Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

4 - Polymers

from Part I - Materials
Summary

Inquiry

How would you design a polymeric suture anchor so that it offered strength for 6 months yet would be resorbed by the body within a year?

The above inquiry presents a realistic challenge that one might face in the field of tissue repair. Suture anchors are fixation devices used for the attachment of tendons and ligaments to bone. These devices are made up of the anchor itself, which is inserted into the bone using a screw mechanism or an interference fit and is often made of biodegradable polymers that dissolve in the body over time. The anchor also is equipped with an opening at its end and a securing suture is attached to the anchor through the eyelet of the anchor. The implant must be integrated into the underlying bone in order to provide structural support until the bone is able to support the necessary loads. Typically, a bioresorbable suture anchor is designed to provide structural integrity for up to 6 months and is often fully resorbed by the body within 1–2 years. The rate at which the polymer degrades is controlled primarily through its backbone chemistry, molecular weight, and crystallinity. The case study presented at the end of this chapter examines bioresorbable polymers as sutures and suture anchors.

Historical perspective and overview

Polymers have been utilized in medical implants for nearly 80 years. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was first used in the body in the 1930s and was initially chosen for its biocompatibility, stiffness, and optical properties. Today, PMMA is widely used as a medical implant in such applications as bone cement for dental and orthopedic applications (Kühn, 2000). In the decades following their introduction into the implant field, the use of polymers expanded in the body with a diverse range of applications including blood pumps, heart-lung machines, vascular grafts, angioplasty catheters, dental and orthopedic implants, and mammary prosthetics (ASM, 2003). Materials such as silicones, polyurethanes, and adhesives were employed; however, there were no stringent device regulations in place and many biomaterials fared poorly in the body. Although medical devices were regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act did not require premarket approval for medical devices (this is discussed further in Chapter 6). In the 1960s and 1970s, developments in heart valve technology, orthopedics, sutures, dental materials, and soft tissue reconstruction prevailed. Early heart valve cages made of silicones fared poorly due to lipid adsorption, polyurethane foams used on the surface of mammary prosthetics for better adhesion were susceptible to chronic inflammatory response, and the use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as a bearing surface in both dental and orthopedic implants was complicated by high wear rates and premature device failures (Feinerman and Piecuch, 1993; Zardenta et al., 1996). Starting in 1976, medical devices were subject to pre-market approval by the FDA. Throughout the decades that followed, the implementation of regulatory constraints on medical implants, certain material applications, such as silicone breast implants and PTFE used in dental implants, were removed (silicone was temporarily banned by the FDA and later reapproved for use in breast implants) from the biomaterials market, while other polymers such as ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) used in total joint replacements became the mainstay of the orthopedics industry. Much of the past two decades has focused on the improvement of polymers known to perform well in the body. A summary of current uses for polymers in orthopedics, dentistry, cardiovascular, and soft tissue implants is given in Table 4.1.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Mechanics of Biomaterials
  • Online ISBN: 9780511977923
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977923
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Amass, W.Amass, A.Tighe, B. 1998 A review of biodegradable polymers: uses, current developments in the synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyesters, blends of biodegradable polymers and recent advances in biodegradation studiesPolymer International 47 89
American Society of Metals 2003 Handbook of Materials for Medical DevicesDavis, J.R.Materials Park, OHASM International
Arosio, P.Busini, V.Perale, G.Moscatelli, D.Masi, M. 2008 A new model of resorbable device degradation and drug releasePolymer International 57 912
Bailey, C.A.Kuiper, J.H.Kelly, C.P. 2006 Biomechanical evaluation of a new composite bioresorbable screwJournal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume 31 208
Bolton, C.W.Bruchman, B. 1983 Mechanical and biological properties of the GORE-TEX (PTFE) expanded ligamentAktuelle Probleme in Chirurgie Orthopadie 26 40
Campbell, C.D.Goldfarb, D.Roe, R. 1975 A small arterial substitute: expanded microporous polytetrafluoroethylene: patency versus porosityAnnals of Surgery 18 138
Catanese, J.Cooke, D.Maas, C.Pruitt, L. 1999 Mechanical properties of medical grade expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: the effects of internodal distance, density, and displacement rateApplied Biomaterials 48 187
Feinerman, D.M.Piecuch, J.F. 1993 Long-term retrospective analysis of twenty-three Proplast-Teflon temporomandibular joint interpositional implantsInternational Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 2 11
Flory, P.J. 1953 Principles of Polymer ChemistryIthaca, NYCornell University Press
Furmanski, J.Pruitt, L. 2009 Polymeric biomaterials for use in load bearing medical devices: The need for understanding structure-property-design relationshipsJournal of Metals14
Geary, C.Birkinshaw, C.Jones, E. 2008 Characterization of bionate polycarbonate polyurethanes for orthopedic applicationsJournal of Materials Science 19 3355
Greene, D.Pruitt, L.Maas, C. 1997 Biomechanical effects of e-PTFE implant structure on soft tissue implant stabilityLaryngoscope 107 957
Hanff, G.Dahlin, L.B.Ludborg, G. 1992 Reconstruction of ligaments with expanded poytetrafluoroethyleneScandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 26 43
Hughes, K.Ries, M.D.Pruitt, L. 2003 Structural degradation of acrylic bone cement due to in vivo and simulated agingJournal of Biomedical Materials Research 65A 126
Klapperich, C.Pruitt, L.Komvopoulos, K. 2001 Chemical and biological characteristics of low-temperature plasma treated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for biomedical applicationsJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 12 549
Kühn, K.D. 2000 Bone Cements: Up-to-date Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Commercial MaterialsNew YorkSpringer
Kurtz, S.M. 2009 The UHMWPE Handbook: Principles and Clinical Applications in Total Joint ReplacementNew YorkElsevier Academic Press
Lawrence, T.Davis, R.C. 2005 A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repairJournal of Hand Surgery 30 836
Maas, C.S.Gnepp, D.R.Bumpous, J. 1993 Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) in facial bone augmentationArchives of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Injuries 90 1008
Paavolainen, P.Makisalo, S.Skutnabb, K.Holmstrom, T. 1993 Biological anchorage of cruciate ligament prosthesisActa Orthopedics Scandanavia 64 323
Pruitt, L. 2001 Fluorocarbon polymers in biomedical engineeringAdvances in Polymer Science: Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and TechnologyWilliams, D.F.OxfordElsevier Science Limited
Pruitt, L. 2003 Radiation effects on medical polymers and on their mechanical propertiesAdvances in Polymer Science: Radiation EffectsKausch, H.H.HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag
Ratner, B.D.Hoffman, A.S.Schoen, F.J.Lemons, J.E. 1996 Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in MedicineLondonAcademic Press
Rosen, S.L. 1993 Fundamental Principles of Polymeric Materials, Second EditionNew YorkWiley
Stanford, R. 2001 A novel, resorbable suture anchor: Pullout strength from the human cadaver greater tuberosityJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 10 286
Watanabe, T. 1984 Experimental study on the influence of porosity on the development of the neointima in e-PTFE graftsJournal of Japanese Surgery Society 85 580
Wheatley, G.H.McNutt, R.T.Diethrich, E.B. 2007 Introduction to thoracic endografting: imaging, guidewires, guiding catheters, and delivery sheathsAnnals of Thoracic Surgery 83 272
Young, R.J. 1991 Introduction to PolymersLondonCRC Press
Zardenta, G.Mukai, H.Marker, V.Milam, S.B. 1996 Protein interactions with particulate teflon: implications for the foreign body responseJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 54 873