridge University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutton, William H., “Multistakeholder Internet Governance?” (2016) World Bank Background Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin and Stemler, Abbey, “From the Digital to the Physical: Federal Limitations on Regulating Online Marketplaces” (2019) 56 Harvard Journal on Legislation 142.Google Scholar

Elms, Deborah, “The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Policy Innovations and Impacts” (2018) Global Economic Dynamics Focus Paper.Google Scholar

EMAG, “Digital Platform’s Market Power” (September 30, 2019).Google Scholar

Emmerson, Andrew, “Conceptualizing Security Exceptions: Legal Doctrine or Political Excuse?” (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ENISA, “Guidelines for Securing the Internet of Things” (2020).Google Scholar

Erie, Matthew S. and Streinz, Thomas, “The Beijing Effect: China’s Digital Silk Road as Transnational Data Governance” (2021) 54(1) New York University Journal of International Law & Policy 1.Google Scholar

European Commission, “Better Regulation: Guidelines and Toolbox” (November 3, 2021).Google Scholar

European Commission, “Competition Policy for the Digital Era” (May 20, 2019).Google Scholar

European Commission, “Cybersecurity of 5G Networks - EU Toolbox of Risk Mitigating Measures” (2020).Google Scholar

European Commission, “DSA: Very Large Online Platforms and Search Engines” (April 25, 2023).Google Scholar

European Commission, “Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC” SWD (2020) 348 final (December 15, 2020).Google Scholar

European Commission, “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Horizontal Cybersecurity Requirements for Products with Digital Elements and Amending Regulation” (2022).Google Scholar

European Commission, “Shaping Europe’s Digital Future” (October 17, 2022).Google Scholar

European Commission, “The Future of the Electronic Communications Sector and its Infrastructure, Consultation Questionnaire” (February 23, 2023).Google Scholar

European Commission, “Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework” (March 25, 2022).Google Scholar

European Parliament, “Digital Sovereignty for Europe” (July 2020).Google Scholar

European Parliament, “Europe’s Digital Decade and Autonomy” (2021).Google Scholar

European Parliament, “Liability of Online Platforms” (2021).Google Scholar

European Parliament, “The Impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Artificial Intelligence” (2020).Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel and Stucke, Maurice, Virtual Competition – The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy (Harvard University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FCC, “Reports to Congress on Future of the Universal Service Fund” (August 15, 2022).Google Scholar

Fisher, Angelina and Streinz, Thomas, “Confronting Data Inequality” (2022) 60(3) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 829.Google Scholar

Flyverbom, Mikkel, The Digital Prism – Transparency and Managed Visibilities in a Datafied World (Cambridge University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Ursula, The Real World of Technology (Anansi Press 1999).Google Scholar

FTC, “Report to Congress on Privacy and Security” (September 13, 2021).Google Scholar

Gao, Henry, “Digital or Trade? The Contrasting Approaches of China and US to Digital Trade” (2018) 21(2) Journal of International Economic Law 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gao, Henry, “E-commerce Joint Statement Initiative Negotiation and China” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Gao, Henry, “Google’s China Problem: A Case Study on Trade, Technology and Human Rights under the GATS” (2011) 6 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law & Policy 349.Google Scholar

Gari, Gabriel, “Recent Preferential Trade Agreements’ Disciplines for Tackling Regulatory Divergence in Services: How Far beyond GATS?” (2020) 19(1) World Trade Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garlick, Jeremy, The Impact of China’s Belt and Roald Initiative (Routledge 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasser, Urs et al., “Multistakeholder as Governance Groups: Observations from Case Studies” (2015) The Berkman Ctr. for Internet & Society Research Publication Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasser, Urs, “Futuring Digital Privacy: Reimaging the Law/Tech Interplay” in Burri, Mira (ed), Big Data and Global Trade Law (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Gellert, Raphaël, The Risk-Based Approach to Data Protection (Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geradin, Damien and Kerf, Michel, “Levelling the Playing Field: Is the WTO Adequately Equipped to Prevent Anti-Competitive Practices in Telecommunications?” in Geradin, Damien and Luff, David (eds), The WTO and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services (Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, Eric, “Five Things to Know about Section 230” (2021) Center for International Governance Innovation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Ryan, “Norms and National Security: The WTO as a Catalyst for Inquiry” (2001) 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 101.Google Scholar

