Abel, R. L. and Lewis, P. S. C. (eds.), Lawyers in Society: An Overview (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)

Abel, R. L. and Lewis, P. S. C.Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988)Google Scholar

ACRI (Association for Civil Rights in Israel), “Negev Bedouins and Unrecognized Villages” (2010)

ACRI (Association for Civil Rights in Israel) Report, Negev Bedouin: Info Sheet (February 5, 2009)

Alon, G. “Ex Chief Justices Support the Seniority Rule,”Ha’aretz, December 21, 1999Google Scholar

Alon, G. “The Government Rejects the Criticism Made by Religious MKs on Justice Barak,” Ha’aretz December 12, 1994Google Scholar

Alon, G. and Verter, Y. “The Attorney General Bar-On Resigned,” Ha’aretz, January 13, 1997Google Scholar

Amit-Kohn, U., Jarach, R., Glick, C. B. and Biton, N.Israel, The ‘Intifada’ and the Rule of Law (Israeli Ministry of Defense Publications, 1993)Google Scholar

Arian, A. et al. “Auditing Israeli Democracy: Democratic Values in Practice,” (The Israel Democracy Institute, 2010)

Atkins, B. M. “Alternative Model of Appeal Mobilization in Judicial Hierarchies,” 37 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 780 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babcock, B. A. “Defending the Guilty,” 32 Clev. St. L. Rev. 175 (1983)Google Scholar

Baker, N. V.Conflicting Loyalties: Law and Politics in the Attorney General’s Office 1789–1990 (University Press of Kansas, 1992)Google Scholar

Baker, N. V. “The Attorney General as a Legal Policy-Maker: Conflicting Loyalties,” in Clayton, C. W. (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar

Baldwin, R. and McCrudden, C.Regulation and Public Law (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987)Google Scholar

Barak-Erez, D. “From an Unwritten to a Written Constitution: The Israeli Challenge in American Perspective,” 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 309 (1995)Google Scholar

Barak-Erez, D.Outlawed Pigs: Law, Religion, and Culture in Israel (University of Wisconsin Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Barzilai, G. “Between the Rule of Law and the Laws of the Ruler: The Supreme Court in Israeli Legal Culture,” 49 (152) Int’l Soc. Sci. J. 193 (1997)Google Scholar

Barzilai, G. “Fantasies of Liberalism and Liberal Jurisprudence: State Law and Israeli Arab-Palestinian Community,” 34 Isr. L. Rev. 425 (2000)Google Scholar

Barzilai, G., Yuchtman-Ya’ar, E. and Segal, Z. —“Supreme Courts and Public Opinion: General Paradigms and the Israeli Case,” 4(3) Law & Courts 3 (1994)Google Scholar

Barzilai, G., Yuchtman-Ya’ar, E. and Segal, Z.The Israeli Supreme Court and the Israeli Public (Tel Aviv: Papyrus, 1993)Google Scholar

Bash, T. and Eran, S.Bureaucratic Harassment; Abuse and Maltreatment during Operational Activities in the West Bank in the First Year of the Declaration of Principles (B’Tselem information sheet, September 1994)Google Scholar

Bassok, O. “Television Coverage of the Israeli Supreme Court 1968–1992: The Persistence of the Mythical Image,” 42 Isr. L. Rev. 306 (2009)Google Scholar

Baum, L.The Supreme Court, 6th edn. (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Ben-David, Y. “The Bedouin in Israel,” Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (July 1999)

Benvenisti, E.The International Law of Occupation, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berenson, S. K. “Public Lawyers, Private Values: Can, Should, and Will Government Lawyers Serve the Public Interest?,” 41 B.C.L. Rev. 789 (2000)Google Scholar

Berenson, S. K. “The Duty Defined: Specific Obligations that Follow from Civil Government Lawyers’ General Duty to Serve the Public Interest,” 42 Brandeis L.J. 13 (2003)Google Scholar

Bisharat, G. E. “Courting Justice? Legitimation in Lawyering under Israeli Occupation,” 20 Law & Soc. Inquiry 349 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, R. C. and Owens, R. JThe Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumberg, A. S. “The Practice of Law as Confidence Game,” in Aubert, V. (ed.), Sociology of Law (1969)

Bogoch, B. and Holtzman-Gazit, Y. “Mutual Bonds: Media Frames and the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 33 Law & Soc. Inquiry 53 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boon, A. and Levin, J.The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales (Oxford: Hart, 2008)Google Scholar

Bracha, B. “The Protection of Human Rights in Israel,” 12 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 110 (1982)Google Scholar

B’Tselem, , “10 Years to the Second Intifada” (press release, September 27, 2010)

Canon, B. C. “Defining the Dimensions of Judicial Activism,” 66 Judicature 236 (1983)Google Scholar

Caplan, L.The Tenth Justice: The Solicitor General and the Rule of Law (New York: Knopf, 1987)Google Scholar

Chayes, A. “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation,” 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1281 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, K. “Government Lawyers and Confidentiality Norms,” 85 Wash. U.L. Rev 1033 (2007)Google Scholar

Clayton, C. W. (ed.) Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Policies (University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar

Clayton, C. W.The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Legal Policy (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1992)Google Scholar

Cohen, S. et al. Impossible Coexistence: Human Rights in Hebron since the Massacre at the Cave of the Patriarchs (B’Tselem information sheet, September 1995)Google Scholar

Cross, F. B. and Lindquist, S. A. “The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism,” 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1752 (2007)Google Scholar

Dailey, W. R. “Who is the Attorney General’s Client? ” 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1113 (2012)Google Scholar

Davis, M. and Elliston, F. A. (eds.) Ethics and the Legal Profession (New York: Prometheus Books, 1986)

De Smith, S. A., Woolf, H., Jowell, J. L. and Le Sueur, A. P.Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 5th edn., vol. I (London:Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)Google Scholar

Devins, N. (ed.), “Government Lawyering,” 61(1–2)Law & Contemp. Probs. 1 (1998)Google Scholar

Devins, N. “Unitariness and Independence: Solicitor General Control over Independent Agency Litigation,” 82 Cal. L. Rev. 255 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diver, C. S. “The Judge as Political Powerbroker: Superintending Structural Change in Public Institutions,” 65 Va. L. Rev. 43 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doron, I. et al. “A decade to ‘Amicus Curiae’: Empirical Analysis of Court Decisions,” 34 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 667 (2011) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Cause Lawyers Crossing the Lines: Patterns of Fragmentation and Cooperation between State and Civil Rights Lawyers in Israel,” 5 Int’l J. Legal Prof. 193 (1998)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Constitution to Israel? The Constitutional Dialog After the ‘Constitutional Revolution’,” 28 Mishpatim [Law] 149 (1997)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Does Israel Need A Constitutional Court,” 5 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 117 (1999)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Do the ‘Haves’ Still Come Out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 33 Law & Soc’y Rev. 1059 (1999)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Government Lawyers as Adjudicators: Pre-petitions in the High Court of Justice Department 1990–1997,” 35 Isr. Law Rev. 453 (2003)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Judicial Activism and Government Practices in Litigation in the Israeli High Court of Justice 1970–2000,” Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco June 2–5, 2011

Dotan, Y. “Judicial Review and Political Accountability: The Case of the High Court of Justice in Israel”, 32 Isr. L. Rev. 448 (1998)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers and Human Rights: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada,” 33 Law & Soc’y Rev. 319 (1999)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Non-Delegation and the Reformulation of Legality,” 42 Mishpatim [Law] 397 (2012) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “‘Pre-petitions’ and Constitutional Dilemmas Regarding the Role of Government Lawyers,” 7 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 159 (2004) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Public Lawyers and Private Clients: An Empirical Observation on the Relative Success Rates of Cause Lawyers,” 21 Law & Pol’y 401 (1999)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Ripeness and Politics in the High Court of Justice,” 20 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 93 (1996) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. “Should Prosecutorial Discretion Enjoy Special Treatment in Judicial Review? A Comparative Analysis of the Law in England and Israel,” Pub. L. 513 (1997)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. and Hofnung, M. “Interest Groups in the Israeli High Court of Justice: Measuring Success in Litigation and in Out-of-Court Settlements,” 23 Law & Pol’y 1 (2001)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y. and Hofnung, M. “Legal Defeats – Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court?,” 38 Comp. Pol. Stud. 75 (2005)Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. “Do Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Judicial Activism?,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1401 (2002)Google Scholar

Edelman, M.Courts, Politics and Culture in Israel (University of Virginia Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Edelman, M. “Israel,” in Neal, C. and Vallinder, T. (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New YorkUniversity Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Edelman, M. “The Judicial Elite of Israel,” 13 Int’l Pol. Sci. Rev. 235 (1992)Google Scholar

Edwards, J. Ll. J. The Attorney General and the Public Interest (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1984)Google Scholar

Einstein, J.Counsel for the United States: U.S. Attorney General in the Political and Legal System (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Eisenberg, T., Fisher, T. and Rosen-Zvi, I. “Israel’s Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: An Empirical Study,” 96 Cornell L. Rev. 693 (2011)Google Scholar

Epp, C. R.The Rights Revolution (University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Epstein, L. and Kobylka, J. F.The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Etinger, Y. “More than 100,000 ultra-orthodox took part in protest against the rule of law,” Ha’Aretz June 18, 2010Google Scholar

Feeley, M. M. and Rubin, E. L.Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Fiss, O. M. “Foreword: The Forms of Justice,” 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1979)Google Scholar

Fletcher, W. A. “The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy,” 91 Yale L.J. 635 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankel, M. E. “The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View,” 123 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1031 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, M. H. Lawyers’ Ethics in an Adversary System (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1975)

Fried, C. “The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation,” 85 Yale L.J. 1060 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, L. L. The Adversary System in Forum Lectures, Series 3, 1 (Washington, D.C.: Voice of America, 1961)Google Scholar

Fuller, L. and Randall, J. D. “Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference,” 44 Am. Bar Ass’n. J. 1159 (1958)Google Scholar

Galanter, M. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Soc’y Rev. 95 (1974)Google Scholar

Galligan, D. J.Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Gambitta, R. A. L., May, M. L. and Foster, J. C. (eds.), Governing Through Courts (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981)Google Scholar

Gavison, R.Administrative Discretion in Law Enforcement (Jerusalem, 1991)Google Scholar

Gavison, R. “Jewish and Democratic? A Rejoinder to the ‘Ethnic Democracy’ Debate,” 4 Isr. Stud. 44 (1999)Google Scholar

Gavison, R. “The Attorney General: A Critical Examination of New Trends,” 5 Plilim [Israel Journal of Criminal Justice] 27 (1996) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M. and Dotan, Y.Judicial Activism at the High Court of Justice (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000)Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T.Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glikman, A. “The Attorney General Freezes the Appointment of the Chief Commissioner,” Ynet, November 18, 2010Google Scholar

Gordon, R. “The Ideal and the Actual in the Law: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1870–1910,” in Gawalt, G. W. (ed.), The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America (1984)

Graglia, L. A.Disaster by Decree: The Supreme Court Decisions on Race and the Schools (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Green, B. A. “Must Government Lawyers ‘Seek Justice’ in Civil Litigation?” 9 Widener J. Pub. L. 235 (2000)Google Scholar

Grosman, G. “Ulmert Calls for Investigation of the OAG for Obstruction of Justice,” Walla News June 23, 2011Google Scholar

Gutman, Y.A Storm in the G.S.S: The Attorney General Versus the Government (Tel-Aviv, 1995)Google Scholar

Gutman, Y.The Attorney General Versus The Government (Jerusalem: Edanim, 1981)Google Scholar

Handler, J. F.Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, J. R. III “Note, Loyalty in Government Litigation: Department of Justice Representation of Agency Clients,” 37 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1569 (1996)Google Scholar

Haynie, S. L. “Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court,” 56 J. Pol. 752 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haynie, S. L. and Devore, J. “Judging in an Unjust Regime: South Africa’s Appellate Division, 1950–1990,” 17 Am. Rev. Pol. 245 (1996)Google Scholar

Hazut, R. “The Night on which the Supreme Court was Almost Conquered,” Yediot Acharonot, May 14, 1997Google Scholar

Herz, M. and Devins, N. “The Consequences of DOJ Control of Litigation on Agencies’ Programs,” 52 Admin. L. Rev. 1345 (2000)Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. “The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions,” 25 Law & Soc. Inquiry 91 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschl, R.Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Hofnung, M. and Weinshall-Margel, K. “Judicial Setbacks, Material Gains: Terror Litigation at the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 7 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 664 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, D. L.The Courts and Social Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Horowitz, D. L.The Jurocracy: Government Lawyers, Agency Programs and Judicial Decisions (Washington, D.C.: Lexington Books, 1977)Google Scholar

Ilan, S. “An Effort to Prevent Violence in the Ultra-orthodox and Secular Demonstrations in Jerusalem Today,” Ha’Aretz February 14, 1999Google Scholar

Ilan, S. “Inflation of Bills: From Four to Average of 40 Bills for Each MK,” Ha’aretz October 30, 2000Google Scholar

Ilan, S. “Rabbi David Yosef: ‘Antisemistic forces in the legal bureaucracy calls the Shas people parasites’,” Ha’aretz February 2, 1999Google Scholar

Ilan, S. “Rabbi Ovadia Yosef: ‘The HCJ Justices Are Worse than Non-Jewish Courts and Should not Be Regarded as Judges of Israel’,” Ha’aretz, October 8, 1996Google Scholar

Ilan, S. “Shas: Deri’s Conviction is the Conviction of Shas,” Ha’aretz March 18, 1999Google Scholar

Ilan, S., Alon, G. and Verter, Y. “An Extreme Ultra-orthodox Attack on the HCJ: ‘Barak is the Enemy of the Jewish People’,” Ha’Aretz February 10, 1999Google Scholar

Ilan, S., Alon, G., Moalem, M. and Krao, N. “Rabbi Yosef: The HCJ Justices are Villains and are the Cause of All the Suffering in the World,” Ha’Aretz February 11, 1999Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, G. J.Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and the United States (Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Kagan, R. A. “Adversarial Legalism and American Government,” 10 J. Pol’y Analysis & Mgmt. 369 (1991)Google Scholar

Kagan, R. A.Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Karp, J. “Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty: A Biography of Power Struggles,” 1 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 323 (1993) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Kedar, A. “The Legal Transformation of Ethnic Geography: Israeli Law and the Palestinian Landholder 1948–1967,” 33 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 923 (2001)Google Scholar

Kelly, J. B. “Bureaucratic Activism and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Department of Justice and Its Entry into the Centre of Government,” 42 Can. Pub. Admin. 476 (1999)Google Scholar

Kelly, J. B. “Canada: Legal Services and the Role of Government Lawyers” (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Budapest, July 4–7, 2001)

Krebs, S. “Lifting the Veil of Secrecy: Judicial Review of Administrative Detention in the Israeli Supreme Court,” 45 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 639, 689 (2012)Google Scholar

Kmiec, K. D. “The Origin and Current Meaning of ‘Judicial Activism’,” 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1441 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kremnitzer, M. “The HCJ and Its Wide Concept of Its Role,” in Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M., and Dotan, Y.Judicial Activism at the High Court of Justice (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000)

Kretzmer, D. “Judicial Review of Knesset Decisions,” 8 Tel Aviv U. Stud. L. 95 (1988)Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D. “The New Basic Laws on Human Rights: A Mini-revolution in Israeli Constitutional Law?,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)

