Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:16:44.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Screening for breast cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Zenon Rayter
Affiliation:
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Janine Mansi
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Screening is the application of diagnostic measures to an apparently healthy population in the hope of uncovering serious disease at an early stage when treatment is more likely to be curative than it is at a later stage. A number of countries have national programmes providing mammographic screening for breast cancer, these include the UK, Finland, Sweden, Netherlands and Australia. In other countries such as the USA widespread mammographic screening activity follows national guidance. This chapter describes the basis for breast screening as well as current practice and potential future developments.

Why screen?

The purpose of screening is to reduce the mortality from breast cancer. The value of regular screening in doing this for women over 50 has been demonstrated by randomized controlled trials.

There are a number of risk factors related to breast cancer (see Table 5.1). The strongest risk factors are being female and an older age. Most of the well-established risk factors for breast cancer are not modifiable. Unlike the association between smoking and lung cancer there is no single major cause of breast cancer that can be easily avoided.

Treatment for breast cancer, both local and systemic shows success rates closely linked to the stage of the cancer at presentation (Figure 5.1). (Cancer Research Campaign, 1996). Patients with small tumours which are less than 2 cm in diameter have a greater than 90% chance of surviving 5 years compared with 60% for patients with tumours over 5 cm in diameter. Involvement of axillary nodes indicates a worse prognosis (Miller et al., 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×