Adams, D. C. and Anthony, C. D. (1996). Using randomization techniques to analyse behavioural data. Animal Behaviour 51, 733–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, M. (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299, 818–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Andersson, M. and Simmons, L. W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 296–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arkes, H. R. and Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin 125, 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, S. J. (1992). Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140, S85–S108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnqvist, G. (2006). Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnqvist, G. and Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspi, J., Jäkäläniemi, A., Tuomi, J. and Siikamäki, P. (2003). Multilevel phenotypic selection on morphological characters in a metapopulation of Silene tatarica. Evolution 57, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bakker, T. C. M. (1999). The study of intersexual selection using quantitative genetics. Behaviour 136, 1237–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baskett, M. L., Levin, S. A., Gaines, S. D. and Dushoff, J. (2005). Marine reserve design and the evolution of size at maturation in harvested fish. Ecological Applications 15, 882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bednekoff, P. A. and Houston, A. I. (1994). Avian daily foraging patterns: effects of digestive constraints and variability. Evolutionary Ecology 8, 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, T. G. and Grant, A. (1999). Optimal reproductive effort in stochastic, density-dependent environments. Evolution 53, 677–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, T. G., Plaistow, S. J. and Coulson, T. N. (2006). Complex population dynamics and complex causation: devils, details and demography. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273, 1173–1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berg, F., Gustafson, U. and Andersson, L. (2006). The uncoupling protein 1 gene (UCP1) is disrupted in the pig lineage: a genetic explanation for poor thermoregulation in piglets. PLoS Genetics 2, 1178–1181.CrossRef

Björklund, M. (2004). Constancy of the G matrix in ecological time. Evolution 58, 1157–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blows, M. W. and Hoffmann, A. A. (2005). A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86, 1371–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boake, C. R. B. (1994). Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Borges, J. L. (1975). A Universal History of Infamy. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Bowler, D. E. and Benton, T. G. (2005). Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biological Reviews 80, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brandt, L. S. E. and Greenfield, M. D. (2004). Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 821–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brodin, A. (2000). Why do hoarding birds gain fat in winter in the wrong way? Suggestions from a dynamic model. Behavioral Ecology 11, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brodin, A. (2007). Theoretical models of adaptive energy management in small wintering birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B, in press.CrossRef

Brommer, J. E. (2000). The evolution of fitness in life-history theory. Biological Reviews 75, 377–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brommer, J. E., Merilä, J. and Kokko, H. (2002). Reproductive timing and individual fitness. Ecology Letters 5, 802–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brommer, J. E., Gustafsson, L., Pietiäinen, H. and Merilä, J. (2004). Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution. American Naturalist 163, 505–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruce, M. J., Herberstein, M. E. and Elgar, M. A. (2001). Signalling conflict between prey and predator attraction. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulmer, M. (1994). Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Butlin, R. K. and Tregenza, T. (2005). The way the world might be. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 1205–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Candolin, U. (1999). The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback?Animal Behaviour 58, 1261–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Candolin, U. (2000). Increased signalling effort when survival prospects decrease: male–male competition ensures honesty. Animal Behaviour 60, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Case, T. J. (2000). An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. and Rowe, L. (2003). Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, B. (1990). Optimization models, quantitative genetics and mutation. Evolution 44, 520–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christiansen, F. B. (1999). Population Genetics of Multiple Loci. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Claessen, D., Roos, A. M. and Persson, L. (2004). Population dynamic theory of size-dependent cannibalism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, C. W. and Ekman, J. (1995). Dominant and subordinate fattening strategies: a dynamic game. Oikos 72, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, C. W. and Mangel, M. (2000). Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, C. W. and Yoshimura, J. (1993a). Behavioral responses to variations in population size: a stochastic evolutionary game. Behavioral Ecology 4, 282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, C. W. and Yoshimura, J. (1993b). Optimization and ESS analysis for populations in stochastic environments. In Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 98: Adaptation in Stochastic Environments, eds. Yoshimura, J. and Clark, C. W., pp. 122–131. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A. A. and Nichols, J. D. (eds.) (2001). Dispersal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comins, H. N., Hamilton, W. D. and May, R. M. (1980). Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 82, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coppack, T. and Both, C. (2002). Predicting life-cycle adaptation of migratory birds to global climate change. Ardea 90, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotton, S., Fowler, K. and Pomiankowski, A. (2004). Condition-dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58, 1038–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T. and Grenfell, B. (1999). Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creel, S. R. (1990a). How to measure indirect fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 241, 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creel, S. R. (1990b). The future components of inclusive fitness: accounting for interactions between members of overlapping generations. Animal Behaviour 40, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crudgington, H. S. and Siva-Jothy, M. T. (2000). Genital damage, kicking and early death: the battle of the sexes takes a sinister turn in the bean weevil. Nature 407, 855–856.Google Scholar

Curio, E. (1987). Animal decision-making and the concorde fallacy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2, 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Day, T. and Taylor, P. D. (1997). Hamilton's rule meets the Hamiltonian: kin selection on dynamic characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264, 639–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeAngelis, D. L. and Mooij, W. M. (2005). Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeWitt, T. J., Sih, A. and Wilson, D. S. (1998). Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dieckmann, U. (1997). Can adaptive dynamics invade?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 128–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dieckmann, U. and Metz, J. A. J. (2006). Surprising evolutionary predictions from enhanced ecological realism. Theoretical Population Biology 69, 263–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doherty, P. F. Jr, Sorci, G., Royle, J. A.et al. (2003). Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100, 5858–5862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dubois, F., Wajnberg, É. and Cézilly, F. (2004). Optimal divorce and re-mating strategies for monogamous female birds: a simulation model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation Among Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A. and Earley, R. L. (2003). Group fusion: the impact of winner, loser, and bystander effects on hierarchy formation in large groups. Behavioral Ecology 14, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A. and Reeve, H. K. (eds.) (1998). Game Theory and Animal Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eadie, J. M. and Fryxell, J. M. (1992). Density dependence, frequency dependence, and alternative nesting strategies in goldeneyes. American Naturalist 140, 621–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edvardsson, M. and Tregenza, T. (2005). Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates?Behavioral Ecology 16, 788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrlich, P. R. and Hanski, I. (eds.) (2004). On the Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System for Population Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enquist, M. and Arak, A. (1998). Neural representation and the evolution of signal form. In Cognitive Ecology, ed. Dukas, R., pp. 21–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ens, B. J., Weissing, F. J. and Drent, R. H. (1995). The despotic distribution and deferred maturity: two sides of the same coin. American Naturalist 146, 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ernande, B. and Dieckmann, U. (2004). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 613–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eshel, I. (1982). Evolutionarily stable strategies and viability selection in Mendelian populations. Theoretical Population Biology 22, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eshel, I. and Feldman, M. W. (2001). Optimality and evolutionary stability under short-term and long-term selection. In Adaptationism and Optimality, eds. Orzack, S. H. and Sober, E., pp. 161–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Falster, D. S. and Westoby, M. (2003). Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrer, M., Otalora, F. and García-Ruiz, J. M. (2004). Density-dependent age of first reproduction as a buffer affecting persistence of small populations. Ecological Applications 14, 616–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrière, R., Dieckmann, U. and Couvet, D. (eds.) (2004a). Evolutionary Conservation Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrière, R., Dieckmann, U. and Couvet, D. (2004b). Introduction. In Evolutionary Conservation Biology, eds. Ferrière, R., Dieckmann, U., and Couvet, D., pp. 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, R. (1999). Luxury Fever. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frank, S. A. (1998). Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gandon, S. and Michalakis, Y. (1999). Evolutionarily stable dispersal rate in a metapopulation with extinctions and kin competition. Journal of Theoretical Biology 199, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, A. and West, S. A. (2004). Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. American Naturalist 164, 753–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gavrilets, S. and Rice, W. R. (2006). Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273, 3031–3038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gavrilets, S., Arnquist, G. and Friberg, U. (2001). The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268, 531–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Getty, T. (2006). Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, J. A., Norris, K., Potts, P. M.et al. (2001). The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds. Nature 412, 436–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gillespie, J. H. (1998). Population Genetics: A Concise Guide. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Givnish, T. J. (1982). Adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. American Naturalist 120, 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfray, H. C. J. and Parker, G. A. (1991). Clutch size, fecundity and parent–offspring conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 332, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomulkiewicz, R. (1998). Game theory, optimization, and quantitative genetics. In Game Theory and Animal Behavior, eds. Dugatkin, L. A. and Reeve, H. K., pp. 283–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., et al. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 198, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gyllenberg, M., Parvinen, K. and Dieckmann, U. (2002). Evolutionary suicide and evolution of dispersal in structured metapopulations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 45, 79–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. and May, R. M. (1977). Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269, 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanski, I. (1998). Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Härdling, R. and Kaitala, A. (2005). The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 106–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hazel, W. N., Smock, R. and Johnson, M. D. (1990). A polygenic model for the maintenance and evolution of conditional strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 242, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hazel, W., Smock, R. and Lively, C. M. (2004). The ecological genetics of conditional strategies. American Naturalist 163, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heino, M. and Hanski, I. (2001). Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. American Naturalist 157, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinsohn, R., Legge, S. and Barry, S. (1997). Extreme bias in sex allocation in Eclectus parrots. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264, 1325–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hines, W. G. S. and Turelli, M. (1997). Multilocus evolutionary stable strategy models: additive effects. Journal of Theoretical Biology 187, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoelzer, G. A. (1989). The good parent process of sexual selection. Animal Behaviour 38, 1067–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, B. and Rice, W. R. (1998). Chase-away selection: antagonistic seduction vs. resistance. Evolution 52, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, R. D. and Gomulkiewicz, R. (2004). Conservation implications of niche conservatism and evolution in heterogeneous environments. In Evolutionary Conservation Biology, eds. Ferrière, R., Dieckmann, U. and Couvet, D., pp. 244–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holt, R. D., Knight, T. M. and Barfield, M. (2004). Allee effects, immigration, and the evolution of species' niches. American Naturalist 163, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Houston, A. I. and McNamara, J. M. (1999). Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Houston, A. I. and McNamara, J. M. (2005). John Maynard Smith and the importance of consistency in evolutionary game theory. Biology and Philosophy 20, 933–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houston, A. I., Székely, T. and McNamara, J. M. (2005). Conflict between parents over care. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hunt, J., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. D.et al. (2004). High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432, 1024–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. and Nee, S. (1991). The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The ‘handicap’ principle. Evolution 45, 1431–1442.Google ScholarPubMed

Johnstone, R. A. and Keller, L. (2000). How males gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. American Naturalist 156, 368–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, A. G., Arnold, S. J. and Borger, R. (2003). Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57, 1747–1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, O. R., Crawley, M. J., Pilkington, J. G. and Pemberton, J. M. (2005). Predictors of early survival in Soay sheep: cohort-, maternal- and individual-level variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272, 2619–2625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jönsson, K. I., Tuomi, J. and Järemo, J. (1998). Pre- and postbreeding costs of parental investment. Oikos 83, 424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N. and Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science 312, 1908–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaitala, A., Kaitala, V. and Lundberg, P. (1993). A theory of partial migration. American Naturalist 142, 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, D. J. and Wiklund, C. (2004). Residency effects in animal contests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271, 1707–1711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kingsland, S. E. (1995). Modeling Nature, 2nd edn Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, M. and Barton, N. H. (1997). Evolution of a species' range. American Naturalist 150, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koch, G. W., Sillett, S. C., Jennings, G. M. and Davis, S. D. (2004). The limits to tree height. Nature 428, 851–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koenig, W. D. and Walters, J. R. (1999). Sex-ratio selection with helpers at the nest: the repayment model revisited. American Naturalist 153, 124–130.Google ScholarPubMed

Kokko, H. (1997). Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kokko, H. and Brooks, R. (2003). Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Annales Zoologici Fennici 40, 207–219.Google Scholar

Kokko, H. and Jennions, M. (2003). It takes two to tango. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kokko, H. and López-Sepulcre, A. (2006). From individual dispersal to species ranges: perspectives for a changing world. Science 313, 789–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kokko, H. and Lundberg, P. (2001). Dispersal, migration and offspring retention in saturated habitats. American Naturalist 157, 188–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kokko, H. and Rankin, D. J. (2006). Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kokko, H. and Sutherland, W. J. (1998). Optimal floating and queuing strategies: consequences for density dependence and habitat loss. American Naturalist 152, 354–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. and Morley, J. (2003). The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270, 653–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kokko, H., Harris, M. P. and Wanless, S. (2004). Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kokko, H., Jennions, M. D. and Brooks, R. (2006a). Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37, 43–66.

Kokko, H., López-Sepulcre, A. and Morrell, L. J. (2006b). From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. American Naturalist 167, 901–912.Google Scholar

Kölliker, M., Brodie, E. D. and Moore, A. J. (2005). The coadaptation of parental supply and offspring demand. American Naturalist 166, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kotiaho, J. S. (2007). The stability of genetic variance–covariance matrix in the presence of selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotiaho, J., Alatalo, R. V., Mappes, J., Parri, S. and Rivero, A. (1998). Male mating success and risk of predation in a wolf spider: a balance between sexual and natural selection?Journal of Animal Ecology 67, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L. W. and Tomkins, J. L. (2001). Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410, 684–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krams, I. (2002). Mass-dependent take-off ability in wintering great tits (Parus major): comparison of top-ranked adult males and subordinate juvenile females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriska, G., Horvath, G. and Andrikovics, S. (1998). Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. Journal of Experimental Biology 201, 2273–2286.Google ScholarPubMed

Kullberg, C., Fransson, T. and Jakobsson, S. (1996). Impaired predator evasion in fat blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 263, 1671–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kun, Á., Boza, G. and Scheuring, I. (2006). Asynchronous snowdrift game with synergistic effect as a model of cooperation. Behavioral Ecology 17, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J. and Feldman, M. W. (1996). The evolutionary consequences of niche construction: a theoretical investigation using two-locus theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lande, R. (1982). A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann, L. and Keller, L. (2006). The evolution of cooperation and altruism: a general framework and a classification of models. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 1365–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessells, C. M. (2005). Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior. American Naturalist 165, S46–S63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lessells, C. M. (2006). The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54, 421–431.Google Scholar

Lima, S. and Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospects. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, J., Fransson, T., Jakobsson, S. and Kullberg, C. (1999). Reduced take-off ability in robins (Erithacus rubecula) due to migratory fuel load. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lion, S., Baalen, M. and Wilson, W. G. (2006). The evolution of parasite manipulation of host dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273, 1063–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lively, C. M. (1986a). Competition, comparative life histories, and maintenance of shell dimorphism in a barnacle. Ecology 67, 858–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lively, C. M. (1986b). Predator-induced shell dimorphism in the acorn barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma. Evolution 40, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Łomnicki, A. (1999). Individual-based models and the individual-based approach to population ecology. Ecological Modelling 115, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorch, P. D., Proulx, S., Rowe, L. and Day, T. (2003). Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5, 867–881.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1974). The Psychology of Animal Learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Macleod, R., Gosler, A. G. and Cresswell, W. (2005). Diurnal mass gain strategies and perceived predation risk in the great tit Parus major. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 956–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangel, M. (2006). The Theoretical Biologist's Toolbox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangel, M., Rosenheim, J. A. and Adler, F. R. (1994). Clutch size, offspring performance, and intergenerational fitness. Behavioral Ecology 5, 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marrow, P., Johnstone, R. A. and Hurst, L. D. (1996). Riding the evolutionary streetcar: where population genetics and game theory meet. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 445–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matthews, L. M. (2003). Tests of the male-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: male snapping shrimps prefer to associate with high-value females. Behavioral Ecology 14, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1977). Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Animal Behaviour 25, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, M. A. (1997). Competition and dispersal from multiple nests. Ecology 78, 873–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McElreath, R. and Boyd, R. (2007). Mathematical Models of Social Evolution: A Guide for the Perplexed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M. (1997). Optimal life histories for structured populations in fluctuating environments. Theoretical Population Biology 51, 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M. (1998). Phenotypic plasticity in fluctuating environments: consequences of the lack of individual optimization. Behavioral Ecology 9, 642–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M. and Houston, A. I. (1986). The common currency for behavioural decisions. American Naturalist 127, 358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M., Webb, J. N. and Collins, E. J. (1995). Dynamic optimization in fluctuating environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 261, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M., Welham, R. K. and Houston, A. I. (1998). The timing of migration within the context of an annual routine. Journal of Avian Biology 29, 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M., Houston, A. I. and Collins, E. J. (2001). Optimality models in behavioral biology. SIAM Review 43, 413–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mead, L. S. and Arnold, S. J. (2004). Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 264–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mesterton-Gibbons, M. (2000). An Introduction to Game-theoretic Modelling, 2nd edn. Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meszéna, G., Kisdi, É., Dieckmann, U., Geritz, S. A. H. and Metz, J. A. J. (2001). Evolutionary optimization methods and matrix games in the unified perspective of adaptive dynamics. Selection 2, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Metcalfe, N. B. and Ure, S. E. (1995). Diurnal variation in flight performance and hence potential predation risk in small birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 261, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Metz, J. A. J., Nisbet, R. M. and Geritz, S. A. H. (1992). How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7, 198–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Milon, J. W. (2000). Pastures, fences, tragedies and marine reserves. Bulletin of Marine Science 66, 901–916.Google Scholar

Moore, A. J. and Boake, C. R. B. (1994). Optimality and evolutionary genetics: complementary procedures for evolutionary analysis in behavioural ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morrow, E. H. and Fricke, C. (2004). Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271, 2395–2401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morrow, E. H. and Pitcher, T. E. (2003). Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270, 1793–1799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moya-Laraño, J., Orta-Ocaña, J. M., Barrientos, J. A., Bach, C. and Wise, D. H. (2002). Territoriality in a cannibalistic burrowing wolf spider. Ecology 83, 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, L. D. and Rose, M. R. (1996). Evolutionary theory predicts late-life mortality plateaus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 93, 15249–15253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mylius, S. D. and Diekmann, O. (1995). On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence. Oikos 74, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakajima, M., Matsuda, H. and Hori, M. (2005). A population genetic model for lateral dimorphism frequency in fishes. Population Ecology 47, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, D. R. (1999). Agonistic behavior in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) in relation to the availability of haulout space. Marine Mammal Science 15, 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, M. A. and Sigmund, K. (2004). Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303, 793–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nunney, L. and Campbell, K. A. (1993). Assessing minimum viable population size: demography meets population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 234–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nussey, D. H., Postma, E., Gienapp, P. and Visser, M. E. (2005). Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population. Science 310, 304–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odenbaugh, J. (2005). Idealized, inaccurate but successful: a pragmatic approach to evaluating models in theoretical ecology. Biology and Philosophy 20, 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, E. M., Heino, M., Lilly, G. R.et al. (2004). Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature 428, 932–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Orzack, S. H. and Hines, W. G. S. (2005). The evolution of strategy variation: will an ESS evolve?Evolution 59, 1183–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Otto, S. P. and Day, T. (2006). A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Page, K. M. and Nowak, M. A. (2002). Unifying evolutionary dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 219, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parker, G. (2006). Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361, 235–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parker, G. A. (1979). Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, eds. M. S., Blum and Blum, N. A., pp. 123–166. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Parker, G. A. and Maynard Smith, J. (1990). Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parmigiani, S., Torricelli, P. and Lugli, M. (1987). Intermale aggression in Padogobius martensi (Guenther) (Pisces: Gobiidae) during the breeding season: effects of size, prior residence, and parental investment. Monitore Zoologico Italiano 22, 161–170.Google Scholar

Parvinen, K. (2004). Adaptive responses to landscape disturbances: theory. In Evolutionary Conservation Biology, eds. Ferrière, R., Dieckmann, U. and Couvet, D., pp. 265–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, S. L. (2004). Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 530–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pen, I. (2000). Reproductive effort in viscous populations. Evolution 54, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pen, I. and Weissing, F. J. (2000). Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 267, 2411–2418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penn, D. J. (2003). The evolutionary roots of our environmental problems: toward a Darwinian ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 78, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, A. D. and Lively, C. M. (1999). The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. American Naturalist 154, 393–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable Illusions: How Mistakes of Reason Rule Our Minds. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2005). Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 481–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pigliucci, M. (2006). Genetic variance–covariance matrices: a critique of the evolutionary quantitative genetics research program. Biology and Philosophy 21, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, M. and Schlichting, C. D. (1997). On the limits of quantitative genetics for the study of phenotypic evolution. Acta Biotheoretica 45, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pravosudov, V. V. and Lucas, J. R. (2001). Daily patterns of energy storage in food-caching birds under variable daily predation risk: a dynamic state variable model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Queller, D. C. (1997). Why do females care more than males?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264, 1555–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radwan, J., Unrug, J., Snigórska, K. and Gawronska, K. (2004). Effectiveness of sexual selection in preventing fitness deterioration in bulb mite populations under relaxed natural selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 94–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reale, D., Bousses, P. and Chapuis, J. L. (1996). Female-biased mortality induced by male sexual harassment in a feral sheep population. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 1812–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhen, T. (2000). Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 54, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rice, S. H. (2004). Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Rodenhouse, N. L., Sherry, T. W. and Holmes, R. T. (1997). Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78, 2025–2042.Google Scholar

Roff, D. A. (1994). Optimality modeling and quantitative genetics: a comparison of the two approaches. In Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution, ed. Boake, C. R. B., pp. 49–66. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Roff, D. A. (1997). Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roff, D. A. (2000). Trade-offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronce, O. and Kirkpatrick, M. (2001). When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55, 1520–1531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosales, A. (2005). John Maynard Smith and the natural philosophy of adaptation. Biology and Philosophy 20, 1027–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, T. C. II., Lima, S. L. and Vetter, W. E. (2006). Determinants of predation risk in small wintering birds: the hawk's perspective. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousset, F. (2004). Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rowe, L., Ludwig, D. and Schluter, D. (1994). Time, condition and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. American Naturalist 143, 698–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roze, D. and Rousset, F. (2005). Inbreeding depression and the evolution of dispersal rates: a multilocus model. American Naturalist 166, 708–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ryan, M. J. (1998). Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281, 1999–2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sachs, J. L., Mueller, U. G., Wilcox, T. P. and Bull, J. J. (2004). The evolution of cooperation. Quarterly Review of Biology 79, 135–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sarkar, S. (2005). Maynard Smith, optimization, and evolution. Biology and Philosophy 20, 951–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sasaki, A. and Jong, G. (1999). Density dependence and unpredictable selection in a heterogeneous environment: compromise and polymorphism in the ESS reaction norm. Evolution 53, 1329–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlichting, C. D. and Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Servedio, M. R. and Lande, R. (2006). Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice. Evolution 60, 674–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shine, R., LeMaster, M. P., Moore, I. T., Olsson, M. M. and Mason, R. T. (2001). Bumpus in the snake den: effects of sex, size, and body condition on mortality of red-sided garter snakes. Evolution 55, 598–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shulman, M. J. (1990). Aggression among sea urchins on Caribbean coral reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 140, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shuster, S. M. and Wade, M. J. (2003). Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stephens, P. A. and Sutherland, W. J. (1999). Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steppan, S. J., Phillips, P. C. and Houle, D. (2002). Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svensson, E. I., Abbott, J. and Härdling, R. (2005). Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations. American Naturalist 165, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tamachi, N. (1987). The evolution of alarm calls: an altruism with nonlinear effect. Journal of Theoretical Biology 127, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanaka, Y. (1998). Theoretical aspects of extinction by inbreeding depression. Researches on Population Ecology 40, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, P. D. (1996). Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour. Journal of Mathematical Biology 34, 654–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Taylor, P. and Frank, S. (1996). How to make a kin selection model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 180, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Taylor, P. D., Wild, G. and Gardner, A. (2007). Direct fitness or inclusive fitness: how shall we model kin selection?Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trayhum, P. (1993). Brown adipose tissue: from thermal physiology to bioenergetics. Journal of Bioscience 18, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tregenza, T. (1997). Darwin a better name than Wallace?Nature 385, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doorn, G. S., Dieckmann, U. andWeissing, F. J. (2004). Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. American Naturalist 163, 709–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Visser, M. E., Both, C. and Lambrechts, M. M. (2004). Global climate change leads to mistimed avian reproduction. Advances in Ecological Research 35, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wade, M. J., Shuster, S. M. and Demuth, J. P. (2003). Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection. American Naturalist 162, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waxman, D. and Gavrilets, S. (2005). 20 questions on adaptive dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 1139–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weber, T. P. and Houston, A. I. (1997). A general model for time-minimising avian migration. Journal of Theoretical Biology 185, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinig, C., Johnston, J., German, Z. M. and Demink, L. M. (2006). Local and global costs of adaptive plasticity to density in Arabidopsis thaliana. American Naturalist 167, 826–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weissing, F. J. (1996). Genetic versus phenotypic models of selection: can genetics be neglected in a long-term perspective?Journal of Mathematical Biology 34: 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenseleers,, T. (2006). Modelling social evolution: the relative merits and limitations of a Hamilton's rule-based approach. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 1419–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, J. F. and Haig, D. (2003). What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 359–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, C. G. (1985). A defence of reductionism in evolutionary biology. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 2, 1–27.Google Scholar

Witter, M. S., Cuthill, I. C. and Bonser, R. H. C. (1994). Experimental investigations of mass-dependent predation risk in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Animal Behaviour 48, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, J. B. and Wade, M. J. (2001). On the assignment of fitness to parent and offspring: whose fitness is it and when does it matter?Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar