Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:26:40.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - A multi-criteria approach to equitable fishing rights allocation in South Africa’s Western Cape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Pieter J. H. van Beukering
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Elissaios Papyrakis
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Jetske Bouma
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Roy Brouwer
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Fisheries resources are vulnerable to overexploitation, in large part because of their open-access nature. For long-term ecological and socio-economic sustainability, fisheries therefore need to be regulated by limiting TAC and/or Total Allowable Effort (TAE). It can be argued that to maximize the efficiency of the fisheries sector tradable fishing rights is the way to go. This is the solution implemented successfully in countries such as Iceland, New Zealand, etc. (Arnason 2005, Scott 2000). In many developing countries, however, protection of traditional fishing communities with their subsistence fisheries is added. Objectives of fishing rights allocation can then include poverty reduction and preservation of traditional culture.

This study deals with the fishing rights allocation in South Africa. South Africa’s fisheries yields peaked in the 1960s and 1970s, but since then many stocks have declined due to overexploitation. Although the fishing industry has historically been dominated by a few white-owned companies, since the end of apartheid new policies have been introduced to (1) rectify this inequitable distribution of fishing opportunities and (2) improve the sustainability of fisheries (Cockcroft et al. 2002, RSA 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Nature's Wealth
The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Poverty
, pp. 155 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnason, R. (2005). Property rights in fisheries: Iceland’s experience with ITQs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 15(3): 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belton, V. and Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockroft, A. C., Sauer, W. H. H., Branch, G. M. et al. (2002). Assessment of resource availability and suitability for subsistence fishers in South Africa, with a review of resource management procedures. South African Journal of Marine Science, 24: 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) (2002). Where Have All the Fish Gone? Measuring Transformation in the South African Fishing Industry. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism.Google Scholar
Janssen, R. (1992). Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, A. R., Stewart, T. J., Scott, L. et al. (2005). Fishing Rights and Small-scale Fishers: An Evaluation of the Rights Allocation Process and the Utilization of Fishing Rights in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town. Available at .Google Scholar
Joubert, A. R., Janssen, R. and Stewart, T. J. (2008). Allocating fishing rights in South Africa: a participatory approach. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 15: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, H., Sauer, W. H. H. and Britz, P. (2003). Commercial fishing rights allocation in post-apartheid South Africa: reconciling equity and stability. African Journal of Marine Science, 25: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RSA (1998). Marine Living Resources Act, Act Number 18, 1998, Republic of South Africa.
Scott, A. (2000). Moving through the narrows: from open access to ITQs and self-government. In Shotton, R. (ed.), Use of property rights in fisheries management. Fisheries Technical Paper 404/1, Rome: FAO, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. J., Joubert, A. R. and Janssen, R. (2010). MCDM Framework for fishing rights allocation in South Africa. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19(3): 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesgro (2001). TheWestern Cape fishing industry. Cape sector factsheet: Business sector updates from South Africa’s Western Cape. Available at: .
Wolman, A. G. (2006). Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 20: 1626–1634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×