Gough, Ian , “Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework” (2019) 90(3) The Political Quarterly 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Government of Canada, “What Does the CPTPP Mean for Canadian Culture?” (2018).Google Scholar

Grubesic, Tony and Mack, Elizabeth, Broadband Telecommunications and Regional Development (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Gur, Berna Akcali, “Cybersecurity, European Digital Sovereignty and the 5G Rollout Crisis” (2022) 46 Computer Law & Security Review 1.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Daniel S. and Quinlan, Joseph P., “The Transatlantic Economy 2021: Annual Survey of Jobs, Trade and Investment between the United States and Europe” (2021).Google Scholar

Haskel, Jonathan and Westlake, Stian, Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy (Princeton University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, J. Benton, “The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order” (2020) 129 Yale Law Journal 1020.Google Scholar

Helmersen, Sondre T., “The Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body in Abi-Saab, Georges et al. (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart Publishing 2019).Google Scholar

Hintz, Arne et al., Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society (Polity Press 2019).Google Scholar

Hintze, Mike, “In Defense of the Long Privacy Statement” (2017) 76 Maryland Law Review 1044.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, “Antitrust and Platform Monopoly” (2021) 130 Yale Law Journal 1952.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, “Importing Regulatory Standards and Principles into WTO Dispute Settlement: The Challenge of Interpreting the GATS Arrangements on Telecommunications” in Lianos, Ioannis and Odudu, Okeoghene (eds), Regulating Trade in Services in the EU and the WTO: Trust, Distrust and Economic Integration (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Iansiti, Marco and Lakhani, Karim R., Competing in the Age of AI: How Machine Intelligence Changes the Rules of Business (Harvard Business Review Press 2020).Google Scholar

IHRB (Institute for Human Rights and Business), “Data Brokers and Human Rights: Big Data, Big Business” (November 2016).Google Scholar

International Trade Union Confederation, “E-Commerce, Free Trade Agreements, Digital Chapters and the Impact on Labor” (2019).Google Scholar

ITU, “Digital Inclusion of All” (2019).Google Scholar

ITU, “GSR Discussion Paper: Regulation and the Internet of Things” (2015).Google Scholar

ITU, “Setting the Scene for 5G: Opportunities & Challenges” (2018).Google Scholar

ITU, “The State of Broadband 2020: Tackling Digital Inequalities” (September 2020).Google Scholar

ITU, “Universal Service Funds and Digital Inclusion for All” (2013).Google Scholar

ITU-D, “Digital Inclusion” (2023).Google Scholar

Kamara, Irene, “Co-Regulation in EU Personal Data Protection: The Case of Technical Standards and the Privacy by Design Standardization Mandate” (2017) 8(1) European Journal of Law and Technology 1.Google Scholar

Kamara, Irene, “Misaligned Union Laws? A Comparative Analysis of Certification in the Cybersecurity Act and the General Data Protection Regulation” in Hallinan, Dara et al. (eds), Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence (Hart Publishing 2021).Google Scholar

Kaminski, Margot E., “Binary Governance: Lessons from the GDPR’s Approach to Algorithmic Accountability” (2019) 92 Southern California Law Review 1529.Google Scholar

Kanetake, Machiko and Nollkaemper, André, “The Application of Informal International Instruments Before Domestic Courts” (2014) 46 George Washington International Law Review 765.Google Scholar

Katz, Vanessa, “Regulating the Sharing Economy” (2015) 30 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1067.Google Scholar