Kritzer, H. M. “The Government Gorilla: Why Does Government Come Out Ahead in Appellate Courts?,” in Kritzer, H. M. and Silbey, S. (eds.), In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? (Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Kronman, A. T.The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Lahav, P.Judgment in Jerusalem: Chief Justice Simon Agranat and the Zionist Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Lanctot, C. J. “The Duty of Zealous Advocacy and the Ethics of the Federal Government Lawyer: The Three Hardest Questions,” 64 S. Cal. L. Rev. 951 (1991)Google Scholar

Langevoort, D. C. and Rasmussen, R. K. “Skewing the Results: The Role of Lawyers in Transmitting Legal Rules,” 5 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 375 (1997)Google Scholar

Lawry, R. P. “Who is the Client of the Federal Government Lawyer? An Analysis of the Wrong Question,” 37 Fed. B.J. 61 (1978)Google Scholar

Lemos, M. H. “The Solicitor General as Mediator between Court and Agency,” 185 Mich. St. L. Rev. 2009Google Scholar

Levine, D. I. “The Modification of Equitable Decrees in Institutional Reform Litigation: A Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Adoption of the Second Circuit’s Flexible Test,” 58 Brook. L. Rev. 1239 (1993)Google Scholar

Levit, N. “Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform,” 49 B. C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)Google Scholar

Levontin, E. “Representation of the State in Court” (PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2009)

Levontin, E. and Gavison, R. “The ‘Binding’ Position of the Attorney General,” in Barak, A. (ed.), Shamgar Book, vol. I (2003)

Lewinbuk, K. P. “Let’s Sue All the Lawyers: The Rise of Claims Against Lawyers for Aiding and Abetting a Client’s Breach of Fiduciary Duty,” 40 Ariz. St. L.J. 135 (2008)Google Scholar

Likhovski, A. “The Invention of ‘Hebrew Law’ in Mandatory Palestine,” 46 Am. J. Comp. L. 339 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linowitz, S. M. and Mayer, M.The Betrayed Profession: Lawyering at the End of the Twentieth Century (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Luban, D. “The Adversary System Excuse,” in Luban, D. (ed.) The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, 1983)Google Scholar

Macey, J. R. and Miller, G. P. “Reflections on Professional Responsibility in a Regulatory State,” 63 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1105 (1995)Google Scholar

Magen, H. “Aharon Barak: We Shall Fight Like Lions against the Individual Survey on Judges,” Globs December 12, 2001

Magen, H. “Changes in the New Proposal to Implement the Or Commission Report,” Globs November 22, 1998Google Scholar

Magen, H. “The Bar Rejects the Central Part of Or Commission Report,” Globs September 9, 1997Google Scholar

Margalit, D. “Rabin and Peres of the HCJ,” Ha’aretz December 9, 1994Google Scholar

Markus, Y. “The Malice, Not the Stupidity,” Ha’aretz January 14, 1997Google Scholar

Marshall, W. P. “Conservatives and the Seven Sins of Judicial Activism,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1217 (2002)Google Scholar

Mate, M. “Public Interest Litigation & The Transformation of the Supreme Court of India,” in Kapsizewski, D., Silverstein, G. and Kagan, R. A. (eds.), Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Mautner, M.Law and Culture in Israel at the Threshold of the Twenty First Century (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 2008)Google Scholar

Mautner, M.The Decline of Formalism and the Rise of Values in Israeli Law (Tel Aviv: Ma’agalei Deot, 1993)Google Scholar

McCann, M. W.Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar

McCann, M. and Silverstein, H. “Rethinking Law’s ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States,” in Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A. (eds.), Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

McCormick, P. “Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada 1949–1992,” 26 Can. J. Pol. Sci. 523 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meir, A.As Nomadism Ends: The Israeli Bedouin of the Negev (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Mellinkoff, D.The Conscience of a Lawyer (St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1973)Google Scholar

Mendel, O. “On the Job of the Lawyer at the High Court of Justice Department,” 2 Ma’asei Mishpat [The Practice of Law] 53 (2009) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Miller, G. P. “Government Lawyers’ Ethics in a System of Checks and Balances,” 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1293 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishkin, P. J. “Federal Courts as State Reformers,” 35 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 949 (1978)Google Scholar

Mizrachi, S. “Dani Dankner to Face Indictment for Bribery and Fraud,” The Marker September 5, 2011Google Scholar

Moalem, M. “A Wave of Intimidation against OAG Staff after the Ultra-orthodox Demonstration against the HCJ,” Ha’aretz February 17, 1999Google Scholar

Nagel, R. F. “Separation of Powers and the Scope of Federal Equitable Remedies,” 30 Stan. L. Rev. 661 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Note, “Developments in the Law: Conflicts of Interest in the Legal Profession,” 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1244 (1981)

Note, “Government Counsel and their Obligations,” 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1409 (2008)

Note, “Rethinking the Professional Responsibilities of Federal Agency Lawyers,” 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1170 (2002)

Ogletree, C. J., Jr. and Sapir, Y. “Keeping Gideon’s Promise: A Comparison of the American and Israeli Public Defender Experience,” 29 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 203 (2004)Google Scholar

Orgad, L. and Lavi, S. “Judicial Guidance: Comments for Legislative Amendment in Supreme Court Decisions,” 34 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 473 (2011) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Pacelle, R. L., Jr. Between Law and Politics: The Solicitor General and the Structuring of Race, Gender and Reproductive Rights Litigation (Texas A&M University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Parker, W. “The Future of School Desegregation,” 94 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1157 (2000)Google Scholar

Paulsen, M. S. “Who ‘Owns’ the Government’s Attorney-Client Privilege?,” 83 Minn. L. Rev. 473 (1998)Google Scholar

Perry, H. W., Jr. “United States Attorneys – Whom Shall They Serve?,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 129 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, R. J. “Two Problems in Administrative Law: Political Polarity on the District of Columbia Circuit and Judicial Deterrence of Agency Rulemaking,” Duke L.J. 300 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polikoff, N. D. “Am I My Client?: The Role Confusion of a Lawyer Activist,” 31 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 443 (1996)Google Scholar

Porsher, E. “Now It Is Official: Chief Justice Beinish,” Ma’ariv-NRG September 7, 2006Google Scholar

Posner, R. “Enlightened Despot,” The New Republic, April 2007 (Review of The Judge in a Democracy by Aharon Barak, 2006)Google Scholar

Postema, G. J. “Moral Responsibility in Professional Ethics,” 55 N.Y. U. L. Rev. 63 (1980)Google Scholar

Provine, D. M.Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court (University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Reichman, A. “A Very Narrow Bridge: Constitution, Justice, Equity and Remedy,” 37 Mishpatim [law] 701 (2007) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Reinfeld, M. “The Movement for the Quality of Government to HCJ: Order the Bar to Discharge Hoter Yishai,” Ha’aretz March 13, 1997Google Scholar

Roitman, Y. “The Public Lawyer and the Protection of Human Rights” (Lecture, 2004)

Roots, R. “Unfair Federal Rules of Procedure: Why Does the Government Get More Time?” 33 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 493 (2010)Google Scholar

Rosenberg, G. N.The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen-Zvi, I.Taking Space Seriously: Law, Space and Society in Contempoary Israel (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004)Google Scholar

Rotem, M., Noach, H. and Al-Ukbi, N. The Arab-Bedouin in the Negev-Naqab Desert in Israel: Response to the Report of the State of Israel on Implementing the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (Shadow Report submitted by The Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality, 2010)

Rubin, M. H. “The Ethical Negotiator: Ethical Dilemmas, Unhappy Clients, and Angry Third Parties,” 26 Constr. Law. 12 (2006)Google Scholar

Rubinstein, A. and Medina, B.The Constitutional Law of Israel (Tel Aviv: Shoken, 2005)Google Scholar

Salokar, R. M. “Politics, Law, and the Office of the Solicitor General,” in Clayton, C. W. (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar

Salokar, R. M.The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Sandler, R. and Schoenbrod, D.Democracy by Decree: What Happens When Courts Run Government (Yale University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. “Cause Lawyering and the Reproduction of Professional Authority,” in Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. (eds.), Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Scheingold, S.The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change (New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1974)Google Scholar

Schiff, Z. and Ya’ari, E.Intifada: The Palestinian Uprising – Israel’s Third Front (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990)Google Scholar

Schlanger, M. “Book Review: Beyond the Hero Judge: Institutional Reform Litigation as Litigation,” 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1994 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlanger, M. “Civil Rights Injunctions over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders,” 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)Google Scholar

Schnapper, E. “Legal Ethics and the Government Lawyer,” 32 Rec. Ass’n. B. City N.Y 649 (1977)Google Scholar

Schuck, P. H. “The Role of Judges in Settling Complex Cases: The Agent Orange Example,” 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 337 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, A. “The Judgement of Edna Arbel [State Attorney] is Flawed,” Maariv April 4, 2001Google Scholar

Segal, J. A. and Spaeth, H. J.The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Z.Israeli Democracy (Tel Aviv: Ministry of Defense, 1990)Google Scholar

Shachar, Y., Haris, R. and Gross, M. “Anatomy of Discourse and Division in the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analysis,” 20 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 749 (1997) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Shachar, Y., Haris, R. and Gross, M. “Reference Patterns of the Supreme Court: A Quantitative Analysis,” 27 Mishpatim [Law] 119 (1996) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Shadmi, H. “The Government to Set Up Clinics for Bedouin: We Shall Build One Clinic,” Ha’aretz March 21, 2003Google Scholar

Shalev, C.Collective Punishment in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (B’Tselem Report, November, 1990)Google Scholar

Shamgar, M. “The Observance of International Law in the Administered Territories,” 1 Israeli Yearbook of Human Rights 262 (1971)Google Scholar

Shamir, R. “‘Landmark Cases’ and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice,” 24 Law & Soc’y Rev. 781 (1990)Google Scholar

Shamir, R. “Suspended in Space: Bedouins under the Law of Israel,” 30 Law & Soc’y Rev. 231 (1996)Google Scholar

Shamir, R. “The Politics of Reasonableness: Discretion as Judicial Power,” 5 Theory and Criticism 7 (1994)Google Scholar

Shapiro, M.Who Guards the Guardians?: Judicial Control of Administration (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Shavit, A. “An Interview with Deri,” Ha’aretz July 20, 2000Google Scholar

Sheehan, R. S., Mishler, W. and Songer, D. S. “Ideology, Status and Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court,” 86 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 464 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shetreet, S.On Adjudication: Justice on Trial (Jerusalem: Yedioth Aharonot, 2004)Google Scholar

Shetreet, S. “Reflections on the Protection of the Rights of the Individual: Form and Substance,” 12 Isr. L. Rev. 32 (1977)Google Scholar

Shetreet, S. “The Critical Challenge of Judicial Independence in Israel,” in Russel, P. and O’Brien, D. M. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (2001)

Simon, W. H. “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,” Wis. L. Rev. 29 (1978)Google Scholar

Solomon, R. C. “Wearing Many Hats: Confidentiality and Conflicts of Interests Issues for the California Public Lawyer,” 25 Sw. U.L. Rev. 265 (1996)Google Scholar

Songer, D. R. and Sheehan, R. S. “Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals,” 36 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 235 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Straschnov, A.Justice Under Fire (Tel Aviv: Yedioth Aharonot, 1994)Google Scholar

Strauss, D. A. “The Solicitor General and the Interests of the United States,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 165 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, P. L., Rakoff, T. D. and Farina, C. R.Gellhorn & Byse’s Administrative Law: Cases and Materials, 10 edn. (New York:Foundation Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. Radicals in Robes (New York:Basic Books, 2005)

Supreme Court of Canada: Statistics 2001 to 2011

Symposium: Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers, 9(2) Widener J. Pub. L. 199 (2000)

Tate, C. N. and Valinder, T. (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York University Press, 1995)

Tidmarsh, J. and Trangsrud, R. H.Complex Litigation and the Adversary System (New York:Foundation Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Trapolin, E. W. “Sued into Submission: Judicial Creation of Standards in the Manufacture and Distribution of Lawful Products – The New Orleans Lawsuit Against Gun Manufacturers,” 46 Loy. L. Rev. 1275 (2000)Google Scholar

Ugarte, E. E. “The Government Lawyer and the Common Good,” 40 S. Tex. L. Rev. 269 (1999)Google Scholar

United Kingdom Ministry of Justice, Judicial and Court Statistics 2010

Utz, P. J. “Two Models of Prosecutorial Professionalism,” in McDonald, W. F. (ed.), The Prosecutor (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979)Google Scholar

Volcansek, M. L. “Exporting the Missouri Plan: Judicial Appointment Commissions,” (in: “Symposium: The Fallacies and Fixables of Merit Selection and the Constituencies that Support Missouri Plan Reform”) 74 Mo. L. Rev. 783 (2009)Google Scholar

Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F. Administrative Law, 10th edn. (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Wald, P. M. “‘For the United States’: Government Lawyers in Court,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 107 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasserstrom, R. “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues,” 5 Hum. Rts. 1 (1975)Google Scholar

Weinshall-Margel, K. “Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel,” 8 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 556 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, S., Cartwright, B., Kagan, R. A. and Friedman, L. M. “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 21 Law & Soc’y Rev. 403 (1987)Google Scholar

Yashuvi, N. (ed.), Violations of Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 1990/1991 (Jerusalem:B’Tselem, 1991)Google Scholar

Yoaz, Y. “The Labor Party: Friedman’s Proposal Will Cause Coalition Crisis,” Ha’Aretz November 16, 2007Google Scholar

Young, E. A. “Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1139 (2002)Google Scholar

Zamir, I.Adjudication in Administrative Cases (Jerusalem:The Harry Sacher Institution, 1975)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “Administrative Law,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “Editor’s Note,” in Zamir, I. (ed.), The Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “Evidence in the High Court of Justice,” 1 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 295 (1993) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Zamir, I.Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “Rule of Law and Civil Liberties in Israel,” 7 C. J. Q. 64, 65 (1988)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “Secondary Legislation: Procedures and Directives,” 11 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 339 (1986) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “The Attorney General: A Public Servant, Not a Government Servant,” in Zamir, I. (ed.), The Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “The Lawyer in the Public Service,” in Dotan, Y. and Bendor, A. (eds.), Zamir Book: On Law, Government and Society (Jerusalem, 1995) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “The Role of the Attorney General in Times of Crisis: The Israeli Shin Bet Affair,” in Shetreet, S. (ed.), The Role of Courts in Society (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1988)Google Scholar

Zamir, I. “Unreasonableness as Ground of Review,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Zarchin, T. “This is how Noam Solberg’s Road is Paved to the Supreme Court,” Ha’aretz October 27, 2011Google Scholar

Zaring, D. “National Rulemaking Through Trial Courts: The Big Case and Institutional Reform,” 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1015 (2004)Google Scholar

Zelikovitz, M. “Ramon: The OAG Became Coercive,” Ynet June 12, 2008Google Scholar

Zer-Gutman, L. “The Lawyer’s Duty not to Mislead the Court,” 24 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 413 (2000) (Hebrew)Google Scholar

Zitrin, B. Z. “Hoter Yishai: The Judicial System is Frozen and Very Conservative,” Ha’aretz February 25, 1997Google Scholar

Ziv, N. “Symposium: The Legal Profession: Looking Backward: Combining Professionalism, Nation Building and Public Service: The Professional Project of the Israeli Bar 1928–2002,” 71 Fordham L. Rev. 1621 (2003)Google Scholar

Zysblat, A. “Introduction: The System of Government,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Zysblat, A. “Protecting Fundamental Rights in Israel without a Written Constitution,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar