Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T22:47:33.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Historical Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2017

Get access

Summary

‘Its language had been left more broadly stated than some would have liked.’

James Grant, Former Executive Director of UNICEF

INTRODUCTION

On 20 November 1989 the United Nations (UN) General Assembly (GA) adopted Resolution A/RES/44/25, to which the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is annexed. Article 6(2) of this Convention is concerned with the right of the child to survival and development and reads as follows: ‘States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.’ This article speaks about two rights: the right of the child to survival and the right of the child to development.

This chapter analyses the drafting history of article 6(2). The discussion starts with an analysis of the relationship between the concept of development, including human development, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. This is important in order to put article 6(2) of the CRC in its original context as a right to development. The chapter then includes a descriptive analysis of the international instruments on the protection of the rights of the child in general and his or her right to development in particular prior to the adoption of the CRC. Following that, a detailed analysis of the drafting history of article 6(2) is included. Lastly, in an attempt to have a comprehensive historical analysis of article 6(2), the chapter discusses what can be called the ‘unoffi cial’ historical background of article 6(2), examining, in this regard, the role of United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) in the draft ing of the article and the possible reflection of the adoption of the 1986 Declaration on the Right to Development.

This historical analysis is crucial in relation to the comprehensive interpretation, classification and implementation of article 6(2). It is also very important to point out that this analysis is not approached philosophically. Moreover, it is not about debating the nature or the historical evolution of the concept of children's rights or the arguments concerned with whether to grant children any rights or not.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×