Book contents
- The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages
- The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Front Rounded Vowels of Heritage Korean in Northern China
- 2 Phonetic Influence from the Minority Language
- 3 Phonological Transfer in Heritage Japanese in Australia
- 4 Phrasal Prosody of Heritage Speakers of Samoan in Aotearoa New Zealand
- 5 Stress Placement in English Loanwords by Speakers of Mirpur Pahari in the UK
- 6 Intergenerational Transmission of Laterals in Punjabi–English Heritage Bilinguals
- 7 Perception and Production of Phonemic Contrasts in Heritage Russian and Polish in Germany
- 8 Focus Realization in Heritage Spanish
- 9 Language-Specific Phonology of Heritage Perception
- 10 An Individual-Differences Perspective on Variation in Heritage Mandarin Speakers
- 11 Childhood Language Exposure
- 12 The Intonation of Declaratives and Polar Questions in Modern versus Heritage Icelandic
- 13 Functional Load and Vowel Merger in Toronto Heritage Cantonese
- 14 Have Cantonese Tones Merged in Spontaneous Speech?
- 15 Phonetics of Stop Voicing in Heritage and Homeland Polish
- 16 Perception and Production of English and Portuguese Voiceless Stops by Heritage Learners
- 17 Prosodically Conditioned Variation
- Index
- References
7 - Perception and Production of Phonemic Contrasts in Heritage Russian and Polish in Germany
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2024
Book contents
- The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages
- The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Front Rounded Vowels of Heritage Korean in Northern China
- 2 Phonetic Influence from the Minority Language
- 3 Phonological Transfer in Heritage Japanese in Australia
- 4 Phrasal Prosody of Heritage Speakers of Samoan in Aotearoa New Zealand
- 5 Stress Placement in English Loanwords by Speakers of Mirpur Pahari in the UK
- 6 Intergenerational Transmission of Laterals in Punjabi–English Heritage Bilinguals
- 7 Perception and Production of Phonemic Contrasts in Heritage Russian and Polish in Germany
- 8 Focus Realization in Heritage Spanish
- 9 Language-Specific Phonology of Heritage Perception
- 10 An Individual-Differences Perspective on Variation in Heritage Mandarin Speakers
- 11 Childhood Language Exposure
- 12 The Intonation of Declaratives and Polar Questions in Modern versus Heritage Icelandic
- 13 Functional Load and Vowel Merger in Toronto Heritage Cantonese
- 14 Have Cantonese Tones Merged in Spontaneous Speech?
- 15 Phonetics of Stop Voicing in Heritage and Homeland Polish
- 16 Perception and Production of English and Portuguese Voiceless Stops by Heritage Learners
- 17 Prosodically Conditioned Variation
- Index
- References
Summary
We examined the production and perception of voiced versus voiceless obstruents by thirty-three adolescent heritage speakers of Polish and Russian. First, a word list task was used to elicit the production of voiced and voiceless plosives in word-initial position. Voice onset time (VOT) values for both sets of stops were compared to the values reported for monolingual Polish and Russian speakers. To investigate the perception of phoneme contrasts in the heritage language, we used an auditory phoneme discrimination task that contained ten minimal pairs of real and nonce words with contrasting voiced and voiceless obstruents. The results showed an almost perfect perceptual discrimination and a separation of voiced and voiceless plosives in production; however, the VOT values differed significantly from those of monolinguals. Both groups showed convergence of VOT values towards the values reported for fortis and lenis stops in the majority language (i.e., German), leading to a non-native accent in the heritage language.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages , pp. 147 - 165Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Abramson, A. S., & Whalen, D. H. (2017). Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics, 63, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, T. K., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., & Romo, L. F. (2008). Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjorndahl, Ch. (2022). Voicing and frication at the phonetics–phonology interface: An acoustic study of Greek, Serbian, Russian, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 92, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.29. www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Brehmer, B. (2021). Slavic heritage languages around the globe. In Montrul, S. & Polinsky, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of heritage languages and linguistics (pp. 13–44). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, B., & Kurbangulova, T. (2017). Lost in transmission? Family language input and its role for the development of Russian as a heritage language in Germany. In Isurin, L. & Riehl, C. M. (Eds.), Integration, identity and language maintenance in young immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians (pp. 225–268). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.44.Google Scholar
Brehmer, B., & Mehlhorn, G. (2015). Russisch als Herkunftssprache in Deutschland: Ein holistischer Ansatz zur Erforschung des Potenzials von Herkunftssprachen [Russian as a heritage language in Germany: A holistic approach to exploring the potential of heritage languages]. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 26(1), 83–121.Google Scholar
Brehmer, B., & Mehlhorn, G. (2020). Die polnische Minderheit [The Polish minority]. In Beyer, R. & Plewnia, A. (Eds.), Handbuch der Sprachminderheiten in Deutschland (pp. 395–431). Narr-Francke-Attempto.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2021). Phonetics and phonology of heritage languages. In Montrul, S. & Polinsky, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of heritage languages and linguistics (pp. 581–612). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, R. L., & Rosenberg, D. M. (1977). Acoustic feature analysis in the perception of voicing contrasts. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(5), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubisz, S. (Ed.). (1997). Język polski poza granicami kraju [The Polish language abroad] . Uniwersytet Opolski.Google Scholar
Hill, P. (2014). The Slavonic languages in emigre communities. In Gutschmidt, K., Kempgen, S., Berger, T., & Kosta, P. (Eds.), The Slavic languages. An international handbook of their structure, their history and their investigation, Vol. 2 (pp. 2116–2135). De Gruyter. www.degruyter.com/serial/hskslavs-b/html#volumes.Google Scholar
Hrycyna, M., Lapinskaya, N., Kochetov, A., & Nagy, N. (2011). VOT drift in 3 generations of heritage language speakers in Toronto. Canadian Acoustics, 39(3), 166–167. https://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/2463.Google Scholar
Isurin, L., & Riehl, C. M. (Eds.). (2017). Integration, identity and language maintenance in young immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessen, M. (1998). Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.44.Google Scholar
Kang, Y., George, S., & Soo, R. (2016). Cross-language influence in the stop voicing contrast in heritage Tagalog. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 184–218. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.13.2.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60(2), 286–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/413642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. A., Mikoś, M. J., & Ganong, W. F. (1981). A cross-language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurbangulova, T. (2018). Voice Onset Time im intergenerationalen Vergleich am Beispiel der Herkunftssprachen Polnisch und Russisch [Intergenerational comparison of Voice Onset Time in heritage Russian and Polish]. In Mehlhorn, G. & Brehmer, B. (Eds.), Potenziale von Herkunftssprachen: Sprachliche und außersprachliche Einflussfaktoren (pp. 39–53). Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Lein, T., Kupisch, T., & van de Weijer, J. (2016). Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German-French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(6), 732–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukyanchenko, A., & Gor, K. (2011). Perceptual correlates of phonological representations in heritage speakers and L2 learners. In Danis, N., Mesh, K., & Sung, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 414–426). Cascadilla Press. www.cascadilla.com/bucld35toc.html.Google Scholar
MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1377287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, J. (1995). Phonologisch–phonetische Überspezifizierung bei Sprechapraxie [Phonological–phonetic overspecification in speech apraxia]. Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung. https://d-nb.info/1050979559/34.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N., & Kochetov, A. (2013). VOT across the generations: A cross-linguistic study of contact- induced change. In Siemund, P., Gogolin, I., Schulz, M., & Davydova, J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and language contact in urban areas: Acquisition – development – teaching – communication (pp. 19–38). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, C., & Kulikov, V. (2012). Voicing in Russian stops: Cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 20(2), 269–286. www.jstor.org/stable/24600129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussex, R. (1993). Slavonic languages in emigration. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. C. (Eds.), The Slavonic languages (pp. 999–1036). Routledge. www.routledge.com/The-Slavonic-Languages/Corbett-Comrie/p/book/9780415280785.Google Scholar
Zemskaja, E. A. (Ed.). (2001). Jazyk russkogo zarubež’ja: obščie processy i rečevye portrety [The language of the Russian diaspora: Common processes and language portraits]. Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar