Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-h9cmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:50:19.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Oil in the water column

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

By
Paul D. Boehm ,
Jerry M. Neff  and
David S. Page
Edited by
John A. Wiens
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
PRBO Conservation Science, California and University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

Introduction

When crude oil or petroleum products are released during a marine oil spill, organisms living in the water or feeding at the surface are the first to be affected. Oil on water or mixed into the water column may injure aquatic species of all types. Understanding the potential for injury to organisms from exposure to oil requires fully studying physical and chemical effects and quickly communicating the results. The risks to the public from the consumption of fish or other species normally harvested from the water can also be serious. A comprehensive water-assessment program provides quantitative data to address multiple concerns.

The Exxon Valdez oil spill was, until recently, the most comprehensively sampled oil spill in history and remains the most exhaustively studied oil spill. In fact, the thoroughness of the data – and the disappearance of most oil slicks and sheens by the end of the summer of 1989 – enabled all commercial fisheries to be reopened in 1990, much earlier than had been anticipated. Techniques and protocols established during the Exxon Valdez spill have been used in subsequent spills, most notably in the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Type
Chapter
Information
Oil in the Environment
Legacies and Lessons of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
 , pp. 57 - 77
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (2003). Water Quality Standards: As Amended through June 26, 2003. Juneau, AK, USA: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water; 18 AAC 70.Google Scholar
American Petroleum Institute (1998). Element 2: Water Column and Source Sampling, Guidelines for the Scientific Study of Oil Spill Effects. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
Barron, M.G., Podrabsky, T., Ogle, S., and Ricker, R.W. (1999). Are aromatic hydrocarbons the primary determinant of petroleum toxicity to aquatic organisms? Aquatic Toxicology 46(3–4): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bence, A.E., Page, D.S., and Boehm, P.D. (2007). Advances in forensic techniques for petroleum hydrocarbons: the Exxon Valdez experience. In Oil Spill Environmental Forensics: Fingerprinting and Source Identification. Wang, Z. and Stout, S.A., eds. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; ISBN-10: 0123695236; ISBN-13: 9780123695239; pp. 449–487.Google Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Brown, J.S., Page, D.S., Burns, W.A., Neff, J.M., Maki, A.W., and Bence, A.E. (2003). The chemical baseline as a key to defining continuing injury and recovery of Prince William Sound. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Oil Spill Conference (Prevention, Preparedness, Response and Restoration – Perspectives for a Cleaner Environment), April 6–11, 2003, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; pp. 275–283.Google Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Cook, L.L., and Murray, K.J. (2011). Aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in seawater: Deepwater Horizon oil spill. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Oil Spill Conference (Promoting the Science of Spill Response), May 24–26, 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Douglas, G.S., Burns, W.A., Mankiewicz, P.J., Page, D.S., and Bence, A.E. (1997). Application of petroleum hydrocarbon chemical fingerprinting and allocation techniques after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin 34(8): 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, P.D. and Fiest, D.L. (1982). Subsurface distributions of petroleum from an offshore well blowout. The IXTOC I blowout, Bay of Campeche. Environmental Science & Technology 16(2): 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Neff, J.M., and Page, D.S. (2007). Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in the waters of Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill: 1989–2005. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54(3): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Page, D.S., Brown, J.S., Neff, J.M., and Bence, A.E. (2005). Comparison of mussels and semi-permeable membrane devices as intertidal monitors of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at oil spill sites. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50(7): 740–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boehm, P.D., Page, D.S., Brown, J.S., Neff, J.M., and Burns, W.A. (2004). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels in mussels from Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA, document the return to baseline conditions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23(12): 2916–2929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilli, R., Reddy, C.M., Yoerger, D.R., Van Mooy, B.A.S., Jakuba, M.V., Kinsey, J.C., McIntyre, C.P., Sylva, S.P., and Maloney, J.V. (2010). Tracking hydrocarbon plume transport and biodegradation at Deepwater Horizon. Science 330(6001): 201–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carls, M.G., Holland, L.G., Short, J.W., Heintz, R.A., and Rice, S.D. (2004). Monitoring polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous environments with passive low-density polyethylene membrane devices. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23(6): 1416–1424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diéz, S., Jover, E., Bayona, J.M., and Albaigés, J. (2007). Prestige oil spill. III. Fate of a heavy oil in the marine environment. Environmental Science & Technology 41(9): 3075–3082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, G.S., Burns, W.A., Bence, A.E., Page, D.S., and Boehm, P. (2004). Optimizing detection limits for the analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons in complex environmental samples. Environmental Science & Technology 38(14): 3958–3964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council (2009). Exxon Valdez Trustee Council Hydrocarbon Database. Anchorage, AK, USA: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council; Project 090290.Google Scholar
French-McCay, D.P. (2004). Oil spill impact modeling: Development and validation. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23(10): 2441–2456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galt, J.A., Lehr, W.J., and Payton, D.L. (1991). Fate and transport of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental Science & Technology 25(2): 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (2011). ITOPF Handbook 2011/2012. London, UK: International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation.Google Scholar
Jernelöv, A. and Lindén, O. (1981). Ixtoc I: a case study of the world’s largest oil spill. Ambio 10(6): 299–306.Google Scholar
Kingston, P. (1999). Recovery of the marine environment following the Braer spill, Scotland. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Oil Spill Conference (Beyond 2000 – Balancing Perspective), March 8–11, 1999, Seattle, Washington. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; Special Technical Publication 4686B; pp. 103–109.Google Scholar
Lauenstein, G.G. and Daskalakis, K.D. (1998). US long-term coastal contaminant temporal trends determined from mollusk monitoring programs, 1965–1993. Marine Pollution Bulletin 37(1–2): 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2010). Analytical Quality Assurance Plan: Mississippi Canyon 252 (Deepwater Horizon) Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Version 2.2. Washington DC, USA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1985). Oil in the Sea: Inputs, Fates and Effects. Washington DC, USA: National Research Council; National Academy Press; ISBN-10: 0309034795.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1999). Spills of Non-floating Oils: Risk and Response. Washington DC, USA: National Research Council; National Academies Press; ISBN-10: 0309065909.Google Scholar
National Research Council (2005). Oil Spill Dispersants: Efficacy and Effects. Washington DC, USA: National Research Council, National Academies Press; ISBN-10: 030909562X.Google Scholar
Neff, J.M. (1990). Composition and fate of petroleum and spill-treating agents in the marine environment. In Sea Mammals and Oil: Confronting the Risks. Geraci, J.R. and Aubin, D.J., eds. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; ISBN-13: 9780122806001; pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Neff, J.M. (2002). Bioaccumulation in Marine Organisms: Effect of Contaminants from Oil Well Produced Water. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; ISBN-10: 0080437168.Google Scholar
Neff, J.M. and Burns, W.A. (1996). Estimation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in the water column based on tissue residues in mussels and salmon: an equilibrium partitioning approach. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15(12): 2240–2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J.M., Ostazeski, S., Gardiner, W., and Stejskal, I. (2000). Effects of weathering on the toxicity of three offshore Australian crude oils and a diesel fuel to marine animals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19(7): 1809–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J.M., Stout, S.A., and Gunster, D.G. (2005). Ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments: Identifying sources and toxicity. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 1(1): 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J.M. and Stubblefield, W.A. (1995). Chemical and toxicological evaluation of water quality following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters. Wells, P.G., Butler, J.N., and Hughes, J.S., eds. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials; ASTM Special Technical Publication 1219; ISBN-10: 0803118961; pp. 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, D.S., Boehm, P.D., Douglas, G.S., and Bence, A.E. (1995). Identification of hydrocarbon sources in the benthic sediments of Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters. Wells, P.G., Butler, J.N., and Hughes, J.S., eds. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials; ASTM Special Technical Publication 1219; ISBN-10: 0803118961; pp. 41–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J.R. and Driskell, W.B. (2003). The importance of distinguishing dissolved versus oil-droplet phases in assessing the fate, transport, and toxic effects of marine oil pollution. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Oil Spill Conference (Prevention, Preparedness, Response and Restoration: Perspectives for a Cleaner Environment), April 6–11, 2003, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; Special Technical Publication I 4730B; pp. 771–778.Google Scholar
Payne, J.R., Driskell, W.B., Lindeberg, M.R., Fournier, W., Larsen, M.L., Short, J.W., Rice, S.D., and Janka, D. (2005). Dissolved- and particulate-phase hydrocarbons in interstitial water from Prince William Sound intertidal beaches containing buried oil thirteen years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference (Prevention, Preparedness, Response and Restoration – Raising Global Standards), May 15–19, 2005, Miami, Florida, USA. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; pp. 83–88.Google Scholar
Petersen, J., Michel, J., Zengel, S., White, M., Lord, C., and Plank, C. (2002). Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines. Version 3.0. Seattle, WA, USA: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Ocean Service, Hazardous Materials Response Division; NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OR&R 11.Google Scholar
Reddy, C.M., Arey, J.S., Seewald, J.S., Sylva, S.P., Lemkau, K.L., Nelson, R.K., Carmichael, C.A., McIntyre, C.P., Fenwick, J., Ventura, G.T., Van Mooy, B.A.S., and Camilli, R. (2011). Composition and fate of gas and oil released to the water column during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. .Google ScholarPubMed
Reddy, C.M. and Quinn, J.G. (1999). GC-MS analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in seawater samples after the North Cape oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38(2): 126–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Requejo, A.G., Sassen, R., McDonald, T., Denoux, G., Kennicutt, II M.C., and Brooks, J.M. (1996). Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) as indicators of the source and maturity of marine crude oils. Organic Geochemistry 24(10–11): 1017–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, S.B. (2001). Guidelines and methods for determining oil spill effects. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Oil Spill Conference (Global Strategies for Prevention, Preparedness, Response, and Restoration), March 26–29, 2001, Tampa, Florida. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; Special Technical Publication 14710; pp. 1545–1548.Google Scholar
Robilliard, G.A., Boehm, P.D., and Amman, M.J. (1997). Ephemeral data collection guidance manual, with emphasis on oil spill NRDAs. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Oil Spill Conference (Improving Environmental Protection – Progress, Challenges, Responsibilities), April 7–10, 1997, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; Special Technical Publication 4651; pp. 1029–1030.Google Scholar
Sauer, T. and Boehm, P. (1991). The use of defensible analytical chemical measurements for oil spill natural resource damage assessment. In Proceedings of the 1991 International Oil Spill Conference (Prevention, Behavior, Control, Cleanup), March 4–7, 1991, San Diego, California. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; Technical Publication 4529; pp. 363–369.Google Scholar
Short, J.W. and Harris, P.M. (1996a). Chemical sampling and analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons in near-surface seawater of Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium. Rice, S.D., Spies, R.B., Wolfe, D.A., and Wright, B.A., eds. Bethesda, MD, USA: American Fisheries Society; Symposium 18; ISBN-10: 0913235954; ISSN: 08922284; pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
Short, J.W. and Harris, P.M. (1996b). Petroleum hydrocarbons in caged mussels deployed in Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium. Rice, S.D., Spies, R.B., Wolfe, D.A., and Wright, B.A., eds. Bethesda, MD, USA: American Fisheries Society; Symposium 18; ISBN-10: 0913235954; ISSN: 08922284; pp. 29–39.Google Scholar
Stout, S.A. and Wang, Z. (2007). Chemical fingerprinting of spilled or discharged petroleum: methods and factors affecting petroleum fingerprints in the environment. In Oil Spill Environmental Forensics: Fingerprinting and Source Identification. Wang, Z. and Stout, S.A., eds. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; ISBN-10: 0123695236; pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Taft, D.G., Egging, D.E., and Kuhn, H.A. (1995). Sheen surveillance: An experimental monitoring program subsequent to the 1989 Exxon Valdez shoreline cleanup. In Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters. Wells, P.G., Butler, J.N., and Hughes, J.S., eds. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials; ASTM Special Technical Publication 1219; ISBN-10: 0803118961; pp. 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, D.A., Hameedi, M.J., Galt, J.A., Watabayashi, G., Short, J., O’Clair, C., Rice, S., Michel, J., Payne, J.R., Braddock, J., Hanna, S., and Sale, D. (1994). The fate of the oil spilled from theExxon Valdez. Environmental Science & Technology 28(13): 561A–568A.Google ScholarPubMed
Wooley, C.B. (2002). The myth of the “pristine environment”: past human impact on the Gulf of Alaska coast. Spill Science and Technology Bulletin 7(1–2): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×