Ahl, F., and Roisman, H. (1996). The Odyssey Re-Formed. Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and de Jonge, C. C. (2017). ‘From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept’. Style 51: 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, W. (2006). ‘Divine Justice and Cosmic Order in Early Greek Epic’. JHS 126: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aloni, A. (2009). ‘Elegy: Forms, Functions and Communication’. In Budelmann (ed.), 168–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aloni, A., and Iannucci, A. (2007). L’elegia greca e l’epigramma dalle origini al v secolo. Florence.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1982). ‘Plato on the Triviality of Literature’. In Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, ed. Moravcsik, J. M. E and Temko, P.. Totowa, NJ: 1–28.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1983). ‘L’eredita dell’ epica in Parmenide’. In Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Haendel, P. and Meid, W.. Innsbruck: 9–16.Google Scholar

Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (2007). Commentary on Herodotus Books i–iv. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atherton, C. (ed.) (1998). Form and Content in Didactic Poetry. Bari.Google Scholar

Atkins, J. W. H. (1934). Literary Criticism in Antiquity: Volume 1, Greek: A Sketch of Its Development. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Attridge, D. (2004). The Singularity of Literature. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attridge, D. (2015). The Work of Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attridge, D. (2019). The Experience of Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, C., and Olson, S. D. (2004). Aristophanes: Thesmophoriazusae. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, N. (1972). ‘Name Magic in the Odyssey’. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 5: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babut, D. (1974a). ‘Xénophane critique des poètes’. AC 43: 83–117.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1974b). ‘Sur la “théologie” de Xénophane’. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 164: 401–40.Google Scholar

Bachvarova, M. R. (2009). ‘Hittite and Greek Perspectives on Travelling Poets, Texts and Festivals’. In Hunter and Rutherford (eds.), 23–45.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2005). Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2013). The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2017a). ‘Trust and Fame: The Seal of Theognis’. In Bakker (ed.), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2017b). Authorship and Greek Song: Authority, Authenticity, and Performance. Leiden.Google Scholar

Barfield, R. (2011). The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, E. T. E. (2015). ‘New Religious Movements’. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. Wright, J. D., 2nd ed. Oxford: 805–8.Google Scholar

Barker, E. T. E. (2009). Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography, and Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1982). The Presocratic Philosophers. Rev. ed. London.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2011a). ‘The History of Philosophy’. In Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I. Oxford: 17–22.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2011b). ‘Philosophy within Quotation Marks?’ In Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I. Oxford: 23–42.Google Scholar

Barrett, J. (2004). ‘Struggling with Parmenides’. Ancient Philosophy 24: 267–91.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. S. (1964). Euripides: Hippolytus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. Translated by R. Miller. Oxford. Originally published as S/Z, Paris, 1973.Google Scholar

Beaufret, J. (1952). Le Poème de Parménide. Paris.Google Scholar

Becker, O. (1937). Das Bild des Weges und Verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin.Google Scholar

Beekes, R. (2010). Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. (1984). ‘A Theory of Imitation in Plato’s Republic’. TAPhA 114: 121–46.Google Scholar

Bernabé, A. (1979). ‘Los filósofos presocráticos como autores literarios’. Emerita 47: 357–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernabé, A. (1987–2007). Poetarum epicorum Graecorum testimonia et fragmenta. 4 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Bernabé, A. (2014). ‘On the Rites Described and Commented Upon in the Derveni Papyrus, Columns i–vi’. In Papadopoulou and Muellner (eds.), 19–52.Google Scholar

Bernabé, A., and San Cristóbal, A. I. J. (2008). Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bernays, J. (1850). ‘Heraklitische Studien’. RhM 7: 90–116.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2013). ‘On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology, with New Appendices’. In Doctrine and Doxography Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, ed. Sider, D. and Obbink, D.. Berlin: 225–61.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2016). ‘Colocation’. In ΣΩΜΑ. Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur, ed. Buchheim, T., Meissner, D. and Wachsmann, N.. Hamburg: 393–421.Google Scholar

Bidez, J. (1894). La Biographie d’Empédocle. Brussels.Google Scholar

Bierl, A. (2014). ‘“Riddles over Riddles”: “Mysterious” and “Symbolic” (Inter)Textual Strategies: The Problem of Language in the Derveni Papyrus’. In Papadopoulou and Muellner (eds.), 187–210.Google Scholar

Bignone, E. (1916). Empedocle: studio critico. Turin.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1981). ‘The Voice of Those Who Live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus’. ZPE 41: 33–6.Google Scholar

Blank, D. L. (1982). ‘Faith and Persuasion in Parmenides’. ClAnt 1: 167–77.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1966). ‘Sprachsituation und immanente Poetik’. In Immanente Ästhetik, ästhetische Reflexion: Lyrik als Paradigma der Moderne, ed. Iser, W.. Munich: 145–55.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D., and Sider, D. (eds.) (2001). The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhme, R. (1986). Die verkannte Muse: Dichtersprache und geistige Tradition des Parmenides. Bern.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. (1965–9). Empédocle. 4 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Bollack, J (2001). ‘Voir la haine’. Methodos 1. Available online at https://journals.openedition.org/methodos/169 (accessed 23 August 2019).Google Scholar

Bollack, J (2003). Purifications. Paris.Google Scholar

Bollack, J (2005). ‘Empedocles: Two Theologies, Two Projects’. In Pierris (ed.), 45–72.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1986). ‘Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival’. JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1993). ‘Lies, Fiction and Slander in Early Greek Poetry’. In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, ed. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 1–37.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2016). ‘Cultic Contexts for Elegiac Performance’. In Iambus and Elegy: New Approaches, ed. Carey, C. and Swift, L. A.. Oxford: 15–32.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1937). ‘The Proem of Parmenides’. CPh 32: 97–112.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1938). ‘Xenophanes, Fragment 1’. CPh 33: 353–67.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1964). Pindar. Oxford.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003). ‘The Stoics’ Two Types of Allegory’. In Boys-Stones (ed.), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) (2003). Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. (2007). ‘Democritus’ Mousika’. In Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul, ed. Brancacci, A. and Morel, P.-M.. Leiden: 181–206.Google Scholar

Bredlow, L. A. (2011). ‘Aristotle, Theophrastus, and Parmenides’ Theory of Cognition (B 16)’. Apeiron 44: 219–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bremer, D. (1980). ‘Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher’. Poetica 12: 350–76.Google Scholar

Bremer, J.-M. (1998). ‘Giving and Thanksgiving in Greek Religion’. In Reciprocity in Ancient Greece, ed. Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N. and Seaford, R.. Oxford: 127–38.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. (1983). The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bremmer, J. (1987). ‘What Is a Greek Myth?’ In Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. Bremmer, J.. London: 1–9.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. (2001). The Rise and Fall of the Afterlife. London.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. (2014). Initiation into the Mysteries of the Ancient World. Berlin.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (1999). ‘Rational Theology’. In Long (ed.), 205–24.Google Scholar

Brooks, C. (1947). The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bryan, J. (2012). Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Budelmann, F. (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bugno, M. (ed.) (2005). Senofane: interpretazioni antiche e contesto culturale. Naples.Google Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1962). Studia Pindarica. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1960). ‘Platon oder Pythagoras? Zum Ursprung des Wortes “Philosophie.”’ Hermes 88: 159–77.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1968). ‘Orpheus und die Vorsokratiker’. A&A 14: 93–114.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1969). ‘Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras’. Phronesis 14: 1–29.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1972). Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1979). Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1982). ‘Craft versus Sect: The Problem of Orphics and Pythagoreans’. In Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, Vol. 3: Self-Definition in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Meyer, B. and Sanders, E. P.. Philadelphia, PA: 1–22.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1983). Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by P. Bing. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. Originally published as Homo Necans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen, Berlin, 1972.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1985). Greek Religion. Translated by J. Raffan. Oxford. Originally published as Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche, Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1987a). Ancient Mystery Cults. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1987b). ‘The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century bc: Rhapsodes versus Stesichorus’. In Papers on the Amasis Painter and His World, ed. von Bothmer, D.. Malibu, CA: 43–62.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1992). The Orientalizing Revolution: Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture in the Early Archaic Age. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1996). Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (2008). ‘Prehistory of Presocratic Philosophy in an Orientalizing Context’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 55–87.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (2014). ‘How to Learn about Souls: The Derveni Papyrus and Democritus’. In Papadopoulou and Muellner (eds.), 107–14.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. (1999). ‘Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic’. Available online at http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/b/Burnyeat99.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019).Google Scholar

Burton, D. (2011). ‘Response and Composition in Archaic Greek Poetry’. Antichthon 45: 58–76.Google Scholar

Bury, R. G. (1936). Sextus Empiricus. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. (1980). ‘Blindness and Limits: Sophokles and the Logic of Myth’. JHS 100: 22–37.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. (1994). Imaginary Greece: The Contexts of Mythology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. (ed.) (1999). From Myth to Reason? Oxford.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. L. (1993). Aidōs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. L. (2002). ‘The Meaning of the Veil in Ancient Greek Culture’. In Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World, ed. Llewellyn-Jones, L.. Swansea: 73–93.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. L. (2014). ‘Exemplarity and Narrative in the Greek Tradition’. In Defining Greek Narrative, ed. Cairns, D. L. and Scodel, R.. Edinburgh: 103–36.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. L. (2015). ‘The Horror and the Pity: Phrikē as a Tragic Emotion’. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 35: 75–94.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. L., and Howie, J. G. (2010). Bacchylides. Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1972). Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1974). ‘Réflexions sur les genres littéraires en Grèce archaïque’. QUCC 17: 113–28.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2005). Masks of Authority: Fiction and Pragmatics in Ancient Greek Poetics. Translated by P. M. Burk. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Calogero, G. (1977). Studi sull’Eleatismo. 2nd ed. Florence.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A. (1982). Greek Lyric Poetry: A Selection of Early Greek Lyric, Elegiac and Iambic Poetry. 2nd ed. Bristol.Google Scholar

Canevaro, L. G. (2015). Hesiod’s Works and Days: How to Teach Self-Sufficiency. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cassin, B. (1987). ‘Le Chant des Sirènes dans le poème de Parménide’. In Études sur Parménide tome ii: Problèmes d’interprétation, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: 163–9.Google Scholar

Cassio, A. C. (2002). ‘Early Editions of the Greek Epics and Homeric Textual Criticism in the Sixth and Fifth Centuries bc’. In Omero tremila anni dopo, ed. Montanari, F.. Rome: 105–36.Google Scholar

Caston, V., and Graham, D. W. (eds.) (2002). Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (2016). Thinking with Literature: Towards a Cognitive Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cerri, G. (1996). Platone sociologo della comunicazione. 2nd ed. Lecce.Google Scholar

Cerri, G. (2001). ‘Physikà e Katharmoì di Empedocle’. Aevum(ant) 1 (n.s.): 181–96.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1968). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1935). Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Chitwood, A. (1986). ‘The Death of Empedocles’. AJPh 107: 175–91.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1989). ‘Xenophanes and the Tradition of Epic Poetry’. In Ionian Philosophy, ed. Boudouris, K., 91–103. Athens.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (2012). ‘Empedocles at Panoplis and Delphi’. In Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift in Honor of Charles Kahn, ed. Patterson, R, Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A.. Las Vegas, NV: 59–77.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1993). ‘The Education of Perses: From “Mega Nepios” to “Dion Genos” and Back’. MD 31: 23–33.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2003). Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2011a). ‘The Homeric Hymns as Genre’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: 233–53.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2011b). Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the IIiad. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2015). ‘Commencing Cosmogony and the Rhetoric of Poetic Authority’. In Cosmologies et cosmogonies dans la littérature antique = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 61. Vandœuvres: 105–47.Google Scholar

Clayman, D. L. (2009). Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonism into Poetry. Berlin.Google Scholar

Clinton, K. (2003). ‘Stages of Initiation into the Eleusinian and Samothracian Mysteries’. In Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret Cults, ed. Cosmopoulos, M. B.. London: 50–78.Google Scholar

Cobley, P. (2014). Narrative. 2nd ed. Abingdon.Google Scholar

Colborn, R. (2013). ‘Solving Problems with Acrostics: Manilius Dates Germanicus’. CQ 63: 450–2.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1967). Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1983). ‘Archaic Truth’. QUCC 13 (n.s.): 7–28.Google Scholar

Collins, D. (2004). Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Collobert, C. (2004). ‘L’odyssée ou la naissance de la fiction’. RPhilos 129: 15–26.Google Scholar

Conche, M. (1996). Parménide: Le poème. Paris.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994). Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Cordero, N.-L. (1984). Les Deux chemins de Parménide. Paris.Google Scholar

Cordero, N.-L. (ed.) (2012). Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1912). From Religion to Philosophy: A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation. London.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, M. R. (2011). ‘The Unknown “Knowing Man”: Parmenides, B1. 3’. CQ 61: 28–47.Google Scholar

Coxon, A. H. (1968). ‘The Text of Parmenides Fr. 1. 3’. CQ 18: 69.Google Scholar

Coxon, A. H. (2009). The Fragments of Parmenides: A Critical Text with Introduction and Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Rev. ed. Schofield, M., with translation by R. D. McKirahan. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (2005). Theories of Mythology. Oxford.Google Scholar

Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist Poetics. London.Google Scholar

Culler, J. (1981). The Pursuit of Signs. London.Google Scholar

Culler, J. (2015). The Theory of the Lyric. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (1998). The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (2002). ‘The Presocratics as Philosophers’. In Laks and Louguet (eds.), 115–38.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (2005). ‘On the Question of Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’. In Pierris (ed.), 137–62.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (2006). ‘Gorgias and the Eleatics’. In Sassi (ed.), 183–200.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (2013a). ‘Where Are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles’. In Early Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics and the Emergence of Reason, ed. McCoy, J.. Washington, DC: 113–38.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (2013b). ‘The Divine and the Thinkable: Toward an Account of the Intelligible Cosmos’. Rhizomata 1: 217–47.Google Scholar

Curd, P., and Graham, D. W. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Currie, B. (2012). ‘Hesiod on Human History’. In Greek Notions of the Past, eds. Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Maciver, C.. Edinburgh: 37–64.Google Scholar

Currie, B. (2016). Homer’s Allusive Art. Oxford.Google Scholar

Currie, G. (1986). ‘Fictional Truth’. Philosophical Studies 50: 195–212.Google Scholar

Currie, G. (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Currie, G. (2010). Narratives and Narrators: A Philosophy of Stories. Oxford.Google Scholar

d’Alessio, G. B. (1995). ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. Frr. 1+6 D.-K.; Pind. Ol. vi 22–27; Pae. viib 10–20)’. SIFC 13: 143–81.Google Scholar

d’Alessio, G. B. (2009). ‘Defining Local Identities’. In Hunter and Rutherford (eds.), 137–67.Google Scholar

Dalzell, A. (1987). ‘Language and Atomic Theory in Lucretius’. Hermathena 143: 19–28.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (1988). ‘Homeric Words and Speakers: An Addendum’. JHS 108: 188–9.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2014). Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C., and van Ophuijsen, J. M. (2010). ‘Greek Philosophers on Language’. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, ed. Bakker, E.. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester: 483–98.Google Scholar

de Rijk, L. M. (1983). ‘Did Parmenides Reject the Sensible World?’ In Graceful Reason: Essays in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Presented to Joseph Owens, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Toronto: 29–53.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1973). ‘Gorgias et le pouvoir de la poésie’. JHS 93: 155–62.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K. (1933). ‘Hymnische Elemente in der Philosophischen Prosa der Vorsokratiker’. Philologus 88: 347–61.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K. (1958). Parmenides’ Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts: Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Delatte, A. (1934). Les Conceptions de l’enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Delattre, D. (2007). Philodème de Gadara sur la musique, livre iv. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

de Man, P. (1983). Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1986). The Creation of Mythology. Translated by M. Cook. Chicago, IL. Originally published as L’Invention de la mythologie, Paris, 1981.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1989). ‘Culinary Practices and the Spirit of Sacrifice’. In The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks, ed. Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P., translated by P. Wissing. Chicago, IL: 1–20. Originally published as La Cuisine du sacrifice en pays grec, Paris, 1979.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1996). The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece. Translated by J. Lloyd. Cambridge, MA. Originally published as Les Maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris, 1967.Google Scholar

di Cesare, D. (1980). ‘Heraklit und die Sprache’. In Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter, ed. Mojsisch, B.. Amsterdam: 1–16.Google Scholar

di Marco, M. (1989). Timone di Fliunte, Silli. Rome.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1884). ‘Gorgias und Empedokles’. SBBerl 49: 343–68.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1897). Parmenides Lehrgedicht. Berlin.Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (2004). Theophrastus: Characters. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1951). The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Doležel, L. (1980). ‘Truth and Authenticity in Narrative’. Poetics Today 1: 7–25.Google Scholar

Doležel, L. (1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Doležel, L. (2010). Possible Worlds of Fiction and History. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Dolin, E. F. (1962). ‘Parmenides and Hesiod’. HSPh 66: 93–8.Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. (1993). The Poetics of Colonization: From City to Text in Archaic Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1964). ‘The Poetry of Archilochus’. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 10: 183–223.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1975). ‘The Freedom of the Intellectual in Greek Society’. Talanta 7: 24–54.Google Scholar

Dowden, K. (1992). The Uses of Greek Mythology. London.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1912). Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary Theory: An Introduction. 2nd, rev. ed. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Edmonds III, R. G. (2004). Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmonds III, R. G. (2013). Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (1985). ‘The Genre of Theognidean Poetry’. In Figueira and Nagy (eds.), 96–111.Google Scholar

Edmundson, M. (1995). Literature against Philosophy, Plato to Derrida: A Defence of Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Effe, B. (1977). Dichtung und Lehre. Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Munich.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1920). ‘Hamlet and His Problems’. In The Sacred Wood, London: 87–94.Google Scholar

Else, G. F. (1957). Aristotle’s Poetics: The Argument. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2002). ‘Introduction: The Genres of Ekphrasis’. Ramus 31: 1–18.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A. (2008). The Stanzaic Architecture of Early Greek Elegy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Faulkner, A. (2008). The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Federico, E. (2001). ‘La Katharsis di Epimenide ad Atene: La vicenda, gli usi e gli abusi ateniesi’. In Epimenide Cretese, ed. Federico, E. and Visconti, A.. Naples: 77–128.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991). The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1995). ‘Criticism Ancient and Modern’. In Ethics and Rhetoric, ed. Innes, D. C., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford: 301–10.Google Scholar

Fehling, D. (1965). ‘Zwei Untersuchungen zur griechischen Sprachphilosophie’. RhM 108: 212–29.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989). ‘Plato and Poetry’. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 1: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 92–148.Google Scholar

Ferrell, R. (2002). Genres of Philosophy. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, B. (1984). ‘Zur Wegmetaphorik beim Goldblättchen aus Hipponion und dem Proömium des Parmenides’. RhM 127: 1–22.Google Scholar

Figueira, T. J. and Nagy, G. (eds.) (1985). Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2007). Sophocles: Electra. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2018). Sophocles: Oedipus the King. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (1998). The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. (1977). Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance and Social Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fischer-Hansen, T., Nielsen, T. H., and Ampolo, C. (2004). ‘Sikelia’. In An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis, ed. Hansen, M. H. and Nielsen, T. H.. Oxford: 172–248.Google Scholar

Flower, M. (2008). The Seer in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Floyd, E. D. (1992). ‘Why Parmenides Wrote in Verse’. AncPhil 12: 251–65.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1985). ‘The Seal of Theognis: The Politics of Authorship in Archaic Greece’. In Figueira and Nagy (eds.), 82–95.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1988). ‘The Classical Definition of ΡΑΨΩΙΔΙΑ’. CPh 83: 300–7.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1992). Homer: The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2002). The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2003). ‘From Letters to Literature: Reading the “Song Culture” of Classical Greece’. In Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. Yunis, H.. Cambridge: 15–37.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2015). ‘The Purpose of Aristotle’s Poetics’. CPh 110: 1–21.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2016). ‘Catharsis, Music, and the Mysteries in Aristotle’. Skenè 2: 24–41.Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1991). ‘Narrate and Describe: The Problem of Ekphrasis’. JRS 81: 25–35.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997). ‘On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies’. MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (2000). ‘The Didactic Plot’. In Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons and Society, ed. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, MA: 205–19.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (1987). Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. Toronto.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2011). ‘Mythos and Logos’. JHS 131: 45–66.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2013). Early Greek Mythography: Volume 2: Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1955). Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens: Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien. Munich.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1993). ‘Xenophanes’ Empiricism and His Critique of Knowledge (B34)’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D., 118–31. Princeton, NJ. Originally published in 1925.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1975a). ‘Studies in Parmenides’. In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy Volume 2: The Eleatics and Pluralists, ed. Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E.. London: 1–47.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1975b). Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Translated by M. Hadas and J. Willis. Oxford. Originally published as Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, New York, NY, 1951.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2008). ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 501–29.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1960). ‘On Sense and Reference’. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. Geach, P. and Black, M.. Oxford: 56–78. Essay originally published in 1892 as ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25–50.Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. (1941). ‘Pattern of Sound and Atomistic Theory in Lucretius’. AJPh 62: 16–34.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1967). Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1993). ‘Democritus and Epicurus on Sensible Qualities’. In Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, ed. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 72–94.Google Scholar

Furley, W. D. (1995). ‘Praise and Persuasion in Greek Hymns’. JHS 115: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furley, W. D., and Bremer, J. M. (2001). Greek Hymns: Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period. 2 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The Relevance of the Beautiful. Translated by N. Walker. Cambridge. Originally published as Die Aktualität des Schönen, Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method. 2nd, rev. ed. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. J. Marshall. London. Originally published as Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, 1960.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. (2006). ‘L’Esthétique de la peur chez Empédocle’. RPhA 24: 83–110.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. (2013). Ancestral Fault in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. (1994). Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gallavotti, C. (1975). Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale. Verona.Google Scholar

Gallop, D. (1984). Parmenides of Elea. Toronto.Google Scholar

Gantz, T. (1993). Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Garani, M. (2007). Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. London.Google Scholar

Garner, R. (1990). From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Garvie, A. F. (1968). Aeschylus’ Supplices: Play and Trilogy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gazis, G. (2018). Homer and the Poetics of Hades. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (1990). Le metamorfosi della tradizione: mutamenti di significato e neologismi nel Peri physeos di Empedocle. Bari.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2001). ‘Le “demonologie” Empedoclee: problemi di metodo e altro’. Aevum(ant) 1 (n.s.): 205–35.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2005a). ‘Senofane: interpretazioni antiche e contesto culturale. La critica ai poeti e il cosiddetto “Monismo”’. In Senofane ed Elea tra Ionia e Magna Grecia, ed. Bugno, M., 63–76. Naples.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2005b). ‘Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology’. In Pierris (ed.), 373–404.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2008). ‘Images and Experience: At the Roots of Parmenides’ Aletheia’. AncPhil 28: 21–48.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2013). Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienza: A cura di Livio Rossetti e Massimo Pulpito, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito, M.. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

Gentili, B. (1988). Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece. Translated by A. T. Cole. Baltimore, MD. Originally published as Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica, Milan, 1984.Google Scholar

George, A. (1999). The Epic of Gilgamesh. Rev. ed. London.Google Scholar

Gera, D. L. (2003). Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gerber, D. E. (1999). Greek Elegiac Poetry. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gernet, L. (1981). The Anthropology of Ancient Greece. Translated by J. B. Hamilton and B. Nagy. Baltimore, MD. Originally published as Anthropologie de la Grèce antique, Paris, 1968.Google Scholar

Gheerbrant, X. (2017). Empédocle, une poétique philosophique. Paris.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (2009). ‘Literature and Knowledge’. In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature, ed. Eldridge, R.. Oxford: 467–85.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (ed.) (2015). The Philosophy of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1991). The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1999). ‘Literary History without Literature: Reading Practices in the Ancient World’. SubStance 28: 57–89.Google Scholar

González, J. (2013). The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goody, J., and Watt, I. (1963). ‘The Consequences of Literacy’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 304–45.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1973). ‘HIKETEIA’. JHS 93: 74–103.Google Scholar

Gould, John (2001). ‘On Making Sense of Greek Religion’. In Myth, Ritual, Memory, and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford: 203–34.Google Scholar

Graeser, A. (1977). ‘On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy’. Dialectica 31: 359–88.Google Scholar

Graf, F., and Johnston, S. I. (2013). Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (1988). ‘Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle’. CQ 38: 297–312.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (1999). ‘Empedocles and Anaxagoras’. In Long (ed.), 159–80.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (2002). ‘Heraclitus and Parmenides’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 27–44.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (2006). Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Granger, H. (2007). ‘Poetry and Prose: Xenophanes of Colophon’. TAPhA 137: 403–33.Google Scholar

Granger, H. (2008). ‘The Proem of Parmenides’ Poem’. AncPhil 28: 1–20.Google Scholar

Granger, H. (2010). ‘Parmenides of Elea: Rationalist or Dogmatist?’ AncPhil 30: 15–38.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2002). Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2006). ‘Il rapporto tra autore ed opera nella tradizione biografica greca’. In L’autore e l’opera nella Grecia antica, ed. Roscalla, F.. Pavia: 155–74.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2013). ‘The Poet in the Iliad’. In The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, ed. Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J.. Oxford: 9–38.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2008). ‘Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey’. JHS 128: 27–51.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2010). The Greeks and Their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century bce. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J., and Huitink, L. (2017). ‘Homer’s Vividness: An Enactive Approach’. JHS 137: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, J. (1986). ‘Homeric Words and Speakers’. JHS 106: 36–57.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1983). ‘Personality in Hesiod’. ClAnt 2: 37–65.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1990). ‘Contest and Contradiction in Early Greek Poetry’. In Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, ed. Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. Atlanta, GA: 185–207.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1965). The Greek and Roman Critics. London.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (1934). Aristoteles: Peri Poietikes. Berlin.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 1, The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W.K.C. (1965). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. (2010). ‘Literary Criticism’. In A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, ed. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Malden, MA: 337–65.Google Scholar

Hahn, R. (2001). Anaximander and the Architects: The Contributions of Egyptian and Greek Architectural Technologies to the Origins of Greek Philosophy. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1986). ‘Where Three Roads Meet: A Neglected Detail in the Oedipus Tyrannus’. JHS 106: 187–90.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1997). ‘Review of Nightingale (1995)’. AncPhil 17: 452–7.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1998). Aristotle’s Poetics. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2002). The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2011). Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harder, A. (2012). ‘Callimachus’ Aetia’. In A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, ed. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Oxford: 92–105.Google Scholar

Hardie, A. (2013). ‘Empedocles and the Muse of the Agathos Logos’. AJPh 134: 209–46.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1985). ‘Imago mundi: Cosmological and Ideological Aspects of the Shield of Achilles’. JHS 105: 11–31.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1995). ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos’. CQ 45: 204–14.Google Scholar

Harriott, R. M. (1969). Poetry and Criticism before Plato. London.Google Scholar

Harvey, A. E. (1955). ‘The Classification of Greek Lyric Poetry’. CQ 5: 157–75.Google Scholar

Haubold, J. H. (2010). ‘Shepherd, Farmer, Poet, Sophist: Hesiod on His Own Reception’. In Plato and Hesiod, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. H.. Oxford: 11–30.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1958). ‘Parmenides and Odysseus’. HSPh 63: 133–43.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1983). ‘The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K.. La Salle, IL: 7–82.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1985). ‘Hesiod’s Didactic Poetry’. CQ 35: 245–63.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1987). The Poetics of Greek Tragedy. London.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1991). ‘The Universality of Poetry in Aristotle’s Poetics’. CQ 41: 389–402.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1999). ‘Longinus On Sublimity’. PCPhS 45: 43–74.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2002). Interpreting Classical Texts. London.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2009). ‘Cognition in Aristotle’s Poetics’. Mnemosyne 62: 51–75.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2013). Ancient Philosophical Poetics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford. Originally published as Sein und Zeit, Tübingen, 1927.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1992). Parmenides. Translated by A. Schuwer and R. Rojcewicz. Bloomington, IN. Originally published as Parmenides, Frankfurt, 1982.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (2002). ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’. In Off the Beaten Track. Translated by J. Young and K. Haynes. Cambridge. Originally published as Holzwege, Frankfurt, 1950.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (2007). ‘The Muses’ Uncanny Lies: Hesiod, “Theogony” 27 and Its Translators’. AJPh 128: 153–75.Google Scholar

Heitsch, E. (1966). ‘Das Wissen des Xenophanes’. RhM 109: 193–235.Google Scholar

Heitsch, E. (1983). Xenophanes: Die Fragmente. Munich.Google Scholar

Helms, M. W. (1988). Ulysses’ Sail: An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge, and Geographical Distance. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Henry, M. (1986). ‘The Derveni Commentator as Literary Critic’. TAPhA 116: 149–64.Google Scholar

Herington, J. (1985). Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (1968). ‘Empedocles’ Oral Style’. CJ 63: 351–7.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2013). The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hölscher, U. (1965). ‘Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie’. Hermes 93: 7–33.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1995). ‘Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phaenomena of Aratus’. Arachnion 2: 1–34.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1996). Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2009). Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2014). Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L., and Russell, D. A. (eds.) (2011). Plutarch: How to Study Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L., and Rutherford, I. (eds.) (2009). Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. (1972). The Presocratics. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. (1982). ‘Epistemology and Meaning in Heraclitus’. In Language and Logos, ed. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 33–59.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. (1990). ‘The Beginnings of Epistemology: From Homer to Philolaus’. In Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: 11–38.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. (2006). ‘Parmenides on Thinking’. In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. King, R. A. H.. Berlin: 11–38.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2001). The Poem of Empedocles: A Text and Translation with a Commentary. 2nd ed. Toronto.Google Scholar

Ioli, R. (2003). ‘Senofane B34DK e il conoscere’. GIF 55: 199–219.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (2005). Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1932). ‘Tyrtaios über die wahre Άρετή’. SBBerlin 23: 537–68.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1939). Paideia: The Ideal of Greek Culture: In Search of the Divine Centre. 3 vols. Translated by G. Highet. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1947). The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960). ‘Linguistics and Poetics’. In Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, T. A.. Cambridge, MA: 350–77.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1981). ‘The Structure of the Homeric Hymns: A Study in Genre’. Hermes 109: 9–24.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1982). Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1992). The Iliad: A Commentary: Volume 4, Books 13–16. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2000). Philodemus on Poems, Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2004). ‘Empedocles, “On Nature” i 233–364: A New Reconstruction of “P. Strasb. Gr.” Inv. 1665-6’. ZPE 150: 1–26.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2010). Philodemus on Poems, Books 3–4: With the Fragments of Aristotle on Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2016). ‘Parmenides in the Derveni Papyrus: New Images for a New Edition’. ZPE 200: 3–23.Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R. (1970). ‘Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory’. Translated by E. Benzinger. New Literary History 2: 7–37. Originally published as sections x–xii of Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft, Konstanz, 1967.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. (2016). ‘Parmenides’ Likely Story’. OSAPh 50: 1–29.Google Scholar

Jordan, M. D. (1981). ‘A Preface to the Study of Philosophic Genres’. Philosophy & Rhetoric 14: 199–211.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1960). ‘Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42: 3–35.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1979). The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (2001). Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (2002). ‘Parmenides and Plato’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 82–93.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (2003). ‘Writing Philosophy: Prose and Poetry from Thales to Plato’. In Yunis (ed.), 139–61.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (2005). ‘Parmenides and Being’. In Frühgriechisches Denken, ed. Rechenauer, G.. Göttingen: 216–26.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (2009). Essays on Being. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kamtekar, R. (2009). ‘Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles’. Phronesis 54: 215–38.Google Scholar

Kannicht, R. (1988). The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry: Aspects of the Greek Conception of Literature. Christchurch.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1989). ‘Language and Meaning in Archaic and Classical Greece’. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 1: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 78–91.Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. B. (1981). The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kern, O. (1888). ‘Empedokles und die Orphiker’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1: 498–508.Google Scholar

Kingsley, P. (1995). Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kingsley, P. (1999). In the Dark Places of Wisdom. Inverness, CA.Google Scholar

Kingsley, P. (2002). ‘Empedocles for the New Millennium’. AncPhil 22: 333–413.Google Scholar

Kingsley, P. (2003). Reality. Inverness, CA.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. (1990). The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume 2: Books 5–8. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., and Raven, J. E. (1957). The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kivilo, M. (2010). Early Greek Poets’ Lives: The Shaping of the Tradition. Leiden.Google Scholar

Koethe, J. (2009). ‘Poetry and Truth’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33: 53–60.Google Scholar

Koller, H. (1954). Die Mimesis in der Antike: Nachahmung, Darstellung, Ausdruck. Bern.Google Scholar

Koning, H. (2010). Hesiod: The Other Poet. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kouremenos, T., Parássoglou, G. M., and Tsantsanoglou, K. (2006). The Derveni Papyrus. Florence.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2006). ‘The Aetiology of Empire? Hero-Cult and Athenian Tragedy’. BICS 87: 79–98.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2007). Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kranz, W. (1916). ‘Über Aufbau und Bedeutung des Parmenideischen Gedichtes’. Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 47: 1158–76.Google Scholar

Kranz, W. (1944). ‘Lukrez und Empedokles’. Philologus 96: 68.Google Scholar

Kraus, M. (1987). Name und Sache: ein Problem im frühgriechischen Denken. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Kraus, M. (2013). ‘Parmenides’. In Die Philosophie Der Antike. Vol. 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. Flashar, H., Bremer, D., and Rechenauer, G.. Basel: 441–530.Google Scholar

Krischer, T. (1965). ‘ΕΤΥΜΟΣ und ΑΛΗΘΗΣ’. Philologus 109: 161–74.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. (1985). ‘Gods and Men in the Iliad and the Odyssey’. HSPh 89: 1–23.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (1990). ‘Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the Tradition of Advice Poetry’. TAPhA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2010). Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2003). ‘Figures of Allegory from Homer to Latin Epic’. In Boys-Stones (ed.), 151–75.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2006). ‘The Value of Ancient Literary Criticism’. In Ancient Literary Criticism, ed. Laird, A.. Oxford: 1–36.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (1999). ‘Soul, Sensation and Thought’. In Long (ed.), 250–70.Google Scholar

Laks, André (2001). ‘Ecriture, prose, et les débuts de la philosophie grecque’. Methodos 1: 131–51.Google Scholar

Laks, André (2002). ‘Reading the Readings: On the First Person Plurals in the Strasburg Empedocles’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 127–37.Google Scholar

Laks, André (2004). Le Vide et la haine: éléments pour une histoire archaïque de la négativité. Paris.Google Scholar

Laks, André (2005). ‘Some Thoughts about the Empedoclean Cosmic and Demonic Cycles’. In Pierris (ed.), 265–82.Google Scholar

Laks, André (2013). ‘Phenomenon and Reference: Revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the Problem of Rationalization’. In Modernity’s Classics, ed. Humphreys, S. C. and Wagner, R.. New York, NY: 165–86.Google Scholar

Laks, André (2018). The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy. Translated by G. W. Most. Princeton, NJ. Originally published as Introduction à la ‘philosophie présocratique’, Paris, 2006.Google Scholar

Laks, A., and Louguet, C. (2002). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique?/ What Is Presocratic Philosophy? Paris.Google Scholar

Laks, A., and Most, G. W. (eds.) (1997). The Derveni Papyrus. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Lamarque, P. (2009a). ‘Poetry and Abstract Thought’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33: 37–52.Google Scholar

Lamarque, P. (2009b). The Philosophy of Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lanata, G. (1963). Poetica preplatonica, testimonianze e frammenti. Florence.Google Scholar

Lang, B. (1990). The Anatomy of Philosophical Style: Literary Philosophy and the Philosophy of Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lapini, W. (2013). Testi frammentari e critica del testo: problemi di filologia filosofia greca. Rome.Google Scholar

Latona, M. J. (2008). ‘Reining in the Passions: The Allegorical Interpretation of Parmenides B Fragment 1’. AJPh 129: 199–230.Google Scholar

Lavery, J. (2007). ‘Philosophical Genres and Literary Forms: A Mildly Polemical Introduction’. Poetics Today 28: 171–89.Google Scholar

Lecznar, A. (2020). Dionysus after Nietzsche. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ledbetter, G. M. (2003). Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. (2013). The Lives of the Greek Poets. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1981). ‘Perceiving and Knowing in the Iliad and Odyssey’. Phronesis 26: 2–24.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1983). ‘Xenophanes’ Scepticism’. In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2, ed. Anton, J. and Preus, T.. New York, NY: 20–40.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1984). ‘Parmenides’ Critique of Thinking. The Poluderis Elenchos of Fragment 7’. OSAPh 2: 1–30.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1992). Xenophanes of Colophon: A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1994). ‘The Emergence of Philosophical Interest in Cognition’. OSAPh 12: 1–34.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1999). ‘Early Interest in Knowledge’. In Long (ed.), 225–49.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (2008). ‘The Humanizing of Knowledge in Presocratic Thought’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 458–84.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (1978). ‘Truth in Fiction’. American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 37–46.Google Scholar

Lilja, S. (1968). On the Style of the Earliest Greek Prose. Helsinki.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. (2009). Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lincoln, B. (1999). Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. London and Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2003). Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece. Swansea.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987). The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990). Demystifying Mentalities. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2006). ‘The Pluralism of Intellectual Life before Plato’. In Principles and Practices in Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Aldershot: 1–13. Originally published as ‘Le Pluralisme de la vie intellectuelle avant Platon’, translated by A. Laks, in Laks and Louguet (eds.), 1–13.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1985). ‘Pindar and the Afterlife’. Entretiens Hardt 17: 245–83.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1963). ‘The Principles of Parmenides’ Cosmogony’. Phronesis 8: 90–107.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1966). ‘Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism’. CQ 16: 256–76.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1985). ‘Early Greek Philosophy’. In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature Volume 1: Greek Literature, ed. Knox, B. M. W. and Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: 245–57.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1992). ‘Stoic Readings of Homer’. In Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes, ed. Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J.. Princeton, NJ: 41–66.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1993). ‘Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the ’Sixties’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Princeton, NJ: 397–425.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1996). ‘Parmenides on Thinking Being’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 12: 125–51.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1999). ‘The Scope of Early Greek Philosophy’. In Long (ed.), 1–21.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (ed.) (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. G. (2017). ‘Immortality in Empedocles’. Apeiron 50: 1–20.Google Scholar

Long, H. S. (1949). ‘The Unity of Empedocles’ Thought’. AJPh 70: 142–58.Google Scholar

Louden, B. (2011). Homer’s Odyssey and the Near East. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. J. (2000). The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. (2011). Shakespeare, Rhetoric and Cognition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, M. M. (later publishing as McCabe, M. M.) (1982). ‘Parmenides’ Dilemma’. Phronesis 27: 1–12.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, T. (2016). ‘The Contents of Empedocles’ Poem: A New Argument for the Single-Poem Hypothesis’. ZPE 200: 25–32.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, T. (2017). ‘Parmenides and Early Greek Allegory’. MD 79: 31–59.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, T. (forthcoming). ‘Empedocles, Personal Identity, and the Narrative of the Fallen Daimōn’. Phoenix.Google Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1982). Homer: Iliad Book xxiv. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Maehler, H. (1963). Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. (1987). Religion and Colonization in Ancient Greece. Leiden.Google Scholar

Manetti, G. (1993). Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1964). Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt. Assen.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1985). ‘Historical and Philosophical Aspects of Gorgias’ On What Is Not’. SicGymn 36: 243–71.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992). Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1995). ‘Insight by Hindsight: Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems’. BICS 40: 225–232.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2005). ‘Minima Parmenidea’. Mnemosyne 58: 554–60.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J., and Primavesi, O. (2012). Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch/Deutsch. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. (1978). ‘Xenophanes on Drinking-Parties and Olympic Games’. ICS 3: 1–26.Google Scholar

Marías, J. (1971). ‘Literary Genres in Philosophy’. In Philosophy as Dramatic Theory. Translated by James Parsons. University Park, PA: 1–35.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A., and Hill, J. (eds.) (2013). The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Martin, A., and Primavesi, O. (1999). L’Empédocle de Strasbourg. Berlin.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1989). The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1992). ‘Hesiod’s Metanastic Poetics’. Ramus 21: 11–33.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1993). ‘The Seven Sages as Performers of Wisdom’. In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics, ed. Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L.. Cambridge: 108–30.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2009). ‘Read on Arrival’. In Hunter and Rutherford (eds.), 80–104.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2015). Pindar and the Emergence of Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mason, R. (1988). ‘Parmenides and Language’. AncPhil 8: 149–66.Google Scholar

McCabe, M. M. (previously publishing as Mackenzie, M. M.) (2000). Plato and His Predecessors. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McNelis, C., and Sens, A. (2016). The Alexandra of Lycophron: A Literary Study. Oxford.Google Scholar

Meijering, R. (1987). Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen.Google Scholar

Metcalf, C. (2015). The Gods Rich in Praise. Oxford.Google Scholar

Meuli, K. (1935). ‘Scythica’. Hermes 70: 121–76.Google Scholar

Miller, M. (2006). ‘Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem’. OSAPh 30: 1–47.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1993). ‘Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura’. MD 31: 111–28.Google Scholar

Mogyoródi, E. (2006). ‘Xenophanes’ Epistemology and Parmenides’ Quest for Knowledge’. In Sassi (ed.), 123–60.Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2000). ‘Wandering Philosophers in Classical Greece’. JHS 120: 86–105.Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2005). Wandering in Ancient Greek Culture. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. A. (2000). Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. D. (2007). The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. 1st ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morrison, J. S. (1955). ‘Parmenides and Er’. JHS 75: 59–68.Google Scholar

Moss, J. (2007). ‘What Is Imitative Poetry and Why Is It Bad?’ In The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, ed. Ferrari, G. R. F.. Cambridge: 415–44.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1993a). ‘Hesiod and the Textualization of Personal Temporality’. In La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realtà e artificio letterario, ed. Arrighetti, G. and Montanari, F.. Pisa: 73–91.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1993b). ‘Die Früheste erhaltene griechische Dichterallegorese’. RhM 136: 209–12.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1999). ‘The Poetics of Early Greek Philosophy’. In Long (ed.), 332–62.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (2002). ‘Heidegger’s Greeks’. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 10: 83–98.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (2007). ‘ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται. Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic’. In Literatur und Religion, 1: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, ed. Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K.. Berlin: 271–301.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (2011). ‘“What Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry?”’ In Plato and the Poets, ed. Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G.. Leiden: 1–20.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1987). ‘Gorgias on the Function of Language’. Philosophical Topics 15: 135–70.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2002). ‘La Terre et les étoiles dans la cosmologie de Xénophane’. In Laks and Louguet (eds.), 331–50.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2008a). The Route of Parmenides: A Study of Word, Image, and Argument in the Fragments. Expanded ed. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2008b). ‘Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Naïve Metaphysics of Things’. In The Route of Parmenides: A Study of Word, Image, and Argument in the Fragments. Rev., expanded ed. Las Vegas, NV: 299–332.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2012). ‘Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome. Plato, Theaetetus 183e: Proceedings of the International Symposium, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: 167–90.Google Scholar

Munteanu, D. L. (2012). Tragic Pathos: Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Murdoch, I. (1970). The Sovereignty of Good. London.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (1993). Early Greece. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Murray, P. (1981). ‘Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece’. JHS 101: 87–100.Google Scholar

Murray, P. (1996). Plato on Poetry: Ion; Republic 376e–398b9; Republic 595–608b10. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1979). The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1989). ‘Early Greek Views of Poets and Poetry’. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism Vol. 1: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 1–77.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1990). Greek Mythology and Poetics. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1994). ‘Genre and Occasion’. Mètis: Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 9–10: 11–25.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1982). ‘Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10’. In Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, ed. Moravcsik, J. M. E. and Temko, P.. Totowa, NJ: 47–78.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1988). ‘Plato and the Mass Media’. The Monist 71: 214–34.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (2002). ‘Parmenidean Being/Heraclitean Fire’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 45–64.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. P. (2004). ‘Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles’. Dictynna 1. Available online at https://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/161 (accessed 18 September 2019).Google Scholar

Nestle, W. (1942). Vom Mythos zum Logos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (1995). Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (2007). ‘The Philosophers in Archaic Greek Culture’. In The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge: 169–98.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1913). Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Noussia-Fantuzzi, M. (2010). Solon the Athenian the Poetic Fragments. Leiden.Google Scholar

Novitz, D. (1987). Knowledge, Fiction, and Imagination. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (1998). Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Berlin.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2005). ‘Poetological Imagery in Empedocles’. In Pierris (ed.), 73–92.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2009). The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1993). ‘The Addressees of Empedocles’. MD 31: 51–98.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (2006). ‘A New Archilochus Poem’. ZPE 156: 1–9.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (1969). Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (1970). ‘The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing’. JHS 90: 140–79.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (1995). ‘Empedocles Revisited’. AncPhil 15: 403–70.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (2001). ‘Empedocles: The Wandering Daimon and the Two Poems’. Aevum(ant) 1 (n.s.): 79–179.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (2005). ‘Empedocles: A Synopsis’. In Frühgriechisches Denken, ed. Rechenauer, G.. Göttingen: 316–42.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (2006). ‘Life beyond the Stars: Aristotle, Plato and Empedocles’. In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. King, R. A. H.. Berlin: 49–102.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, T. (1997). ‘The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus’. AncPhil 17: 119–34.Google Scholar

Osborne, C. (later publishing as Rowett, C.). (1987). ‘Empedocles Recycled’. CQ 37: 24–50.Google Scholar

Osborne, C. (1998). ‘Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?’ In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Atherton, C.. Bari: 23–35.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1960). ‘Eleatic Questions’. CQ 10: 84–102.Google Scholar

Page, D. L. (1955). Sappho and Alcaeus: An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. (1999). Plato’s Reception of Parmenides. Oxford.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. (2008). ‘Classical Representations and Uses of the Presocratics’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 530–54.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. (2009). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. (2013). ‘Revelation and Reasoning in Kalliopeia’s Address to Empedocles’. Rhizomata 1: 308–29.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. (2016). ‘Parmenides’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/parmenides/ (accessed 18 September 2019).Google Scholar

Palumbo, L. (2007). ‘Empedocle e il linguaggio poetico’. In Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. Casertano, G.. Naples: 83–107.Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, I., and Muellner, L. (eds.) (2014). Poetry as Initiation: The Center for Hellenic Studies Symposium on the Derveni Papyrus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Parker, R. (1983). Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Parker, R. (1995). ‘Early Orphism’. In The Greek World, ed. Powell, A.. London: 483–510.Google Scholar

Parker, R. (1996). Athenian Religion: A History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Parker, R. (1999). ‘Through a Glass Darkly: Sophocles and the Divine’. In Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, ed. Griffin, J.. Oxford: 11–30.Google Scholar

Parker, R. (2011). On Greek Religion. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Parker, R. (2017). Greek Gods Abroad: Names, Natures, and Transformations. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar

Patzer, A. (1986). Der Sophist Hippias als Philosophiehistoriker. Munich.Google Scholar

Patzer, A. (2006). Wort und Ort: Oralität und Literarizität im sozialen Kontext der frühgriechischen Philosophie. Munich.Google Scholar

Pavel, T. (1986). Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Pellikaan-Engel, M. E. (1974). Hesiod and Parmenides: A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides’ Proem. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Peponi, A.-E. (2013). ‘Dithyramb in Greek Thought’. In Dithyramb in Context, ed. Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P., 353–67. Oxford.Google Scholar

Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I. (2016). Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion: Volume i: Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar

Piano, V. (2016). Il papiro di Derveni tra religione e filosofia. Florence.Google Scholar

Picot, J.-C. (2007). ‘Empedocles, Fragment 115.3: Can One of the Blessed Pollute His Limbs with Blood?’ In Reading Ancient Texts. Volume i: Presocratics and Plato, ed. Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K.. Leiden: 41–56.Google Scholar

Picot, J.-C. (2008a). ‘Empédocle pouvait-il faire de la lune le séjour des bienheureux?’ Organon 37: 9–38.Google Scholar