Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:51:36.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter F3 - Fluorescence microscopy

from Part F - Optical microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Igor N. Serdyuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Protein Research, Moscow
Nathan R. Zaccai
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Joseph Zaccai
Affiliation:
Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble
Get access

Summary

Historical review

1931

M. Goppert-Mayer gave the theoretical background of two-photon excitation in fluorescence. Thirty years later this phenomenon was observed experimentally shortly after the invention of the laser by W. Kaiser and C. Garrett. In 1990 W. Denk introduced two-photon excitation in fluorescent microscopy.

1948

T. Forster formulated the principle of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), a phenomenon that occurs when two different chromophores (donor and acceptor) with overlapping emission/absorption spectra are separated by a suitable orientation and a distance in the range 20–100 Å. In the early 1970s, after a long period of inaction, the ground-breaking work of L. Stryer and R. P Hohland on FRET revealed the spatial proximity relationships of two fluorescence-labelled sites in biological macromolecules, thereby establishing FRET as a spectroscopic ruler. All of this early work used either fluorescent analogues of biomolecules or fluorescent reagents covalently or non-covalently attached to macromolecules as donors or acceptors of FRET. In the 1990s the introduction of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) to FRET-based imaging microscopy gave new life to its use as a sensitive probe of protein–protein interactions and protein conformational changes in vivo.

1964

S. Singh and L. Bradely predicted a three-photon absorption mechanism. In 1995 three-photon excited fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy was demonstrated by a few groups and applied to the imaging of biological specimens and live cells.

Early 1970s

The first lifetime measurements on single points under a microscope were carried out by a few groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Methods in Molecular Biophysics
Structure, Dynamics, Function
, pp. 658 - 682
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lakovicz, J. R. (ed.) (1999). Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, second edition. New York: Academic / Plenum Publ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, B., and Jacobson, K., (eds.) (1990). Optical Microscopy for Biology. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Tamm, L. K. (1993). Total internal reflectance fluorescence microscopy. In Optical Microscopy. Emerging Methods and Applications. Eds Herman, B. and Lemasters, J. J., Academic Press.Google Scholar
Piston, D. W. (1999). Imaging living cells and tissues by two-photon excitation microscopy. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, M. G. L. (1999). Extended resolution fluorescence microscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 9, 627–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, S. (2000). Shattering the diffraction limit of light: a revolution in fluorescence microscopy? Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA., 97, 8747–8749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrader, M., Bahlmann, K., Giese, G., and Hell, S. W. (1998). 4Pi-confocal imaging in fixed biological specimens. Biophys. J., 75, 1659–1668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagorni, M., and Hell, S. W. (1998). 4Pi-Confocal microscopy provides three-dimensional images of the microtubule network with 100-to-150 nm resolution. J. Struct. Biol., 123, 236–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cragg, G. E., and So, P. T. C. (2000). Lateral resolution enhancement with standing evanescent waves. Opt. Lett., 25, 46–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klar, T. A., Jacobs, S., Dyba, M., Egner, A., and Hell, S. W. (2000). Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 8206–8210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stryer, L. (1978). Fluorescence energy transfer as a spectroscopic ruler. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 47, 819–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvin, P. R. (2000). The renaissance of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nature Str. Biol., 7, 730–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillisch, A., Lorenz, M., and Diekmann, S. (2001). Recent advances in FRET: distance determination in protein-DNA complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 11, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tcien, R. Y. (1998). The green fluorescent protein. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 509–544.Google Scholar
Ellenberg, J., Lippincot-Schwartz, J., and Presly, J. F. (1999). Dual-colour imaging with GFP variants. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaens, P. I. H., and Squire, A. (1999). Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: spatial resolution of biochemical processes in the cell. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tcien, R. Y., and Miyawaki, A. (1998). Seeing the machinery of live cells. Science, 280, 1954–1955.Google Scholar
Piston, D. W. (1999). Imaging living cells and tissues by two-photon excitation microscopy. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaens, P. I. H., and Pepperkok, R. (2000). Observing proteins in their natural habitat: the living cell. TIBS, 25, 631–636.Google ScholarPubMed
Lakovicz, J. R. (ed.) (1999). Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, second edition. New York: Academic / Plenum Publ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, B., and Jacobson, K., (eds.) (1990). Optical Microscopy for Biology. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Tamm, L. K. (1993). Total internal reflectance fluorescence microscopy. In Optical Microscopy. Emerging Methods and Applications. Eds Herman, B. and Lemasters, J. J., Academic Press.Google Scholar
Piston, D. W. (1999). Imaging living cells and tissues by two-photon excitation microscopy. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, M. G. L. (1999). Extended resolution fluorescence microscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 9, 627–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, S. (2000). Shattering the diffraction limit of light: a revolution in fluorescence microscopy? Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA., 97, 8747–8749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrader, M., Bahlmann, K., Giese, G., and Hell, S. W. (1998). 4Pi-confocal imaging in fixed biological specimens. Biophys. J., 75, 1659–1668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagorni, M., and Hell, S. W. (1998). 4Pi-Confocal microscopy provides three-dimensional images of the microtubule network with 100-to-150 nm resolution. J. Struct. Biol., 123, 236–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cragg, G. E., and So, P. T. C. (2000). Lateral resolution enhancement with standing evanescent waves. Opt. Lett., 25, 46–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klar, T. A., Jacobs, S., Dyba, M., Egner, A., and Hell, S. W. (2000). Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 8206–8210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stryer, L. (1978). Fluorescence energy transfer as a spectroscopic ruler. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 47, 819–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvin, P. R. (2000). The renaissance of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nature Str. Biol., 7, 730–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillisch, A., Lorenz, M., and Diekmann, S. (2001). Recent advances in FRET: distance determination in protein-DNA complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 11, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tcien, R. Y. (1998). The green fluorescent protein. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 509–544.Google Scholar
Ellenberg, J., Lippincot-Schwartz, J., and Presly, J. F. (1999). Dual-colour imaging with GFP variants. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaens, P. I. H., and Squire, A. (1999). Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: spatial resolution of biochemical processes in the cell. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tcien, R. Y., and Miyawaki, A. (1998). Seeing the machinery of live cells. Science, 280, 1954–1955.Google Scholar
Piston, D. W. (1999). Imaging living cells and tissues by two-photon excitation microscopy. Trends Cell Biol., 9, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaens, P. I. H., and Pepperkok, R. (2000). Observing proteins in their natural habitat: the living cell. TIBS, 25, 631–636.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×