Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T17:01:35.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Admissibility: Contractual choice of forum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Zachary Douglas
Affiliation:
Jesus College, Cambridge
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lowe, V., ‘Overlapping Jurisdiction in International Tribunals’ (1999) 20 Australian YB of Int L 191, 198–9Google Scholar
Lipstein, K., ‘The Place of the Calvo Clause in International Law’ (1945) 22 British Year Book of International Law130Google Scholar
Lillich, R., ‘The Diplomatic Protection of Nationals Abroad: An Elementary Principle of International Law under Attack’ (1975) 69 American Journal of International Law359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W., ‘Of Missionaries, Fanatics, and Lawyers: Some Thoughts on Investment Disputes in the Americas’ (1978) 72 American Journal of International Law1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipstein, K., ‘The Place of the Calvo Clause in International Law’ (1945) 22 British Year Book of International Law 130, 131–4Google Scholar
Parra, A., ‘Provisions on the Settlement of Investment Disputes in Modern Investment Laws, Bilateral Investment Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment’ (1997) 12 ICSID Rev – Foreign Investment LJ 287Google Scholar
Wälde, T, ‘Investment Arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty’ (1996) Arbitration Int 429, 460–1Google Scholar
Hayes, E, ‘Forum Non Conveniens in England, Australia and Japan: The Allocation of Jurisdiction in Transnational Litigation’ (1992) 26 Univ of British Columbia LR41, 54–63Google Scholar
Verheul, J, ‘The Forum (Non) Conveniens in English and Dutch Law and under Some International Conventions’ (1986) 35 ICLQ 314, 416–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannemann, G, ‘Jurisdiction Based on the Presence of Assets in Germany: A Case Note’ (1992) 41 ICLQ632CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×