Abelson, Robert P., “Script Processing in Attitude Formation and Decision-Making,” in Carroll, J. S. and Payne, J. W., eds., Cognition and Social Behavior (Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1976), pp. 33–46.Google Scholar

Adams, Iestyn, Brothers Across the Ocean: British Foreign Policy and the Origins of the Anglo-American “Special Relationship” 1900–1905 (London: Tauris, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Ralph James Q., British Politics and Foreign Policy in the Age of Appeasement, 1935–1939 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the Emergence of the Idea of Nuclear Rams Control,” International Security 46, no. 1 (1992), pp. 101–45.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms and Order in International Society,” International Organization 68, no. 1 (2014), pp. 143–76.Google Scholar

Adomeit, Hannes, “Russia as a ‘Great Power’ in World Affairs: Images and Reality,” International Affairs 70, no. 1 (1995), pp. 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max, Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Jephcott, Edmund (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002 [1944]).Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W., Frankel-Brunswick, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Nevitt Sanford, R., The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper, 1950).Google Scholar

Albahari, Miri, Analytical Buddhism: The Two-Tiered Illusion of the Self (New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar

Albert, Matthias, Jacobson, David, and Lapid, Yosif, eds., Identities, Border, Orders (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Albertini, Luigi, The Origins of the War of 1914, 3 vols., trans. Massey, Isabella M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952–56).Google Scholar

Alden, Chris and Schoeman, Maxi, “South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony in Africa,” International Politics 52, no. 2 (2015), pp. 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allman, T. D. Rogue State: America at War with the World (New York: Nation Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Allport, Gordon W. and Postman, Leo, Psychology of Rumor (New York: Henry Holt, 1947).Google Scholar

Ambrosio, Thomas, America’s Global Preeminience: Russia’s Quest for Multipolarity (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).Google Scholar

Anderson, Jeffrey J., “Hard Interests, Soft Power, and Germany’s Changing Role in Europe,” in Katzenstein, Tamed Power, pp. 49–79.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. S., Eighteenth Century Europe, 1713–1789 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Andreoni, James and Vesterlund, Lisa, “Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 1 (2001), pp. 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applebaum, Anne, Gulag: A History (New York: Anchor Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Archibugi, Daniele, The Global Commonwealth of Citizens. Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics and Politics in Barnes, Jonathan, ed., The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Art, David, “Making Room for November 9, 1989? The Fall of the Berlin Wall in German Politics and Memory,” in Bernhard and Kubik, Twenty Years after Communism, pp. 195–212.Google Scholar

Art, David, Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Art, David, The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Ash, Timothy Garton, In Europe’s Name: Germany and the Divided Continent (New York: Random House, 1993).Google Scholar

Ashley, Richard K. and Walker, R. B. J., “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissidence in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly, 34, no. 3 (1990), pp. 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayers, Alison J., “An Illusion of the Epoch: Critiquing the Ideology of ‘Failed States’,” International Politics 49, no. 5 (2012), pp. 568–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacevich, Andrew, The New American Militarism: How Americans are Seduced by War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Bache, Ian, George, Stephen, and Bulmer, Simon, Politics in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. “Is Memory All Talk?,” Psychologist 5 (1991), pp. 447–48.Google Scholar

Badie, Bertrand, Les Temps des Humiliés: Pathologie des Relations Internationales (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2014).Google Scholar

Bain, William, Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Twilight of International Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael, “Enlightenment and the Institution of Society: Notes for a Conceptual History,” in Kaviraj and Khilnani, Civil Society, pp. 84–104.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David A., Economic Statecraft (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Barclay, Craig R. “Composing Protoselves Through Improvisation,” in Neisser and Fivush, Remembering Self, pp. 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrie, James M., Peter Pan (New York: Henry Holt, 1987 [1904]).Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, Christopher John, The Special Relationship A Political History of Anglo-American Relations since 1945 (London: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C., Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (New York: Macmillan, 1932).Google Scholar

Baruch, Marc Olivier, “Changing Things so Everything Stays the Same: The Impossible ‘épuration’ of French Society, 1945–2000,” in Wouters, Transnational Justice and Memory in Europe, pp. 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batta, Anna, “Getting a Look into the Black Hole of Unrecognized States,” International Studies Review 15, no. 3 (2013), pp. 465–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauböck, Rainer “Constructing the Boundaries of the Volk: Nation-Building and National Populism in Austrian Politics,” in Woldak, Ruth and Pelinka, Anton, eds., The Haider Phenomenon in Austria (London: Transaction, 2002), pp. 231–53.Google Scholar

Bayne, Nicholas and Putnam, Robert D., Hanging in There: The G7 and G8 Summit in Maturity and Renewal (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate, 2000).Google Scholar

Becker, Markus C., “Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature,” Industrial and Corporate Change 13, no. 4 (2004), pp. 643–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Markus C., ed., Handbook of Organizational Routines (Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Duncan, “Victorian Visions of Global Order: An Introduction,” in Bell, Duncan, ed., Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swindler, A., and Tipton, S. M., eds., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Bem, Daryl J., “Self-Perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive dissonance Phenomena,” Psychological Review 74 (1967), pp. 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bem, Daryl J., “Self-Perception Theory,” in Berkowitz, L., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 6 (New York: Academic Press, 1972), pp. 1–62.Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, Felix, “Friends, There Are No Friends? An Intimate Reframing of the International,” Millennium 35, no. 2 (2007), pp. 647–76.Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, Felix, “Identity in International Relations,” in Danemark, Robert A., ed., The International Studies Encyclopedia (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, Felix, “Gefährliche Freundschaft: Der deutsche Einsatz in Afghanistan im transatlantischen Verhältnis,” Zeitschrift für Aussen und Sicherheits Politik 4, no. 1 (2011), pp. 271–98.Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, Felix, “Friendship, Security and Power,” forthcoming.Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, Felix, “Parameters of a National Biography,” European Journal of International Relations, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, Felix and Giegerich, Bastian, “From NATO to ESDP: A Social Constructivist Analysis of German Strategic Adjustment after the End of the Cold War,” Security Studies 19, no 3 (2010), pp. 407–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Peter and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (London: Penguin, 1966).Google Scholar

Bergmann, Werner, “Antisemitism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification,” in Kurthen, Hermann, Bergmann, Werner, and Erb, Rainer, eds., Antisemitism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah, “Two Concepts of Liberty” (first published 1958) in Hardy, Henry, ed., Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 166–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermudez, José Luis, Marcel, Anthony, and Elan, Naomi, eds., The Body and the Self (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael and Kubik, Jan, “Roundtable Discord: The Contested Legacy of 1989 in Poland,” in Bernhard and Kubik, Twenty Years after Communism, pp. 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhard, Michael and Kubik, Jan, Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, R. J., The Abuse of Evil: The Corruption of Politics and Religion since 9/11 (Cambridge: Polity, 2005).Google Scholar

Bially Mattern, Janice, “The Power Politics of Identity,” European Journal of International Relations 7, no. 3 (2001), pp. 349–97.Google Scholar

Bially Mattern, Janice, Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Biddle, Bruce, “Recent Development in Role Theory,” Annual Review of Sociology 12 (1986), pp. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggs, Michael, “Putting the State on the Map: Cartography, Territory, and European State Formation,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 1, no. 2 (1999), pp. 374–405.Google Scholar

Binder, Martin and Heupel, Monika, “The Legitimacy of the UN Security Council: Evidence from Recent General Assembly Debates,” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 3 (2014), pp. 69–106.Google Scholar

Binns, Leroy, “The Demise of the Soviet Union and its Effects on Cuba, Latin American Quarterly 42, no. 1 (1996), pp. 41–54.Google Scholar

Black, Donald, “Social Control as a Dependent Variable,” in Black, Donald, Toward a General Theory of Social Control (Orlando: Academic Press, 1984), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy, Maps and History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Black, Lindsay and Hwang, Yih-Jye, “China and Japan’s Quest for Great Power Status: Norm Entrepreneurship in Anti-Piracy Responses,” International Relations 26, no. 4 (2012), pp. 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanning, T. C. W., The Origins of the French Revolutionary Wars (London: Longmans, 1986).Google Scholar

Blanning, T. C. W., The Pursuit of Glory: Europe 1648–1815 (London: Penguin, 2007).Google Scholar

Bleiker, Roland, “The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory,” Millennium 30, no. 3 (2001), pp. 713–37.Google Scholar

Bloodgood, Elizabeth and Schmitz, Hans Peter, “Researching NGOs: Innovations in Data Collection and Methods of Analysis,” Paper presented at the International Studies Association, Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 31 March 2012.Google Scholar

Bloom, William, Personal Identity, National Identity, and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum, William, Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower, 3rd. ed. (Washington, DC: Common Cause Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Bluth, Christopher, Crisis on the Korean Penninsula (Dulles: Potomac Books, 2011).Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Philip, The Shield of Achilles: Wars, Peace and the Course of History (London: Anchor, 2002).Google Scholar

Bockenföde, Eugen W., Die deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte Forschung im 19. Jahrdundert, zeitgebundene und Leitbilder (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1961).Google Scholar

Bohannon, J. N. and Symons, V. L., “Flashbulb Memories: Confidence, Consistency, and Quantity,” in Winograd, E., and Neisser, U., eds., Affect and Accuracy in Recall (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosco, David L., Five to Rule Them All: The UN Security Council and the Making of the Modern World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Bothwell, Robert, Alliance and Illusion: Canada and the World, 1945–1984 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Bourantonis, Dimitris, The History and Politics of UN Security Council Reform (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, “Identity and Representation: Elements for a Critical Reflection on the Idea of Region,” in Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991), pp. 220–28.Google Scholar

Bozo, Frédéric, “France, ‘Gaullism’ and the Cold War,” in Leffler and Westad, Cambridge History of the Cold War, II, pp. 158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Mark Philip, “Decolonization, the Global South and the Cold War, 1919–1962,” in Leffler and Westad, Cambridge History of the Cold War, I, pp. 464–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branch, Jordan, The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Brands, H . W., The Devil We Knew: Americans and the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Brands, Hal, “Dilemmas of Brazilian Grand Strategy,” U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute Monograph, August 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braudel, Fernand, The Identity of France: History and Environment, vol. 1, trans. Reynolds, Siân (New York: Harper & Row, 1986).Google Scholar

Breslin, Shaun, “China and the Global Order: Signalling Threat or Friendship,” International Affairs 89 no. 3 (2013), pp. 615–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55, no. 3 (1999), pp. 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Gardner, W., “Who Is This ‘We’? Levels of Collective Identity and Self-Representation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, no. 2 (1996), pp. 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, W. F. “What Is Autobiographical Memory?” in Rubin, D. C., ed., Autobiographical Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 24–49.Google Scholar

Bridge, Carl and Fedorowich, Kent, The British World: Diaspora, Culture and Identity (London: Frank Cass, 2003).Google Scholar

Bridge, F. R. and Bullen, Roger, The Great Powers and the European State System, 1814–1914, 2nd ed. (Harlow: Pearson, 2005).Google Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., “American Primacy in Perspective,” Foreign Affairs 81, no. 4 (2002a), pp. 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., “From Old Thinking to New Thinking in Qualitative Research,” International Security 26 no. 4 (Spring 2002b), pp. 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Brown, Roger Glenn, Fashoda Reconsidered: The Impact of Domestic Politics on French Policy in Africa, 1893–98 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Browning, Christopher S. and McDonald, Matt, “The Future of Critical Security Studies: Ethics and the Politics of Security’, European Journal of International Relations (2011), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers and Cooper, Frederick, “Beyond ‘Identity,’” Theory and Society 29, no. 1 (2000), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruter, Michael, “On What Citizens Mean by Feeling ‘European’: Perceptions of News, Symbols and Borderless-ness,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30, no. 1 (2004), pp. 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruter, Michael, “Time Bomb – News, Media, and European Identity,” Contemporary Political Studies, 42, no. 12 (2009), pp. 1498–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brzezinski, Zbigniew and Huntington, Samuel P., Political Power: USA/USSR (New York: Viking, 1964).Google Scholar

Bucher, Bernd, “Acting Abstractions: Metaphors, Narrative Structures, and the Eclipse of Agency,” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 3 (2014), pp. 742–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, The War Trap (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Bukovansky, Mlada, Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas J., Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, eds., The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Bullock, Alan, Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, rev. ed. (New York: Harper, 1962).Google Scholar

Burges, Sean W., “Brazil’s Africa Strategy: Role Conception and the Drive for International Status,” International Affairs 91, no. 5 (2015), pp. 1212–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burges, Sean W., “Brazil as a Bridge between Old and New Powers?,” International Affairs 89 no. 3 (2013), pp. 577–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrow, Colin, “Virgils, from Dante to Milton,” in Martindale, Charles, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büthe, Tim, “Governance Through Private Authority? Non-State Actors in World Politics,” Journal of International Affairs 58 1, no. 1 (2004), pp. 281–90.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Butler, Judith, Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex (New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Butler, Judith, Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performance (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Buzan, , From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Byrnes, Giselle, ed., The New Oxford History of New Zealand (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., eds., To Walk without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T., “Legal and Primary-Social Group Social Controls,” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5 (1982), pp. 431–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, rev. ed. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Campbell, Duncan, Unlikely Allies: Britain, America and the Victorian Origins of the Special Relationship (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2008).Google Scholar

Caro, Robert A., Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York (New York: Knopf, 1974).Google Scholar

Caro, Robert A., The Years of Lyndon Johnson, 3 vols. (New York: Knopf, 1982–2002).Google Scholar

Carpenter, Charli, “Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms,” International Organization 61, no. 3 (2011), 643–67.Google Scholar

Carradine, David, The Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy (London: Penguin, 2013).Google Scholar

Carvalho, José Murilo de, “Brazil: The Burden of the Past, the Promise of the Future,” Daedalus 129, no. 2 (2000), pp. 65–68.Google Scholar

Casarini, Nicola, Barysch, Katinka, Grant, Charles, and Leonard, Mark, The Evolution of the EU-China Relationship: From Constructive Engagement to Strategic Partnership; Embracing the Dragon: The EU’s Partnership with China (London: Centre for European Reform 2006).Google Scholar

Caspersen, Nina, Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System (Cambridge: Polity, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castano, Emanuele, “European Identity: A Social-Psychological Perspective,” in Herrmann, Risse and Brewer, Transnational Identities, pp. 40–58.Google Scholar

Castano, Emanuele, “In Case of Death, Cling to the Ingroup,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 34 (2004a), pp. 375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castano, Emanuele, “On the Advantages of Reifying the Ingroup,” in Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., and Corneille, O., eds., The Psychology of Group Perception: Perceived Variability, Entitativity, and Essentialism (London: Psychology Press, 2004b), pp. 381–400.Google Scholar

Castano, Emanuele and Dechesne, Mark, “On Defeating Death: Group Reification and Social Identification as Immortality Strategies,” European Review of Social Psychology 16 (2005), pp. 221–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castano, Emanuele, Yzerbyt, V., and Paladino, M., “Fan Affiliation: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Fan Identification and Optimism,” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (2000), pp. 813–35.Google Scholar

Castano, Emanuele, Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M. P., and Sacchi, S., “I Belong, Therefore, I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002), pp. 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castiglione, Dario, “Political Identity in a Community of Strangers,” in Checkel and Katzenstein, European Identity, pp. 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cederman, Lars-Erik, “Political Boundaries and Identity Trade-Offs,” in Cederman, Lars-Erik, ed., Constructing Europe’s Identity: The External Dimension (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2001), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Cerny, Phil C., “Dilemmas of Operationalizing Hegemony,” in Haugaard, Mark and Lentner, Howard H., eds., Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics (Lanham: Lexington, 2006), pp. 67–87.Google Scholar

Cerutti, Furio and Lucarelli, Sonia, eds., The Search for a European Identity: Values, Policies and Legitimacy of the European Union (London: Routledge, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cha, Victor, Impossible State, North Korea Past and Future (New York: Ecco, 2012).Google Scholar

Chamberlain, M. E., Decolonization, 2nd ed. (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).Google Scholar

Chan, Steve, China, and the U.S., and Power-Transition Theory: A Critique (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar

Chanda, Nayan, “When Asia Was One,” Global Asia 1, no. 1 (2006), pp. 58–68.Google Scholar

Charter, David, Au Revoir Europe: What if Britain Left the EU? (London: Biteback, 2012).Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey, “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” World Politic 52, no. 2 (1998), pp. 324–48.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe, International Studies Quarterly 43 (1999), pp. 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Pater J., eds., European Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Peter J., “The Politicization of European Identities,” in Checkel and Katzenstein, European Identity, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chickering, Lawrence and Haley, P. Edward, “Strong Society, Weak State,” Hoover Institution Policy Review, no. 143, 1 June 2007.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Rogue States: The Rule of Force in World Affairs (Cambridge: South End Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Churchill, Winston, A History of the English Speaking Peoples, 4 vols. (London: Cassell, 1956–58).Google Scholar

Clark, Donald N., “Sino-Korean Relations under the Ming,” in The Cambridge History of China, vol. 8, Twitchett, Denis and Mote, Frederick W., eds., The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1694, Part 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 272–99.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian, The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ian, Globalization and International Relations Theory (Oxford: Oxford University, 1999).Google Scholar

Clark, Ian, Legitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Clark, Ian, Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ian, “Setting the Revisionist Agenda for International Legitimacy,” International Politics 44, no. 2 (March 2007), pp. 325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claude, Inis. L., “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” International Organization 20, no. 3 (1966), pp. 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl von, On War, ed. and trans. Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clinton, Hillary Rodham, “Leading Through Civilian Power: Redefining American Diplomacy and Development,” Foreign Affairs 89, no. 6 (2010), pp. 13–24.Google Scholar

Clunan, Anne L., The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity and Security Interests (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Codevilla, Angelo M., Between the Alps and a Hard Place: Switzerland in World War II and the Rewriting of History (Chicago: Regnery, 2000).Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean and Arato, Andrew, Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen P., India’s Emerging Power (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2001).Google Scholar

Cohen, Warren I., “China’s Rise in Historical Perspective,” in Liu, Guoli and Zhao, Quansheng, eds., Managing the Chinese Challenge: Global Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 23–40.Google Scholar

Cohen, Warren I., America’s Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Coicaud, Jean-Marc, Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, Vernon, Saving England: The Case for Independence. Why England Should Declare UDI (Stirling: Stirling Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Colley, Linda, Acts of Union and Disunion (London: Profile, 2014).Google Scholar

Collins, A. E., Gathercole, S. E., Conway, M. A., and Morris, P. E. M., eds., Theories of Memory (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993).Google Scholar

Connolly, William E., Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Conway, Martin, et al., eds., Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiographical Memory (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Alice, “When Just Causes Conflict with Acceptable Means: The German Peace Movement and Military Intervention in Bosnia,” German Politics and Society 15, no. 3 (1997), pp. 99–118.Google Scholar

Croft, Stuart, Securitizing Islam: Identity and the Search for Security (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Crofton, Ian, Walking the Border: A Journey Between Scotland and England (London: Birlinn, 2014).Google Scholar