Kelsey, Jane, “The Illegitimacy of Joint Statement Initiatives and Their Systemic Implications for the WTO” (2022) 25 Journal of International Economic Law 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Charles H., An Introduction to U.S. Telecommunications Law (Artech House 2001).Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M., “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” (2017) 126 Yale Law Journal 710.Google Scholar

Kho, Stephen and McNamara, Yujin K., “Focus on China: The Expansive Use of National Security Measures to Address Economic Competitiveness Concerns” (2022) 17 University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review 368.Google Scholar

Knight, Lizzie and Voon, Tania, “The Evolution of National Security at the Interface Between Domestic and International Investment Law and Policy: The Role of China” (2020) 21 Journal of World Investment and Trade 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services (Kluwer Law International 2003).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, “Jurisdiction Unbound: (Extra)territorial Regulation as Global Governance” (2022) 33(2) European Journal of International Law 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krishnamurthy, Vivek et al., “CDA 230 Goes North American? Examining the Impacts of the USMCA’s Intermediary Liability Provisions in Canada and the United States” (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulesza, Joanna and Weber, Rolf H., “Protecting the Internet with International Law” (2021) 40 Computer Law & Security Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachaud, Eric, “What GDPR Tells about Certification” (2020) 38 Computer Law and Security Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Andrew, “GATS” in Bethlehem, Daniel et al. (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Lim, Aik Hoe, “Trade Rules for Industry 4.0” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties (Springer 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, Martin and Wegrich, Kai, Managing Regulation: Regulatory Analysis Politics and Policy (Palgrave Macmillan 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luff, David, “Telecommunications and Audiovisual Services: Considerations for a Convergence Policy at the World Trade Organization Level” (2004) 38(6) Journal of World Trade 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markopoulou, Dimitra et al., “The New EU Cybersecurity Framework: The NIS Directive, ENISA’s Role and the General Data Protection Regulation” (2019) 35(6) Computer Law & Security Review 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo et al., “Competition Policy and Trade” in Matsushita, Mitsuo et al. (eds.) The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, “Trade and Competition Policy” in Bethlehem, Daniel et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauve, Pierre, “Regionalism in Services Trade” in Mattoo, Aaditya et al. (eds), A Handbook of International Trade in Services (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wolfe, Robert, “Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More” (2017) 16 World Trade Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade in Goods (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Mayer-Schonberger, Viktor and Cukier, Kenneth, Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Harper Business 2013 ).Google Scholar

McDonald, Aleecia M., “Stakeholders and High Stakes Divergent Standards for Do Not Track” in Selinger, Evan et al. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

McNealy, Jasmine E., “Sonic Privacy” (2022) 24 Yale Journal of Law and Technology 365.Google Scholar

Meltzer, Joshua P., “The Internet, Cross-Border Data Flows and International Trade” (2015) 2(1) Asia & Pacific Policy Studies 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meuwese, Anne, “Constitutional Aspects of Regulatory Coherence in TTIP: An EU Perspective” (2015) 78 Law & Contemporary Problems 153.Google Scholar

Mishra, Neha, “International Trade Law Meets Data Ethics: A Brave New World” (2020) 53(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 305.Google Scholar

Mishra, Neha“The Trade – (Cyber)security Dilemma and its Impact on Global Cybersecurity Governance” (2020) 54(4) Journal of World Trade 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misra, Sudip et al., Introduction to Industrial Internet of Things and Industry 4.0 (Routledge 2020).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew and Mishra, Neha, “Digital Trade Integration in Preferential Trade Agreements” (2020) 191 Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series 34–36.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew and Mishra, Neha, “Regulating Cross-Border Data Flows in a Data-Driven World: How WTO Law Can Contribute” (2019) 22(3) Journal of International Economic Law 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes (Cambridge University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D., “Brief of Evidence of Andrew David Mitchell in the Matter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Inquiry before the Waitangi Tribunal” (2020).Google Scholar

Moazed, Alex and Johnson, Nicholas L., Modern Monopolies: What It Takes to Dominate the Twenty-First Century Economy (St. Martin’s Press 2016).Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World (Harvard University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Mundie, Craig, “Privacy Pragmatism: Focus on Data Use, Not Data Collection” (2014) 93(2) Foreign Affairs 28.Google Scholar

NIST, “Cybersecurity for IOT Program” (2023).Google Scholar

NIST, “Cybersecurity Framework” (2022).Google Scholar

OECD, “Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age” (2017).Google Scholar

OECD, “Big Data: Bringing Competition Policy to the Digital Era” DAF/COMP (2016).Google Scholar

OECD, “Fostering Cross-Border Data Flows with Trust” OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 343 (December 2022).Google Scholar

OECD, “Regional Competition Agreements: Benefits and Challenges” (November 29, 2018).Google Scholar

OECD, “Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence” (2009).Google Scholar

OECD, “Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy” (2020).Google Scholar

OECD, “Reviews of Risk Management Policies Good Governance for Critical Infrastructure Resilience” (2019).Google Scholar

Partiti, Enrico et al., “Evolutionary Dynamics of Transnational Private Regulation” (2023) Transnational Legal Theory 1.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, “Rien ne va plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in GATT and GATS” (2005) 4 World Trade Review 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, “Rule-Based Trade 2.0? The Rise of Informal Rules and International Standards and How They May Outcompete WTO Treaties” (2014) 17 Journal of International Economic Law 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi and Liu, Han-Wei, “The Legality of Data Residency Requirements: How Can the Trans-Pacific Partnership Help?” (2017) 51:2 Journal of World Trade 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi, “Autonomous Vehicle Standards under the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi, “Cybersecurity and Trade Governance” in Chaisse, Julien & Rodríguez-Chiffelle, Cristián (eds), The Elgar Companion to the WTO (Edward Elgar 2023).Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi, “Cybersecurity Threats and the WTO National Security Exceptions” (2015) 18(2) Journal of International Economic Law 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Digital Trade” in Bethlehem, Daniel et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“GATS and the Over-the-Top Services: A Legal Outlook” (2016) 50(1) Journal of World Trade 21.Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Lessons from the TPP Regulatory Coherence Chapter: The Laws Governing Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Messages as a Case Study” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Governing Science and Technology under the International Economic Order: Regulatory Divergence and Convergence in the Age of Mega-regionals (Edward Elgar 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Levelling the Playing Field between Sharing Platforms and Industry Incumbents: Good Regulatory Practices?” in Chander, Anupam and Sun, Haochen (eds), Data Sovereignty: From the Digital Silk Road to the Return of the State (Oxford University Press 2023).Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Private Cybersecurity Standards? Cyberspace Governance, Multistakeholderism, and the (Ir)relevance of the TBT Regime” (2018) 51(2) Cornell International Law Journal 445.Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Public–Private Interactions in Privacy Governance” (Concept Paper) (2022) 11(6) MDPI-Laws Special Issue: International Law as a Driver of Internet Governance 80.Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Regulating New Services through Litigation? Electronic Commerce as a Case Study on the Evaluation of ‘Judicial Activism’ in the WTO” (2014) 48(6) Journal of World Trade 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Renegotiate the WTO Commitments? Technological Change and Treaty Interpretation” (2012) 45(2) Cornell International Law Journal 403.Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“The Rule of Law in Times of Technological Uncertainty: Is International Economic Law Ready for Emerging Supervisory Trends?” (2019) 22(1) Journal of International Economic Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“The Uneasy Interplay between Digital Inequality and International Economic Law” (2022) 33(1) European Journal of International Law 205.Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Trade in Telecommunications Services: Doha and Beyond” (2007) 41(2) Journal of World Trade.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi“Universal Telecommunications Service in China: Trade Liberalization, Subsidy, and Technology in the Making of Information Equality in the Broadband Era” (2003) 4 Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 21.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “Competition-oriented Reforms of the WTO World Trade System-Proposals and Policy Options” in Zach, Roger et al. (eds.), Towards WTO Competition Rules (Kluwer Law International 1999).Google Scholar

Petit, Nicolas, Big Tech & the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario (Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piffaut, Henri, “Algorithms: The Impact on Competition” (2022) 23(1) Business Law International 5.Google Scholar

Polanco, Rodrigo Lazo and Gómez Fiedler, Sebastián, “A Requiem for The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Something New, Something Old and Something Borrowed?” (2018) 18(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 298.Google Scholar

Polanco, Rodrigo, “The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and Regulatory Coherence” in Voon, Tania (ed), Trade Liberalization and International Cooperation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Edward Elgar 2013).Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, “Governing the Internet” (2017) 110 American Journal of International Law 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reidenberg, Joel R. et al., “Trustworthy Privacy Indicators: Grades, Labels, Certifications, and Dashboards” (2019) 96 Washington University Law Review 1409.Google Scholar

Rothchild, John A., “Against Notice and Choice: The Manifest Failure of the Proceduralist Paradigm to Protect Privacy Online or Anywhere Else” (2018) 66 Cleveland State Law Review 559.Google Scholar

Rounseville, Isaac, “Drawing A Line: Legislative Proposals to Clarify the CDA, Reinforce Consumer Rights, and Establish a Uniform Policy for Online Marketplaces” (2020) 60(4) Jurimetrics 263.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Ira S., “The Future of Self-Regulation Is Co-Regulation” in Selinger, Evan et al. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Rustad, Michael L. and Koenig, Thomas H, “Creating a Public Health Disinformation Exception to CDA Section 230” (2021) 71 Syracuse Law Review 1255.Google Scholar

Sauvé, Pierre, Trade Rules Behind Borders: Essays on Services, Investment and the New Trade Agenda (Cameron May 2003).Google Scholar

Schill, Stephan and Briese, Robyn, “If the State Considers: The Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement,” in von Bogdandy, Armin et al. (eds), 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nationals Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009).Google Scholar

Segura, María Soledad and Waisbord, Silvio, “Between Data Capitalism and Data Citizenship,” (2019) 20(4) Television & New Media 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selbst, Andrew D and Powles, Julia, “Meaningful Information and the Right to Explanation” (2017) 7(4) International Data Privacy Law 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Semendyai, Vladimir J., “Due Process and the FTC’s Fair and Reasonable Approach to Data Protection” (2016) 84 George Washington Law Review 51.Google Scholar

Shackelford, Scott J. et al., “Bottoms Up: A Comparison of “Voluntary” Cybersecurity Frameworks” (2016) 16 U.C. Davis Business Law Journal 217.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory and Gao, Henry, “A New Chinese Economic Order?” (2020) 23(3) Journal of International Economic Law 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, “Governing the Interface of U.S. – China Trade Relations” (2022) 115(4) American Journal of International Law 650.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, “Reconceiving Trade Agreements for Social Inclusion” in Elsig, Manfred et al. (eds), The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, “Trade Law in a Data-Driven Economy: The Need for Modesty and Resilience” in Peng, Shin-yi at al. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stuart, “The Triumph of Regulatory Politics: Benefit–Cost Analysis and Political Salience” (2012) 6 Regulation & Governance 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sidak, Gregory and Spulber, Daniel, “Deregulation and Managed Competition in Network Industries” (1998) 15 Yale Journal on Regulation 117.Google Scholar

Skinner, Chris, Digital Human: The Fourth Revolution of Humanity Includes Everyone (UNKNO 2018).Google Scholar

Słok-Wódkowska, Magdalena and Mazur, Joanna, “Secrecy by Default: How Regional Trade Agreements Reshape Protection of Source Code” (2022) 25(1) Journal of International Economic Law 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomun, Sonja et al., “Platform Responsibility and Regulation in Canada: Considerations on Transparency, Legislative Clarity, and Design” (2021) 34 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 1.Google Scholar

Solove, Daniel J., “Privacy Self-Management and The Consent Dilemma” (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review 1879.Google Scholar

Southerton, Clare, “Datafication” in Schintler, Laurie A. and McNeely, Connie L. (eds), Encyclopedia of Big Data (Springer International 2022).Google Scholar

Streinz, Thomas, “International Economic Law’s Regulation of Data as a Resource for the Artificial Intelligence Economy” in Shin-yi Peng, et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Stucke, Maurice and Grunes, Allen, Big Data and Competition Policy (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Clare, “EU GDPR or APEC CBPR? A Comparative Analysis of the Approach of the EU and APEC to Cross Border Data Transfers and Protection of Personal Data in the IoT Era” (2019) 35(4) Computer Law & Security Review 380.Google Scholar

Suominen, Kati, “Implications of the European Union’s Digital Regulations on U.S. and EU Economic and Strategic Interests” Center for Strategic & International Studies (November 2022).Google Scholar

Sylvain, Olivier, “Platform Realism, Informational Inequality, and Section 230 Reform” (2021) 131 Yale Law Journal 475.Google Scholar

The U.S. White House, “Executive Order on Protecting Americans’ Sensitive Data from Foreign Adversaries” (June 09, 2021).Google Scholar

The U.S. White House, “National Security Strategy” (2022).Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., “Platforms and Global Governance: Globalization on Steroids” (2023) 26(1) Journal of International Economic Law 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trautman, Lawrence J., “Is Cyberattack the Next Pearl Harbor?” (2016) 18 North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 233.Google Scholar

Tuthill, Lee and Roy, Martin, “GATS Classification Issues for Information and Communication Technology Services” in Burri, Mia and Cottier, Thomas (eds), Trade Governance in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Tuthill, Lee, “The GATS and New Rules for Regulators” (1997) 21 Telecommunications Policy 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule” (2010).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, “Digital Trade and Data” First Report (June 23, 2021).Google Scholar

UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport, “Consultation Outcome- Audience Protection Standards on Video-on-Demand Services” (April 28, 2022).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, “Digital Economy Report” (2019).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, “Technology and Innovation Report” (2021).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, “The COVID-19 Crisis: Accentuating the Need to Bridge the Digital Divides” (2020).Google Scholar

United Nations, “World Investment Report 2016” (2016).Google Scholar

United Nations, “World Investment Report 2022” (2022).Google Scholar

United States President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), “Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective” (2014).Google Scholar

USTR, “National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers” (2023).Google Scholar

USTR, “Report to Congress on China’s WTO Compliance” (2021).Google Scholar

van Aaken, Anne, “Introduction to the Symposium on Digital Trade” (2023) 117 AJIL Unbound 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Damme, Isabelle, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viljoen, Salomé, “A Relational Theory of Data Governance” (2021) 131 Yale Law Journal 573.Google Scholar

Viljoen, Salomé, “An Argument for Positive Political Theories of Data Governance” (2022) 6 Georgetown Law Technology Review 464.Google Scholar

Voon, Tania, Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Waldman, Ari E., Privacy as Trust: Information Privacy for an Information Age (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Wang, Heng, “The Belt and Road Initiative Agreements: Characteristics, Rationale, and Challenges” (2021) 20 World Trade Review 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Rolf H. and Burri, Mira, Classification of Services in the Digital Economy (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Weber, Rolf H. and Evelyne, Studer, “Cybersecurity in the Internet of Things: Legal Aspects” (2016) 32 Computer Law & Security Review 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Rolf H., “Global Law in the Face of Datafication and Artificial Intelligence” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar

West, Sarah Myers, “Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy” (2019) 58(1) Business & Society 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Nigel, “Australia’s National Broadband Network: A Cybersecure Critical Infrastructure?” (2014) 30 Computer Law & Security 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Trade Forum, “How Industrial Data Can Help Unleash Productivity, Innovation and Sustainability” (May 13, 2022).Google Scholar

WTO Secretariat, Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (Kluwer Law International 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, “Background Note by the Secretariat, Advertising Services” S/C/W/47 (July 9, 1998).Google Scholar

WTO, “Declaration on The Conclusion of Negotiations on Services Domestic Regulation” WT/L/1129 (December 2, 2021).Google Scholar

WTO, “E-Commerce, Trade and the Covid-19 Pandemic Information Note” (2020).Google Scholar

WTO, “Guidelines for the Scheduling of Specific Commitments Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services” Council for Trade in Services, S/L/92 (March 28, 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, “Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation Reference Paper on Services Domestic Regulation” INF/SDR/2 (November 26, 2021).Google Scholar

WTO, “Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce” WT/L/1056 (January 25, 2019).Google Scholar

WTO, “Joint Statement on the Negotiations on Audiovisual Service” TN/S/W/49 (June 30, 2005).Google Scholar

WTO, “Minutes of the Meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods” G/C/M/139 (June 16, 2021).Google Scholar

WTO, “Multilateral Trade Negotiations the Uruguay Round Group of Negotiations on Services” MTN.GNS/23 (July 11, 1989).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, “Work Programme on Electronic Commerce” S/C/W/359 (December 17, 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, “WTO Negotiations on Trade-Related Aspects of E-Commerce” INF/ECOM/1 (March 25, 2019).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, “Understanding on the Scope of Coverage of CPC 84 – Computer and Related Services” TN/S/W/60, S/CSC/W/51 (January 26, 2007).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, “Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce” INF/ECOM/19 (April 24, 2019).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, “The E-Commerce Moratorium: Scope and Impact” WT/GC/W798 (March 10, 2020).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, “GATS 2000; Audio-visual Services, Council for Trade in Services” S/CSS/W/74 (May 4, 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, “Report of Panel Discussion on Digital Industrial Policy and Development” JOB/GC/133 (July 21, 2017).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, “China’s Transitional Review Mechanism” G/TBT/W/326 (October 29, 2009).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, “Elements for Complementary Approaches in Services” TN/S/W/55 (October 27, 2005).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, “Classification in the Telecom Sector under the WTO-GATS Framework” TN/S/W/27, S/CSC/W/44 (February 10, 2005).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, “An Enabling Environment to Facilitate Online Transactions” TN/S/W/64 (May 23, 2017).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, “Work Programme on Electronic Commerce: Ensuring that Trade Rules Support Innovative Advances in Computer Applications and Platforms” S/C/W/339 (September 20, 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, Electronic Commerce Negotiations – Consolidated Negotiating Text, INF/ECOM/62/Rev.1 (December 2020).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, Non-Paper for the Discussions on Electronic Commerce, “Work Programme on Electronic Commerce” JOB/GC/100 (July 25, 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, Non-Paper from Brazil, “Exploratory Work on Electronic Commerce” INF/ECOM/3 (March 25, 2019).Google Scholar

Wu, Mark, “Digital Trade-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Existing Models and Lessons for the Multilateral Trade System” (November 2017) RTA Exchange, ICTSD and IDB.Google Scholar

Wu, Tim & Yoo, Christopher S., “Keeping the Internet Neutral? Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate” (2007) 59 Federal Communications Law Journal 575.Google Scholar

Wu, Tim, “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination” (2002) 2 Journal of Telecomm. & High Technology Law 141.Google Scholar

Wu, Tim, “The World Trade Law of Censorship and Internet Filtering” 7(1) Chicago Journal of International Law (2006) 263.Google Scholar

Wurzel, Rüdiger et al., “Pioneers, Leaders and Followers in Multilevel and Polycentric Climate Governance” in Wurzel, Rüdiger et al. (eds), Pioneers, Leaders and Followers in Multilevel and Polycentric Climate Governance (Routledge 2020).Google Scholar

Yoo, Christopher S., “Beyond Network Neutrality” (2005) 19 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 1.Google Scholar

Yoo, Christopher S., “Wireless Network Neutrality: Technological Challenges and Policy Implications” (2016) 31 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1409.Google Scholar

Zuboff, Shoshana, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs 2019).Google Scholar