Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T05:39:42.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Cancer proteomics

from Part 1.2 - Analytical techniques: analysis of RNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Samir Hanash
Affiliation:
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle,WA, USA
Ayumu Taguchi
Affiliation:
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle,WA, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The functional consequences of genetic and epigenetic changes that occur during tumor development and progression are mediated through protein alterations, which in turn account for the hallmarks of cancer, including uncontrolled proliferation, and tissue invasion and metastasis. Our current knowledge of the proteome and the spectrum of protein changes that occur in cancer and their functional consequences remain limited (1). We are challenged by the complexity of the proteome stemming from numerous post-translational modifications and the multitude of subcellular compartments in which proteins reside or traffic. As a result, most proteomic investigations have tackled a particular feature or component of the proteome, whether in cells, tissues, or biological fluids (Table 7.1). The emphasis of cancer proteomic studies has been on the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive markers, the identification of novel therapeutic targets, elucidation of signaling pathways regulated by oncogenes, and other genetic alterations that occur in cancer. Some of the progress made to date and the technologies utilized are highlighted in this chapter.

Proteomic technologies: mass spectrometry

Currently the workhorse for proteomic discovery studies is mass spectrometry, which has evolved from a tool to identify and characterize isolated proteins or for mass peak profiling of more complex protein mixtures, as in the application of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) to clinical samples, to a high-performance platform for interrogating proteomes by matching mass spectra to sequence databases to derive protein identifications (15). The parallel development of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for protein identification coupled with various pre-fractionation and separation schemes has allowed quantitative analysis of an ever-increasing number of proteins from cells, tissues, and biological fluids. Mass spectrometers currently available have significantly increased sensitivity and scan speed (16). As a result, identification of the major protein form of virtually all proteins translated from expressed genes in a cancer cell population and the comprehensive analysis of the serum and plasma proteome across seven or more logs of protein abundance have become achievable (17). However, such coverage of the proteome using mass spectrometry is achieved with low throughput. The massive amount of data produced necessitate intense informatics and statistical analysis to identify protein alterations associated with a disease state such as cancer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 52 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hanash, S, Taguchi, A. The grand challenge to decipher the cancer proteome. Nature Reviews Cancer 2010;10:652–60.CrossRef
Mallick, P, Kuster, B. Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective. Nature Biotechnology 2010;28:695–709.CrossRef
Gao, W, Kuick, R, Orchekowski, RP, et al. Distinctive serum protein profiles involving abundant proteins in lung cancer patients based upon antibody microarray analysis. BMC Cancer 2005;5:110.CrossRef
Abbott, KL, Pierce, JM. Lectin-based glycoproteomic techniques for the enrichment and identification of potential biomarkers. Methods in Enzymology 2010;480:461–76.CrossRef
Taylor, AD, Hancock, WS, Hincapie, M, Taniguchi, N, Hanash, SM. Towards an integrated proteomic and glycomic approach to finding cancer biomarkers. Genome Medicine 2009;1:57.CrossRef
Haab, BB. Antibody-lectin sandwich arrays for biomarker and glycobiology studies. Expert Reviews in Proteomics 2010;7:9–11.CrossRef
Harsha, HC, Pandey, A. Phosphoproteomics in cancer. Molecular Oncology 2010;4:482–95.CrossRef
Nomura, DK, Dix, MM, Cravatt, BF. Activity-based protein profiling for biochemical pathway discovery in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 2010;10:630–8.CrossRef
Kolch, W, Pitt, A. Functional proteomics to dissect tyrosine kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 2010;10:618–29.CrossRef
Spurrier, B, Ramalingam, S, Nishizuka, S. Reverse-phase protein lysate microarrays for cell signaling analysis. Nature Protocols 2008;3:1796–808.CrossRef
Cutillas, PR, Jorgensen, C. Biological signalling activity measurements using mass spectrometry. Biochemical Journal 2011;434:189–99.CrossRef
Choudhary, C, Mann, M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cellular Biology 2010;11:427–39.CrossRef
Qiu, J, Hanash, S. Autoantibody profiling for cancer detection. Clinical Laboratory Medicine 2009;29:31–46.CrossRef
Bassani-Sternberg, M, Barnea, E, Beer, I, et al. Soluble plasma HLA peptidome as a potential source for cancer biomarkers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107:18 769–76.
Nilsson, T, Mann, M, Aebersold, R, et al. Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nature Methods 2010;7:681–5.CrossRef
Olsen, JV, Schwartz, JC, Griep-Raming, J, et al. A dual pressure linear ion trap Orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Molecular and Cell Proteomics 2009;8:2759–69.CrossRef
Zhang, Q, Faca, V, Hanash, S.Mining the plasma proteome for disease applications across seven logs of protein abundance. Journal of Proteome Research 2011;10:46–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, M.Can proteomics retire the Western Blot?Journal of Proteome Research 2008;7:3065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wingren, C, Borrebaeck, CA. Antibody microarray analysis of directly labelled complex proteomes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2008;19:55–61.CrossRef
Buys, S, Partridge, E, Black, A, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2011;305:2295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoevesandt, O, Taussig, MJ, He, M. Protein microarrays: high-throughput tools for proteomics. Expert Reviews in Proteomics 2009;6:145–57.CrossRef
Hu, S, Xie, Z, Onishi, A, et al. Profiling the human protein-DNA interactome reveals ERK2 as a transcriptional repressor of interferon signaling. Cell 2009;139:610–22.CrossRef
Anderson, T, Wulfkuhle, J, Liotta, L, Winslow, RL, Petricoin, E, 3rd. Improved reproducibility of reverse-phase protein microarrays using array microenvironment normalization. Proteomics 2009;9:5562–6.CrossRef
Qiu, J, Choi, G, Li, L, et al. Occurrence of autoantibodies to annexin I, 14-3-3 theta and LAMR1 in prediagnostic lung cancer sera. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008;26:5060–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faca, VM, Ventura, AP, Fitzgibbon, MP, et al. Proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer cells reveals dynamic processes of protein secretion and shedding of extra-cellular domains. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e2425.
Gortzak-Uzan, L, Ignatchenko, A, Evangelou, AI, et al. A proteome resource of ovarian cancer ascites: integrated proteomic and bioinformatic analyses to identify putative biomarkers. Journal of Proteome Research 2008;7:339–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sodek, KL, Evangelou, AI, Ignatchenko, A, et al. Identification of pathways associated with invasive behavior by ovarian cancer cells using multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT). Molecular BioSystems 2008;4:762–73.CrossRef
Hochgrafe, F, Zhang, L, O’Toole, SA, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation profiling reveals the signaling network characteristics of basal breast cancer cells. Cancer Research 2010;70:9391–401.CrossRef
Geiger, T, Cox, J, Mann, M. Proteomic changes resulting from gene copy number variations in cancer cells. PLoS Genetics 2010;6:e1001090.
Geiger, T, Cox, J, Ostasiewicz, P, Wisniewski, JR, Mann, M. Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue. Nature Methods 2010;7:383–5.CrossRef
VanMeter, AJ, Rodriguez, AS, Bowman, ED, et al. Laser capture microdissection and protein microarray analysis of human non-small cell lung cancer: differential epidermal growth factor receptor (EGPR) phosphorylation events associated with mutated EGFR compared with wild type. Molecular and Cell Proteomics 2008;7:1902–24.CrossRef
Rikova, K, Guo, A, Zeng, Q, et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell 2007;131:1190–203.CrossRef
Carretero, J, Shimamura, T, Rikova, K, et al. Integrative genomic and proteomic analyses identify targets for Lkb1-deficient metastatic lung tumors. Cancer Cell 2010;17:547–59.CrossRef
Hu, S, Loo, JA, Wong, DT. Human body fluid proteome analysis. Proteomics 2006;6:6326–53.CrossRef
Chen, S, LaRoche, T, Hamelinck, D, et al. Multiplexed analysis of glycan variation on native proteins captured by antibody microarrays. Nature Methods 2007;4:437–44.CrossRef
Tada, H, Higuchi, H, Wanatabe, TM, Ohuchi, N. In vivo real-time tracking of single quantum dots conjugated with monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody in tumors of mice. Cancer Research 2007;67:1138–44.CrossRef
Shafer, MW, Mangold, L, Partin, AW, Haab, BB. Antibody array profiling reveals serum TSP-1 as a marker to distinguish benign from malignant prostatic disease. Prostate 2007;67:255–67.CrossRef
Fredriksson, S, Gullberg, M, Jarvius, J, et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nature Biotechnology 2002;20:473–7.CrossRef
Kato, K, Ishimuro, T, Arima, Y, Hirata, I, Iwata, H. High-throughput immunophenotyping by surface plasmon resonance imaging. Analytical Chemistry 2007;79:8616–23.CrossRef
Burg, TP, Godin, M, Knudsen, SM, et al. Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid. Nature 2007;446:1066–9.CrossRef
Kuhn, E, Wu, J, Karl, J, et al. Quantification of C-reactive protein in the serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry and 13C-labeled peptide standards. Proteomics 2004;4:1175–86.CrossRef
Hoppe-Seyler, F, Butz, K.Peptide aptamers: powerful new tools for molecular medicine. Journal of Molecular Medicine 2000;78:426–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerchia, L, Hamm, J, Libri, D, Tavitian, B, de Franciscis, V. Nucleic acid aptamers in cancer medicine. FEBS Letters 2002;528:12–16.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×