Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:13:19.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Design and Application of DFB Laser Systems and Optical Fibre Networks for Near-IR Gas Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2021

George Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde
Get access

Summary

The applications of near-IR spectroscopy with DFB lasers and fibre optic networks are reviewed. Since near-IR absorption lines are relatively weak, techniques to enhance the sensitivity are reviewed, including the use of multi-pass cells, ring-down spectroscopy and the various forms of cavity-enhanced spectroscopy. Examples of non-enhanced gas cellsconsidered include micro-optic cells for integration with optical fibre networks, evanescent-wave cells on silicon chips, and open-path free space propagation for atmospheric monitoring based on collection of scattered light or from a retro-reflector. The design of fibre optic sensor networks is discussed in detail particularly the use of spatial-division multiplexing for multi-point detection of gases over large areas. Throughout the chapter, a number of application areas are considered with examples given of near-IR systems employed for the detection of gas leaks from pipelines and storage facilities, characterisation of combustion processes, tomographic imaging of carbon dioxide in aero-engine exhaust emissions, imaging of hydrocarbons within internal combustion engines and atmospheric sensing of water vapour and greenhouse gases.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goldenstein, C. S., Spearrin, R. M., Jeffries, J. B. and Hanson, R. K., Infrared laser-absorption sensing for combustion gases, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 60, 132176, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C. and Xu, L., Laser absorption spectroscopy for combustion diagnosis in reactive flows: a review, Appl. Spectr. Rev., 54, (1), 144, 2018.Google Scholar
Tittel, F. K., Lewicki, R., Lascola, R. and McWhorter, S., Emerging infrared laser absorption spectroscopic techniques for gas analysis, in Trace Analysis of Specialty and Electronic Gases, Geiger, W. M. and Raynor, M. W., Eds., Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ch. 4, 71109, 2013.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, J. and Tatam, R. P., Optical gas sensing: a review, Meas. Sci. Technol., 24, (1), 159, 2013.Google Scholar
Mosely, P. T., Solid State Gas Sensors, (Adam Hilger Series on Sensors), Tofield, B. C., Ed., Bristol, UK, CRC Press, 1987.Google Scholar
White, J. U., Long optical paths of large aperture, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 32, 285288, 1942.Google Scholar
Herriott, D. R., Kogelnik, H. and Kompfner, R., Off-axis paths in spherical mirror interferometers, Appl. Opt., 3, (4), 523526, 1964.Google Scholar
Herriott, D. R. and Schulte, H. J., Folded optical delay lines, Appl. Opt., 4, (8), 883889, 1965.Google Scholar
Altmann, J., Baumgart, R. and Weitkamp, C., Two-mirror multipass absorption cell, Appl. Opt., 20, (6), 995999, 1981.Google Scholar
McManus, J. B., Kebabian, P. L. and Zahniser, M. S., Astigmatic mirror multipass absorption cells for long-path-length spectroscopy, Appl. Opt., 34, (18), 33363348, 1995.Google Scholar
Aerodyne Research Inc. Astigmatic multipass absorption cells. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.aerodyne.com/products/astigmatic-multipass-absorption-cells (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Photonics Technologies Ltd. Herriott-type cell. 2018. [Online]. Available: www.photonicstechnologies.com/gas-cells/herriott-type-cell/cmp-30-st.html (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Wavelength References. Fiber-coupled reference cells. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.wavelengthreferences.com/product/gas-cells/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Stewart, G., Mencaglia, A., Philp, W. and Jin, W., Interferometric signals in fibre optic methane sensors with wavelength modulation of the DFB laser, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., 16, (1), 4353, 1998.Google Scholar
Busch, K. A. and Busch, M. A., Eds., Cavity-Ringdown Spectroscopy: An Ultratrace-Absorption Measurement Technique, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Romanini, D., Ventrillard, I., Méjean, G., Morville, J. and Kerstel, E., Introduction to cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy, in Cavity-Enhanced Spectroscopy and Sensing (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol. 179), Gagliardi, G. and Loock, H.-P., Eds., Berlin, Springer, 2014, ch. 1, 160.Google Scholar
Mazurenka, M., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Peverall, R. and Ritchie, G. A. D., Cavity ring-down and cavity enhanced spectroscopy using diode lasers, Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem., Sect. C, 101, 100142, 2005.Google Scholar
Van Zee, R. D., Hodges, J. T. and Looney, J. P., Pulsed, single-mode cavity ringdown spectroscopy, Appl. Opt., 38, (18), 39513960, 1999.Google Scholar
Liu, A.W., Kassi, S. and Campargue, A., High sensitivity CW-cavity ring down spectroscopy of CH4 in the 1.55μm transparency window, Chem. Phys. Lett., 447, 1620, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Y., Macko, P., Romanini, D., et al., High sensitivity CW-cavity ring down and Fourier transform absorption spectroscopies of 13CO2, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 226, 146160, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeln, R., von Helden, G., Berden, G. and Meijer, G., Phase shift cavity ring down spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 262, 105109, 1996.Google Scholar
Hecht, E. and Zajac, A., Optics, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 306309, 1974.Google Scholar
Drever, R. W. P., Hall, J. L., Kowalski, F. V., et al., Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator, Appl. Phys. B, 31, 97105, 1983.Google Scholar
Paul, J. B., Lapson, L. and Anderson, J. G., Ultrasensitive absorption spectroscopy with a high-finesse optical cavity and off-axis alignment, Appl. Opt., 40, (27), 49041020, 2001.Google Scholar
Engel, G. S., Drisdell, W. S., Keutsch, F. N., Moyer, E. J. and Anderson, J. G., Ultrasensitive near-infrared integrated cavity output spectroscopy technique for detection of CO at 1.57μm: new sensitivity limits for absorption measurements in passive optical cavities, Appl. Opt., 45, (36), 92219229, 2006.Google Scholar
Morville, J., Romanini, D., Kachanov, A. A. and Chenevier, M., Two schemes for trace detection using cavity ringdown spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. B, 78, 465476, 2004.Google Scholar
Morville, J., Kassi, S., Chenevier, M. and Romanini, D., Fast, low-noise, mode-by-mode, cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy by diode-laser self-locking, Appl. Phys. B, 80, 10271038, 2005.Google Scholar
Li, H. and Abraham, N. B., Analysis of the noise spectra of a laser diode with optical feedback from a high-finesse resonator, IEEE J. Quant. Electron., 25, (8), 17821793, 1989.Google Scholar
Uttam, D. and Culshaw, B., Precision time domain reflectometry in optical fiber systems using a frequency modulated continuous wave ranging technique, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., 3, (5), 971977, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morville, J., Romanini, D. and Kerstel, E., Cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy with optical feedback in Cavity-Enhanced Spectroscopy and Sensing (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol. 179), Gagliardi, G. and Loock, H.-P., Eds., Berlin, Springer, ch. 5, 163209, 2014.Google Scholar
Ap2e. Enhanced IR laser technology. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.ap2e.com/en/enhanced-ir-laser-technology/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Ye, J., Ma, L.-S. and Hall, J. L., Ultrasensitive detections in atomic and molecular physics: demonstration in molecular overtone spectroscopy, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 15, (1), 615, 1998.Google Scholar
Ma, L.-S., Ye, J., Dubé, P. and Hall, J. L., Ultrasensitive frequency modulation spectroscopy enhanced by a high-finesse cavity: theory and application to overtone transitions of C2H2 and C2HD, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 16, (12), 22552268, 1999.Google Scholar
Axner, O., Ehlers, P., Foltynowicz, A., Silander, I. and Wang, J., NICE-OHMS – frequency modulation cavity-enhanced spectroscopy – principles and performance in Cavity-Enhanced Spectroscopy and Sensing (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol. 179), Gagliardi, G. and Loock, H.-P., Eds., Berlin, Springer, ch. 6, 210251, 2014.Google Scholar
Siller, B. M. and McCall, B. J., Applications of NICE-OHMS to molecular spectroscopy in Cavity-Enhanced Spectroscopy and Sensing (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol. 179), Gagliardi, G. and Loock, H.-P., Eds., Berlin, Springer, ch. 7, 253270, 2014.Google Scholar
Bell, C. L., Hancock, G., Peverall, R., et al., Characterization of an external cavity diode laser based ring cavity NICE-OHMS system, Opt. Express, 17, (12), 98349839, 2009.Google Scholar
Foltynowicz, A., Schmidt, F. M., Ma, W. and Axner, O., Noise-immune cavity-enhanced optical heterodyne molecular spectroscopy: current status and future potential, Appl. Phys. B, 92, 313316, 2008.Google Scholar
Stewart, G., Muhammad, F. A. and Culshaw, B., Sensitivity improvement for evanescent wave gas sensors, Sens. Actuators B: Chem, 11, 521524, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. and Culshaw, B., Optical waveguide modelling and design for evanescent field chemical sensors, Opt. Quant. Electron., 26, 249259, 1994.Google Scholar
Jin, W., Stewart, G., Wilkinson, M., et al., Compensation for surface contamination in a D-fibre evanescent wave methane sensor, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., 13, (6), 11771183, 1995.Google Scholar
Jin, W., Stewart, G. and Culshaw, B., A liquid contamination detector for D-fibre sensors using white light interferometry, Meas. Sci. Technol., 6, 14711475, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G., Jin, W. and Culshaw, B., Prospects for fibre optic evanescent field gas sensors using absorption in the near-infrared, Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 38, 42–7, 1997.Google Scholar
Lavers, C. R., Itoh, K, Wu, S. C., et al., Planar optical waveguides for sensing applications, Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 69, 8595, 2000.Google Scholar
Phoenix Photonics. Side polished optical fibers. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.phoenixphotonics.com/website/technology/side-polished-fibers.html (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
McCulloch, S., Stewart, G., Guppy, R. M. and Norris, J. O. W., Characterisation of TiO2-SiO2 sol-gel films for optical chemical sensor applications, Int. J. Optoelectron., 9, (3), 235241, 1994.Google Scholar
Tombez, L., Zhang, E. J., Orcutt, J. S., Kamlapurkar, S. and Green, W. M. J., Methane absorption spectroscopy on a silicon photonic chip, Optica, 4, (11), 13221325, 2017.Google Scholar
Green, W. M. J., Zhang, E. J., Xiong, C., et al., Silicon photonic gas sensing. ICAn Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2019, San Diego, CA, USA, OSA Technical Digest 2019, paper M2J.5.Google Scholar
Russell, P. St. J., Photonic-crystal fibers, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., 24, (12), 47294749, 2006.Google Scholar
Knight, J., Hand, D. and Yu, F., Hollow-core optical fibers offer advantages at any wavelength, Photonics Spectra, 53, (4), 5357, 2019.Google Scholar
Ritari, T., Tuominen, J., Ludvigsen, H., et al., Gas sensing using air-guiding photonic bandgap fibers, Opt. Express, 12, 40804087, 2004.Google Scholar
Hoo, Y. L., Liu, S., Ho, H. L. and Jin, W., Fast response microstructured optical fiber methane sensor with multiple side-openings, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 22, (5), 296298, 2010.Google Scholar
Jin, W., Ho, H. L., Cao, Y. C., Ju, J. and Qi, L.F., Gas detection with micro- and nano-engineered optical fibers, Opt. Fiber Technol., 19, 741759, 2013.Google Scholar
Yang, F., Jin, W., Cao, Y., Ho, H. L. and Wang, Y., Towards high sensitivity gas detection with hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers, Opt. Express, 22, (20), 2014.Google Scholar
Stewart, G., Tandy, C., Moodie, D., Morante, M. A. and Dong, F., Design of a fibre optic multi-point sensor for gas detection, Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 51, (1–3), 227232, 1998.Google Scholar
Culshaw, B., Stewart, G., Dong, F., Tandy, C. and Moodie, D., Fibre optic techniques for remote spectroscopic methane detection: from concept to system realisation, Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 51, 1–3, 2537, 1998.Google Scholar
OptoSci Ltd. Innovative fibre optic gas detection systems. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.optosniff.com/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Shemshad, J., Design of a fibre optic sequential multipoint sensor for methane detection using a single tunable diode laser near 1666nm, Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 186, 466477, 2013.Google Scholar
Ho, H. L., Jin, W. and Demokan, M. S., Sensitive, multipoint gas detection using TDM and wavelength modulation spectroscopy, Electron. Lett., 36, (14), 11911193, 2000.Google Scholar
Hymans, A. J. and Lait, J., Analysis of a frequency-modulated continuous-wave ranging system, Proc. IEEE, 107, 365372, 1960.Google Scholar
Zheng, J., Analysis of optical frequency-modulated continuous-wave interference, Appl. Opt., 43, (21), 41894198, 2004.Google Scholar
Završnik, M. and Stewart, G., Coherent addressing of quasi-distributed absorption sensors by the FMCW method, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., 18, (1), 5765, 2000.Google Scholar
Završnik, M. and Stewart, G., Theoretical analysis of a quasi-distributed optical sensor system using FMCW for application to trace gas measurement, Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 71, 3135, 2000.Google Scholar
Završnik, M. and Stewart, G., Analysis of quasi-distributed optical sensors combining rf modulation with the FMCW method, Opt. Eng., 39, (11), 30533059, 2000.Google Scholar
Ho, H. L., Jin, W., Yu, H. B., et al., Experimental demonstration of a fiber-optic gas sensor network addressed by FMCW, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 12, (11), 15461548, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, H. B., Jin, W., Ho, H. L., et al., Multiplexing of optical fiber gas sensors with a frequency-modulated continuous-wave technique, Appl. Opt., 40, (7), 10111020, 2001Google Scholar
SPIE Optics.org. Laser methane sensor installed at Californian gas storage facility. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://optics.org/news/7/12/17 (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Environmental Defense Fund. Acutect: continuous open path methane monitors. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://business.edf.org/acutect-continuous-open-path-methane-monitors (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Physical Sciences Inc. Laser based sensors. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.psicorp.com/products/laser-based-sensors (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Heath Consultants Inc. Remote methane leak detector, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://heathus.com/products/remote-methane-leak-detector-rmld/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Frish, M. B., PSI – Emerging mobile and airborne TDLAS methods for detecting, locating and quantifying methane leakage, in International Conference on Field Laser Applications in Industry and Research, (FLAIR 2016), Aix-les-Bains, France, 20, 2016.Google Scholar
Gibson, G. M., Sun, B., Edgar, M. P., et al., Real-time imaging of methane gas leaks using a single-pixel camera, Opt. Express, 25, (4) 29983005, 2017.Google Scholar
Physical Sciences Inc. Tunable diode laser gas sensors. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.psicorp.com/products/laser-based-sensors/tunable-diode-laser-tdl-gas-sensors (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Zolo Technologies. Combustion optimization. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.johnzinkhamworthy.com/products-applications/zolo-technologies/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Cai, W. and Kaminski, C. F., Tomographic absorption spectroscopy for the study of gas dynamics and reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 59, 131, 2016.Google Scholar
Benoy, T., Wilson, D., Lengden, M., et al., Measurement of CO2 concentration and temperature in an aero engine exhaust plume using wavelength modulation spectroscopy, IEEE Sens. J., 17, (19), 64096417, 2017.Google Scholar
Lengden, M., Wilson, D., Armstrong, I., et al., Fibre laser imaging of gas turbine exhaust species – a review of CO2 aero engine imaging in OSA Advanced Photonics Congress, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 27 June–1 July, 2015, paper JM 3A.37.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., Humphries, G. S., Benoy, T., et al., Working towards cleaner air travel: the technology behind the FLITES project, in International Conference on Field Laser Applications in Industry and Research, (FLAIR 2016), Aix-les-Bains, France, 12–16 Sept., 2016, 124.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., Nilsson, J., Jain, S., et al., LD-seeded thulium-doped fibre amplifier for CO2 measurements at 2µm in 6th EPS QEOD Europhoton Conference (Europhoton 2014), Neuchatel, Switzerland, 24–29 August 2014, Poster TuP-T1-P-12.Google Scholar
Liu, C., Cao, Z., Lin, Y., Xu, L. and McCann, H., Online cross-sectional monitoring of a swirling flame using TDLAS tomography, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 67, (6), 13381348, 2018.Google Scholar
Qu, Q., Cao, Z., Xu, L., et al., Reconstruction of two-dimensional velocity distribution in scramjet by laser absorption spectroscopy tomography, Appl. Opt., 58, (1), 201212, 2019.Google Scholar
Tsekenis, S.-A., Ramaswamy, K. G., Tait, N., et al., Chemical species tomographic imaging of the vapour fuel distribution in a compression-ignition engine, Int. J. Engine Res., 19, (7), 718731, 2018.Google Scholar
Werle, P., Laser Optical Sensors for In-Situ Gas Analysis, Recent Research Developments in Optical Engineering, vol. 2, Research Signpost, 1–20, 1999.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. M., Adkins, E. M. and Miller, J. H., An open-path tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer for detection of carbon dioxide at the Bonanza Creek Long‑Term Ecological Research Site near Fairbanks, Alaska, Appl. Phys. B., 123, (245), 2017.Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S. B., Tyner, D. R. and Johnson, M. R., Remote ambient methane monitoring using fiber‑optically coupled optical sensors, Appl. Phys. B., 119, 133142, 2015.Google Scholar
Ford, B. L., Atmospheric sensing: TDLAS atmospheric water vapor sensing improves weather forecasting, Laser Focus World, 54, (8), 2018.Google Scholar
Ford, B. L.. TDLAS atmospheric water vapor sensing improves weather forecasting. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/spectroscopy/article/16555201/photonics-applied-atmospheric-sensing-tdlas-atmospheric-water-vapor-sensing-improves-weather-forecasting (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
SpectraSensors Inc. WVSS-II: Atmospheric water vapor sensing system. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.spectrasensors.com/wvss/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Knestel Technologie & Elektronik GmbH. Gasanalytics. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.knestel.de/en/technology-fields/gasanalytics.html (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Axetris, A. G. Laser gas detection. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.axetris.com/en/lgd/products (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Los Gatos Research Inc. Trace gas analysers. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.lgrinc.com/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Nanosystems & Technologies GmbH. DFB lasers & applications. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nanoplus.com/ (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Hamamatsu Photonics K. K. Infrared detectors. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/optical-sensors/infrared-detector/index.html (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Thorlabs Inc. Detectors. 2019. [Online]. Available: www.thorlabs.com/navigation.cfm?guide_id=36 (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Gowar, J., The receiver amplifier in Optical Communication Systems, London, England, Prentice Hall, ch. 14, 411424, 1984.Google Scholar
Agrawal, G. P., Optical receivers, in Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, 3rd edn., New York, USA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ch. 4, 133182, 2002.Google Scholar
Zurich Instruments. Principles of lock-in detection. [Online]. Available: www.zhinst.com/applications/principles-of-lock-in-detection (accessed April 2020)Google Scholar
Werle, P., Miicke, R. and Slemr, F., The limits of signal averaging in atmospheric trace-gas monitoring by tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), Appl. Phys. B, 57, 131139, 1993.Google Scholar
Werle, P. W., Mazzinghi, P., D’Amato, F., et al. Signal processing and calibration procedures for in situ diode laser absorption spectroscopy, Spectrochim. Acta A, 60, 16851705, 2004.Google Scholar
Werle, P., Accuracy and precision of laser spectrometers for trace gas sensing in the presence of optical fringes and atmospheric turbulence, Appl. Phys. B, 102, 313329, 2011.Google Scholar
Allan, D. W., Statistics of atomic frequency standards, Proc. IEEE, 54, (2), 221230, 1966.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×