Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T15:37:22.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Ron Johnston
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Charles Pattie
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

The February 2013 Eastleigh by-election, discussed in the Introduction, illustrates the foundations for the Liberal Democrats’ successes at both by-elections and general elections since the 1970s. Those have been built on combinations of a strong local activist cohort, a substantial local government base (the party held all of Eastleigh's local government seats at the time of the by-election, and their candidate was one of its local councillors there; see Terry, 2013), and continuous campaigning based on local issues and claimed policy delivery, funded by local money-raising efforts aided by grants from the party's central office and the Association of Liberal Democrat Councillors. The party's problem, however, is that it has only been able to build such foundations in a minority of the country's parliamentary constituencies, and it lacks the funding to extend that base very substantially. Most of its local parties, as illustrated here, are small, with few members and insubstantial incomes and, of course, at a general election it cannot focus all of its campaigning efforts, and mobilise large numbers of party activists and volunteers, on one seat, as was the case at Eastleigh and other byelection successes in recent decades.

That situation is not peculiar to the Liberal Democrats. Labour, as again we have demonstrated here, and as the party's officials and campaign managers have admitted, is in an even weaker position overall, with very few large and active constituency parties having substantial sources of local income that can be used to sustain an organisation (with staffing and infrastructure) and to fund intensive campaigns. Few of those local parties had incomes of £25,000 or more in the years leading up to the 2010 General Election, and the party centrally was unable to contribute to their campaigning costs, when a number of their Conservative opponents were able to spend as much as £40,000 during the three months before polling day, virtually all of that money being raised locally with no subsidies from Central Office. Some constituency Labour parties were able to mobilise substantial numbers of canvassers and campaigners (including volunteers) despite their financial frailties, but these were largely last-minute responses to local situations and could not be replicated across the country.

Type
Chapter
Information
Money and Electoral Politics
Local Parties and Funding at General Elections
, pp. 191 - 194
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • In conclusion
  • Ron Johnston, University of Bristol, Charles Pattie, The University of Sheffield
  • Book: Money and Electoral Politics
  • Online publication: 24 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447306337.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • In conclusion
  • Ron Johnston, University of Bristol, Charles Pattie, The University of Sheffield
  • Book: Money and Electoral Politics
  • Online publication: 24 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447306337.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • In conclusion
  • Ron Johnston, University of Bristol, Charles Pattie, The University of Sheffield
  • Book: Money and Electoral Politics
  • Online publication: 24 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447306337.007
Available formats
×