Abass, Ademola, ‘Consent Precluding State Responsibility: A Critical Analysis’, 53 ICLQ 211 (2004)Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The Uses of Article 19’, 10 EJIL 339 (1999)Google Scholar

Ago, Roberto, ‘Droit des traités à la lumière de la Convention de Vienne’, 134 RdC 303 (1971)Google Scholar

Akande, Dapo & Shah, Sangeeta, ‘Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts’, 21 EJIL 815 (2010)Google Scholar

Alexidze, Levan, ‘Legal Nature of Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law’, 172 RdC 227 (1981)Google Scholar

Alland, Denis, ‘Countermeasures of General Interest’, 13 EJIL 1221 (2002)Google Scholar

Alston, Philip & Simma, Bruno, ‘The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens and General Principles’, 12 AYIL 82 (1988–1989)Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Third: Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Revised), Vols. I and II (1987)Google Scholar

Anderson, David H., ‘Law-Making Processes in the UN System – Some Impressions’, 2 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 23 (1998)Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, Cours de droit international (Gidel, Gilbert, trans.) (1929)Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd ed., 2013)Google Scholar

Bartsch, Kerstin & Elberling, Björn, ‘Jus Cogens vs. State Immunity, Round Two: The Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kalogeropoulou et al. v. Greece and Germany Decision’, 4 German Law Journal 477 (2003)Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ‘International Crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes’, 59 Law and Contemporary Problems 63 (1996)Google Scholar

Belsky, Adam C., Merva, Mark & Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, ‘Implied Waiver under the FSIA: A Proposed Exception to Immunity for Violations of Peremptory Norms of International Law’, 77 California Law Review 365 (1989)Google Scholar

Beneš, Edvard, Palměti – od Mnichova k nové válce, a k novému vitěztvi (1947)Google Scholar

Beneš, Edvard, Šest let exilu a druhé světové valky – řeči, projevy a dokumenty z r. 1939–1945 (1947)Google Scholar

Berman, Franklin, ‘Treaty “Interpretation” in a Judicial Context’, 29 Yale Journal of International Law 315 (2004)Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Ferrini v. Federal Republic of Germany’, 99 AJIL 242 (2005)Google Scholar

Björge, Eirik, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed., 2009)Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Kaspar, Draft Code, from Le droit des gens codifié (translated from German to French by M.C. Lardy, 3rd ed., 1881), 29 AJIL Supp., 1208–1212 (1935)Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence & Condorelli, Luigi, ‘De la «responsabilité de protéger», ou d’une nouvelle parure pour une notion déjà bien établie’, 110 RGDIP 11 (2006)Google Scholar

Boldt, Frank, Hilf, Rudolf & Reiter, Willibald, München 1938: Das Ende des alten Europa (1990)Google Scholar

Bonafé, Béatrice I., ‘La violation d’obligations envers la communauté internationale dans son ensemble et la compétence juridictionnelle de la Cour internationale de Justice’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Present and Future of Jus Cogens 145 (2015)Google Scholar

Borgen, Christopher J., ‘Treaty Conflicts and Normative Fragmentation’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties 448 (2012)Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek W., ‘Crimes of State and the 1996 Report of the International Law Commission on State Responsibility’, 9 EJIL 163 (1998)Google Scholar

Beneš, Edvard, ‘Estoppel Before International Tribunals and its Relations to Acquiescence’, 33 BYIL 176 (1957)Google Scholar

Brandner, Karl, ‘Pacta contra bonos mores im Völkerrecht’, Jahrbuch der Konsularakademie zu Wien 33 (1937)Google Scholar

Brandon, Michael, ‘The Validity of Non-Registered Treaties’, 29 BYIL 186 (1952)Google Scholar

Bretton, Philippe, ‘Les négotiations germano-tchécoslovaques sur l’accord de Munich du 29 Septembre 1938’, 19 AFDI 189 (1973)Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, ‘The Prohibition on Torture: Driving Jus Cogens Home’, 104 American Society of International Law Proceedings 454 (2010)Google Scholar

Bruns, Viktor, ‘Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung I’, 1 ZaöRV 1 (1929)Google Scholar

Bruns, Viktor, ‘Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung II’, 3 ZaöRV 445 (1933)Google Scholar

Buffard, Isabelle & Zemanek, Karl, ‘‘‘Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ 3 Austrian Review of International and European Law 311 (1998)Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’, 51 HILJ 1 (2010)Google Scholar

Buzzini, Gionata Piero, ‘Lights and Shadows of Immunities and Inviolability of State Officials in International Law: Some Comments on the Djibouti v. France Case’, 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 455 (2009)Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, ‘Conceptualising the Relationship between Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Rules’, 66 Nordic Journal of International Law 211 (1997)Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (1999)Google Scholar

Caddell, Richard, ‘Treaties, Secret’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. X, 11 (2012)Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (2011)Google Scholar

Bruns, Viktor, The Present and Future of Jus Cogens (2015)Google Scholar

Bruns, Viktor, “On the Special Consequences of a Serious Breach of Obligations Arising out of Peremptory Rules of International Law”, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Present and Future of Jus Cogens 133 (2015)Google Scholar

Caplan, Lee M., ‘State Immunity, Human Rights and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory’, 97 AJIL 741 (2003)Google Scholar

Carlyle, Margaret (ed.), Documents on International Affairs 1939–1946, Vol. II Hitler’s Europe (1954)Google Scholar

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Conference on International Law (Lagonissi, April 3–8, 1966), Papers and Proceedings, The Concept of Jus Cogens in Public International Law (Summary Record) (1967)Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, ‘Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving Towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?’, 10 EJIL 23 (1999)Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, ‘When May Senior State Officials Be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v. Belgium Case’, 13 EJIL 853 (2002)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., ‘The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law’, 56 BYIL 1 (1985)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., ‘Universal International Law’, 87 AJIL 529 (1993)Google Scholar

Chetail, Vincent & Haggenmacher, Peter (eds.), Vattel’s International Law in a XXI^st Century Perspective (2011)Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine ‘Article 62’, in Zimmermann, Andreas et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary 1529 (2nd ed., 2012)Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christin & Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (2015)Google Scholar

Christenson, Gordon A., ‘The World Court and Jus Cogens’, 81 AJIL 93 (1987)Google Scholar

Christenson, Gordon A., ‘Jus Cogens: Guarding Interests Fundamental to International Society’, 28 Virginia Journal of International Law 585 (1988)Google Scholar

Chrysostomides, Kypros, The Republic of Cyprus: A Study in International Law (2000)Google Scholar

Conforti, Benedetto, International Law and the Role of Domestic Legal Systems (2013)Google Scholar

Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II (2011)Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., ‘Responsibility to the International Community as a Whole’, 8 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 303 (2001)Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (2002)Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’, 319 RdC 335 (2006)Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., The Creation of States in International Law (2007)Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., ‘State Responsibility’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. IX, 517 (2012)Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., State Responsibility: The General Part (2013)Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain & Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (2010)Google Scholar

Crépeau, François, Côté, René & Rehaag, Sean, ‘Article 71: Consequences of the invalidity of a treaty which conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II (2011)Google Scholar

Crowe, David M., The Baltic States and the Great Powers: Foreign Relations, 1938–1940 (1993)Google Scholar

Curtis, Monica (ed.), Documents on International Affairs 1938, Vol. II (1943)Google Scholar

Czapliński, Władysław, ‘Jus Cogens and the Law of Treaties’, in Tomuschat, Christian & Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes 83 (2006)Google Scholar

Czapliński, Władysław & Danilenko, Gennady M., ‘Conflicts of Norms in International Law’, 21 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3 (1990)Google Scholar

Danilenko, Gennady M., ‘International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law-Making’, 2 EJIL 42 (1991)Google Scholar

Dawidowicz, Martin, ‘Public Law Enforcement without Public Law Safeguards? An Analysis of State Practice on Third-Party Countermeasures and Their Relationship to the Security Council’, 77 BYIL 333 (2006)Google Scholar

Dawidowicz, Martin, ‘The Obligation of Non-Recognition of an Unlawful Situation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain & Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility 677 (2010)Google Scholar

Dawidowicz, Martin, ‘Trading fish or human rights in Western Sahara? Self-determination, non-recognition and the EC–Morocco Fisheries Agreement’, in French, Duncan (ed.), Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law 250 (2013)Google Scholar

Dawidowicz, Martin, ‘Third-party countermeasures: Observations on a controversial concept’, in Chinkin, Christin & Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford 340 (2015)Google Scholar

Degras, Jane (ed.), Soviet Documents on Foreign Policy, Vol. III, 1933–1941 (1953)Google Scholar

Deleau, Olivier, ‘Les positions françaises à la conférence de Vienne sur le droit des traités’, 15 Annuaire français de droit international 7 (1969)Google Scholar

Devine, D. J., ‘Requirements of Statehood Re-examined’, 34 MLR 410 (1971)Google Scholar

de Hoogh, A. J. J., ‘The Relationship between Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and International Crimes: Peremptory Norms in Perspective’, 42 Austrian Journal of Public and International Law 183 (1991)Google Scholar

Dickinson, Andrew, Lindsay, Rae & Loonam, James P., State Immunity: Selected Materials and Commentary (2004)Google Scholar

Dictionnaire de droit international public: sous la direction de Jean Salmon (2001)Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (1989)Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘The Settlement of War-Related Claims: Does International Law Recognize a Victim’s Private Right of Action? Lessons after 1945’, 20 Berkeley Journal of International Law 296 (2002)Google Scholar

Domb, Fania, ‘Jus Cogens and Human Rights’, 6 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 104 (1976)Google Scholar

Dominicé, Christian, ‘The International Responsibility of States for Breach of Multilateral Obligations’, 10 EJIL 353 (1999)Google Scholar

Douglas, Zachary, ‘State Immunity for the Acts of State Officials’, 82 BYIL 281 (2012)Google Scholar

Dugard, John, Recognition and the United Nations (1987)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Action publique et crime international de l’état: a propos de l’article 19 de projet de la Commission du droit international sur la responsabilité des États’, 25 AFDI 539 (1979)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Le fait générateur de la responsabilité internationale des états’, 188 RdC 21 (1984)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’, 1 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1 (1997)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘A General Stocktaking of the Connections between the Multilateral Dimension of Obligations and Codification of the Law of Responsibility’, 13 EJIL 1053 (2002a)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘L’unité de l’ordre juridique international: cours général de droit international public’, 297 RdC 269 (2002b)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Vattel et le droit des traités’, in Chetail, Vincent & Haggenmacher, Peter (eds.), Vattel’s International Law in a XXI^st Century Perspective 151 (2011)Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Le jus cogens, les mots et les choses. Où en est le droit impératif devant la CIJ près d’un demi-siècle après sa proclamation?’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Present and Future of Jus Cogens 99 (2015)Google Scholar

Eilers, Karolyn A., ‘Article 14(b) of the 1951 Treaty of Peace with Japan: Interpretation and Effect on POWs’ Claims Against Japanese Corporations’, 11 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 469 (2001)Google Scholar

Elias, T. O., ‘Problems Concerning the Validity of Treaties’, 134 RdC 341 (1971)Google Scholar

Fahmi, Aziza M., ‘Peremptory Norms as General Rules of International Law’, 22 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 383 (1971)Google Scholar

Farrall, Jeremy Matam, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law (2007)Google Scholar

Fawcett, J.E.S., ‘Security Council Resolutions on Rhodesia’, 41 BYIL 103 (1965–1966)Google Scholar

Fawcett, J.E.S., The Law of Nations (2nd ed., 1971a)Google Scholar

Fawcett, J.E.S., ‘Note in response to D.J. Devine’, 34 MLR 417 (1971b)Google Scholar

Feichtner, Isabel, ‘Waiver’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. X, 747 (2012)Google Scholar

Field, David Dudley, Draft Code, from Outlines of an International Code (1876), 29 AJIL Supp. 1207 (1935)Google Scholar

Fiore, Pasquale, Il diritto internazionale codificato: e la sua sanzione giuridica studii (1890) (for English translation of passage from 5th Italian edition by Borchard, E.M. (1918): 29 AJIL Supp. 1212 (1935))Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: General Principles and Substantive Law’, 27 BYIL 1(1950)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald, ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’, 92 RdC 5 (1957)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘Material Breach of Treaty: Some Legal Issues’, 6 Austrian Review of International and European Law 3 (2001)Google Scholar

Flume, Werner, Allgemeiner Teil des bürgerlichen Rechts. Zweiter Band: Das Rechtsgeschäft (1965)Google Scholar

Foakes, Joanne & O’Keefe, Roger, ‘Article 12’, in Tams, Christian J. & O’Keefe, Roger (eds.), The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property 209 (2013)Google Scholar

Focarelli, Carlo, ‘Denying Foreign State Immunity for Commission of International Crimes: The Ferrini Decision’, 54 ICLQ 951(2005)Google Scholar

Focarelli, Carlo, ‘Promotional Jus Cogens: A Critical Appraisal of Jus Cogens’ Legal Effects’, 77 Nordic Journal of International Law 429 (2008)Google Scholar

Fox, Hazel & Webb, Philippa, The Law of State Immunity (3rd ed., 2013)Google Scholar

French, Duncan (ed.), Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law (2013)Google Scholar

Fröhlich, Max, Die Sittlichkeit in völkerrechtlichen Verträgen (1924)Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A., ‘Reactions by not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International Law’, 248 RdC 345 (1994)Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio ‘Jus Cogens Beyond the Vienna Convention’, 172 RdC 271 (1981)Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Obligations Erga Omnes, International Crimes and Jus Cogens: A Tentative Analysis of Three Related Concepts’, in Weiler, Joseph H.H., Cassese, Antonio & Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility 151 (1989)Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Should All References to International Crimes Disappear from the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility?’, 10 EJIL 365 (1999)Google Scholar

Gardiner, Richard, ‘The Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties 475 (2012)Google Scholar

Gardiner, Richard, Treaty Interpretation (2nd ed., 2015)Google Scholar

Gattini, Andrea, ‘War Crimes and State Immunity in the Ferrini Decision’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice 224 (2005)Google Scholar

Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Do Damages Claims Arising from Jus Cogens Violations Override State Immunity from the Jurisdiction of Foreign Courts?’, in Tomuschat, Christian & Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes 203 (2006).Google Scholar

Glennon, Michael J., ‘De l’absurdité du droit impératif (jus cogens)’, 110 RGDIP 529 (2006)Google Scholar

Gómez Robledo, Antonio, ‘Le ius cogens international: sa genèse, sa nature, ses fonctions’, 172 RdC 9 (1981)Google Scholar

Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, Collective Responses to Illegal Acts in International Law: United Nations Action in the Question of Southern Rhodesia (1990)Google Scholar

Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘Security Council Enforcement Action and Issues of State Responsibility’, 43 ICLQ 55 (1994)Google Scholar

Graebner, Norman A. & Bennett, Edward M., The Versailles Treaty and Its Legacy: The Failure of the Wilsonian System (2011)Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force (3rd ed., 2008)Google Scholar

Griffin, Joan & Griffin, Jonathan, Lost Liberty?: The Ordeal of the Czechs and the Future of Freedom (1939)Google Scholar

Guggenheim, Paul, ‘La validité et la nullité des actes juridiques internationaux’, 74 RdC 191 (1949)Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard, ‘Historical Background to the Convention’, in Tams, Christian J. & O’Keefe, Roger (eds.), The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property 1 (2013)Google Scholar

Hannikainen, Lauri, Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens) in International Law: Historical Development, Criteria, Present Status (1988)Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Terminating Treaties’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties 634 (2012)Google Scholar

Heydte, Friedrich August von der, ‘Die Erscheinungsformen des zwischenstaatlichen Rechts; jus cogens und jus dispositivum im Völkerrecht’, XVI Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht 461 (1932)Google Scholar

Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (2012)Google Scholar

Horn, Frank, Reservations and Interpretative Declarations to Multilateral Treaties (1988)Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O., ‘Legal Effect of Unregistered Treaties in Practice, under Article 18 of the Covenant’, 28 AJIL 546 (1934)Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D.N., ‘The Significance of the Registration or Non-Registration of an International Agreement in Determining Whether or Not It Is a Treaty’, 46 Current Legal Problems 257 (1993)Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International, ‘Contemporary Problems concerning the Immunity of States in relation to questions of jurisdiction and enforcement’, 64-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 389 (1992)Google Scholar

International Law Association, Berlin Conference, Accountability of International Organizations, ‘Final Conference Report Berlin’, available at www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/9 (2004)Google Scholar

Janis, Mark W., ‘Jus Cogens: An Artful Not a Scientific Reality’, 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 370 (1987–1988a)Google Scholar

Janis, Mark W., ‘The Nature of Jus Cogens’, 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 359 (1987–1988b)Google Scholar

Jenks, C. Wilfred, ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’, 30 BYIL 401 (1953)Google Scholar

Jenks, C. Wilfred, The Prospects of International Adjudication (1964)Google Scholar

Jennings, Robert Y., The Acquisition of Territory in International Law (1963)Google Scholar

Jennings, Robert Y., Collected Writings of Sir Robert Jennings, Vol. I (1998)Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Nina H.B., ‘The Obligation of Cooperation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain & Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility 695 (2010a)Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Nina H.B., ‘The Obligation of Non-Assistance to the Responsible State’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain & Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility 687 (2010b)Google Scholar

Jouannet, Emmanuelle, The Liberal-Welfarist Law of Nations: A History of International Law (Christopher Sutcliffe, trans., 2012)Google Scholar

Kadelbach, Stefan, Zwingendes Völkerrecht (1992)Google Scholar

Kadelbach, Stefan, ‘Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and other Rules – The Identification of Fundamental Norms’, in Tomuschat, Christian & Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes 21 (2006)Google Scholar

Kee, Robert, Munich: The Eleventh Hour (1988)Google Scholar

Kennan, George F., From Prague After Munich: Diplomatic Papers 1938–1940 (1968)Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic L., ‘Some Lingering Questions about Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, 22 Cornell International Law Journal 549 (1989)Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic L., ‘The Security Council’s First Fifty Years’, 89 AJIL 506 (1995)Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Some Problems Regarding the Object and Purpose of Treaties’, 8 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 138 (1997)Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘The Validity and Invalidity of Treaties’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties 551 (2012)Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘Responsibility for Serious Breaches of Obligations Deriving from Peremptory Norms of International Law and United Nations Law’, 13 EJIL 1241 (2002)Google Scholar

Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘Jus Cogens as the ‘Highest Law’? Peremptory Norms and Legal Hierarchies’, 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 173 (2015)Google Scholar

Knapp, Ursula, ‘Article 102’, in Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary 1103 (1995)Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, ‘The Formal Source of Ius Cogens in Public International Law’, 53 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 69 (1998)Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, La bonne foi en droit international public: contribution à l’étude des principes généraux de droit (2000)Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, Théorie du ius cogens international (2001)Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens: A General Inventory (2015)Google Scholar

Kontorovich, Eugene, ‘Economic Dealings with Occupied Territories’, 53 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 584 (2015)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order’, 72 BYIL 337 (2001)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal’, 16 EJIL 113 (2005)Google Scholar

Krieger, Heike, ‘Article 66: Procedures for judicial settlement, arbitration and conciliation’, in Dörr, Oliver & Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary 1151 (2012)Google Scholar

Kunz, Josef L., ‘The Meaning and the Range of the Norm Pacta Sunt Servanda’, 39 AJIL 180 (1945)Google Scholar

Lanfranchi, Marie-Pierre, ‘Article 58: Suspension of the operation of a multilateral treaty by agreement between certain of the parties only’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, 1311 (2011)Google Scholar

Langer, Robert, Seizure of Territory: The Stimson Doctrine and Related Principles in Legal Theory and Diplomatic Practice (1947)Google Scholar

Larenz, Karl & Wolf, Manfred, Allgemeiner Teil des bürgerlichen Rechts (8th ed., 1997)Google Scholar

Laserson, Max M., ‘The Recognition of Latvia’, 37 AJIL 233 (1943)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, Recognition in International Law (1947)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’, 62 RdC 95 (1937)Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences?’, 18 EJIL 853 (2007a)Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2007b)Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘Normative Conflict and the Fuzziness of the International ius cogens Regime’, 69 ZaöRV 961 (2009)Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘What Is So Special About Jus Cogens? – On the Difference between the Ordinary and the Peremptory International Law’, 14 International Community Law Review 3 (2012)Google Scholar

Lloyd, John Selwyn, Suez 1956: A Personal Account (1978)Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, International Law (2007)Google Scholar

MacDonald, Ronald St. J., ‘Fundamental Norms in Contemporary International Law’, 25 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 115 (1987)Google Scholar

MacGibbon, I.C., ‘The Scope of Acquiescence in International Law’, 31 BYIL 143 (1954)Google Scholar

McGregor, Lorna, ‘State Immunity and Jus Cogens’, 55 ICLQ 437 (2006)Google Scholar

McGregor, Lorna, ‘Torture and State Immunity: Deflecting Impunity, Distorting Sovereignty’, 18 EJIL 903 (2007)Google Scholar

McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, 54 ICLQ 279 (2005)Google Scholar

McNair, Arnold Duncan, The Law of Treaties: British Practice and Opinions (1938)Google Scholar

McNair, Arnold Duncan, The Law of Treaties (1961)Google Scholar

Magallona, Merlin M., ‘The Concept of Jus Cogens in the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties’, 51 Philippine Law Journal 521 (1976)Google Scholar

Marek, Krystyna, ‘Contribution à l’étude du jus cogens en droit international’, in Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim (1968)Google Scholar

Marston, Geoffrey, ‘Armed Intervention in the 1956 Suez Canal Crisis: The Legal Advice Tendered to the British Government’, 37 ICLQ 773 (1988)Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights’, 80 AJIL 1 (1986)Google Scholar

Milanović, Marko & Papić, Tatjana, ‘As Bad as it Gets: The European Court of Human Rights’s Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law’, 58 ICLQ 267 (2009)Google Scholar

Milanović, Marko & Wood, Michael (eds.), The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion (2015)Google Scholar

Mosler, Hermann, ‘Ius Cogens im Völkerrecht’, 25 Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für internationals Recht 9 (1968)Google Scholar

Mosler, Hermann, ‘The International Society as a Legal Community’, 140 RdC 1 (1974)Google Scholar

Mosler, Hermann, The International Society as a Legal Community (1980)Google Scholar

Münch, Fritz, ‘Die Martens’sche Klausel und die Grundlagen des Völkerrechts’, 36 ZaöRV 347 (1976)Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean, ‘Reflections on the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: Interpreting Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999)’, in Milanović, Marko & Wood, Michael (eds.), The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion (2015)Google Scholar

Mus, Jan B., ‘Conflicts between Treaties in International Law’, 45 Netherlands International Law Review 208 (1998)Google Scholar

Nash, Marian L. (Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State), Digest of United States Practice in International Law 1979 (1983)Google Scholar

Necatigil, Zaim M., The Cyprus Question and the Turkish Position in International Law (2nd ed., 1993)Google Scholar

Nisot, Joseph, ‘Le concept de jus cogens evisagé par rapport au droit international’, 4 Revue belge de droit international 1 (1968)Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, ‘Concurrence between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International Law’, 52 ICLQ 615 (2003)Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, ‘From Dionisio Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-state Relations’, 13 EJIL 1083 (2002)Google Scholar

Novogrodsky, Noah Benjamin, ‘Immunity for Torture: Lessons from Bouzari v. Iran’, 18 EJIL 939 (2007)Google Scholar

Nutting, Anthony, No End of a Lesson: The Story of Suez (1967)Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger, ‘Universal Jurisdiction: Clarifying the Basic Concept’, 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 735 (2004)Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger, ‘State Immunity and Human Rights: Heads and Walls, Hearts and Minds’, 44 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 999 (2011)Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger & Tams, Christian J. (eds.), The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property (2013)Google Scholar

Onuf, N.G. & Birney, Richard K., ‘Peremptory Norms of International Law: Their Source, Function and Future’, 4 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 187 (1974)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Impact of Peremptory Norms on the Interpretation and Application of United Nations Security Council Resolutions’, 16 EJIL 59 (2005)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law (2006)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norms: Why the House of Lords Got It Wrong’, 18 EJIL 955 (2007)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts: A Reply to Dapo Akande and Sangeeta Shah’, 22 EJIL 849 (2011)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece intervening)’, 106 AJIL 609 (2012).Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Audience and Authority – the Merit of the Doctrine of Jus Cogens’, 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 115 (2015)Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed., 2005)Google Scholar

Packer, Corinne A.A. & Rukare, Donald, ‘The New African Union and its Constitutive Act’, 96 AJIL 365 (2002)Google Scholar

Palmisano, Giuseppe, ‘Fault’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. III, 1128 (2012)Google Scholar

Paulus, Andreas L., ‘Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and Fragmentation: An Attempt at a Reappraisal’, 74 Nordic Journal of International Law 297 (2005)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (2003a)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘A Typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligations: Are WTO Obligations Bilateral or Collective in Nature?’, 14 EJIL 907(2003b)Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘The Normative Dilemma: Will and Consent in International Law-Making’, 12 AYIL 22 (1988–1989)Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘Comments in Response to Christine Chinkin and in Defense of Jus Cogens’, 17 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 83 (2006)Google Scholar

Pergler, Charles, ‘The Munich ‘Repudiation’’, 37 AJIL 308 (1943)Google Scholar

Pfeil, Julia, ‘Torrey Canyon, The’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. IX, 948 (2012)Google Scholar

Pineau, Christian, Suez 1956 (1976)Google Scholar

Prost, Mario, ‘Article 65: Procedure to be followed with respect to invalidity, termination, withdrawal from or suspension of the operation of a treaty’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II (2011)Google Scholar

Puchta, Georg Friedrich, Lehrbuch der Pandekten (4th ed., 1848)Google Scholar

Puchta, Georg Friedrich, Vorlesungen über das heutige römische Recht, Vol. I (5th ed., 1862).Google Scholar

Quigley, John B., ‘Camp David Accords (1978)’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. I, 1104 (2012)Google Scholar

Ragazzi, Maurizio, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (1997)Google Scholar

Reimann, Mathias, ‘A Human Rights Exception to Sovereign Immunity: Some Thoughts on Princz v. Federal Republic of Germany’, 16 Michigan Journal of International Law 403 (1995)Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael, ‘Termination of the USSR’s Treaty Right of Intervention in Iran’, 74 AJIL 144 (1980)Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, ‘Solidarité et divisibilité des engagements conventionnels’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne 623 (1989)Google Scholar

Rigaux, Anne & Simon, Denys, ‘Article 41: Agreements to modify multilateral treaties between certain of the parties only’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, 986 (2011)Google Scholar

Roberts, Ivor (ed.), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (6th ed., 2009)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, The Law of Treaties: A Guide to the Legislative History of the Vienna Convention (1970)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ‘The Settlement of Treaty Disputes under the Vienna Convention of 1969’, 31 ZaöRV 1 (1971)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945–1986 (1989)Google Scholar

Rothstein, Andrew, The Munich Conspiracy (1958)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Charles, ‘Chronique des faits internationaux’, 73 RGDIP 798 (1969)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Charles, Droit International Public, Vol. I (1970)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Charles, ‘Chronique des faits internationaux’, 84 RGDIP 1068 (1980)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Charles, ‘Chronique des faits internationaux’, 88 RGDIP 204 (1984)Google Scholar

Rozakis, Christos L., The Concept of Jus Cogens in the Law of Treaties (1976)Google Scholar

Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, ‘Article 66: Procedures for judicial settlement, arbitration and conciliation’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, 1513 (2011)Google Scholar

Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, ‘Enhancing the Rhetoric of Jus Cogens’, 23 EJIL 1049 (2012)Google Scholar

Sari, Aurel, ‘The Al-Jedda Case before the House of Lords’, 13 Journal of International Peacekeeping 181 (2009)Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W., The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (1994)Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘International Jus Cogens?’, 43 Texas Law Review 455 (1964–1965)Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Problem of International Public Policy’, 18 Current Legal Problems 191 (1965)Google Scholar

Schwelb, Egon, ‘The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination’, 15 ICLQ 996 (1966)Google Scholar

Schwelb, Egon, ‘Some Aspects of International Jus Cogens as Formulated by the International Law Commission’, 61 AJIL 946 (1967)Google Scholar

Schwelb, Egon, ‘The Actio Popularis and International Law’, 2 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 46 (1972)Google Scholar

Scobbie, Iain, ‘The Invocation of Responsibility for the Breach of ‘Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law’’, 13 EJIL 1201 (2002)Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, ‘Der Barcelona-Traction-Fall’, 22 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 255 (1971)Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Normative Hierarchy in International Law’, 100 AJIL 291 (2006)Google Scholar

Sherman, Gordon E., ‘Jus Gentium and International Law’, 12 AJIL 56 (1918)Google Scholar

Shlaim, Avi, ‘The Protocol of Sèvres, 1956: anatomy of a war plot’, 73 International Affairs 509 (1997)Google Scholar

Shraga, Daphna, ‘UN Peacekeeping Operations: Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and Responsibility for Operations-Related Damage’, 94 AJIL 406 (2000)Google Scholar

Sicault, Jean-Didier, ‘Du caractère obligatoire des engagements unilatéraux en droit international public’, 83 RGDIP 633 (1979)Google Scholar

Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander, ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’, 13 EJIL 1127 (2002)Google Scholar

Sievers, Loraine & Daws, Sam, The Procedure of the UN Security Council (4th ed., 2014)Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘Bilateralism and Community Interest in the Law of State Responsibility’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne 821(1989)Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’, 250 RdC 217 (1994)Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (1995)Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian McTaggart, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd ed., 1984)Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd ed., 2010)Google Scholar

Spain, Anna, ‘The U.N. Security Council’s Duty to Decide’, 4 Harvard National Security Journal 320 (2013)Google Scholar

Spengler, Erhard, Zur Frage des völkerrechtlich gültigen Zustandekommens der deutsch-tschechoslowakischen Grenzneuregelung von 1938 (1967)Google Scholar

Spinedi, Marina, ‘International Crimes of State: The Legislative History’, in Weiler, Joseph H.H., Cassese, Antonio & Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility 7 (1989)Google Scholar

Spinedi, Marina, ‘From One Codification to Another: Bilateralism and Multilateralism in the Genesis of the Codification of the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility’, 13 EJIL 1099 (2002a)Google Scholar

Spinedi, Marina, ‘State Responsibility v. Individual Responsibility for International Crimes: Tertium Non Datur?’, 13 EJIL 895 (2002b)Google Scholar

Stein, Ted L., ‘The Approach of the Different Drummer: The Principle of the Persistent Objector in International Law’, 26 HILJ 463 (1985)Google Scholar

Steinbach, Armin, ‘The Western Sahara Dispute: A Case for the ECJ?’, 18 Columbia Journal of European Law 415 (2012)Google Scholar

Stephan, Paul B., ‘The Political Economy of Jus Cogens’, 44 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1073 (2011)Google Scholar

Stern, Brigitte, ‘The Elements of an Internationally Wrongful Act’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain & Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility 193 (2010)Google Scholar

Suy, Eric, Les actes juridiques unilatéraux en droit international public (1962)Google Scholar

Suy, Eric, ‘Article 53: Treaties conflicting with a peremptory norm of general international law (‘jus cogens’)’, in Corten, Olivier & Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, 1224 (2011)Google Scholar

Sztucki, Jerzy, Jus Cogens and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Critical Appraisal (1974)Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan, Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile (1998)Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan, ‘Luftverkehr mit nicht anerkannten Staaten. Der Fall Nordzypern’, 43 Archiv des Völkerrechts 1 (2005)Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan, ‘The Duty Not to ‘Recognize as Lawful’ a Situation Created by the Illegal Use of Force or other Serious Breaches of a Jus Cogens Obligation: An Obligation without Real Substance?’, in Tomuschat, Christian & Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes 99 (2006a)Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan, Kollektive Nichtanerkennung illegaler Staaten (2006b)Google Scholar

Tams, Christian J., ‘Do Serious Breaches Give Rise to Any Specific Obligations of the Responsible State?’, 13 EJIL 1161 (2002a)Google Scholar

Tams, Christian J., ‘Schwierigkeiten mit dem Ius Cogens’, 40 Archiv des Völkerrechts 331 (2002b)Google Scholar

Tams, Christian J., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (2005)Google Scholar

Thirlway, Hugh, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989’, 61 BYIL 1 (1990)Google Scholar

Thirlway, Hugh, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part Three’, 62 BYIL 1 (1991)Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’, 241 RdC 195 (1993)Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Receonceptualizing the Debate on Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes – Concluding Observations’, in Tomuschat, Christian & Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes 425 (2006)Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘The Security Council and Jus Cogens’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Present and Future of Jus Cogens 7 (2015)Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian & Thouvenin, Jean-Marc (eds.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (2006).Google Scholar

Trabucchi, Alberto, Istituzioni di diritto civile (39th ed., 1999)Google Scholar

Troen, Ilan, ‘The Protocol of Sèvres: British/French/Israeli Collusion Against Egypt, 1956’, (1996) 1 Israel Studies 122Google Scholar

Tunkin, Grigory I., ‘Remarks on the Juridical Nature of Customary Norms of International Law’, 49 California Law Review 419 (1961)Google Scholar

Tunkin, Grigory I., ‘Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law’, 3 University of Toledo Law Review 107 (1971)Google Scholar

Turns, David, ‘The Stimson Doctrine of Non-Recognition: Its Historical Genesis and Influence on Contemporary International Law’, 2 Chinese Journal of International Law 105 (2003)Google Scholar

Turpel, Mary Ellen & Sands, Philippe, ‘Peremptory International Law and Sovereignty: Some Questions’, 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 365 (1987–1988)Google Scholar

Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions’ (2011)Google Scholar

United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of Practice of the Secretary-General as Depositary of Multilateral Treaties (1994)Google Scholar

United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties: Handbook (2003)Google Scholar

United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Treaty Handbook (2012)Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de, Le droit des gens ou principes de la loi naturelle: appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des Nations et des Souverains, Vol. I, (1916, reproduction of Books I and II of edition of 1758)Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred von, ‘Les principes généraux du droit dans la jurisprudence internationale’, 52 RdC 191 (1935)Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred von, ‘Forbidden Treaties in International Law’, 31 AJIL 571 (1937a)Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred von, ‘Trattati contra bonos mores’, 29 Rivista di diritto internazionale 3 (1937b)Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred von, ‘Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law’, 60 AJIL 55 (1966)Google Scholar

Verhoeven, Joe, ‘Jus Cogens and Reservations or «Counter-Reservations» to the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, in Wellens, Karel (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice, Essays in Honour of Eric Suy 195 (1998)Google Scholar

Vidmar, Jure, ‘Norm Conflicts and Hierarchy in International Law: Towards a Vertical International Legal System’, in de Wet, Erika & Vidmar, Jure (eds.), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights 13 (2012)Google Scholar

Vierdag, E.W., ‘The Time of the ‘Conclusion’ of a Multilateral Treaty: Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Related Provisions’, 59 BYIL 75 (1988)Google Scholar

Villalpando, Santiago, ‘The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests Are Protected in International Law’, 21 EJIL 387 (2010)Google Scholar

Virally, Michel, ‘Réflexions sur le “jus cogens’’’, 12 AFDI 5 (1966)Google Scholar

Vitas, Robert A., The United States and Lithuania (1990)Google Scholar

Vizulis, Izidors, The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939: The Baltic Case (1988)Google Scholar

Watts, Arthur, ‘The Legal Position in International Law of Heads of States, Heads of Governments and Foreign Ministers’, 247 RdC 10 (1994)Google Scholar

Watts, Arthur, ‘Nuclear Tests Cases’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. VII, 855 (2012)Google Scholar

Weatherall, Thomas, Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract (2015)Google Scholar

Webster, Charles, The Congress of Vienna: 1814–1815 (1919)Google Scholar

Webster’s New World College Dictionary (3rd ed., 1996)Google Scholar

Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’, 77 AJIL 413 (1983)Google Scholar

Weil, Prosper, ‘Le droit international en quête de son identité: cours général de droit international public’, 237 RdC 11 (1992)Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H.H., Cassese, Antonio & Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (1989)Google Scholar

Weisburd, A. Mark, ‘The Emptiness of the Concept of Jus Cogens, as Illustrated by the War in Bosnia-Herzegovina’, 17 Michigan Journal of International Law 1 (1995–1996)Google Scholar

Wellens, Karel (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice, Essays in Honour of Eric Suy (1998)Google Scholar

Wengler, Wilhelm, ‘Public International Law: Paradoxes of a Legal Order’, 158 RdC 9 (1977)Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika, The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (2004a)Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika, ‘The Prohibition of Torture as an International Norm of jus cogens and Its Implications for National and Customary Law’, 15 EJIL 97 (2004b)Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika & Vidmar, Jure (eds.), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights (2012a)Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika ‘Introduction’, in de Wet, Erika & Vidmar, Jure (eds.), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights 1 (2012b)Google Scholar

Wetzel, Ralf Günter & Rauschning, Dietrich, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Travaux Préparatoires (Die Wiener Vertragsrechtskonvention: Materialien zur Entstehung der einzelnen Vorschriften) (1978)Google Scholar

Wheeler-Bennett, John, Munich: Prologue to Tragedy (2nd ed., 1963)Google Scholar

Whiteman, Marjorie M., ‘Jus Cogens in International Law, with a Projected List’, 7 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 609 (1977)Google Scholar

Wilt, Harmen van der, ‘On the Hierarchy between Extradition and Human Rights’, in de Wet, Erika & Vidmar, Jure (eds.), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights 148 (2012)Google Scholar

Wirth, Steffen, ‘Immunity for Core Crimes? The ICJ’s Judgment in the Congo v. Belgium Case’, 13 EJIL 877 (2002)Google Scholar

Wittich, Stephan, ‘Punitive Damages’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain & Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility 667 (2010)Google Scholar

Wittich, Stephan, ‘Article 71: Consequences of the invalidity of a treaty which conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law’, in Dörr, Oliver & Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary 1211 (2012)Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, ‘Common Heritage of Mankind’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. II, 452 (2012a)Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012b)Google Scholar

Wood, Michael C., ‘The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions’, 2 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 73 (1998)Google Scholar

Wood, Michael C., ‘Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures: Lecture 2’ (as delivered on November 8, 2006), available at www.lcil.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LCIL/documents/lectures/2006_hersch_lecture_2.pdfGoogle Scholar

Woolsey, Lester H., ‘The Polish Boundary Question’, 38 AJIL 441 (1944)Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan & Verhoeven, Sten, ‘The Prohibition of Genocide as a Norm of Ius Cogens and Its Implications for the Enforcement of the Law of Genocide’, 5 International Criminal Law Review 401 (2005)Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy, ‘The Munich Settlement and International Law’, 33 AJIL 12 (1939)Google Scholar

Wyler, Eric, ‘From “State Crime” to Responsibility for “Serious Breaches of Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law’’’, 13 EJIL 1147 (2002)Google Scholar

Yasseen, Mustafa Kamil ‘L’interprétation des traités d’après la Convention de Vienne sur le droit des traités’, 151 RdC 1 (1976)Google Scholar

Zemanek, Karl, ‘The Metamorphosis of the Jus Cogens: From an Institution of Treaty Law to the Bedrock of the International Order?’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention 381 (2011)Google Scholar

Zemanek, Karl, ‘Unilateral Legal Acts Revisited’, in Wellens, Karel (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice, Essays in Honour of Eric Suy 209 (1998)Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas, ‘Sovereign Immunity and Violations of International Jus Cogens – Some Critical Remarks’, 16 Michigan Journal of International Law 433 (1995)Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas, et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd ed., 2012)Google Scholar