Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T21:01:43.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Fusimotor control of the respiratory muscles

from Part III - Control of central nervous system output

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

A. Taylor
Affiliation:
Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK
R. Durbaba
Affiliation:
Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK
Hugh Bostock
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, London
P. A. Kirkwood
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, London
A. H. Pullen
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, London
Get access

Summary

The first observations

Following the demonstration by Leksell (1945) of the fusimotor effects of γ-efferent fibres and their detailed study by Kuffler, Hunt & Quilliam (1951), their chief action was thought to be to bias spindle afferent firing. Hunt & Kuffler (1951) emphasized the usefulness of this in preventing silencing of spindles during active muscle shortening, while Merton (1953) visualized it as a way of operating a ‘length follow-up servo’ system. By the end of the 1950s much ground work had been done on the fusimotor system, principally in hindlimb muscles, and Granit's view had become established that the γ loop was generally co-activated with direct drive to α-motoneurones (Granit, 1955; Granit, Kellerth & Szumski, 1966).

In the early 1960s, the respiratory system was recognized as a convenient model for the organization of motor control. Tom Sears was involved in a series of studies laying the foundations for this approach. Intracellular recording demonstrated the monosynaptic connections of muscle afferents to intercostal motoneurones (Eccles, Sears & Shealy, 1962) and the inhibitory as well as excitatory effects of descending respiratory drive (Sears, 1964c). He also provided important background information on the afferent and efferent fibre diameter spectra (Sears, 1964a) and on motor unit types in intercostal muscles (Andersen & Sears, 1964) and introduced recording from natural intramuscular nerve filaments of intercostal muscles, in which the action potentials of a and α motor fibres could be distinguished by their different amplitudes (Sears, 1962, 1963).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Neurobiology of Disease
Contributions from Neuroscience to Clinical Neurology
, pp. 231 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Fusimotor control of the respiratory muscles
    • By A. Taylor, Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK, R. Durbaba, Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK
  • Edited by Hugh Bostock, Institute of Neurology, London, P. A. Kirkwood, Institute of Neurology, London, A. H. Pullen, Institute of Neurology, London
  • Book: The Neurobiology of Disease
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570193.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Fusimotor control of the respiratory muscles
    • By A. Taylor, Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK, R. Durbaba, Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK
  • Edited by Hugh Bostock, Institute of Neurology, London, P. A. Kirkwood, Institute of Neurology, London, A. H. Pullen, Institute of Neurology, London
  • Book: The Neurobiology of Disease
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570193.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Fusimotor control of the respiratory muscles
    • By A. Taylor, Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK, R. Durbaba, Sherrington School of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK
  • Edited by Hugh Bostock, Institute of Neurology, London, P. A. Kirkwood, Institute of Neurology, London, A. H. Pullen, Institute of Neurology, London
  • Book: The Neurobiology of Disease
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570193.025
Available formats
×