Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:39:29.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Intellectual Property and the Theory of the Firm

from Part I - Perspectives on Theories of Intellectual Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

F. Scott Kieff
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Intellectual property (IP) rules are fundamental to economic activity because they affect transaction costs in the market for ideas. Just as transaction costs affect the allocation of goods and services, so transaction costs affect the allocation of ideas. Transaction costs in the market for ideas include the full range of such costs: communication and information processing, search and matching, bargaining, moral hazard, adverse selection, free riding, and contracting. These transaction costs occur in direct exchange among individuals as well as in intermediated exchange through firms. The market for ideas includes the exchange of basic scientific and technological discoveries, new product designs, manufacturing processes, and business methods. Ideas that are subject to market exchange can be embodied in goods and services, including final products, production equipment, software, and consulting services. Alternatively, ideas can be exchanged in disembodied forms, including blueprints, designs, formulas, and other technical descriptions.

This discussion identifies three critical areas in which the system of IP rights affects the economy. First, IP rights influence the establishment of firms because they affect the relative transaction costs of direct and intermediated exchange in the market for ideas. Individuals establish firms when the transaction costs of intermediated exchange are less than the transaction costs of direct exchange. IP rules will affect the relative costs of direct exchange and intermediated exchange in markets for ideas. Therefore, IP rights affect the scope of the firm, that is, the mix between its market-making activities and its organizational activities. However, IP rights also affect the establishment of firms themselves and the economic mix between direct exchange and intermediated exchange. IP rules are inefficient if they induce an inefficient mix of direct exchange and intermediated exchange in the market for ideas. Property rights are important for developing the market for innovations. With well-defined IP rights, firms are able to serve as intermediaries in the market for IP, whether though internal transactions or through external market transactions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Spulber, D. F. 2010
Epstein, R. A. 1997 A Clear View of the Cathedral: The Dominance of Property RulesYale Law Journal 106 2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. E. 2003 The Language of Property: Form, Context, and AudienceStanford Law Review 55 1005Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. 1994 Of Property Rules, Coase, and Intellectual PropertyColumbia Law Review 94 2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G.A. D. Melamed 1972 Harvard Law Review 85CrossRef
Ayres, I. 2005 Optional Law: The Structure of Legal EntitlementsChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 2009 The Theory of the Firm: Microeconomics with Endogenous Entrepreneurs, Firms, Markets, and OrganizationsCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, W. 1954 Factors Governing the Development of Marketing ChannelsMarketing Channels for Manufactured ProductsHomewood, ILIrwinGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R. M. 1978 Intermediation with Costly Bilateral ExchangeReview of Economic Studies 55 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M.Meckling, W. 1976 Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership StructureJournal of Financial Economics 3 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, S. 1997
Hayek, F. A. 1977 The Creative Powers of a Free CivilizationEssays on IndividualityIndianapolisThe Liberty FundGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. A.Demsetz, H. 1972 Production, Information Costs, and Economic OrganizationThe American Economic Review 62 777Google Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 1996 Market Microstructure and IntermediationJournal of Economic Perspectives 10 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 1998 The Market Makers: How Leading Companies Create and Win MarketsNew YorkMcGraw Hill/Business Week BooksGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 1999 Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and the Theory of the FirmNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 2002 Transaction Innovation and the Role of the FirmThe Economics of the Internet and E-commerceNew YorkJAI Press/Elsevier Science159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee T1A1 [renamed Network Performance, Reliability and Quality of Service Committee (PRQC)] 2000 ATIS Telecom Glossary 2000Washington, DCAlliance for Telecommunications Industry SolutionsGoogle Scholar
Zbaracki, M. J.Ritson, M.Levy, D.Dutta, S.Bergen, M. 2004 Managerial and Customer Costs of Price Adjustment: Direct Evidence from Industrial MarketsReview of Economics and Statistics 86 514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zbaracki, M. J 2002
Lucking-Reiley, D.Spulber, D. F. 2001 Business-to-Business Electronic CommerceJournal of Economic Perspectives 15 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. 2003 Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for PractitionersNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Clower, R.Leijonhufvud, A. 1975 The Coordination of Economic Activities: A Keynesian PerspectiveAmerican Economic Review 65 182Google Scholar
Lim, C. 1981 Risk Pooling and Intermediate Trading AgentsCanadian Journal of Economics 14 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 1985 Risk Sharing and InventoriesJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 6 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. 1968 The Cost of ContractingQuarterly Journal of Economics 87 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1937 The Nature of the FirmEconomica 4 386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1977 The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American BusinessCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Holmström, B. 1982 Moral Hazard in TeamsBell Journal of Economics 13 324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalebuff, B. J.Stiglitz, J. E. 1983 Prizes and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and CompetitionBell Journal of Economics 14 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, T.Galai, D. 1983 Information Effects on the Bid-Ask SpreadJournal of Finance 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L.Milgrom, P. 1985 Bid, Ask and Transaction Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed TradersJournal of Financial Economics 14 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melumad, N.Mookherjee, D.Reichelstein, S. 1997 Contract Complexity, Incentives, and Value of DelegationJournal of Economics & Management Strategy 6 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, D. W. 1984 Financial Intermediation and Delegated MonitoringReview of Economic Studies 51 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, R. T. S.Thakor, A.V. 1984 Information Reliability and a Theory of Financial IntermediationReview of Economic Studies 51 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. 1986 The Economic Function of Futures MarketsCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasa, S.Villamil, A. 1992 Monitoring the Monitor: An Incentive Structure for a Financial IntermediaryJournal of Economic Theory 57 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1988
Williamson, Oliver E.Winter, Sidney G. 1991 The Nature of the Firm: Origin, Meaning, InfluenceOxfordOxford University Press34Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1994 The Institutional Structure of Production,” The 1991 Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize Lection in Economic SciencesEssays on Economics and EconomistsChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1975 Markets and HierarchiesNew YorkFree PressGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1985 The Economic Institutions of CapitalismNew YorkFree PressGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. 1991 The Theory of the Firm RevisitedThe Nature of the FirmOxfordOxford University Press159Google Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 2007 Global Competitive StrategyCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, J. M. 2004
Smith, A. 1998 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of NationsWashington, DCRegnery PublishingGoogle Scholar
Kieff, F. S. 2006 Coordination, Property, and Intellectual Property: An Unconventional Approach to Anticompetitive Effects and Downstream AccessEmory Law Journal 56 327Google Scholar
Becker, G. S.Murphy, K. M. 1995 The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and KnowledgeThe Essence of BeckerStanfordHoover Institution Press608Google Scholar
Ayres, I.Klemperer, P. 1999 Limiting Patentees’ Market Power Without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive RemediesMichigan Law Review 97 985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieff, F. S. 2007 On Coordinating Transactions in Intellectual Property: A Response to Smith's Delineating Entitlements in InformationThe Yale Law Journal Pocket Part 117 101Google Scholar
Caulfield, T.Cook-Deegan, R. M.Kieff, F. S.Walsh, J. P. 2006 1091
Lamoreaux, N. R.Sokoloff, K. L. 2002
McDonough, J. F. 2006 The Myth of the Patent Troll: An Alternative View of the Function of Patent Dealers in an Idea EconomyEmory Law Journal 56 189Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A 1934 The Theory of Economic DevelopmentNew Brunswick, NJTransaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939 Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist ProcessNew York:McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1964 Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist ProcessPhiladelphiaPorcupine Press61Google Scholar
Schmookler, J. 1966 Invention and Economic GrowthCambridge, MAHarvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1969 The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe From 1750 to the PresentCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, K. L. 1988 Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846Journal of Economic History 48 813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. M.Posner, R. A. 1987 Trademark Law: An Economic PerspectiveJournal of Law and Economics 30 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P. 1987 Markets with Consumer SwitchingQuarterly Journal of Economics 102 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. 1970
Posner, R. A. 2005 Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics ApproachJournal of Economic Perspectives 19 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisano, G. P 1990 The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical AnalysisAdministrative Science Quarterly 35 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. 1986 Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public PolicyResearch Policy 15 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. 1988 Technological Change and the Nature of the FirmTechnical Change and Economic TheoryLondonFrances Pinter256Google Scholar
Shan, W. 1990 An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Strategies by Entrepreneurial High-Technology FirmsStrategic Management Journal 11 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1962 Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for InventionThe Rate and Direction of Inventive ActivityPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Anton, J. J.D. A. Yao 1994 American Economic Review 84
Anton, J. J.D. A. Yao 1995 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11
Anton, J. J.Yao, D. A. 2002 The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and ContractingReview of Economic Studies 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton, J. J.D. A. Yao 2003 Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 12CrossRef
Anton, J. J.Yao, D. A. 2004 Little Patents and Big Secrets: Managing Intellectual PropertyRand Journal of Economics 35 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S.Stern, S. 2000 Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative DestructionJournal of Economics & Management Strategy 9 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S.Stern, S. 2003 The Product Market and the Market for ‘Ideas’: Commercialization Strategies for Technology EntrepreneursResearch Policy 32 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1960 The Problem of Social CostJournal of Law and Economics 3 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.11.008CrossRef
OECD 2008 The Internationalization of Business R&D: Evidence, Impacts and ImplicationsParisOrganization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
OECD 2008 Compendium of Patent StatisticsParisOrganization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Kuemmerle, W. 1999 The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical InvestigationJournal of International Business Studies 30 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, B.Khanna, T. 2000 The Structure of Licensing ContractsJournal of Industrial Economics 48 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A.Fosfuri, A.Gambardella, A. 2001 Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate StrategyCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Arora, A.Fosfuri, A.Gambardella, A. 2001 Specialized Technology Suppliers, International Spillovers and Investment: Evidence from the Chemical IndustryJournal of Development Economics 65 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, T.Singh, J. 2002
OECD 2008 Science, Technology, and Industry OutlookParisOrganization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
OECD 2008 Open Innovation in Global NetworksParisOrganization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J.Kortum, S. 1996 Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECDJournal of International Economics 40 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Backer, K.López-Bassols, V.Martínez, C. 2008
Deardorff, A. V. 1992 Welfare Effects of Global Patent ProtectionEconomica 59 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.Helpman, E. 1991 Innovation and Growth in the Global EconomyCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. S. 1994 Trips, Trade and GrowthInternational Economic Review 35 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1961 Uncertainty, Learning, and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development EffortsReview of Economics and Statistics 43 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J.Kortum, S. 2001 Technology, Trade, and Growth: A Unified FrameworkEuropean Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 45 742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, L.Romer, P. 1991 Economic Integration and Endogenous GrowthQuarterly Journal of Economics 106 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.Helpman, E. 1990 Comparative Advantage and Long-Run GrowthAmerican Economic Review 80 796Google Scholar
Eaton, J.Kortum, S. 1999 International Technology Diffusion: Theory and MeasurementInternational Economic Review 40 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. F. 2008 Innovation and International Trade in TechnologyJournal of Economic Theory 138 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×