Cruz, Consuelo, “Identity and Persuasion: How Nations Remember their Pasts and Make their Futures,” World Politics 52, no. 2 (2000), p. 275–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummings, Bruce, Origins of the Korean War, vol. I (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Cummings, Bruce, “Still the American Century?” Review of International Studies 25, no. 3 (1999), pp. 271–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummings, Bruce, Origins of the Korean War, vol. II (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, Ralf, Homo sociologicus. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1971).Google Scholar

Dallek, Robert, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dallek, Robert, Nixon and Kissinger: Partners in Power (New York: Harper Collins, 2007).Google Scholar

Davenport, John J., “Just War Theory Requires a New Federation of Democratic Nations,” Fordham International Law Journal 28 no. 3 (2005), pp. 763–85.Google Scholar

Davies, J. E., Constructive Engagement?: Chester Crocker & American Policy in South Africa, Namibia & Angola (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Davis, Joseph E., “Healing and the Fragmented Self,” Hedgehog Review 1 (Fall 1999), pp. 47–54.Google Scholar

Dedijer, Vladimir, The Road to Sarajevo (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996).Google Scholar

Delehanty, Wil K. and Steele, Brent J., “Engaging the Narrative in Ontological (In)Security Theory: Insights from Feminist IR,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22, no. 3 (2009), pp. 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Der Derian, James “Introducing Philosophical Traditions in International Relations,” Millennium 17, no. 2 (1988), pp. 189–93.Google Scholar

Der Derian, James, “The (S)pace of International Relations: Simulation, Surveillance, and Speed,” International Studies Quarterly 34 (1990), pp. 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, Politics of Friendship, trans. Collins, George (London: Verson, 1997).Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W., Nationalism and Social Communication (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W., Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control (Glencoe: Free Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W., Deutsch, Karl W., et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard “Postmodernism,” in Burchill, Scott and Linklater, Andrew, eds., Theories of International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1996), p. 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur F., “Knowing and the Known,” in Dewey, John, The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 12, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Dijker, Anton J. M. and Koomen, Willem, Stigmatization, Tolerance and Repair: An Integrative Psychological Analysis of Responses to Deviance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimitrova, Antoaneta and Pridham, Geoffrey, “International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe,” Democratization 11, no. 5 (2004), pp. 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dittmer, Lowell and Kim, Samuel S., eds., China’s Quest for National Identity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dittmer, Lowell and Kim, Samuel S., “In Search of a Theory of National Identity,” in Dittmer and Kim, China’s Quest for National Identity, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Dobrynin, Anatoly, In Confidence: Moscow’s Ambassador to America’s Six Cold War Presidents (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar

Dobson, Alan P., Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century: Of Friendship, Conflict and the Rise and Decline of Superpowers (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Dostoevsky, Fyodor, Notes from the Underground and the Double, trans. Wilks, Robin (New York: Penguin, 2009).Google Scholar

Dower, John, Ways of Forgetting, Ways of Remembering: Japan in the Modern World (New York: New Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Doxey, Margaret P., Economic Sanctions and Economic Enforcement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W., Empires (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Doyle, William, Oxford History of the French Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel W., The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumbrell, John, The Special Relationship: Anglo-American Relations from the Cold War to Iraq (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, John, “The Contemporary Political Significance of John Locke’s Conception of Civil Society,” in Kaviraj and Khilnani, Civil Society, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar

Dunne, Tim, “Sociological Investigations: Instrumental, Legitimist and Coercive Interpretations of International Society,” Millennium 30, no. 1 (2001), pp. 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, Emile, Suicide: A Study in Sociology (New York: Free Press, 1951 [1897]).Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile, The Rules of Sociological Method, ed. Lukes, Steven, trans. Halls, W. D. (New York: Free Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, Emile, The Division of Labor in Society, trans. Halls, W.D. (New York: Macmillan, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, Emile, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. Cosman, Carol (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Easton, David, The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science (New York: Knopf, 1953).Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek and Potter, Jonathan, “The Chancellor’s Memory: Rhetoric and Truth in Discursive Remembering,” Applied Cognitive Psychology 6 (1992), pp. 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Derek, Potter, Jonathan, and Middleton, D., “Toward a Discursive Psychology of Remembering,” The Psychologist 5 (1992), pp. 441–46.Google Scholar

Eglitis, Daina S. and Ardava, Laura, “Remembering the Revolution: Contested Pasts in the Baltic Countries,” in Bernhard, and Kubik, Twenty Years After Communism, pp. 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elder, Robert, The Information Machine: The United States Information Agency and American Foreign Policy (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert, The Court Society, trans. Jephcott, Edmund (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert, “Introduction: A Theoretical Essay on Established and Outsiders,” in Elias, Norbert and Scorson, John L., eds., The Established and Outsiders (London: Sage, 1994), pp. xv–lii.Google Scholar

Ellemers, N. and Barreto, M., “The Impact of Relative Group Status: Affective, Perceptual and Behavioral Consequences,” in Brown, R. and Gaertner, S., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), pp. 324–43.Google Scholar

Ellner, Steve “The Contrasting Variants of Populism of Hugo Chavez and Alberto Fujimori,” Journal of Latin American Studies 25, no. 1 (2003), pp. 139–62.Google Scholar

Emerson, Rupert, From Empire to Nation: The Rise to Self-Assertion of African and Asian Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emirbayer, Mustafa, “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 103, no. 2 (1997), pp. 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English, Robert D., Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals, and the End of the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English, Robert D., “Power, Ideas, and New Evidence on the Cold War’s End: A Reply to Brooks and Wohlforth,” International Security 26, no. 4 (2002), pp. 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Charlotte, “Stop Telling Us How to Behave: Socialization or Infantilization? International Studies Perspective 13, no. 2 (2012), pp. 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Erik, Childhood and Society (New York: Norton, 1950).Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik H., Identity and the Life Cycle (New York: Norton, 1959).Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik H., Identity: Youth and Crisis (New York: Norton, 1968).Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated Communities.’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erskine, Toni and Lebow, Richard Ned, Tragedy and International Relations (London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ertman, Thomas, Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew A., Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew, “Turning Points in Arms Control,” in Herrmann, Richard K. and Lebow, Richard Ned, eds., Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation, and the Study of International Relations (New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004), pp. 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fanon, Frantz, Black Skin, White Masks (Boston: Grove Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Farrell, Jonathan, “The Virgililan Intertext,” in Martindale, Charles, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 222–38.Google Scholar

Feinstein, Bruce, Real Men Don’t Eat Quiche (New York: Pocket Books, 1982).Google Scholar

Feldman, Lily Gardner, Germany’s Foreign Policy of Reconciliation: From Enmity to Amity (London: Rowman & Littlefeld, 2012).Google Scholar

Ferguson, Yale H. and Barry Jones, R. J., Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalizing World (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrara, Alessandro, Reflective Authenticity (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

Fest, Joachim, Hitler, trans. , Richard and Winslow, Clara (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1974).Google Scholar

Finkielkraut, Alain, L’identité malheureuse (Paris: Stock, 2013).Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norms Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998), pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Louis, Russia’s Road from Peace to War: Soviet Foreign Relations, 1917–1941 (New York: Harper & Row, 1969).Google Scholar

Fischer, Louis, ed., The Essential Gandhi, 2nd, ed. (New York: Vintage, 2002).Google Scholar

Fiske, Susan T., “Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination,” in Fiske, Susan T., Gilbert, Daniel T., and Lindzey, Gardner, eds., Handbook of Modern Psychology, vol. 2 (New York: Wiley, 2010), pp. 941–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fligstein, Neil, Euro-Clash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Fogu, Claudio, “Italiani brava gente: The Legacy of Fascist Historical Culture on Italian Politics of Memory,” in Lebow, Kansteiner, and Fogu, Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe, pp. 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, Rosemary, Rights beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle over Human Rights in China (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, Rosemary, “Chinese Strategies in a US-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging,” International Affairs 82, no. 1 (2006), pp. 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, Rosemary and Walter, Andrew, China, The United States and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, Rosemary and Walter, Andrew, “Global Norms and Major State Behavior: The Cases of China and the United States, European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 2 (2011), pp. 329–52.Google Scholar

Forsberg, Tuomas, “Status Conflicts Between Russia and the West: Perceptions and Emotional Biases,” unpublished paper 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Robert H., Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess (New York: Free Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, “Rethinking Recognition,” New Left Review 3 (May–June 2000), pp. 107–20.Google Scholar

Fravel, M. Taylor, Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China’s Territorial Disputes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fravel, M. Taylor, “International Relations Theory and China’s Rise: Assessing China’s Potential or Territorial Expansion,” International Studies Review 12, no. 4 (2010), pp. 505–32.Google Scholar

Friedlander, Henry, The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Friedman, Thomas L., The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999).Google Scholar

Friese, Heldrun, Identity: Identity, Time and Difference (New York: Berghahn, 2012).Google Scholar

Frölich-Steffen, Susanne, Die österreichische Identität im Wandel (Wien: Braumüller, 2003).Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn, “Tragedy, Ethics and International Relations,” in Erskine and Lebow, Tragedy and International Relations, pp. 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis, Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War, rev. ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galtung, Johann, “On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: With Examples from the Case of Rhodesis,” World Politics 19, no. 3 (1967), pp. 378–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamson, William, “The Social Psychology of Collective Action,” in Morris, Alden D. and Mueller, Carol McClure, eds., Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), pp. 53–76.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Mahatma, An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with Truth (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Garthoff, Raymond L., Détente and Confrontation: American-Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1985).Google Scholar

Garthoff, Raymond L., The Great Transition: American Soviet Relations and the End of the Cold War (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1994).Google Scholar

Gates, Robert M., Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War (New York: Knopf, 2014).Google Scholar

Gecas, Viktor, “The Self-Concept as a Basis for a Theory of Motivation,” in Howard, Judith A. and Callero, Peter L., eds., The Self-Society Dynamic (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 171–87.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, “‘From the Native’s Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding,” in Geertz, , ed., Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books, 1983), pp. 55–70.Google Scholar

Gehler, Michael, “From Non-Alignment to Neutrality: Austria’s Transformation during the First East-West Détente, 1953–1958,” Journal of Cold War Studies 7, no. 4 (2005), pp. 104–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geis, Anna and Wunderlich, Carmen, “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Comparing the Notions of ‘Rogue’ and ‘Evil’ in International Politics,” International Politics 51, no 4 (2014), pp. 458–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelb, Leslie H. with Betts, Richard K., The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1979).Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest, Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1994).Google Scholar

Genschel, Philipp and Zangl, Bernhard, “Metamorphosen des Staates – vom Herrschaftmonopolisten zum Herrschaftmanager,” Leviathan 36, no. 3 (2008), pp. 430–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genschel, Philipp and Zangl, Bernhard, “L’état et l’exercise de l’authorité politique: dénationalisation et administration,” Revue Française de Sociologie 52, no. 3 (2011), pp. 509–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentz, Friedrich von, [CE: Dépêche] inédites du chevalier de Gentz aux Hospodars de Valachie, 1813–26, 3 vols. (Paris: Plon, 1876).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and George, Juliette, Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House, a Personality Study (New York: Dover, 1964).Google Scholar

George, Jim, Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re) Introduction to International Relations (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994).Google Scholar

Gergen, Kenneth J., “Mind, Text, and Society: Self-Memory in Social Context,” in Neisser and Fivush, The Remembering Self, pp. 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, Kenneth J., “The Social Construction of Self,” in Gallagher, Oxford Handbook of the Self, pp. 633–53.Google Scholar

Gergen, Kenneth J. and Gergen, Mary M., “Narrative Form and the Construction of Psychological Science,” in Sarbin, Theodore R., ed., Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct (New York: Praeger, 1986), pp. 22–44.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity, 1990).Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).Gilbert, Martin. Auschwitz and the Allies (New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1981).Google Scholar

Gilmore, James and Pine, Joseph, Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in International Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, Sorrows of Young Werther and Novella, trans. Mayer, Elizabeth and Bogan, Louise (New York: Vintage, 1990).Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving, Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Doubleday, 1959).Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity: How People Are Categorized and Why It Matters (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1963).Google Scholar

Goh, Evelyn, Constructing the U.S. Rapprochement with China, 1961–1974: From “Red Menace” to “Tacit Ally” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Goldman, Merle, Link, Perry, and Su, Wei, “China’s Intellectuals and the Deng Era: Loss of Identity with the State,” in Dittmer and Kim, China’s Quest for National Identity, pp. 125–53.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Joshua, War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit and Teo, Victor, eds., Reconceptualizing the Divide: Identity, Memory, and Nationalism in Sino-Japanese Relations (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2010).Google Scholar

Gordon, Joy, The Invisible War: The United States and Iraq Sanctions (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Gordon, Michael R., “Domestic Conflict and the Origins of the First World War: The British and German Cases,” Journal of Modern History 46 (June 1974), pp. 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorer, Geoffrey, The People of Great Russia: A Psychological Study (New York: Chanticleer, 1950).Google Scholar

Gourevitch, Peter, “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization 32, no. 4 (Autumn 1978), pp. 881–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Arndt, J., Schimel, J., Pyszczynski, T., and Solomon, S., “Clarifying the Function of Mortality Salience-Induced Worldview Defense: Renewed Suppression or Reduced Accessibility of Death- Related Thoughts?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 (2001), pp. 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L., and Pyszczynski, T., eds., Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (New York: Guilford Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Porteus, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., and Solomon, S., “Evidence of a Terror Management Function of Cultural Icons: The Effects of Mortality Salience on the Inappropriate Use of Cherished Cultural Symbols,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (1995), pp. 1221–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., and Solomon, S., “The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory,” in Baumeister, F., ed., Public Self and Private Self (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986), pp. 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S. et al., “Evidence for Terror Management II: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Reactions to Those who Threaten or Bolster the Cultural Worldview,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990), pp. 308–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., and Breus, M., “Role of Consciousness and Accessibility of Death-Related Thoughts in Mortality Salience Effects,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994), pp. 627–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., and Chatel, D., “Terror Management and Tolerance: Does Mortality Salience Always Intensify Negative Reactions to Others Who Threaten One’s Worldview?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (1992), pp. 212–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., and Pyszczynski, T., “Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Social Behaviour: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements,” in Zanna, M. P., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 29 (New York: Academic Press, 1997), pp. 61–139.Google Scholar

Greenhill, Brian, “Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 2 (2008), pp. 343–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gries, Peter H., China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics and Diplomacy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Gries, Peter H., “Chinese Nationalism: Challenging the State?” Current History (September 2005), pp. 251–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gries, Peter H., “Identity and Conflict in Sino-American Relations,” in Johnston, Alastair Ian and Ross, Robert S., eds., New Directions in the Study of China’s Foreign Policy (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 309–39.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Martin, “Beyond the Bush Doctrine: American Hegemony and the World Order,” Australian Journal of American Studies 23, no. 1 (2004), pp. 63–75.Google Scholar

Gurr, Robert and Harff, Barbara, Ethnic Conflict in World Politics (Boulder: Westview, 1994).Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano, “The Framework of Analysis: Geopolitics Meets Foreign Policy Identity Crisis,” in Guzzini, Return of Geopolitics in Europe?, pp. 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano, ed., The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, Richard N. and O’Sullivan, Meaghan L., “Terms of Engagement: Alternatives to Punitive Policies,” Survival 42 (Summer 2000), pp. 156–72.Google Scholar

Hagström, Linus, “The ‘Abnormal’ State: Identity, Norm/Exception and Japan,” European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 1 (2015), pp. 122–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hajnal, Peter I., The G8 System and the G20: Evolution, Role and Documentation (Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Halbwachs, Maurice, La Topographie légendaire des Évangiles en Terre Sainte: Étude de mémoire collective (Paris: Presses Universitaires, 1941).Google Scholar

Halbwachs, Maurice, Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire (Paris: Albin Michel, 1994 [1935]).Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney B., National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and the International System (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart, “Negotiating Caribbean Identities,” New Left Review 209 (January–February 1995), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Halliday, Fred, Revolution and World Politics: The Rise and Fall of the Sixth Great Power (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John, The Federalist Papers with Letters of ‘Brutus’, ed. Ball, Terence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampson, Fen Osler, Jean Daudelin, John B. Hay, Holly Reid, and Martin, Todd, Madness in the Multitude: Human Security and World Disorder (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Hannan, Daniel, A Doomed Marriage: Britain and Europe (London: Notting Hill, 2012).Google Scholar

Harnisch, Sebastian, Frank, Cornelia, and Maull, Hanns Walter, Role Theory in International Relations (London: Routledge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Harwich, Martin, An Exhibit Denied: Lobbying the History of Enola Gay (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996).Google Scholar

Hassan, Gary and Ilett, Rosie, eds., Radical Scotland: Arguments for Self-Determination (Edinburgh: Luath Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Hayes, Carleton J. H., Essays on Nationalism (New York: Macmillan, 1926).Google Scholar

Heatherton, Todd F. et al., eds., The Social Psychology of Stigma (New York: Guilford, 2000).Google Scholar

Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen H., trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E. (New York: Harper & Row, 1962).Google Scholar

Hellmann, , “Linking Foreign Policy Analysis and Systemic Transformations in Global Politics: Methodological Implications of a Deweyan Approach.” Paper presented at conference on “Theorizing Foreign Policy in A Globalized World,” Forschuungskolleg Humanswissenschaften, Bad Homburg, Germany, 1–4 July 2010.Google Scholar

Hemmings, John and Karoke, Maiko, “Shinzo Abe: Foreign Policy 2.0,” Harvard Asia Quarterly 15, no. 1 (2003), pp. 8–14.Google Scholar

Henderson, Gregory, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stoessinger, John G., Divided Nations in a Divided World (New York: David MacKay, 1974).Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried, Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Herodotus, , The Histories, trans. Selincourt, Aubery de (London: Penguin, 2003).Google Scholar

Herring, George C., From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrmann, Richard and Brewer, Marilynn B., “Identities and Institutions: Becoming European in the EU,” in Herrmann, Risse, and Brewer, Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU (London: Rowman & Littlefeld, 2004), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger, “Luxury” Fleet: The Imperial German Navy, 1888–1918 (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1980).Google Scholar

Hevia, James L., Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793 (Durham: Duke University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Hinsley, F. H., “The Rise and Fall of the Modern International System,” Review of International Studies (January 1982), pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, Harold C., China’s Turbulent Quest (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Hirono, Miwa and Lanteigne, Marc, eds., China’s Evolving Approach to Peacekeeping (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, Gerhard, ed., The Policies of Genocide: Jews and Soviet Prisoners of War in Nazi Germany (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, De Cive, in Gert, Bernard, ed., Man and Citizen (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991 [1651]).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Hochman, Jiri, The Soviet Union and the Failure of Collective Security, 1934–1938 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Hofmannsthal, Hugo von, Das Märchen der 672. Nacht und andere Erzählungen (Vienna: Wiener Verlag, 1905).Google Scholar

Holbraad, C., The Concert of Europe: A Study of German and British International Theory, 1815–1914 (London: Longman, 1970).Google Scholar

Holmes, Douglas R., “Experimental Identities (after Maastricht),” in Checkel and Katzenstein, European Identity, pp. 52–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holsti, K. J., Taming the Sovereign: Institutional Change in International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel, The Struggle for Recognition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel and Fraser, Nancy Recognition or Redistribution? A Political- Philosophical Exchange (New York: Verso Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted, “The Promise of Constructivism in International Politics,” International Security 223 (1998), pp. 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopf, Ted, “Constructivism All the Way Down,” International Politics 37 (2000), pp. 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopf, Ted, Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted, “The Logic of Habit in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 16 (2010), pp. 539–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopgood, Stephen, Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Houellebecq, Michel, Soumission (Paris: Flammarion, 2015).Google Scholar

Howe, Daniel Walker, What Hath God Wrought? The Transformation of America, 1815–48 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyt, P. D., “The ‘Rogue State’ Image in American Foreign Policy,” Global Society 14, no. 2 (2000), pp. 475–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J., and Eliott, Kimberley Ann, Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd. ed. (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009).Google Scholar

Hume, David, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Beauchamp, Tom L. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hunt, Michael, “Chinese National Identity and the Strong State: The Late Qing-Republican Crisis,” in Dittmer and Kim, China’s Quest for National Identity, pp. 62–79.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996).Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian, “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization 53, no. 2 (1999), pp. 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurd, Ian, After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian, “Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimization in UN Security Council Reform,” Global Society 14 (2008), pp. 199–217.Google Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew, “Vattel: Pluralism and Its Limits,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B., eds., Classical Theories of International Relations (Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1994), pp. 233–55.Google Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew, On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew and Narilkar, Amrita, “New Politics of Confrontation? Brazil and India in Multilateral Trade Negotiations,” Global Society 20, no. 4 (2006), pp. 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huysmans, Jef, “Security! What Do You Mean! From Concept to Thick Signifier,” European Journal of International Relations 4 no. 2 (1998), pp. 226–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huysmans, Jef, The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. (London: Routledge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, Jr., I. E., “Multiple Approaches to Remembering,” The Psychologist 5 (1992), pp. 450–51.Google Scholar

Hymans, Jacques E. C., The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hynek, Nik and Bosold, David, eds., Canada’s Foreign and Security Policy (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael, “Intervention and State Failure, Dissent 49, no. 1 (2002), pp. 115–23.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, ed., America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition (Cambridge: Polity, 2006).Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John and Deudney, Daniel, “Democratic Internationalism: A New Grand Strategy for the Post-Exceptionalism Era,” Council on Foreign Relations, Working Paper, November 2012.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John and Kupchan, Charles A., “Socialization and Hegemonic Power,” International Organization 44, no. 3 (Summer 1990), pp. 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, C., Sullivan, L. and Ford, T. (1980) “Affective and Cognitive Determinants of Prejudice,” Social Cognition 9, pp. 359–80Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Richard, “Culture, Identity and Hegemony: Continuity and (Lack of) Change in US Counterterrorism Policy from Bush to Obama,” International Politics 48 (2011), pp. 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Robert H., The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J. K., “Duelling Constructivisms: A Post-Mortem on the Ideas Debate in Mainstream IE/IPE,” Review of International Studies 29, no. 1 (2003), pp. 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Jon, When the Soviet Union Entered World Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janis, Irving L. and Man, Leon, Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment (New York: Free Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Jarrett, Mark, The Congress of Vienna and Its Legacy: War and Great Power Diplomacy after Napoleon (London: I.B. Taurus, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffrey, Renée, Evil and International Relations Human Suffering in an Age of Terror (Houndsmills: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar

Jentleson, Bruce W. and Whtock, Christopher A., “Who Won Libya? The Force-Diplomacy Debate and Its Implications for Theory and Policy, International Security 30, no. 3 (2005/06), pp. 47–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert, “The Remaking of a Unipolar World,” Washington Quarterly 29, no. 3 (2006), pp. 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, Janice, Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Jian, Chen, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Jien, Chen, China’s Road to the Korean War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Jien, Chen, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain, “Is China a Status Quo Power?” International Security 27, no. 4 (2003), pp. 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Catherine, “Constructing Great Powers: China’s Status in a Socially Constructed Plurality,” International Politics 51, no. 5 (2014), pp. 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, E. E. and Harris, V. A., “The Attribution of Attitudes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3, no. 1 (1967), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Gareth Stedman, “Hegel and the Economics of Civil Society,” in Kaviraj and Khilnani, Civil Society, pp. 105–30.Google Scholar

Judd, Denis, Balfour and the British Empire: A Study in Imperial Evolution (London: Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar

Jung, Carl G., “The Spiritual Problem of Modern Man,” in Campbell, Joseph, ed., The Portable Jung (New York: Viking, 1971 [1928]), pp. 456–79.Google Scholar

Kafka, Franz, The Trial, trans. , Willa and Muir, Edwin (New York: Random House, 1956 [1925]).Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert, “America’s Crisis of Legitimacy,” Foreign Affairs 83, no. 2 (2004), pp. 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, Miles, “Rising Power and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo.” International Affairs 89 no. 3 (2013), pp. 711–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaina, Viktoria, “‘Wir’ und die ‘Anderen’ – Europäische Identitätsbildung als Konstruktion von Gemeinsamkeit und Differenz,” Zeitschrift für Politik 57, no. 4 (2010), pp. 413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, David, China Rising: Peace, Power and Order in East Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kang, David, East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Kansteiner, Wulf, “Losing the War, Winning the Memory Battle: The Legacy of Nazism, World War II, and the Holocaust in the Federal Republic of Germany,” in Lebow, , Kansteiner, , and Fogu, , Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe, pp. 102–46.Google Scholar

Kansteiner, Wulf, In Pursuit of German Memory: History, Television, and Politics after Auschwitz (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, “Conjectures on the Beginning of Human History,” in Reiss, Hans, ed., Kant’s Political Writings, 2nd. ed., trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Kaplan, Morton. System and Process in International Politics (New York: Wiley, 1957).Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., “United Germany in an Integrating Europe,” in Katzenstein, Tamed Power, pp. 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., ed., Tamed Power: Germany in Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira, Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time (New York: Liveright, 2013).Google Scholar

Kaufman, Stuart J., Little, Richard, and Wohlforth, William C., The Balance of Power in World History (New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaviraj, Sudipta and Khilnani, Sunil, eds. Civil Society: History and Possibilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kay, Sean, “Ontological Security and Peace-Building in Northern Ireland,” Contemporary Security Policy 33, no. 2 (2012), pp. 236–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keal, Paul, European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Katherine, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Edward, “International Hierarchy and the Origins of the Modern Practice of Intervention,” Review of International Studies 29, no. 5 (2013), pp. 1077–90.Google Scholar

Kehoe, Alice Beck, Humans: An Introduction to Four-Field Anthropology (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

Kehr, Eckart, Der Primat der Innenpolitik (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Robert E., “A ‘Confucian Long Peace’ in pre-Western East Asia?” European Journal of International Relations 18, no. 3 (2012), pp. 407–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendle, John E., The Round Table Movement and Imperial Union (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Kennan, George F., “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” Foreign Affairs 25, no. 4 (1947), pp. 566–82. Attributed to “X” when first published.Google Scholar

Kennan, George F., “America and the Russian Future,” Foreign Affairs 29, no. 3 (1951), pp. 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan F., “Modern Receptions and Their Interpretative Implications,” in Martindale, Charles, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M., The Rise of Anglo-German Antagonism, 1860–1914 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1980).Google Scholar

Kenny, Michael, The Politics of English Nationhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent, An, Beyond Compliance: China, International Organization, and Global Security (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder: Westview, 1989).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Jr., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Nye, Joseph S., Jr., and Hoffmann, Stanley, After the Cold War: International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989–1991 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Kershaw, Ian, The “Hitler Myth”: Image and Reality in the Third Reich (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Kessler, Suzanne and McKenna, Wendy, Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach (New York: Wiley, 1978).Google Scholar

Key, V. O., Southern Politics in State and Nation (New York: Knopf, 1949).Google Scholar

Khilnani, Sunil, “The Development of Civil Society,” in Kaviraj and Khilnani, Civil Society, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Kim, Mia, The Defections (London: Quercus, 2014).Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P., Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (New York: Basic Books, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P., “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides,” International Studies Quarterly 25, no. 2 (1981), pp. 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P., The World in Depression, 1929–1939, rev. ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986 [1973]).Google Scholar

King, Michael, The Penguin History of New Zealand (Auckland: Penguin, 2003).Google Scholar

Kinnvall, Catarina, Globalization and Religious Nationalism in India: the Search for Ontological Security (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Kinnvall, Catarina and Nesbitt-Larking, Paul, The Political Psychology of Globalization: Muslims in the West (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissinger, Henry, World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History (London: Allen Lane, 2014).Google Scholar

Kivelson, Valerie, “Cartography, Autocracy, and State Powerlessness: The Uses of Maps in Early Modern Russia,” Imago Mundi: The International Journal for the History of Cartography 51 (2002), pp. 17–42.Google Scholar

Kloft, Hans “Die Germania der Tacitus und das deutsche Nationalbewusstein,” Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 72, no. 1 (1990), pp. 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klotz, Audie, Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Koestler, Arthur, Darkness at Noon (New York: Macmillan, 1941).Google Scholar

Kohn, Hans J., The Idea of Nationalism (New York: Macmillan, 1944).Google Scholar

Kohn, Hans J., Prophets and Peoples: Studies in Nineteenth Century Nationalism (New York: Macmillan, 1946).Google Scholar

Kohn, Richard H., “History at Risk: The Case of the Enola Gay,” in Blumenthal, Edward T. and Engelhard, Tom, eds., History Wars: The Enola Gay and Other Battles for the American Past (New York: Henry Holt, 1996), pp. 140–71.Google Scholar

Kohut, Heinz, The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders (New York: International Universities Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Koinova, Maria, Ethnonationalist Conflict in Postcommunist States: Varieties of Governance in Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Kosovo (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korman, Sharon, The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kornienko, G. M., Kholodnaia voina – svideltel’svto ee uchastnika (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniia, 1994).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kowert, Paul A., “National Identity: Inside and Out,” Security Studies 8, no. 2–3 (1998), pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen, “Abiding Sovereignty,” International Political Science Review 22, no. 3 (2001), pp. 229–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich V., The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraus, Peter A., A Union of Diversity. Language, Identity and Polity-Building in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauthammer, Charles, “The Unipolar Moment,” Foreign Affairs 70, no. 1 (1990/91), pp. 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krebs, , Ronald R., Narrative and the Making of US Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krolikowsi, Alanna, “State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Sceptical View,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 1 (2008), pp. 109–33.Google Scholar

Krull, D. S., “On Partitioning the Fundamental Attribution Error: Dispositionalism and the Correspondence Bias,” in Moskowitz, G. B., ed., Cognitive Social Psychology (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001), pp. 211–27.Google Scholar

Krumeich, Gerd, “Die Dolchstoss-Legende,” in Francois, Etienne and Schulze, Hagen, eds., Deutsche Erinnerungsorte (Munich: Beck, 2000), pp. 585–99.Google Scholar

Kubik, Jan and Bernhard, Michael, “A Theory of the Politics of Memory,” in Bernhard and Kubik, Twenty Years after Communism, pp. 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Teresa, “Individual Transnationalism, Globalisation and Euroscepticism: An Empirical Test of Deutsch’s Transationalist Theory,” European Journal of Political Research 50, no. 6 (2011), pp. 811–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

La Feber, Walter, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America (New York: Norton, 1983).Google Scholar

Laffey, Mark, “Locating Identity: Performativity, Foreign Policy and State Action,” Review of International Studies 26, no. 3 (2000), pp. 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafond, Jean, La Rochefoucauld, Augustinisme et littérature, 3rd ed. (Paris: Klinchsieck, 1986).Google Scholar

Laing, R. D., Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1960).Google Scholar

Lake, Anthony “Confronting Backlash States,” Foreign Affairs 73, no. 2 (1994), pp. 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David, “Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics,” International Security 32, no 1 (2007), pp. 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David, Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Lampton, David M., The Three Faces of Chinese Power: Might, Money, and Minds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lampton, David M., Power Constrained: Sources of Mutual Suspicion in U.S.-China Relations (Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2010).Google Scholar

Lancaster, Thomas and Montinola, Gabriella, “Toward a Methodology for the Comparative Study of Political Corruption,” Crime, Law and Social Change 27, no. 3 (1997), pp. 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langer, Walter C., The Mind of Adolf Hitler (New York: Basic Books, 1972).Google Scholar

Langhorne, R, The Collapse of Europe, 1890–1914 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1981).Google Scholar

Lapid, Yosef, “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era,” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 3 (1989), pp. 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laqueur, Walter, The Terrible Secret: Suppression of the Truth about Hitler’s “Final Solution” (London: Penguin Books, 1980).Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles, “Alessandro Ferrara’s Theory of Authenticity,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2004a), pp. 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar