Book contents
- Personality and Close Relationship Processes
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Personality and Close Relationship Processes
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Introduction
- Part I Overview
- Part II Self and Personality Constructs as Reflected in Close Relationship Processes
- Part III Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
Book contents
- Personality and Close Relationship Processes
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Personality and Close Relationship Processes
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Introduction
- Part I Overview
- Part II Self and Personality Constructs as Reflected in Close Relationship Processes
- Part III Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Personality and Close Relationship Processes , pp. 199 - 232Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Acker, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acton, G. S., & Revelle, W. (2002). Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 456–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adler, A. (1917a). Study of organ inferiority and its psychical compensation: A contribution to clinical medicine. New York, NY: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co. (Original work published 1907).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, A. (1917b). The neurotic constitution: Outline of a comparative individualistic psychology and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Moffatt. (Original work published 1912).Google Scholar
Adler, A. (1957). Understanding human nature. New York, NY: Greenberg. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations, pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Thompson, V. D., & Gaines, S. O., Jr. (2000). Incorporating proximal and distal influences on prejudice: Testing a general model across outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1992). John Bowlby (1907–1990): Obituary. American Psychologist, 47, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1928). A test for ascendance-submission. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 23, 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In Murchison, C. A. (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1937a). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1937b). The functional autonomy of motives. American Journal of Psychology, 50, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1963). Pattern and growth in personality. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1961).Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1968). The person in psychology: Selected essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954).Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 1, pp. 1–107). New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published 1968).Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (Whole No. 211), i–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). Study of values. Manual and test booklet (3rd edn.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. A., Eloy, S. V., Guerrero, L. K., & Spitzberg, B. H. Romantic jealousy and relational satisfaction: A look at the impact of jealous experience and expression. Communication Reports, 8, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1961a). Emotion and personality, Vol. 1: Psychological aspects. London: Cassell & Co. (Original work published 1960).Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1961b). Emotion and personality, Vol. 2: Neurological and physiological aspects. London: Cassell & Co. (Original work published 1960).Google Scholar
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Aron, A., (2010). Rusbult’s investment model and the expansion of the self-expansion model. Personal Relationships, 17, 152–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., & Nardone, N. (2012). Self and close relationships. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd edn., pp. 520–541). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Paris, M., & Aron, E. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Strong, G. (2006). Romantic love. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 595–614). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2013). An interdependence theory analysis of close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 39–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attridge, M., Berscheid, E., & Sprecher, S. (1998). Dependency and insecurity in romantic relationships: Development and validation of two companion scales. Personal Relationships, 5, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, A. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2015). Personality, affect, and affect regulation. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 147–165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M. W., & Holmes, J. G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1087–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 353–393). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banks, C. (1948). Primary personality factors in women: A reanalysis. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 204–218.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, J. M., Magun-Jackson, S., & Ryan, J. J. (2010). Dispositional approach-avoidance achievement motivation and cognitive self-regulated learning: The mediation of achievement goals. Individual Differences Research, 8, 97–110.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1994). The assessment of individual differences in adult attachment. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartholomew, K., & Shaver, P. (1998). Methods of assessing adult attachment: Do they converge? In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 25–45). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Identity, self-concept, and self-esteem: The self lost and found. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 681–710). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejanyan, K., Marshall, T. C., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). Associations of collectivism with relationship commitment, passion, and mate preferences: Opposing roles of parental influence and family allocentrism. PLoS One, 10(2), e0117374. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing source. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1984: Psychology and gender (pp. 76–103). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 413–484). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Hatfield, E. (1974). A little bit about love. In Huston, T. L. (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 355–381). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E., (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd edn.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnie, C., McClure, M. J., Lydon, J. E., & Holmberg, D. (2009). Attachment avoidance and commitment aversion: A script for relationship failure. Personal Relationships, 16, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In Robinson, J., Shaver, P., & Wrightsman, L. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 161–194). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohns, V. K., Lucas, G. M., Molden, D. C., Finkel, E. L., Coolsen, M. K., Kumashiro, M., . . . Higgins, E. T. (2013). Opposites fit: Regulatory focus complementarity and relationship well-being. Social Cognition, 31, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, J. E., Boles, T. L., Judge, T. A., & Lauver, K. J. (2002). The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. Journal of Personality, 70, 311–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgatta, E. F. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 12, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1991). A questionnaire for assessing five robust personality factors. Diagnostica, 37, 29–41.Google Scholar
Borrello, G. M., & Thompson, B. (1990). An hierarchical analysis of the Hendrick-Hendrick measure of Lee’s typology of love. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 327–342.Google Scholar
Boucher, H. C. (2014). The relational-interdependent self-construal and positive illusions in friendship. Self and Identity, 13, 460–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1997). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1969).Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1998a). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger. London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1973).Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1998b). Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: Loss: Sadness and depression. London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1980).Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (2005b). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1979).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. A., & Scott, W. A. (1991). Values. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 661–753). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1988). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, S. R., Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1980). An analysis of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringle, R. G. (1982). Preliminary report on the Self-Report Jealousy Scale (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2006). Selective investment theory: Recasting the functional significance of close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C. L. (1966). The genetic determination of differences in intelligence: A study of monozygotic twins reared together and apart. British Journal of Psychology, 57, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1980). The frequency concept of disposition: Dominance and prototypically dominant acts. Journal of Personality, 48, 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary personality psychology. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B. P. (1990). Relational interaction satisfaction scale. In Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., & Straus, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (pp. 106–107). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P. (1997). Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 997–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B. P., & Bakker, A. B. (1997). Responses to unprotected dyadic sex by one’s partner: Testing predictions from interdependence and equity theory. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2006). Temptations and threat: Extradyadic relations and jealousy. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 535–555). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caccioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, M. W. (1917). The case of self against soul. Psychological Review, 24, 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. K., & Campbell, S. M. (2009). On the self-regulatory dynamics created by the particular benefits and costs of narcissism: A contextual reinforcement model and examination of leadership. Self and Identity, 8, 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L., & Simpson, J. A. (2013). The blossoming of relationship science. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 3–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Stanton, S. C. E. (2013). Handling conflicts positively. In Hojjat, M., & Cramer, D. (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 134–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2012). Self-awareness. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 50–68). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2015). Behavioral approach, behavioural avoidance, and behavioural inhibition. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 307–327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J., (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1946). Development and measurement of personality. New York, NY: World Book Co.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic, theoretical, and factual study. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1970). Personality and social psychology: Collected papers of Raymond B. Cattell. San Diego, CA: Knapp.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-C. (2013). Family ties, living arrangement, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick-Jones, J. K. (1976). Social exchange theory: Its structure and influence in social psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., Andersen, S. M., & Saribay, S. A. (2013). Transference and the relational self. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 281–305). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheong, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2012). Mediation/indirect effects in structural equation modeling. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 417–435). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., & Leung, K. (1998). Indigenous personality measures: Chinese examples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, R. (1991). Authoritarianism and related constructs. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 501–571). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). A hierarchical structure of basic human values in a third-order confirmatory factor analysis. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Lemay, E. P., Jr. (2010). Close relationships. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 898–940). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cloninger, C. R. (1987). Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science, 236, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, A. B. (2010). Just how many different forms of culture are there? American Psychologist, 65, 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In Bartholomew, K. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 53–92). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Collins, N. L., Ford, M. B., & Feeney, B. C. (2011). An attachment-theory perspective on social support in close relationships. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 209–231). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-Femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 29, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C. R., & Denner, J. (1998). Theories linking culture and psychology: Universal and community-specific processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Longitudinal stability of adult personality. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 269–290). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T., (2011). The Five-Factor Model, five-factor theory, and interpersonal psychology. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 91–104). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cox, C. E., Wexler, M. O., Rusbult, C. E., & Gaines, S. O., Jr. (1997). Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2015). Relationships and the self: Ecosystem and egosystem. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 93–116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Gore, J. S. (2012). Cultural models of the self. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd edn., pp. 587–614). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construal theory and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., Bacon, P., & Morris, M. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependence self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The What, How, Why, and Where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowell, J., Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Measures of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd edn., pp. 599–634). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, C. E., Hughes, J. L., & Cook, R. E. (2012). Components of love and relationship satisfaction: Lesbians and heterosexual women. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 17, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalsky, D., Gohm, C., Noguchi, K., & Shiomura, K. (2008). Mutual self-enhancement in Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. E., & Latty-Mann, H. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. E., & Todd, M. J. (1982). Friendship and love relationships. In Davis, K. E. & Mitchell, T. O. (Eds.), Advances in descriptive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 79–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Deaux, K., & Lafrance, M. (1998). Gender. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 788–827). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, J. I. M., (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 369–399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2015). Sexuality and same-sex sexuality in relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 523–553). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diessner, R., Frost, N., & Smith, T. (2004). Describing the neoclassical psyche embedded in Sternberg’s triangular theory of love. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 683–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkic, M., & Oatley, K. (2004). Love and personal relationships: Navigating on the border between the ideal and the real. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillard, J. P., Kinney, T. A., & Cruz, M. G. (1996). Influence, appraisals, and emotions in close relationships. Communication Monographs, 63, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy: An analysis in terms of learning, thinking, and culture. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Drigotas, S. M. (2002). The Michelangelo phenomenon and personal well-being. Journal of Personality, 70, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drigotas, S. M., Whitney, G. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). On the peculiarities of loyalty: A diary study of responses to dissatisfaction in everyday life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 596–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Verette, J. (1999a). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., Wieselquist, J., & Whitton, S. (1999b). Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 378–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., & Malamuth, N. M. (2000). Love and anger in romantic relationships: A discrete systems model. Journal of Personality, 68, 525–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, T., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation in close relationships. In Campbell, L., & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 500–513). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T.-F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20, 546–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, R. B. (1998). An introduction to theories of personality (5th edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fabrigar, L. R., Visser, P. S., & Browne, M. W. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in testing the circumplex structure of data in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 184–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairchild, H. H. (1991). Scientific racism: The cloak of objectivity. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, H. H., Yee, A. H., Wyatt, G., & Weizmann, F. (1995). Readdressing psychology’s problems with race. American Psychologist, 50, 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feeney, J. A. (2008). Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical implications (pp. 450–481). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. (1994). Assessing adult attachment. In Sterling, M. B. & Berman, W. H. (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. 128–152). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, B. (2013). The social psychology of love. In Campbell, L., & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 201–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, B. (2015). Love: Conceptualization and experience. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 495–522). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., & Eckhardt, C. (2013). Intimate partner violence. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 452–474). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Hui, C, M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014a). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Larson, G. M., Carswell, K. L., & Hui, C. M. (2014b). Marriage at the summit: Response to the commentaries. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 120–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkenauer, C. (2010). Although it helps, love is not all you need: How Caryl Rusbult made me discover what relationships are all about. Personal Relationships, 17, 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, C., Mitte, K., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). The relationship-specific interpretation bias mediates the link between neuroticism and satisfaction in couples. European Journal of Personality, 27, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 915–981). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fitness, J. (2015). Emotions in relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 297–318). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitness, J., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1993). Love, hate, anger, and jealousy in close relationships: A prototype and cognitive appraisal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 942–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitness, J., & Williams, V. (2013). The features and functions of positive emotions in close relationships. In Hojjat, M. & Cramer, D. (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 44–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. M., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015). Goal pursuit in relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 273–296). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Shapiro, B., & Rayman, J. (2001). Perfectionism, beliefs, and adjustment in dating relationships. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 20, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franks, D. F., & Gecas, V. (1992). Autonomy and conformity in Cooley’s self-theory: The looking-glass self and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 15, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeberg, A. L., & Stein, C. H. (1996). Felt obligations toward parents in Mexican-American and Anglo-American young adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, A. (1966). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York, NY: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1936).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1961). Beyond the pleasure principle. New York, NY: Norton. (Original work published 1920).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1965). The interpretation of dreams. New York, NY: Avon. (Original work published 1900).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1927). The ego and the id. London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1923).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1950). Libidinal types. In Freud, S. (Ed.), Collected papers (Vol. 5). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1931).Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1965). Escape from freedom. New York, NY: Avon. (Original work published 1941).Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funder, D. C., & Fast, L. A. (2010). Personality in social psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 668–697). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gagne, F. M., & Lydon, J. E. (2003). Identification and the commitment shift: Accounting for gender differences in relationship illusions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 907–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaines, S. O., Jr. (1991/1992). Interpersonal traits, gender-role compliance, and interpersonal resource exchange among romantic and nonromantic male-female relationships (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 3944-B.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O., (with Buriel, R., Liu, J. H., & Rios, D. I.) (1997). Culture, ethnicity, and personal relationship processes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O., (2007a). Personality and personal relationship processes: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., (2007b). Personality and personal relationship processes: Concluding thoughts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 613–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., (2012). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination revisited: From William James to W. E. B. Du Bois. In Dixon, J., & Levine, M. (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 105–119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Relationship maintenance in intercultural marriages: An interdependence perspective. In Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 231–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Hardin, D. P. (2013). Interdependence revisited: Perspectives from cultural psychology. In Campbell, L. & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 553–572). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Henderson, M. C. (2002). Impact of attachment style on responses to accommodative dilemmas among same-sex couples. Personal Relationships, 9, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Ketay, S. (2013). Positive psychology, culture, and personal relationship processes. In Hojjat, M. & Cramer, D. (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 218–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Liu, J. H. (2000). Multicultural/multiracial relationships. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 97–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Ramkissoon, M. W. (2008). US/Caribbean relationships. In Karis, T. A. & Killian, K. D. (Eds.), Cross-cultural couples: Transborder relationships in the twenty-first century (pp. 227–250). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Marelich, W. D., Bledsoe, K. L., Steers, W. N., Henderson, M. C., Granrose, C. S., Barajas, L., Hicks, D., Lyde, M., Takahashi, Y., Yum, N., Rios, D. I., Garcia, B. F., Farris, K., & Page, M. S. (1997a). Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1460–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Panter, A. T., Lyde, M. D., Steers, W. N., Rusbult, C. E., Cox, C. L., & Wexler, M. O. (1997b). Evaluating the circumplexity of interpersonal traits and the manifestation of interpersonal traits in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 610–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Reis, H. T., Summers, S., Rusbult, C. E., Cox, C. L., Wexler, M. O., Marelich, W. D., &.Kurland, G. J. (1997c). Impact of attachment style on reactions to accommodative dilemmas in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Granrose, C. S., Rios, D. I., Garcia, B. F., Page, M. S., Farris, K. R., & Bledsoe, K. L. (1999a). Patterns of attachment and responses to accommodative dilemmas among interethnic/interracial couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Rios, D. I., Granrose, C. S., Bledsoe, K. L., Farris, K. R., Page Youn, M. S., & Garcia, B. F. (1999b). Romanticism and interpersonal resource exchange among African American/Anglo and other interracial couples. Journal of Black Psychology, 25, 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Work, C., Johnson, H., Page Youn, M. S., & Lai, K. (2000). Impact of attachment style and self-monitoring on individuals’ responses to accommodative dilemmas across relationship types. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 767–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Ramkissoon, M., & Matthies, B. K. (2003). Cultural value orientations and accommodation among heterosexual relationships in Jamaica. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Larbie, J., Sereke-Melake, Z., Pereira, L., & Varasani, S. (2004, July). Revisiting cultural values as predictors of accommodation in heterosexual relationships: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Paper presented at the 2004 conference of the International Association for Relationship Research, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O., Jr., Henderson, M. C., Kim, M., Gilstrap, S., Yi, J., Rusbult, C. E., Hardin, D. P., & Gaertner, L. A. (2005). Cultural value orientations, internalized homophobia, and accommodation in romantic relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 50, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geen, R. G. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 317–356). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 89–150). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tillburg University Press.Google Scholar
Goodboy, A. K., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2009). Individual differences in romantic partners’ desire for less closeness. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 209–218.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. (2009). Changing relations: Achieving intimacy in a time of social transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R., & Pillay, U. (2006). Relationships, culture, and social change. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 695–708). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, J. S., Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Let’s be friends: Relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships, 13, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. G., & Christiansen, K. (2009). The reliability of romantic love: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Personal Relationships, 16, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasmick, J. F., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. H. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994a). Metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In Bartholomew, K. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 5: Attachment processes in adulthood (pp.17–52). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Griffin, D., (1994b). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Attachment-style differences in the experience and expression of romantic jealousy. Personal Relationships, 5, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, L. K. (2014). Jealousy and relational satisfaction: Actor effects, partner effects, and the mediating role of destructive communication responses to jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., & Eloy, S. V. (1992). Relational satisfaction and jealousy across marital types. Communication Reports, 5, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., Eloy, S. V., Jorgensen, P. F., & Andersen, P. A. (1993). Hers or his? Sex differences in the communication of jealousy in close relationships. In Kalbfleisch, P. (Ed.), Interpersonal communication in evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 109–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., Hannawa, A. F., & Babin, E. A. (2011). The communicative responses to jealousy scale: Revision, empirical validation, and associations with relational satisfaction. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories of personality (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2007). Introduction to personality and intelligence. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazan, C., (1994a). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, C., (1994b). Deeper into attachment theory: Reply to commentaries. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherton, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: Past, present, and future. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). Short form of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI), an objective measure of self-esteem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, N. K. (1964). Statistical research methods in education and psychology. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C., (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C., (1990). A relationship-specific version of the Love Attitudes Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 239–254.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., (2013). Conclusions/epilogue. In Hojjat, M. & Cramer, D. (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 235–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S., Foote, F. H., & Slapion-Foote, M. J. (1984). Do men and women love differently? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Dicke, A. (1998). The love attitudes scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2000). Romantic love. In Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 202–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyns, R. W., Veroff, J. J., & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). A scoring manual for the affiliation motive. In Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, M. Y., Chen, S. X., Bond, M. H., Hui, C. M., Chan, C., & Friedman, M. (2012). Linking adult attachment styles to relationship satisfaction in Hong Kong and the United States: The mediating role of personal and structural commitment. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849–870). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (2004a). The search for the secure base: Attachment theory and psychotherapy. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (2000). Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 447–495.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (2004b). The benefits of abstract functional analysis in theory construction: The case of interdependence theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtforth, M. G., Thomas, A., & Caspar, F. (2011). Interpersonal motivation. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 107–122). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behaviour: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyle, R. H. (1987). Factorial validity of the Multifaceted-Evaluation-of-Self Inventory (MESI). Paper presented at the 27th annual meeting of the New England Psychological Association, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Introduction and overview. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Huitema, B. E. (1980). The analysis of covariance and alternatives. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (2009). What’s love got to do with it? Why some marriages succeed and others fail. Personal Relationships, 16, 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, T. L., & Melz, H. (2004). The case for (promoting) marriage: The devil is in the details. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 943–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, T. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1991). Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 721–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ickes, W. (1985). Sex-role influences on compatibility in relationships. In Ickes, W. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they make, and then break, our relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). “His” and “her” relationships? A review of the empirical evidence. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 273–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impett, E. A., Gable, S. L., & Peplau, L. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, B., Dimmock, J. A., Gucciardi, D. F., & Grove, J. R. (2011). Relationship commitment in athletic dyads: Actor and partner effects for Big Five self- and other-ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. (1974). Manual for the Personality Research Form. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologist’s Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. (2009). Influence and canonical supremacy: How George Herbert Mead demoted Charles Horton Cooley in the sociological canon. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45, 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Iyer-Eimerbrink, P. A., & Knack, J. M. (2015). Interpersonal traits. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 351–368). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd edn., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In Jones, W. H. & Perlman, D. W. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 117–143). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. E. (1998). Major developments in five decades of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 3–57). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1985).Google Scholar
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (2nd edn., pp. 220–266). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H., Couch, L. L., & Scott, S. (1997). Trust and betrayal: The psychology of trust violation. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 466–482). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kammrath, L. K., & Dweck, C. (2006). Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and equity theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1497–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakurt, G. (2012). Relationship stability through lenses of complexity. American Journal of Family Therapy, 40, 126–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine, D. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–240). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In Jones, E. E.., Kanouse, D. E., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., & Weiner, B. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour (pp. 151–174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1983). The situation origins of human tendencies: A further reason for the formal analysis of structures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1997a). Expanding the analysis of social orientations by reference to the sequential-temporal structure of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 373–404.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1997b). The “stimulus field” for interpersonal phenomena: The source for language and thought about interpersonal events. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 140–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L, Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (2002). Close relationships. New York, NY: Percheron Press. (Original work published 1983).Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols 1 & 2). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., & Lerner, J. S. (2010). Emotion. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 317–352). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guildford.Google Scholar
Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. E., & Christensen, A. (1983). The relationship events scale: A Guttman scale of progress in courtship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, G. H., Pleasant, N. D., Whitton, S. W., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Understanding couple conflict. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 445–462). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, L. K., & Metts, S. (2013). Emotion in relationships. In Campbell, L. & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 514–534). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knobloch, L. K., Miller, L. E., & Carpenter, K. E. (2007). Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship. Personal Relationships, 14, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, D. L., & Miller, D. T. (1985). Altruism and aggression. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 1–72). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atesh, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumashiro, M. (2010). Caryl Rusbult: The epitome of the Michelangelo phenomenon in action. Personal Relationships, 17, 166–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumashiro, M., Finkel, E. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (2002). Self-respect and pro-relationship behavior in marital relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 1009–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumashiro, M., Rusbult, C. E., Finkenauer, C., & Stocker, S. (2007). To think or to do: Assessment orientation locomotor orientation, and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdek, L. A. (1992). Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdek, L. A. (2007). Avoidance motivation and relationship commitment in heterosexual, gay male, and lesbian partners. Personal Relationships, 14, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdek, L. A. (2008). A general model of relationship commitment: Evidence from same-sex couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, V. S. Y., & Herrmann, S. D. (2015). The interplay between culture and personality. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 553–574). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., & Sullivan, D. (2015). Terror management motivation at the core of personality. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 209–230). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lantz, B. (2012). The large sample size fallacy. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Studies, 27, 487–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationship: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lay, C., Fairlie, P., Jackson, S., Ricci, T., Eisenberg, J., Sato, T., Teeaar, A., & Melamud, A. (1998). Domain-specific allocentrism-idiocentrism: A measure of family connectedness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 434–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, B., Dove, M. L., Agnew, C. R., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, M. R., & Toner, K. (2015). Self-processes in the construction and maintenance of personality. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences, pp. 447–467). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lee, J. A. (1973). Colours of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Toronto: New Press.Google Scholar
Lefcourt, H. M. (1991). Locus of control. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 413–499). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, A. (1998, June). Motivations in close relationships. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Personal Relationships, Saratoga Spring, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lehnart, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2006). Should I stay or should I go? Attachment and personality in stable and instable romantic relationships. European Journal of Personality, 20, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (1999). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the triangular theory of love. Psychological Reports, 85, 497–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemieux, R., (2000). Intimacy, passion, and commitment among married individuals: Further testing of the Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Reports, 87, 941–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenney, E. (1991). Sex roles. In Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 573–660). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, C., & Hawkins, L. (2006). Self-monitoring and close relationships. Journal of Personality, 74, 739–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In Lefcourt, H. M. (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, H. (2011). Time-limited dynamic psychotherapy. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 545–563). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Levy, M. B., & Davis, K. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared to each other: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Nardone, N., & Raines, A. J. (2010). The role of self-concept clarity in relationship quality. Self and Identity, 9, 416–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topographical psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving group conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (Lewin, G. W., Ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Li, T., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 406–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linardatos, L., & Lydon, J. E. (2011). A little reminder is all it takes: The effects of priming and relational self-construal on responses to partner transgressions. Self and Identity, 10, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1000–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, S. A., Cate, R. M., & Henton, J. M. (1984). Predicting premarital relationship stability: A methodological refinement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, K. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, K. D. (2003). Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, K. D. (2008). Attachment styles and interpersonal approach and avoidance goals in everyday couple interactions. Personal Relationships, 15, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, K. D. (2011). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 313–324). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Locke, K. D. (2014). Circumplex scales of intergroup goals: An interpersonal circle model of goals for interactions between groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 433–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2012). Individual differences in self-esteem. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd edn., pp. 354–377). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Madey, S. F., & Rodgers, L. (2009). The effect of attachment and Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love on relationship satisfaction. Individual Differences Research, 7, 76–84.Google Scholar
Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2012). Self-efficacy. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd edn., pp. 198–224). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Markey, P. M., & Markey, C. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16, 352–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 1, pp. 137–230). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, B. A., Clark, E. M., & Cahill, M. J. (2011a). Approach and avoidance motivation as predictors of pro-relationship behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, B. A., Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2011b). An examination of relational-interdependent self-construal, communal strength, and pro-relationship behaviors in friendships. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, B. A., McIntyre, K. P., & Lewandowski, G. W., Jr. (2012). Approach motivation and the expansion of self in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 19, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1979). Validation of a thematic coding system for the intimacy motive (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1980). A thematic coding system for the intimacy motive. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1997). A conceptual history of personality psychology. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Bryant, F. B. (1987). Intimacy motivation and subjective mental health in a nationwide sample. Journal of Personality, 55, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D. P., & Manczak, E. (2015). Personality and the life story. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 425–446). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Powers, J. (1981). Themes of intimacy in behavior and thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1985).Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1989). Some reflections on the two psychologies of love. Journal of Personality, 54, 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121–137.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & CostaJr., P. C. (1985). Using Norman’s “adequacy taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., (1987). Validation of the five-factor model across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., (1992). Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 826–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. (2013). Personality and relationships. In Campbell, L. & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 535–552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M. J., & Aboud, F. E. (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, A. C., & Pauley, P. M. (2013). Maximizing relationship possibilities: Relational maximization in romantic relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 467–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., (2009). Attachment theory: I. Motivational, individual-differences and structural aspects. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 228–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., (2013). The role of attachment security in adolescent and adult close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 66–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., Sapir-Lavid, Y., Yaakobi, E., Arias, K., Tal-Aloni, L., & Bor, G. (2003). Attachment theory and concern for others’ welfare: Evidence that activation of the sense of secure base promotes endorsement of self-transcendence values. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (2001). Viewing close romantic relationships as communal relationships: Implications for maintenance and enhancement. In Harvey, J. & Wentzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 13–25). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mills, J., Clark, M. S., Ford, T. E., & Johnson, M. (2004). Measurement of communal strength. Personal Relationships, 11, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001a). Expanding the dynamic self-regulatory processing model of narcissism: Research directions for the future. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morf, C. C., (2001b). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies. Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M., & Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morry, M. M., & Kito, M. (2009). Relational-interdependent self-construal as a predictor of relationship quality: The mediating roles of one’s own behaviors and perceptions of the fulfillment of friendship functions. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). The architecture of interdependent minds: A motivation-management theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116, 908–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Dolderman, D., & Griffin, D. W. (2000). What the motivated mind sees: Comparing friends’ perspectives to married partners’ views of each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 600–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Griffin, D. W., Bellavia, G., & Rose, P. (2001). The mismeasure of love: How self-doubt contaminates relationship beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyer, F. J., & Voigt, D. (2004). Personality and social network effects on romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. European Journal of Personality, 18, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, T. K., & Cheng, C. H. K. (2010). The effects of intimacy, passion, and commitment on satisfaction in romantic relationships among Hong Kong Chinese people. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11, 123–146.Google Scholar
Nguyen, S. R. (2014). Modeling an interdisciplinary review using the green-eyed monster: A cross-cultural review of psychology, sociology, and communication. Insights to a Changing World, 2014, 85–96.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. A. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002a). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. M. (2002b). Cultural psychology: A new look: Reply to bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panayiotou, G. (2005). Love, commitment, and response to conflict among Cypriot dating couples: Two models, one relationship. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the emotions of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 906–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlman, D., & Duck, S. (2006). The seven seas of the study of personal relationships: From the “thousand islands” to interconnected waterways. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 11–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perunovic, M., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Automatic accommodation: The role of personality. Personal Relationships, 15, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, S. M., & Wong, P. T. (1989). Multidimensional jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Beck, L. A. (2015). Attachment processes in adult romantic relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 33–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistole, M., Clark, E. M., & Tubbs, A. L. (1995). Love relationships: Attachment style and the investment model. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 81, 318–328.Google Scholar
Planalp, S., Fitness, J., & Fehr, B. (2006). Emotion in theories of close relationships. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 369–384). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quek, K. M.-T., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2013). Cultural values, self-disclosure, and conflict tactics as predictors of marital satisfaction among Singaporean husbands and wives. The Family Journal, 21, 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Collins, W. A. (2004). Relationships, human behavior, and psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. K. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of human relationships (Vols 1–3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., Capobianco, A., & Tsai, F.-F. (2002). Finding the person in personal relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 813–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T., Aron, A., Clark, M., Holmes, J., & van Lange, P. (2010). Caryl E. Rusbult (1952–2010). American Psychologist, 65, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, J. K., & Burris, C. T. (2005). Let me count the ways: An integrative theory of love and hate. Personal Relationships, 12, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, J. K., & Holmes, J. G. (1986). How do I trust thee? Psychology Today, 20 (2), 28–34.Google Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodewalt, F. (2012). Contemporary perspectives on narcissism and the narcissistic personality type. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd edn., pp. 571–586). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ripley, J. S., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Bromley, D., & Kemper, S. D. (2005). Covenantal and contractual values in marriage: Marital Values Orientation toward Wedlock or Self-Actualization (VOWS) Scale. Personal Relationships, 12, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. W., & John, O. P. (1997). The quest for self-insight: Theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perception. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. A., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 649–679). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. W., Hendin, K. M., & Trzesnewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodin, J. (1985). The application of social psychology. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 805–881). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Roloff, M. E., & Cloven, D. H. (1990). The chilling effect in interpersonal relationships: The reluctance to speak one’s mind. In Cahn, D. D. (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. A., & Hooley, J. M. (2010). Narcissism assessment in social-personality research: Does the association between narcissism and psychological health result from a confound with self-esteem? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, S. (1944). Converging approaches to personality: Murray, Allport, Lewin. Psychological Review, 51, 248–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2010). Prosocial motivation and behavior in close relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 327–345). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Arriaga, X. B. (2000). Interdependence in personal relationships. In Ickes, W. & Duck, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of personal relationships (pp. 79–108). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rusbult, C. E., & Zembrodt, I. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 274–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M., & Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1230–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986a). Impact of couple patterns of problem solving on distress and nondistress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 744–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1986b). Predicting satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic relationships: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G., Slovik, L., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. & Wentzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Coolsen, M. K., Kirchner, J. L., & Clarke, J. A. (2006). Commitment. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 615–635). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., & Kumashiro, M. (2009a). The Michelangelo phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., Kubacka, K. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2009b). “The part of me that you bring out”: Ideal similarity and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydell, R. J., & Bringle, R. G. (2007). Differentiating reactive and suspicious jealousy. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 1099–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Bringle, R. G. (2004). Jealousy and commitment: Perceived threat and the effect of relationship alternatives. Personal Relationships, 11, 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, J., & Bocker, S. (1993). The German version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): A short scale for measuring satisfaction in a dyadic relationship. Diagnostica, 39, 55–62.Google Scholar
Sanderson, C. A., & Cantor, N. (1995). Social dating goals in late adolescence: Implications for safer sexual activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, C. A., (1997). Creating satisfaction in steady dating relationships: The role of personal goals and situational affordances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1424–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, C. A., (2001). The association of intimacy goals and marital satisfaction: A test of four mediational hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1567–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, C. A., & Karetsky, K. H. (2002). Intimacy goals and strategies of conflict resolution in dating relationships: A mediational analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, C. A., Rahm, K. B., & Beigbeder, S. A. (2005). The link between the pursuit of intimacy goals and satisfaction in close same-sex friendships: An examination of the underlying processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, C. A., Keiter, E. M., Miles, M. G., & Yopyk, D. J. A. (2007). The association between intimacy goals and plans for initiating dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 14, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T. (2007). The Family Allocentrism-Idiocentrism Scale: Convergent validity and construct exploration. Individual Differences Research, 5, 194–200.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (2009). Semantic and linguistic aspects of personality. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 379–399). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlan, T. K., Carpenter, P. J., Schmidt, G. W., Simons, J. P., & Keller, B. (1993). An introduction to the Sport Commitment Model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffhuser, K., Allemand, M., & Martin, M. (2014a). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28, 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffhuser, K. Wagner, J., Ludtke, O., & Allemand, M. (2014b). Dyadic longitudinal interplay between personality and relationship satisfaction: A focus on neuroticism and self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharfe, E., & Bartholomew, K. (1995). Accommodation and attachment representations in young couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. A. (1978). Masters of social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmalt, H. D. (1999). Assessing the achievement motive using the grid technique. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2002). Personality, attachment and sexuality related to dating relationship outcomes: Contrasting three perspectives on personal attribute interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 589–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumm, W., Paff-Bergen, L., Hatch, F., Obiorah, J., Copeland, J., Meens, L., & Bugaighis, M. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Lyubomirsky, S., Monterosso, J., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey (pp. 259–319). London: European Social Survey.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behaviour: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Studying values: Personal adventure, future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, R. R. (1951). A theoretical framework for personality and social behavior. American Psychologist, 6, 476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedikides, C. (2012). Self-protection. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd edn., pp. 327–353). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaver, P. R. (2010). My appreciation of Caryl Rusbult. Personal Relationships, 17, 172–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2006). Attachment theory, individual psychodynamics, and relationship functioning. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 251–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P. R., (2009). Attachment theory: II. Developmental, psychodynamic and structural aspects. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behavior. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 17–35). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Shechtman, N., & Horowitz, L. (2006). Interpersonal and noninterpersonal interactions, interpersonal motives, and the effect of frustrated motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1126–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheldon, K. M., & Schuler, J. (2015). Agency and its discontents: A two-process perspective on basic psychological needs and motives. Interpersonal traits. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandanti, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shostrom, E. (1964). An inventory for the measurement of self-actualization. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44. 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 683–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., & Kim, J. S. (2011). Evolution, life history theory, and personality. In Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic implications (pp. 75–89). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Orina, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L., & Fehr, B. (2005). Voice versus loyalty: Self-construals and responses to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawak, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism: A theoretical and methodological refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivadas, E., Bruvold, N. T., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). A reduced version of the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale: A four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research, 61, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaggs, E. B. (1947). Ten basic postulates of personalistic psychology. Psychological Review, 54, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behaviour of organisms: An experimental analysis. London: D. Appleton Century Company.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M. (1967). Usefulness of peer ratings of personality in educational research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27, 967–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M. (1974). Self monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M., & Cantor, M. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 635–679). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, M., (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 883–947). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1984 (pp. 59–95). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity, and their relationship to self-reports of neuroticism and acting out behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Sawin, L. L. (1980). The Male-Female Relations Questionnaire: A self-report inventory of sex role behaviors and preferences and its relationships to masculine and feminine personality traits, sex role attitudes, and other measures. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 87.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 149–178). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1998). Social exchange theories and sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the “Romantic Beliefs Scale” and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., (1999). Romantic beliefs: Their influence on relationships and patterns of change over time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 834–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G. (1985). Intergroup relations. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 599–658). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–95.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In Sternberg, R. J. & Barnes, M. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119–138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313–335.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachman, A., & Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance relationship commitment. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 1, pp. 311–378). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A., & Hughes, D. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, W. B., Jr., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and identity. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 589–628). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success (Unpublished manuscript). George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzino, K. A., & Cross, S. E. (2009). Predicting commitment in new relationships: Interactive effects of relational self-construal and power. Self and Identity, 8, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolmacz, R. (2010). Forms of concern: A psychoanalytic perspective. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 93–107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J. M., & Aron, A. (2013). The positive psychology of romantic love. In Hojjat, M. & Cramer, D. (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 3–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H. C., Chan, D. K.-S., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Iwao, S., & Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). Multimethod probes of allocentrism and idiocentrism. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangelisti, A. L., & Daly, J. A. (1997). Gender differences in standards for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lange, P. A. M., & Balliet, D. (2015). Interdependence theory. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., de Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verreault, M., Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., Normandin, L., & Clarkin, J. F. (2013). Assessment of personality organization in couple relationships: Factorial structure of the Inventory of Personality Organization and incremental validity over neuroticism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, A. S., & Burger, B. D. (2013). “I love you, and I cheated”: Investigating disclosures of infidelity to primary romantic partners. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 17, 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. A., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR)-Short Form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weigel, D. J. (2008). Mutuality and the communication of commitment in romantic relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 73, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, D. J. (2010). Mutuality of commitment in romantic relationships: Exploring a dyadic model. Personal Relationships, 17, 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2002). Investigating the behavioural indicators of relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinfield, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., & Carlson, E. (2008). Individual differences in infant-caregiver attachment: Conceptual and empirical aspects of security. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical implications (pp. 78–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Personality measurement: Reliability and validity issues. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. A., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 143–164). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. L. (1984). Comparison of four jealousy scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1993). Reliability and aspects of the construct validity of Sternberg’s Triangular Love Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In Grove, W. M. & Ciccetti, D.(Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1995). Interpersonal Adjective Scales professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1985). The Interpersonal Circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research. In Hogan, R. & Jones, W. H. (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 1–47). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. (1978). Psychological androgyny and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1992). Personality: Structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 473–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1997). Personality structure: The return of the Big Five. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 737–765). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., Steiger, J. H., & Gaelick, L. (1981). Evaluating circumplexity in personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 263–289.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, J. T. (2000). Gender and personal relationships. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 301–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., Perrone, K. M., Kurusu, T. A., & Jones, D. R. (1997). Strategic hope-focused relationship-enrichment counseling: Investigations of outcome and process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 384–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woszidlo, A., & Segrin, C. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of newlywed couples’ neuroticism and stressful events on marital satisfaction through mutual problem solving. Marriage and Family Review, 49, 520–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Interpersonal trust and attitudes toward human nature. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 373–412). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.-C., & Yoon, G. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 175–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yee, A. H., Fairchild, H. H., Weizmann, F., & Wyatt, G. E. (1993). Addressing psychology’s problem with race. American Psychologist, 48, 1132–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovetich, N. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yum, Y. O. (2004). Culture and self-construal as predictors of responses to accommodative dilemmas in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacchilli, T. L., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (2009). The Romantic Partner Conflict Scale: A new scale to measure relationship conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1073–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zayas, V., Shoda, Y., & Ayduk, O. N. (2002). Personality in context: An interpersonal systems perspective. Journal of Personality, 70, 851–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H. (2012). Self-improvement as a response to interpersonal regulation in close relationships: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 697–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuroff, D. C. (1986). Was Gordon Allport a trait theorist? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 993–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar