Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T04:10:44.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

71 - Vascular access

from Part IX - Miscellaneous

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

A. Martin Barrett
Affiliation:
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Roly Squire
Affiliation:
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Mark D. Stringer
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Keith T. Oldham
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Pierre D. E. Mouriquand
Affiliation:
Debrousse Hospital, Lyon
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The intravascular administration of drugs has a long history, dating back to at least the seventeenth century, when William Harvey defined vascular anatomy (Exercitatio Anatomica De Motu Cordis et Sanguinis). However, early techniques were crude, relying on natural materials such as quill and bladder. A significant advance occurred in 1853, when Alexander Wood employed the recently developed needle and syringe to give intravenous medications. Contemporary practice is based on these early developments, but it is only in the last 50 years that progressive refinements of equipment and technique have allowed the routine use of vascular access through various routes. In 1952 Aubaniac introduced a technique for central venous catheterization, and bravely stated “elle est strictement sans danger”. Many subsequent publications have demonstrated the overconfidence of this pronouncement but, at the same time, reviews of the various procedures have shown that vascular access can be performed effectively with a high degree of safety. In the UK, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance which recommends the use of ultrasound guidance for percutaneous cannulation of the internal jugular veins in all patients over 3 kg. Table 71.1 outlines the range of vascular access procedures currently in common usage. Unfortunately, there are very little data on long-term outcomes. In particular, there are no long-term longitudinal cohort studies in children. Our current knowledge is therefore based on extrapolation from published short- to mid-term data.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pediatric Surgery and Urology
Long-Term Outcomes
, pp. 947 - 957
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubaniac, R.L'injection intraveneuse sous-claviculaire.Presse Med. 1952; 60:1456.Google Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Final Appraisal Determination. Ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. NICE guidelines – Aug.2002. www.nice.org.uk.
Janik, J. E., Conlon, S. J., & Janik, J. S.Percutaneous central access in patients younger than 5 years: size does matter.J. Pediatr. Surg. 2004; 39:1252–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karthaus, M., Doellmann, T., Klimasch, T.et al.Central venous catheter infections in patients with acute leukaemia.Chemotherapy 2002; 48:154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raad, I., Davies, S., Khan, A.et al.Impact of central venous catheter removal on the recurrence of catheter-related coagulase negative staphylococcal bacteremia.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1992; 13:215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppes, S. C., Troutman, J. L. & Gutman, L. T.Outcome of treatment of candidemia in children whose central catheters were removed or retained.Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1989; 8:99–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Raad, I. I., Luna, M., Khalil, S. A.et al.The relationship between the thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994; 271:1014–1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehall, J. A., Saltzman, D. A., Jackson, R. J.et al.Fibrin sheath enhances central venous catheter infection.Crit. Care Med. 2002; 30:908–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massicote, P., Dix, D., Monagle, P.et al.Central venous catheter-related thrombus in children: analysis of the Canadian Registry of Thromboembolic Complications.J. Pediatr. 1998; 133:770–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monagle, P., Adams, M., Mahoney, M.et al.Outcome of paediatric thromboembolic disease. A report from the Canadian Childhood Thrombophilia Registry. Pediatr. Res. 2000; 47:763–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, P. W., Jones, R., Bagnall-Reeb, H. A.et al.Prophylactic urokinase in the management of long-term venous access devices in children: a Children's Oncology Group study.J. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 22:2718–2723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terrill, K. R., Lemons, R. S. & Goldsby, R. E.Safety, dose and timing of releplase in treating occluded central venous catheters in children with cancer.J. Pediatr. Haematol. Oncol. 2003; 25:864–867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pippus, K. G., Giacomantonio, J. M., Gillis, D. A.et al.Thrombotic complications of saphenous central venous lines.J. Pediatr. Surg. 1994; 29:1218–1219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, P. Jr., Ehrenkranz, R., Kleinman, C. S.et al.Thrombus associated with central venous catheters in infants and children.J. Pediatr. Surg. 1989; 24:253–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alkalay, A. L., Mazkereth, R., Santulli, T. Jr.et al.Central venous line thrombosis in premature infants: a case management and literature review.Am. J. Perinatol. 1993; 10:323–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newall, F., Barnes, C., Savoia, H.et al.Warfarin therapy in children who require long-term total parenteral nutrition.Pediatrics 2003; 112:e386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worly, J. M., Fortenberry, J. D., Hansen, I.et al.Deep venous thrombosis in children with diabetic ketoacidosis and femoral central venous catheters.Pediatrics 2004; 113:e57–e60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeney, S. E. & Richardson, C. J.Extravascular extravasation of fluid as a complication of central venous lines in the neonate.J. Perinatol. 1995; 15:284–288.Google ScholarPubMed
Kassner, E.Evaluation and treatment of chemotherapy extravasation injuries.J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nursing 2000; 17:135–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gault, D. T.Extravasation injuries.Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1993; 46:91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, J., Gault, D., & Buchdahl, R.Preventing the scars of neonatal intensive care.Arch. Dis. Child. 1994; 70:F50–F51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yucha, B., Hasting-Tolsma, M., & Szevenji, N. M.Effect of elevation on intravenous extravasation.J. Intraven. Nursing 1994; 17:231–234.Google Scholar
Tweddle, D. A., Windebank, K. P., Barrett, A. M.et al.Central venous catheter usage in UKCCSG oncology centres.Arch. Dis. Child. 1997; 77:58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. C., Patel, J. V., Picton, S. V.et al.Internal thoracic vein cannulation as a complication of central venous catheter insertion.Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 2003; 40:195–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, A. M., Imeson, J., Leese, D.et al.Factors influencing early failure of central venous catheters in children with cancer.J. Pediatr. Surg. 2004; 39:1520–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willetts, I. E., Ayodeji, M., Ramsden, W. H.et al.Venous patency after open central venous cannulation.Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2000; 16:411–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angel, C. Y., Brenot, P., Rion, J. Y.et al.Extraction des corps estrangers intra-vasculaires.Presse Med. 1995; 24:665–670.Google Scholar
Jones, S. A. & Giacomantonio, M.A complication associated with central line removal in the pediatric population: retained fixed catheter fragments.J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003; 38: 594–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rand, T., Kohlhauser, C., Popow, C.et al.Sonographic detection of internal jugular vein thrombosis after central venous catheterization in the newborn period.Pediatr. Radiol. 1994; 24:577–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moukarzel, A. A., Haddad, I., Ament, M. E.et al.230 patient years of experience with home long-term parenteral nutrition: natural history and life of central venous catheters.J. Pediatr. Surg. 1994; 29:1323–1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stratov, I., Gottlieb, T., Bradbury, R.et al.Candidaemia in an Australian teaching hospital: relationship to central line and TPN use.J. Infect. 1998; 36:203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollery, C. M., Sullivan, I. D., Bauraind, O.et al.Thrombosis and embolism in long-term central venous access for parenteral nutrition.Lancet 1994; 344:1043–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, A. J., Sreeram, N., Wright, J. G.et al.ECG and echocardiographic diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism associated with central venous lines.Arch. Dis. Child. 1995; 73:147–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wesley, J. R.Efficiency and safety of total parenteral nutrition in pediatric patients.Mayo Clin. Proc. 1992; 67:671–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiba, E., Kanbasyashi, J., Sahon, M.et al.Septic pulmonary emboli after prolonged use of central venous catheter for parenteral nutrition.Eur. J. Surg. 1992; 158:59–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Essex-Cater, A., Gilbert, J., Robinson, T.et al.Totally implantable venous access systems in paediatric practice.Arch. Dis. Child. 1989; 64:119–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sola, J. E., Stone, M. M., Wise, B.et al.Atypical thrombotic and septic complications of totally implantable venous access devices in patients with cystic fibrosis.Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1992; 14:239–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, C. K. & Conway, S. P.Candidaemia therefore risk factors in patients with cystic fibrosis who have totally implantable vascular access systems.J. Infect. 1993; 26:127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, A. & Spencer, D.Totally implantable venous access devices for cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003; 3:CD004111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santagostino, E., Gringeri, A., Berardinelli, L.et al.Long-term safety and feasibility of arteriovenous fistulae as vascular accesses in children with haemophilia: a prospective study.Br. J. Haematol. 2003; 123:502–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wesenberg, F., Flaaten, H., & Janssen, C. W. Jr. Central venous catheter with subcutaneous injection port (Port-A-Cath): 8 years clinical follow up with children.Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1993; 10:233–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girvan, D. P., Verber, L. L., Inwood, M. J.et al.Subcutaneous infusion ports in the paediatric patient with haemophilia.J. Pediatr. Surg. 1994; 29:1220–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, C., Smith, J., & Khair, K.et al.Central venous access devices in children with congenital coagulation disorders: complications and long-term outcome.Br. J. Haematol. 2000; 110:461–468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leisner, R. J., Vora, A. J., Hann, I. M.et al.Use of central venous catheters in children with severe congenital coagulopathy.Br. J. Haematol. 1995; 91:203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambauer, R., Inniger, R., Pirrung, K. J.et al.Complications and side effects associated with large-bore catheters in the subclavian and internal jugular veins.Artif. Organs 1994; 18:318–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schillinger, F., Schillinger, D., Montagnac, R.et al.Stenosis veinuses centrales en hemodialyse: etude angiographique comparative des acces soud-claviers et jugulaires internes.Nephrologie 1994; 15:129–131.Google Scholar
Kovalik, E. C., Newman, G. E., Suhooki, P.et al.Correction of central venous stenosis: use of angioplasty and vascular wall stents.Kidney Int. 1994; 45:1177–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, W. W. M., Vos, A., & Okken, A.Incidence of forearm and hand ischaemia related to radial artery cannulation in newborn infants.Intens. Care Med. 1990; 16:50–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, E., Baines, D. B., French, B. G.et al.Upper limb amputation following radial artery cannulation.Anaesth. Intens. Care 1993; 21:351–353.Google ScholarPubMed
Berger, C., Dwand, C., Francoise, M.et al.Surveillance echographique ud cathetrisine arterial umbilical chez le noueau-ne.Arch. Pediatr. 1994; 1:998–1003.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Relationship of intraventricular hemorrhage or death with the level of umbilical artery catheter placement: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Umbilical Artery Catheter Trial Group. Pediatrics 1992; 90:881–887.
Cumming, W. A. & Burkfield, D. J.Accidental catheterization of internal iliac branches: a serious complication of umbilical artery catheterization.J. Perinatol. 1994; 14:304–309.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirk, C. R., & Qureshi, S. A.Microvascular surgery to preserve a preterm infant's ischaemic arm (letter).Br. Med. J. 1988; 297:1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, P. M. & Scully, L.Microvascular surgery to preserve a preterm infant's ischaemic arm.Br. Med. J. 1988; 297:788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, R., Kissoon, N. & Gayle, M.Compartment syndrome following intraosseus infusion.Pediatrics 1993; 91:1201–1202.Google Scholar
Simmons, C. M., Johnson, N. E., & Perkin, R. M.et al.Intraosseus extravasation complication reports.Ann. Emerg. Med. 1994; 23:363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolar, C. J. H., Snedecor, S. M., & Bartlett, R. H.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and neonatal respiratory failure: experience from the Extracorporial Life Support Organisation.J. Pediatr. Surg. 1991; 26:563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, J., Frisk, V., & White, H.Developemental outcome of infants treated with extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the neonatal period: is the evidence all in?Paediatr. Perinatal. Epidemiol. 1994; 8:123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. S., Shore, A. C., & Fauza, D.et al.Fate of the reconstructed carotid artery after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.J. Pediatr. Surg. 1995; 30:1046–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somme, S. & Liu, D. C.New trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in newborn pulmonary diseases.Artif. Organs. 2001; 25:633–637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×