Book contents
- Legal Foundations of EU Economic Governance
- The Law in Context Series
- Legal Foundations of EU Economic Governance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Boxes
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Analytical Dialectics, Rationality, and Trust
- 2 Law as Credibility: Basic Traits
- 3 The Eurozone: Accession, Exit, and Expulsion – Revisited
- 4 The ECB and European Monetary Policy
- 5 The European Framework of Financial Regulation and Supervision: Towards a Banking Union
- 6 The Stability and Growth Pact before the Crisis
- 7 The Stability and Growth Pact under the Crisis – and Beyond
- 8 European Union Bailouts (I): General Aspects
- 9 European Union Bailouts (II): Bailouts of Member States and MOUs
- 10 The EU Economic Strategy
- Index
- References
3 - The Eurozone: Accession, Exit, and Expulsion – Revisited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2018
Book contents
- Legal Foundations of EU Economic Governance
- The Law in Context Series
- Legal Foundations of EU Economic Governance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Boxes
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Analytical Dialectics, Rationality, and Trust
- 2 Law as Credibility: Basic Traits
- 3 The Eurozone: Accession, Exit, and Expulsion – Revisited
- 4 The ECB and European Monetary Policy
- 5 The European Framework of Financial Regulation and Supervision: Towards a Banking Union
- 6 The Stability and Growth Pact before the Crisis
- 7 The Stability and Growth Pact under the Crisis – and Beyond
- 8 European Union Bailouts (I): General Aspects
- 9 European Union Bailouts (II): Bailouts of Member States and MOUs
- 10 The EU Economic Strategy
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legal Foundations of EU Economic Governance , pp. 36 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alonso Garcia, R. 2011, “El soft law comunitario,” Revista de Administración Pública, no. 154, pp. 63–94.Google Scholar
Alonso Garcia, R. 1994, Derecho comunitario : sistema constitucional y administrativo de la Comunidad Europea, CEURA, Madrid.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2010, “‘A dwelling beyond violence’: on the uses and disadvantages of history for contemporary republicans,” History of Political Thought, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, P. 2009, “Withdrawal and expulsion from the EU and EMU. Some reflections,” ECB Legal Working Paper Series, vol. 10, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Bernstorff, J. 2010, The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bordo, M. & MacDonald, R. 2012, Credibility and International Monetary Regime. A Historical Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Buti, M., Franco, D., & Ongena, H. 1998, “Fiscal discipline and flexibility in EMU: the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 81–97.Google Scholar
Charteris-Blacka, J. & Musolffb, A. 2003, “‘Battered hero’ or ‘innocent victim’? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting,” English for Specific Purposes, no. 22, pp. 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. 2012, “Competence and member state autonomy: causality, consequence and legitimacy” in The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States, eds. Micklitz, H. W. & de Witte, B., Intersentia, Cambridge, pp. 11–62.Google Scholar
Craig, P. 2011, “The ECJ and ultra vires action: a conceptual analysis,” Common Market Law Review, no. 48, pp. 395–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. P. & De Burca, G. 2011, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Damman, J. 2013, “The right to leave the Eurozone,” Texas International law Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 125–155.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. 2012, Economics of Monetary Union, 9th edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Domingo, R. 2006, Principios de derecho Global. 1000 reglas, principios y aforismos juridicos comentados Aranzadi, Thomson Aranzadi, Cizur Menor.Google Scholar
Draghi, M. 2012, Speech by Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank at the Global Investment Conference in London July 26, 2012.Google Scholar
Durden, T. 2015, “UBS Says ‘A Market Dislocation Is Necessary To Focus Minds’ And Stop ‘Underestimating Grexit Risks’,” June 2, www.zerohedge.com.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. 2007, “The breakup of the Euroarea,” NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) Working Paper 13393.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1989, Solomonic Judgements. Studies in the Limitations of Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Estella, A. 2015, “Law as credibility: an outline,” Il Foro Napoletano, no. 1, pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Estella, A. 2002, The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and Its Critique, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández de Buján, F. (dir.) 2008, Diccionario Juridico El Derecho, El Derecho Editores, Madrid.Google Scholar
Garcia de Enterria, E. 1958, “Observaciones sobre el fundamento de la inderogabilidad singular de los reglamentos,” Revista de Administración Pública, vol. 27, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Herrmann, C. W. 2002, “Monetary sovereignty over the euro and external relations of the euro area: competences, procedures and practice,” European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Hinajeros, A. 2015, The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hofmeister, H. 2011, “Goodbye Euro: legal aspects of withdrawal from the Eurozone,” Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 18, pp. 111–134.Google Scholar
James, H. 2012, Making the European Monetary Union, Harvard University Press, Cambridge & London.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1953, “Théorie du droit international public,” Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 84, pp. 1–201.Google Scholar
Klamert, M. 2014, The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R. 2001, ‘La règle résiduelle de liberté en droit international public (‘tout ce qui n’est pas interdit est permis’). Aspects théoriques.,” Revue Belge de Droit International, no. 1, pp. 100–127.Google Scholar
Konstadinidies, T. 2014, “EU foreign policy under the doctrine of implied powers: codification drawbacks and constitutional limitations,” European Law Review, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 511–530.Google Scholar
Lastra, R. M. 2006, Legal Foundations of International Monetary Stability, Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York.Google Scholar
Lastra, R. M. & Louis, J. 2013, “European economic and monetary union: history, trends, and prospects,” Yearbook of European Law, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57–206.Google Scholar
Legrain, P. 2014, European Spring: Why Our Economies and Politics are in a Mess – and How to Put Them Right, CB Books, London.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. 2011, “Federalism and the rule of law: perspectives from the European Court of Justice,” Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1338–1387.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. 1990, “Constitutionalism and the many faces of federalism,” The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 205–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K. & Gutierrez-Fons, J. A. 2010, “The allocation of powers and general principles of EU law,” Common Market Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 1629–1669.Google Scholar
Louis, J.-V. 2010, “Guest editorial: The no bail-out clause and rescue packages,” Common Market Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 971–986.Google Scholar
Magliveras, K. 2011, Membership in International Organisations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Magliveras, K. 1999, Exclusion from Participation in International Organisations. The Law and Practice Behind Member States’ Expulsion and Suspension of Membership, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.Google Scholar
Merler, S. 2015, “Who’s (still) exposed to Greece?,” Bruegel, 29 January. http://bruegel.org/2015/02/whos-still-exposed-to-greece/.Google Scholar
Mody, A. 2013, “Sovereign debt and its restructuring framework in the euro area,” Bruegel Working Paper 2013/05.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2013, “Defending democracy within the EU,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 138–149.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. 2006, “The future of the Euroarea: what happens if a Member State leaves?,” European Business Law Review, no. 4, pp. 909–937.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. & Thyeffry, G. 1998, “Thinking the unthinkable – The break up of Economic and Monetary Union,” www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/68769/thinking-the-unthinkable-the-break-up-of-economic-and-monetary-union.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W. 2010, “Adding bite to a bark: the story of article 7, E.U. enlargement, and Jorg Haider,” Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 16, pp. 385–426.Google Scholar
Scott, H. 2011, “When the Euro falls apart – A sequel 5,” Harvard Public Law, Working Paper no. 12-16, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1998356.Google Scholar
Scott, H. 1988, “When the Euro falls apart,” International Finance, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 207–228.Google Scholar
Seyad, S. M. 1999, European Community Law on the Free Movement of Capital and EMU, Kluwer Law International, The Hague & London.Google Scholar
Sinn, H. 2011, “There is no alternative but Greece’s euro zone expulsion,” www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/09/sinngreece-eurozone-expulsion.html.Google Scholar
Sinn, H. & Sell, F. 2012, “Our opt-in opt-out solution for the euro,” Financial Times, July 31, p. 9, www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2c75538-da35-11e1-b03b-00144feab49a.html#axzz3LP3MQJht.Google Scholar
Stark, J. 2008, Speech by Jürgen Stark, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, delivered at the Icelandic Chamber of Commerce Reykjavik, February 13, 2008.Google Scholar
Tatham, A. 2012, “‘Don’t mention divorce at the wedding, darling!’: EU accession and withdrawal after Lisbon” in EU Law after Lisbon, eds. Biondi, A., Eeckhout, P. & Ripley, S., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 129–154.Google Scholar
Tayler, D. 2015, “White House Refutes European Complacency: Warns Grexit Threatens Global Economic Recovery,” May 7, 2015, www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-21/white-house-refutes-european-complacency-warns-grexit-threatens-global-economic-reco.Google Scholar
Thieffry, G. 2011, “Thinking the probable: the break-up of monetary union,” Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, no. 3, pp. 103–104.Google Scholar
Tomkins, A. & Scott, P. 2015, Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland.Google Scholar
Treves, T. 2000, “Monetary sovereignty today” in International Monetary Law: Issues for the New Millennium ed. Giovanoli, M., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K. & Tuori, K. 2014, The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weatherill, S. 2004, “Competence creep and competence control,” Yearbook of European Law, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–55.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 2001, “Federalism without constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg” in The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, eds. Nicolaïdis, K. & Howse, R., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Zilioli, C. & Selmayr, M. 2000, “The European Central Bank: an independent specialized organization of Community Law,” Common Market Law Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 591–643.Google Scholar