Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:51:45.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Promoting organ donation: challenges for the future

from Part V - Current reform and future challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

David Price
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Leicester
Anne-Maree Farrell
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
David Price
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Leicester
Muireann Quigley
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

Data from the Potential Donor Audit (PDA) of all deaths in intensive care units (ICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2008 revealed a total of 30,276 audited deaths. In 3,184 patients brain stem death was a likely diagnosis, in 2,475 cases brain stem death tests were carried out and in a further 2,417 cases, death was diagnosed according to such tests (typically patients who suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial haemorrhage). The possibility of organ donation was then considered in 2,266 cases, leading to the family being approached for permission for donation in 2,125 instances. Consent was given on 1,299 occasions and organ donation occurred in 1,186 cases. Thus, not only are just a small percentage of persons who die in ICUs potential (heart-beating) donors (slightly over 10 per cent), but only a relatively limited percentage of these potential donors become actual donors (the conversion rate) – approximately 49 per cent. A process of attrition begins from the moment that brain stem death becomes a possibility. Not only were 22 per cent of these patients not subjected to brain stem death testing at all, but in 12 per cent of instances the family was not approached for consent, nor did any discussion of organ donation take place. The picture presented above replicates that demonstrated by the earlier PDA in the UK between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2006.

Type
Chapter
Information
Organ Shortage
Ethics, Law and Pragmatism
, pp. 245 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×