Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:58:05.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 23 - Reflections on a Personal Journey Studying the Psychology of Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2018

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, I. K., Cushen, P. J., and Wiley, J. (2009). Obstacles in investigating the role of restructuring in insightful problem solving. Journal of Problem Solving, 2, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buderi, R. (1996). The invention that changed the world. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Chein, J. M., and Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Working memory and insight in verbal problems: Analysis of compound remote associates. Memory and Cognition, 42, 6783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuderski, A. (2014). How well can storage capacity, executive control, and fluid reasoning explain insight problem solving. Intelligence, 46, 258270.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In The nature of insight, edited by Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, J. E., 125156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, J. I. (2008). Working memory demands in insight versus analytic problem solving. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 139176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, J. I., and Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem. Memory and Cognition, 32, 9901006.Google Scholar
Fleck, J. I., and Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436463.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. A., and Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, T. C., and Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 313.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., and Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 15341555.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., and Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29, 10001009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kounios, J., and Beeman, M. (2015). The eureka factor: Aha moments, creative insight, and the brain. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Laurenza, D. (2006). Written text for Leonardo's machines: Da Vinci's inventions revealed. In Leonardo's machines: Da Vinci's inventions revealed, edited by Taddei, M. and Zanon, E.. Cincinnati, OH: David and Charles.Google Scholar
Lung, C., and Dominowski, R. L. (1985). Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 804811.Google Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1930). Reasoning in humans: I. On direction. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10, 115143.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., and Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 15, 238246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, A., and Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In Advances in the psychology of thinking, edited by Keane, M. T, and Gilhooly, K. J., 1:144. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öllinger, M., Jones, G., and Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem. Psychological Research, 78, 266275.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (2000). The Eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Richter, I. (Ed.). (1952). The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., and Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 9296.Google Scholar
Scheerer, M. (1963). Problem solving. Scientific American, 208(4), 118128.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. (1953). Coleridge, opium, and Kubla Khan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, 3744.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2013). On the “demystification” of insight: A critique of neuroimaging studies of insight. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 114.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2015a). On the usefulness of value in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 111124.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2015b). Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 21, 539.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (forthcoming). Problem solving. In International handbook of thinking and reasoning, edited by Ball, L. and Thompson, M.. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., and Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 169192.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., and Suls, J. M. (1973). An information-processing model of Duncker's candle problem. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 255276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, J., and Jarosz, A. F. (2012). Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 258262.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×