Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:05:41.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter A2 - Macromolecules as physical particles

from Part A - Biological macromolecules and physical tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Igor N. Serdyuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Protein Research, Moscow
Nathan R. Zaccai
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Joseph Zaccai
Affiliation:
Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble
Get access

Summary

Historical review and biological applications

Late 1600s

R. Boyle questioned the extremely practically oriented chemical theory of his day and taught that the proper task of chemistry was to determine the composition of substances.

1750

A.-L. Lavoisier studied oxidation, and correctly understood the process. He demonstrated the quantitative similarity between chemical oxidation and respiration in animals. He is considered the father of modern chemistry.

Late 1700s

The work of J. Priestley, J. Ingenhousz and J. Senebier established that photosynthesis is essentially the reverse of respiration.

1800s

The development of organic chemistry, despite the strong opposition of vitalists (who believed that transformations of substances in living organisms did not obey the rules of chemistry or physics but those of a vital force), led to the birth of biochemistry. In 1828, F. Wöhler performed the first laboratory synthesis of an organic molecule, urea. During the 1840s J. V. Liebig established a firm basis for the study of organic chemistry and described the great chemical cycles in Nature. In 1869 a substance isolated from the nuclei of pus cells was named nucleic acid. O. Avery's experiments of 1944 on the transformation of pneumococcus strongly suggested that nucleic acid was the support of genetic information.

1860s

L. Pasteur is considered the father of bacteriology. He proved that microorganisms caused fermentation, putrefaction and infectious disease, and developed chemical methods for their study. In 1877 Pasteur's ‘ferments’ were named enzymes (from the Greek en ‘in’ and zyme ‘leaven or yeast’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Methods in Molecular Biophysics
Structure, Dynamics, Function
, pp. 38 - 64
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Woese, C. (1967). The Genetic Code. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Crick, F. H. C. (1968). The origin of the genetic code. J. Mol. Biol., 38, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orgel, L. E. (1968). Evolution of the genetic apparatus. J. Mol. Biol., 38, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, W. (1986). The RNA World. Nature, 319, 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirao, I., and Ellington, A. D. (1995). Re-creating the RNA World. Curr. Biol., 5, 1017–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dykxhoorn, D. M., and Novina, C. D. (2003). Killing the messenger: short RNAs that silence gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 457–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varki, A., Cummings, R.et al. (eds) (1999). Essentials of Glycobiology. New York: CSHL Press.Google Scholar
Langan, P., Nishiyama, Y., and Chanzy, H. (1999). A revised structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose II from a neutron fibre diffraction analysis. J. Am. Chem Soc., 121, 9940–9946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrit, E. A., Sarfaty, S.et al. (1994). Crystal structure of cholera toxin B-pentamer bound to receptor GM1 pentasaccharide. Protein Sci. 3, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffrey, M. (2000). A lipid's eye view of membrane protein crystallization in mesophases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 10, 486–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Pancost, R. D., and Damste, J. S. S. (2000). Widespread occurrence of structurally diverse tetraether membrane lipids: Evidence for the ubiquitous presence of low-temperature relatives of hyperthermophiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 14421–14426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickerson, R., and Geiss, I. (1969). The Structure and Action of Proteins. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
Branden, C., and Tooze, J. (1999). Introduction to Protein Structure. New York: Garland Science.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×