Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Aristotle. De interpretatione, trans. J. L. Ackrill, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.

Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, trans. Jonathan Barnes, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.

Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre. La Logique ou l'art de penser, ed. Clair, P. and Girbal, F. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1981). Trans. Jill Vance Buroker, Logic or the Art of Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica (Halle, 1739), repr. in Kant, AAxvii.Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. Dissertatio de usu et limitibus principii rationis determinantis, vulgo sufficientis (Leipzig, 1743).Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunftwahrheiten, wie sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzt werden (Metaphysik), 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1753).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Oeuvres, ed. Adam, Charles, Tannery, Paul, and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 11 vols. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1971–5).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 1985, 1991).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Principles of Philosophy, in Philosophical Writings of Descartes.

Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, in Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Hildesheim: Olms, 1964). Engl. trans. Begriffsschrift: a formula language for pure thought, modeled upon that of arithmetic, in Frege and Gödel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic, ed. Jean van Heijenhoort (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen, trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Faith and Knowledge, trans. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Gesammelte Werke, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. Akad., Rhein-Westfäl.Wiss, d.. (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1968–).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd edn, with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Jungius, Joachim. Logica Hamburgensis (Hamburg, 1638).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Mary Gregor (The Hague; Nijhoff, 1974).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes in Philosophy, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, ed. and trans. with introduction by White Beck, Lewis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965; originally published, London: Macmillan, 1929).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality, Being an Answer to the Question Proposed for Consideration by the Berlin Royal Academy of Sciences for the year 1763, in Theoretical Philosophy.

Kant Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic, in Lectures on Logic.

Kant Immanuel. Kants Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Preußischen, Königlichen (later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. (Berlin: 1902–83; 2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1968, for vols. i–ix).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Lectures on Logic, ed. and trans. J Michael Young (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Logik Blomberg, in Lectures on Logic.

Kant Immanuel. Logik Philippi, in Lectures on Logic.

Immanuel, Kant. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. Michael Friedman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. A New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Immanuel, Kant. On a Discovery whereby any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be made superflous by an older one, trans. H. Allison in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Kant Immanuel. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World (Inaugural Dissertation), in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Kant Immanuel. Philosophical Correspondence 1759–1799, ed. and trans. Zweig, Arnulf (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (with Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason), trans. and ed. Hatfield, Gary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, ed. and trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. Engl. trans. and ed. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan, New Essays on Human Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Nietzsche, FriedrichThe Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition, 1989).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, ArthurOn the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, trans. E. F. J. Payne (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2001).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. Über die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde (1813).

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and the philosophy of mind,” in Feigl, Herbert and Scriven, Michael (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, i (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956), pp. 253–329; repr. with an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study guide by Robert Brandom (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms, 1962–).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Philosophia Prima sive Ontologia (Frankfurt-am-Main and Leibzig, 1736), repr. in Gesammelte Werke.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Philosophia rationalis sive Logica, in Gesammelte Werke.

Allison, Henry. “Causality and causal laws in Kant: a critique of Michael Friedman,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.

Allison, Henry. Kant's Theory of Taste: a Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense, rev. enlarged edn (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry. “Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's Transcendental Deduction,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Lewis White (ed.). Essays on Kant and Hume (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. “Some pragmatic themes in Hegel's idealism”, in Brandom, Robert B., Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002), ch. 7.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76/B92–201 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991). Trans. Eric Watkins, The Table of Judgments: Critique of Pure Reason A67/76–B92–201, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, 4 (1995).Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd. Kant and the Dynamics of Reason: Essays on the Structure of Kant's Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. “Kant und die moderne Mathematik,” Kant-Studien, vol. 12 (1907), p. 35Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (Berlin, 1910, repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969). Trans. W. C. Swabey and M. C. Swabey, Substance and Function (New York: Dover, 1953).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann. Kants Begründung der Ethik (Berlin, 1877; 2nd edn 1910).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, 3rd edn (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1918).Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “ ‘L'Espace est représenté comme une grandeur infinie donnée’. La radicalité de l'Esthétique,” Philosophie, no. 56 (1997), pp. 3–48.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the will and the concept of a person,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68 (1971), pp. 5–20. Repr. in The Importance of What We Care About.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, Michael and Lorenz, Krüger. “Über die Zuordnung der Quantitäten des Urteils und der Kategorien der Größe bei Kant,” Kant-Studien, vol. 61 (1970), pp. 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Causal laws and the foundations of natural science,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.

Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Kant and the twentieth century,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.

Friedman, Michael. “Logical forms and the order of nature: comments on Béatrice Longuenesse's Kant and the Capacity to Judge”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 82 (2000), pp. 202–15.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer and Heidegger (Chicago and La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2000).Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Transcendental philosophy and a priori knowledge: a neo-Kantian perspective,” in Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic judging and the intentionality of pleasure,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understanding,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 25, no. 1 (1997), pp. 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the key to the critique of taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 72 (1991), pp. 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gram, Moltke S. (ed.). Kant: Disputed Questions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, Gilbert. “Internal critique: a logic is not a theory of reasoning and a theory of reasoning is not a logic,” Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, I (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, collected edn vol. iii (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991). Engl. trans. Richard Taft, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Phänomenologische Interpretation der Kritik der reinen Vernunft, collected edn vol. xxv (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977). Engl. trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly, Phenomenological Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E.Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Kaulbach, Friedrich and Joachim, Ritter (eds.). Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Preface to Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.

Lachièze-Rey, Pierre. L'Idéalisme kantien, 3rd edn (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1972).Google Scholar

Lebrun, Gérard. Kant et la fin de la métaphysique (Paris: Armand Colin, 1970).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Hegel, Lecteur de Kant sur le jugement,” Philosophie, no. 36 (1992), pp. 62–7.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the “Critique of Pure Reason,” trans. Charles T. Wolfe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l'Analytique transcendentale de la “Critique de la Raison Pure” (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: on Henry Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Point of view of man or knowledge of God: Kant and Hegel on concept, judgment and reason,” in Sedgwick, Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel.

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Review of Michelle Grier's Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, in Mind, vol. 112, no. 448 (2003), pp. 718–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Self-consciousness and consciousness of one's own body: variations on a Kantian theme,” forthcoming in Philosophical Topics.

Lovejoy, Arthur. “On Kant's reply to Hume,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 18 (1906) pp. 380–407. Reprinted in Gram, Kant: Disputed Questions.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. Mind and World, 2nd edn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. “Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism,” Philosophical Review, vol. III (2002), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia and Eileen, O'Neill (eds.). Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Parrini, Paulo (ed.). Kant and Contemporary Epistemology (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parsons, Charles. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.

Rawls, John. “Two concepts of rules,” Philosophyical Review, vol. 64 (1955), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, Klaus. Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel (Berlin: Schoetz, 1932; repr. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986). Trans. J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).

Schulthess, Peter. Relation und Funktion. Eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).Google Scholar

Sedgwick, Sally. “Longuenesse on Kant and the priority of the capacity to judge,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedgwick, Sally (ed.). Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans D.Gottlob Frege (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980).Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F.The Bounds of Sense: an Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar

Thompson, Manley. “Unity, plurality, and totality as Kantian categories,” The Monist, vol. 72 (1989), pp. 168–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio. “Die Voraussetzungen zur Kantischen Urteilstafel in der Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts,” in Kaulbach and Ritter, Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag.

Waxman, Wayne. Kant's Model of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. “Sufficient reason: a principle in diverse guises, both ancient and modern,” Acta Philosophia Fennica, vol. 61 (1996), pp. 117–32.Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges “Begriffsschrift” (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Allen. Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Aristotle. De interpretatione, trans. J. L. Ackrill, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.

Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, trans. Jonathan Barnes, in The Complete Works of Aristotle.

Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre. La Logique ou l'art de penser, ed. Clair, P. and Girbal, F. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1981). Trans. Jill Vance Buroker, Logic or the Art of Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica (Halle, 1739), repr. in Kant, AAxvii.Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. Dissertatio de usu et limitibus principii rationis determinantis, vulgo sufficientis (Leipzig, 1743).Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunftwahrheiten, wie sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzt werden (Metaphysik), 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1753).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Oeuvres, ed. Adam, Charles, Tannery, Paul, and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 11 vols. (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1971–5).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 1985, 1991).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Principles of Philosophy, in Philosophical Writings of Descartes.

Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, in Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Hildesheim: Olms, 1964). Engl. trans. Begriffsschrift: a formula language for pure thought, modeled upon that of arithmetic, in Frege and Gödel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic, ed. Jean van Heijenhoort (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen, trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Faith and Knowledge, trans. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Gesammelte Werke, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. Akad., Rhein-Westfäl.Wiss, d.. (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1968–).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd edn, with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Jungius, Joachim. Logica Hamburgensis (Hamburg, 1638).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Mary Gregor (The Hague; Nijhoff, 1974).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes in Philosophy, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, ed. and trans. with introduction by White Beck, Lewis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965; originally published, London: Macmillan, 1929).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality, Being an Answer to the Question Proposed for Consideration by the Berlin Royal Academy of Sciences for the year 1763, in Theoretical Philosophy.

Kant Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic, in Lectures on Logic.

Kant Immanuel. Kants Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Preußischen, Königlichen (later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. (Berlin: 1902–83; 2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1968, for vols. i–ix).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. Lectures on Logic, ed. and trans. J Michael Young (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Logik Blomberg, in Lectures on Logic.

Kant Immanuel. Logik Philippi, in Lectures on Logic.

Immanuel, Kant. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. Michael Friedman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Immanuel, Kant. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. A New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Immanuel, Kant. On a Discovery whereby any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be made superflous by an older one, trans. H. Allison in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Kant Immanuel. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World (Inaugural Dissertation), in Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770.

Kant Immanuel. Philosophical Correspondence 1759–1799, ed. and trans. Zweig, Arnulf (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (with Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason), trans. and ed. Hatfield, Gary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kant Immanuel Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, ed. and trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. Engl. trans. and ed. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan, New Essays on Human Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Nietzsche, FriedrichThe Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition, 1989).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, ArthurOn the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, trans. E. F. J. Payne (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2001).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. Über die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde (1813).

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and the philosophy of mind,” in Feigl, Herbert and Scriven, Michael (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, i (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956), pp. 253–329; repr. with an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study guide by Robert Brandom (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms, 1962–).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Philosophia Prima sive Ontologia (Frankfurt-am-Main and Leibzig, 1736), repr. in Gesammelte Werke.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Philosophia rationalis sive Logica, in Gesammelte Werke.

Allison, Henry. “Causality and causal laws in Kant: a critique of Michael Friedman,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.

Allison, Henry. Kant's Theory of Taste: a Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense, rev. enlarged edn (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry. “Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's Transcendental Deduction,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Lewis White (ed.). Essays on Kant and Hume (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. “Some pragmatic themes in Hegel's idealism”, in Brandom, Robert B., Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002), ch. 7.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76/B92–201 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991). Trans. Eric Watkins, The Table of Judgments: Critique of Pure Reason A67/76–B92–201, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, 4 (1995).Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd. Kant and the Dynamics of Reason: Essays on the Structure of Kant's Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. “Kant und die moderne Mathematik,” Kant-Studien, vol. 12 (1907), p. 35Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (Berlin, 1910, repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969). Trans. W. C. Swabey and M. C. Swabey, Substance and Function (New York: Dover, 1953).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann. Kants Begründung der Ethik (Berlin, 1877; 2nd edn 1910).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, 3rd edn (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1918).Google Scholar

Fichant, Michel. “ ‘L'Espace est représenté comme une grandeur infinie donnée’. La radicalité de l'Esthétique,” Philosophie, no. 56 (1997), pp. 3–48.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the will and the concept of a person,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68 (1971), pp. 5–20. Repr. in The Importance of What We Care About.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, Michael and Lorenz, Krüger. “Über die Zuordnung der Quantitäten des Urteils und der Kategorien der Größe bei Kant,” Kant-Studien, vol. 61 (1970), pp. 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Causal laws and the foundations of natural science,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.

Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Kant and the twentieth century,” in Parrini, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology.

Friedman, Michael. “Logical forms and the order of nature: comments on Béatrice Longuenesse's Kant and the Capacity to Judge”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 82 (2000), pp. 202–15.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer and Heidegger (Chicago and La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 2000).Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Transcendental philosophy and a priori knowledge: a neo-Kantian perspective,” in Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic judging and the intentionality of pleasure,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understanding,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 25, no. 1 (1997), pp. 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the key to the critique of taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 72 (1991), pp. 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gram, Moltke S. (ed.). Kant: Disputed Questions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, Gilbert. “Internal critique: a logic is not a theory of reasoning and a theory of reasoning is not a logic,” Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, I (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, collected edn vol. iii (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991). Engl. trans. Richard Taft, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Phänomenologische Interpretation der Kritik der reinen Vernunft, collected edn vol. xxv (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977). Engl. trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly, Phenomenological Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E.Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Kaulbach, Friedrich and Joachim, Ritter (eds.). Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Preface to Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.

Lachièze-Rey, Pierre. L'Idéalisme kantien, 3rd edn (Paris: Librairie philosophique Vrin, 1972).Google Scholar

Lebrun, Gérard. Kant et la fin de la métaphysique (Paris: Armand Colin, 1970).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Hegel, Lecteur de Kant sur le jugement,” Philosophie, no. 36 (1992), pp. 62–7.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the “Critique of Pure Reason,” trans. Charles T. Wolfe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l'Analytique transcendentale de la “Critique de la Raison Pure” (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: on Henry Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste,” Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2 (2003), pp. 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Point of view of man or knowledge of God: Kant and Hegel on concept, judgment and reason,” in Sedgwick, Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel.

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Review of Michelle Grier's Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, in Mind, vol. 112, no. 448 (2003), pp. 718–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Self-consciousness and consciousness of one's own body: variations on a Kantian theme,” forthcoming in Philosophical Topics.

Lovejoy, Arthur. “On Kant's reply to Hume,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 18 (1906) pp. 380–407. Reprinted in Gram, Kant: Disputed Questions.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. Mind and World, 2nd edn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. “Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism,” Philosophical Review, vol. III (2002), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar

Mercer, Christia and Eileen, O'Neill (eds.). Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Parrini, Paulo (ed.). Kant and Contemporary Epistemology (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parsons, Charles. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, The Cambridge Companion to Kant.

Rawls, John. “Two concepts of rules,” Philosophyical Review, vol. 64 (1955), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, Klaus. Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel (Berlin: Schoetz, 1932; repr. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986). Trans. J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).

Schulthess, Peter. Relation und Funktion. Eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).Google Scholar

Sedgwick, Sally. “Longuenesse on Kant and the priority of the capacity to judge,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no.1 (2000), pp. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedgwick, Sally (ed.). Kant and German Idealism: Fichte, Schelling, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans D.Gottlob Frege (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980).Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F.The Bounds of Sense: an Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar

Thompson, Manley. “Unity, plurality, and totality as Kantian categories,” The Monist, vol. 72 (1989), pp. 168–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio. “Die Voraussetzungen zur Kantischen Urteilstafel in der Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts,” in Kaulbach and Ritter, Kritik und Metaphysik. Heinz Heimsoeth zum achtzigsten Geburtstag.

Waxman, Wayne. Kant's Model of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. “Sufficient reason: a principle in diverse guises, both ancient and modern,” Acta Philosophia Fennica, vol. 61 (1996), pp. 117–32.Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges “Begriffsschrift” (Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Allen. Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar