Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:24:51.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2019

Edited by
David Miller  and
Christine Straehle
David Miller
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Christine Straehle
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Political Philosophy of Refuge , pp. 252 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, J., ‘Hirschman’s Choice: Exiles and Obligations of an Anti-Fascist’, Transatlantica: American Studies Journal, 1 (2014). Available at https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/6864.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T., Alexander, T., Martin, D. A., Motomura, H., Fullerton, M. and Stumpf, J. P. (eds.), Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy, 7th ed. (St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Amnesty International, ‘Turkey: Illegal Mass Returns of Syrian Refugees Expose Fatal Flaws in Eu-Turkey Deal’ (2016), available at www.amnesty.org/en/press-releases/2016/04/turkey-illegal-mass-returns-of-syrian-refugees-expose-fatal-flaws-in-eu-turkey-deal/.Google Scholar
Anderson, E., ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics, 109 (1999), 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applbaum, A., Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Arendt, H., The Origins of Totalitarianism, 2nd ed. (New York: Meridian Books, 1958).Google Scholar
Ayers, J. W., Hofstetter, C. R., Schnakenberg, K. and Kolody, B., ‘Is Immigration a Racial Issue? Anglo Attitudes on Immigration Policies in a Border County’, Social Science Quarterly, 90 (2009), 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baban, F., Ilcan, S. and Rygiel, K., ‘Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Pathways to Precarity, Differential Inclusion, and Negotiated Citizenship Rights’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43 (2017), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakewell, O., ‘Encampment and Self-Settlement’, in Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E., Loescher, G., Long, K. and Sigona, N. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 127–38.Google Scholar
Baldwin-Edwards, M. and Lutterbeck, D., ‘Coping with the Libyan Migration Crisis’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (2018), 1–17.Google Scholar
Barry, C. and Øverland, G., ‘How Much for the Child?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16 (2013), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baubock, R., Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
Beitz, C., The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, A. and Collier, P., Refuge: Transforming a Broken Refugee System (London: Allen Lane, 2017).Google Scholar
Blake, M., ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30 (2001), 257–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, M., ‘Equality without Documents: Political Justice and the Right to Amnesty’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 40 (2010), 99–122.Google Scholar
Blake, M., Migration, Justice, and Mercy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Borjas, G. J., ‘The Economic Benefits from Immigration’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (1995), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, G. J., Heaven’s Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Boubtane, E., Dumont, J. C. and Rault, C., ‘Immigration and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries 1986–2006’, Oxford Economic Papers, 68 (2016), 340–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M., ‘Unlocking Protracted Displacement: Central America’s “Success Story” Reconsidered’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 30 (2011), 84–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M., Refugee Repatriation: Justice, Responsibility and Redress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M., ‘Rethinking Refugeehood: Statelessness, Repatriation, and Refugee Agency’, Review of International Studies, 40 (2014), 101–23.Google Scholar
Bradley, M., ‘Durable Solutions and the Right of Return for IDPs: Evolving Interpretations’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 30 (2018), 218–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. and Sherwood, A. (2016) ‘Addressing and Resolving Internal Displacement: Reflections on a Soft Law “Success Story”’, in Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., Lagoutte, S. and Cerone, J. (eds.), Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 155–82.Google Scholar
Bradley, M., Milner, J. and Peruniak, B., ‘Shaping the Struggles of Their Times: Refugees, Peacebuilding and Resolving Displacement’, in Bradley, M., Milner, J. and Peruniak, B. (eds.), Refugees’ Roles in Resolving Displacement and Building Peace: Beyond Beneficiaries (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Brezger, J. and Cassee, A., ‘Debate: Immigrants and Newcomers by Birth – Do Statist Arguments Imply a Right to Exclude Both?’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 24 (2016), 367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J., ‘Fairness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 91 (1990–91), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A., Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Carasik, L., ‘Whom Do Sanctuary Cities Protect?’, Boston Review, 9 March 2017, available at http://bostonreview.net/law-justice/lauren-carasik-whom-do-sanctuary-cities-protect.Google Scholar
Carens, J., ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’, Review of Politics, 49 (1987), 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, J., Culture, Community and Citizenship: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Carens, J., ‘The Rights of Irregular Migrants’, Ethics and International Affairs, 22 (2008), 163–88.Google Scholar
Carens, J., Immigrants and the Right to Stay (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Carens, J., The Ethics of Immigration (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Cartagena Declaration on Refugees (1984), available at www.oas.org/dil/1984_cartagena_declaration_on_refugees.pdf (accessed 19 August 2018).Google Scholar
Cherem, M., ‘Refugee Rights: Against Expanding the Definition of a “Refugee” and Unilateral Protection Elsewhere’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 24 (2016), 183–205.Google Scholar
Chimni, B. S., ‘The Meaning of Words and the Role of UNHCR in Voluntary Repatriation’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 5 (1993), 442–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimni, B. S., ‘From Resettlement to Involuntary Repatriation: Towards a Critical History of Durable Solutions to Refugee Problems’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 23 (2004), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Chicago, Welcoming City Ordinance (2012), available at www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/mayor/Office%20of%20New%20Americans/PDFs/WelcomeCityOrdinance.pdf.Google Scholar
City of New York, City Policy Concerning Aliens (1989), available at www.nycourts.gov/library/queens/PDF_files/Orders/ord124.pdf.Google Scholar
City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia Action Guide: Immigration Policies (2018), available at www.phila.gov/2018-01-08-immigration-policies/.Google Scholar
City of San Francisco, City and Country of Refuge Ordinance (1989), available at https://sfgov.org/oceia/sites/default/files/Documents/SF%20Admin%20Code%2012H-12I.pdf.Google Scholar
City of Vancouver, Access to City Services without Fear for Residents with Uncertain or No Immigration Status (2016), available at council.vancouver.ca/20160406/documents/pspc3.pdf.Google Scholar
Cohen, E., The Political Value of Time: Citizenship, Duration, and Democratic Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., ‘The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12 (1983), 3–33.Google Scholar
Cole, P., Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Cole, P., ‘Taking Moral Equality Seriously: Egalitarianism and Immigration Controls’, Journal of International Political Theory, 8 (2012), 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S., ‘When Does “Can” Imply “Ought”?’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26 (2018), 354–75.Google Scholar
Cornelius, W. A., ‘Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Control Policy’, Population and Development Review, 27 (2001), 661–85.Google Scholar
Cox, A. B. and Hosein, A. O., ‘Immigration and Equality’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Crawley, H., Düvell, F., Jones, K., McMahon, S. and Sigona, N., ‘Destination Europe? Understanding the Dynamics and Drivers of Mediterranean Migration in 2015’, MEDMIG Final Report (2016), available at www.medmig.info/research-brief-destination-europe.pdf.Google Scholar
Cusumano, E. and Pattison, J., ‘The Non-governmental Provision of Search and Rescue in the Mediterranean and the Abdication of State Responsibility’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31 (2018), 53–75.Google Scholar
Dempsey, M. and Lister, M., ‘Applied Legal and Political Philosophy’, in Lippert-Rasmussen, K., Brownlee, K. and Coady, D. (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2017), pp. 313–27.Google Scholar
Dummett, M., On Immigration and Refugees (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Durieux, J.-F., ‘Three Asylum Paradigms’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 20 (2013), 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R., ‘How to Be a Free People’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 58 (2013), 163–82.Google Scholar
Ekins, R., Hennessey, P., Tugendhat, T. and Mahmood, K., ‘Aiding the Enemy’, Policy Exchange (2018), available at http://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/aiding-the-enemy/.Google Scholar
Elster, J., ‘Taming Chance: Randomisation in Individual and Social Decisions’, Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 9 (1988), 107–79.Google Scholar
Ferracioli, L., ‘The Appeal and Danger of a New Refugee Convention’, Social Theory and Practice, 40 (2014), 123–44.Google Scholar
Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Finnis, J., ‘Nationality, Alienage and Constitutional Principle’, Law Quarterly Review, 123 (2007), 417–45.Google Scholar
Finnis, J., ‘Judicial Law-Making and the “Living” Instrumentalisation of the ECHR’, in Barber, N. W., Ekins, R., and Yowell, P. (eds.), Lord Sumption and the Limits of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), pp. 73–120.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J., The Limits of Obligation (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Fleming, J. E. and Levy, J. (eds.), Federalism and Subsidiarity (New York: New York University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Ford, R., ‘Acceptable and Unacceptable Immigrants: How Opposition to Immigration in Britain Is Affected by Migrants’ Region of Origin’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37 (2011), 1017–37.Google Scholar
Fullinwider, R. K., Conscripts and Volunteers: Military Requirements, Social Justice, and the All-Volunteer Force (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1983).Google Scholar
Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. and Hathaway, J., ‘Non-refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence’, Law and Economics Working Papers, Paper 106 (2004), available at http://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/106.Google Scholar
Gatrell, P., The Making of the Modern Refugee (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Gerver, M., ‘Refugee Repatriation and the Problem of Consent’, British Journal of Political Science, 48 (2016), 855–75.Google Scholar
Gibney, M. J., The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gibney, M. J., ‘Refugees and Justice between States’, European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (2015), 448–63.Google Scholar
Gibney, M. J., ‘The Ethics of Refugees’, Philosophy Compass 2018; 13:e12521. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12521.Google Scholar
Gkliati, M., ‘The Application of the EU–Turkey Agreement: A Critical Analysis of the Decisions of the Greek Appeals Committee’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 10 (2017), 81–123.Google Scholar
Golebiowska, K., Valenta, M., and Carter, T., ‘International Immigration Trends and Data’, in Carson, D. et al. (eds.), Demography at the Edge: Remote Human Populations in Developed Nation (Surrey: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 53–84.Google Scholar
Goodin, R., Protecting the Vulnerable (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, G. and McAdam, J., The Refugee in International Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Greenhill, K. M., Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Gregory, D., ‘From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War’, Theory, Culture and Society, 28 (2011), 188–215.Google Scholar
Gross, M., Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dilemmas of Medicine and War (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Grotius, H., On the Law of War and Peace, trans F. Kelsey (Washington: Carnegie Institution, 1913).Google Scholar
Gzesh, S., ‘Central Americans and Asylum Policy in the Reagan Era’, Migration Information Source, 1 April 2006, available at www.migrationpolicy.org/article/central-americans-and-asylum-policy-reagan-era.Google Scholar
Hannum, H., The Right to Leave and Return in International Law and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987).Google Scholar
Hans, A. and Suhrke, A., ‘Responsibility Sharing’, in Hathaway, J. (ed.), Reconceiving International Refugee Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997), pp. 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, R., ‘The Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework: A Commentary’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 31 (2018), 131–51.Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. C. (ed.), Reconceiving International Refugee Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, J. C., The Rights of Refugees under International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. C., ‘Refugee Solutions, or Solutions to Refugeehood?’, Refuge (2007), available at https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/viewFile/21378/20048 (accessed 16 March 2018).Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. C. and Foster, M., The Law of Refugee Status (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. C. and Neve, R. A., ‘Making International Refugee Law Relevant Again: A Proposal for Collectivized and Solution-Oriented Protection’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 10 (1997), 115–211.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A., ‘Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?’, Yale Law Journal, 111 (2001), 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, C. and Pezzani, L., ‘Death by Rescue’, Forensic Architecture Agency (2016).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, J. M. and Doswald-Beck, L., Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hidalgo, J., ‘The Case for the International Governance of Immigration’, International Theory, 8 (2016), 140–70.Google Scholar
Hosein, A. O., ‘Immigration: The Argument for Legalization’, Social Theory and Practice, 40 (2014), 609–30.Google Scholar
Hosein, A. O., ‘Arguments for Regularization’, in Sager, A. (ed.), The Ethics and Politics of Immigration: Core Issues and Emerging Trends (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2016), pp. 159–79.Google Scholar
Hosein, A. O., The Ethics of Migration: An Introduction (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Hovil, L., ‘Local Integration’, in Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 488–98.Google Scholar
Hurley, J., Mentzakis, E., Giacomini, M., DeJean, D. and Grignon, M., ‘Nonmarket Resource Allocation and the Public’s Interpretation of Need: An Empirical Investigation in the Context of Health Care’, Social Choice and Welfare, 49 (2017), 117–43.Google Scholar
Johnsson, A. B., ‘Duties of Refugees’, The International Journal of Refugee Law, 3 (1991), 579–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. and Teytelboym, A., ‘The International Refugee Match: A System That Respects Refugees’ Preferences and the Priorities of States’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 36 (2017), 84–109.Google Scholar
Jones, W. and Teytelboym, A., ‘Matching Systems for Refugees’, Journal on Migration and Human Security, 5 (2017), 667–81.Google Scholar
Kälin, W., Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: Annotations, revised ed. (Washington, DC: American Society of International Law and Brookings Institution–University of Bern Project on Internal Displacement, 2008).Google Scholar
Kinder, R. and Kam, C. D., Us against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Kolodny, N., ‘Rule over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42 (2014), 287–336.Google Scholar
Korey, W., ‘Jackson-Vanik: A “Policy of Principle”’, in Friedman, M. and Chernin, A. D. (eds.), A Second Exodus: The American Movement to Free Soviet Jews (Boston, MA: Brandeis University Press, 1999), pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Kritzman-Amir, T., ‘Not in My Backyard: On the Morality of Responsibility Sharing in Refugee Law’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 34 (2009), 355–93.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C., ‘Are Refugees Special?’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 249–68.Google Scholar
Lazin, F., The Struggle for Soviet Jewry in American Politics (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005).Google Scholar
League of Nations, Convention Concerning the Status of Refugees Coming from Germany (1938), available at www.refworld.org/docid/3dd8d12a4.html (accessed 12 August 2018).Google Scholar
Leckie, S. (ed.), Housing, Land and Property Restitution Rights of Refugees and Displaced Persons: Laws, Cases, and Materials (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaitre, J. and Sandvik, K., ‘From IDPs to Victims in Colombia: Reflections on Durable Solutions in the Post-Conflict Setting’, in Bradley, M., Milner, J. and Peruniak, B. (eds.), Refugees’ Roles in Resolving Displacement and Building Peace: Beyond Beneficiaries (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019), pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
Lenard, P. T., ‘The Ethics of Deportation in Liberal Democratic States’, European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (2015), 464–80.Google Scholar
Lever, A., ‘Why Racial Profiling Is Hard to Justify: A Response to Risse and Zeckhauser’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), 94–110.Google Scholar
Lippert, R. and Rehaag, S. (eds.), Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship and Social Movements (New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, M., ‘Citizenship, in the Immigration Context’, Maryland Law Review, 70 (2010), 175–233.Google Scholar
Lister, M., ‘Who Are Refugees?’, Law and Philosophy, 32 (2013), 645–71.Google Scholar
Lister, M., ‘Climate Change Refugees’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17 (2014), 618–34.Google Scholar
Lister, M., ‘The Place of Persecution and Non-state Actors in Refugee Protection’, in Sager, A. (ed.), The Ethics and Politics of Immigration: Core Issues and Emerging Trends (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2016), pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
Lister, M., ‘The Rights of Families and Children at the Border’, in Brake, E. and Ferguson, L. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 153–70.Google Scholar
Loescher, G., The UNHCR and World Politics: A Perilous Path (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Maas, W. (ed.), Multilevel Citizenship (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Maley, W., What Is a Refugee? (Melbourne: Scribe Publications, 2016).Google Scholar
Malkki, L., ‘National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialisation of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees’, Cultural Anthropology 7 (1992), 24–44.Google Scholar
Malone, L. and Wood, G., ‘In re Kasinga’, American Journal of International Law, 91 (1997), 140–47.Google Scholar
Mandle, J., Global Justice (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Margalit, A. and Raz, J., ‘National Self-Determination’, The Journal of Philosophy, 87 (1990), 439–61.Google Scholar
McAdam, J., Complementary Protection in International Refugee Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Mendoza, J. J., ‘Enforcement Matters: Reframing the Philosophical Debate over Immigration’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 29 (2015), 73–90.Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Reasonable Partiality towards Compatriots’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 8 (2005), 63–81.Google Scholar
Miller, D., National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Irregular Migrants: An Alternative Perspective’, Ethics and International Affairs, 22 (2008), 193–97.Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh’, Political Theory, 38 (2010), 111–20.Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Justice in Immigration’, European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (2015), 391–408.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘A Response to Song, Stilz and Oberman’, European Political Science, 17 (2018), 661–66.Google Scholar
Milner, J., ‘Refugees and the Regional Dynamics of Peacebuilding’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 28 (2011), 13–30.Google Scholar
Motomura, H., Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Nagel, T., ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), 113–47.Google Scholar
Nakache, D. and D’Aoust, S., ‘Provincial and Territorial Nominee Programs: An Avenue for Permanent Residency for Low-Skilled Temporary Foreign Workers?’, in Lenard, P. T. and Straehle, C. (eds.), Legislating Inequality: Temporary Labour Migration in Canada (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012), pp. 158–77.Google Scholar
Nettelfield, L. J. and Wagner, S. E., Srebrenica in the Aftermath of Genocide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., ‘The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost–Benefit Analysis’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (2000), 1005–36.Google Scholar
Oberman, K., ‘Can Brain Drain Justify Immigration Restrictions?’, Ethics, 123 (2013), 427–55.Google Scholar
Oberman, K., ‘Immigration as a Human Right’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 32–56.Google Scholar
Oberman, K., ‘Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What Is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 25 (2017), 91–107.Google Scholar
Oberman, K., ‘Reality for Realists: Why Economic Migrants Should Not Just “Go Home and Wait for Assistance”’, European Political Science, 17 (2018), 658–61.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, S., ‘Freedom, Force and Choice: Against the Rights-Based Definition of Voluntariness’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (1998), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsaretti, S., and Arneson, R. (eds.), Preferences and Well-Being (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Orchard, P., A Right to Flee: Refugees, States, and the Construction of International Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Citizenship and the Marginalities of Migrants’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (2013), 326–43.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘In Loco Civitatis: On the Normative Basis of the Institution of Refugeehood and Responsibilities for Refugees’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 269–90.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Refugees, Fairness and Taking Up the Slack: On Justice and the International Refugee Regime’, Moral Philosophy and Politics, 3 (2016), 141–64.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Refugees and Responsibilities of Justice’, Global Justice, 11 (2018), 23–44.Google Scholar
Parekh, S., Refugees and the Ethics of Forced Displacement (New York: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Pateman, C., The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critical Analysis of Liberal Theory (Chichester: Wiley and Sons, 1979).Google Scholar
Perla, H. Jr. and Coutin, S. B., ‘Legacies of the 1980s US–Central American Sanctuary Movement’, in Lippert, R. and Rehaag, S. (eds.), Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship and Social Movements (New York: Routledge, 2012), pp. 73–91.Google Scholar
Peruniak, B., ‘Displacement Resolution and Massively Shared Agency’, in Bradley, M., Milner, J. and Peruniak, B. (eds.), Refugees’ Roles in Resolving Displacement and Building Peace: Beyond Beneficiaries (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019), pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, J., ‘The Law of Hospitality’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2 (2012), 501–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, C., ‘Returning to a Safe Area? The Importance of Burial for Return to Srebrenica’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 16 (2003), 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. E., Rethinking Asylum: History, Purpose, and Limits (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Rimmer, S. H., ‘Refugees, Internally Displaced Persons and the “Responsibility to Protect”’, UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper No. 185 (2010), available at www.unhcr.org.Google Scholar
Risse, M. and Zeckhauser, R., ‘Racial Profiling’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32 (2004), 131–70.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marin, R., Immigration as a Democratic Challenge: Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Ruhs, M. and Martin, P., ‘Numbers vs. Rights: Trade‐Offs and Guest Worker Programs’, International Migration Review, 42 (2008), 249–65.Google Scholar
Sager, A., ‘Immigration Enforcement and Domination: An Indirect Argument for Much More Open Borders’, Political Research Quarterly, 70 (2017), 42–54.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A., ‘How Practices Matter’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 24 (2016), 3–23.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S., Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D., ‘Islands in a Sea of Obligation: Limits to the Duty to Rescue’, Law and Philosophy, 19 (2000), 683–705.Google Scholar
Schneider, G., ‘The Cooperation Duties of Asylum Seekers’, available at www.ipw.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/politische_wissenschaft/Dateien/luise_druke/schneider_541_570.pdf.Google Scholar
Schuck, P., ‘Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal’, Yale Journal of International Law, 22 (1997), 243–97.Google Scholar
Shachar, A., The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Shacknove, A. E., ‘Who Is a Refugee?’, Ethics, 95 (1985), 274–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, J. N., ‘Obligation, Loyalty, Exile’, Political Theory, 21 (1993), 181–97.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K., The Justice Cascade (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011).Google Scholar
Silverman, S. J., ‘The Difference That Detention Makes: Reconceptualizing the Boundaries of the Normative Debate on Immigration Control’, in Sager, A. (ed.), The Ethics and Politics of Immigration: Core Issues and Emerging Trends (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2016), pp. 105–24.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J., Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Singer, P., ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1 (1972), 229–43.Google Scholar
Singer, P., The Life You Can Save (New York: Random House, 2009).Google Scholar
Song, S., ‘The Significance of Territorial Presence and the Rights of Immigrants’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 225–48.Google Scholar
Souter, J., ‘Durable Solutions as Reparations for the Unjust Harms of Displacement: Who Owes What to Refugees?’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 27 (2014), 171–90.Google Scholar
Souter, J., ‘Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice’, Political Studies, 62 (2014), 326–42.Google Scholar
Spijkerboer, T. P., ‘The Human Costs of Border Control’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 9 (2007), 127–39.Google Scholar
Stilz, A., ‘Nations, States and Territory’, Ethics, 121 (2011), 572–601.Google Scholar
Stilz, A., ‘Occupancy Rights and the Wrong of Removal’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41 (2013), 324–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, A., ‘Is There an Unqualified Right to Leave?’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, A., ‘Settlement, Expulsion and Return’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 16 (2017), 351–74.Google Scholar
Stilz, A., ‘The Morally Excruciating Dilemma of Refugees’, European Political Science, 17 (2018), 654–58.Google Scholar
Straehle, C., ‘Thinking about Protecting the Vulnerable When Thinking about Immigration: Is There a Responsibility to Protect in Immigration Regimes?’, Journal of International Political Theory, 8 (2012), 159–71.Google Scholar
Straehle, C., ‘Falling into the Justice Gap? Between Duties of Social and Global Justice’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 19 (2016), 645–61.Google Scholar
Straehle, C., ‘Justice in Migration’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 48 (2018), 245–65.Google Scholar
Straehle, C., ‘Refuge, Claim and Place’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Suhrke, A., ‘Burden-sharing during Refugee Emergencies: The Logic of Collective versus National Action’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 11 (1998), 396–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toal, G. and Dahlman, C., Bosnia Remade: Ethnic Cleansing and Its Reversal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, P., ‘Dual Citizenship and Security Norms in Historical Perspective’, in Faist, T. and Kivisto, P. (eds.), Dual Citizenship in Global Perspective: From Unitary to Multiple Citizenship (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 27–41.Google Scholar
Unger, P., Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
UNHCR, Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva: UNHCR, 1996).Google Scholar
UNHCR, UNHCR Resettlement Handbook (Geneva: UNHCR, 2011).Google Scholar
UNHCR, Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (Geneva: UNHCR, 2014).Google Scholar
UNHCR, ‘“Detained and Dehumanised” Report on Human Rights Abuses against Migrants in Libya’ (2016).Google Scholar
UNHCR, Refugee Protection and Mixed Migration: 10-Point Plan in Action (Geneva: UNHCR, 2016).Google Scholar
UNHCR, ‘Refugees Operational Data Portal: Mediterranean Situation’ (2018), available at http://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/mediterranean.Google Scholar
United Nations, Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Report of the Secretary-General (New York: United Nations, 2009).Google Scholar
Verdirame, G. and Harrell-Bond, B., Rights in Exile: Janus-Faced Humanitarianism (New York: Berghahn Books, 2005).Google Scholar
Ville de Montréal, Déclaration de Montréal contre la discrimination raciale (1989), available at http://ocpm.qc.ca/sites/ocpm.qc.ca/files/pdf/PD02/3e.pdf.Google Scholar
Ville de Montréal, Déclaration de Montréal pour la diversité culturelle et l’inclusion (2004), available at http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/pls/portal/docs/page/charte_mtl_fr/media/documents/d%c9claration%20diversit%c9%20et%20inclusion%20(2004).pdf.Google Scholar
Vineberg, R., ‘Canada’s Refugee Strategy: How It Can Be Improved’, University of Calgary School of Public Policy Publications, 11 (2018), available at https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cdfai/pages/3533/attachments/original/1523488412/Canadas_Refugee_Strategy.pdf?1523488412.Google Scholar
Virgil, , Aeneid: A Prose Translation, trans. D. West (London: Penguin Classics, 1995).Google Scholar
Vrachnas, J., Bagaric, M., Dimopoulos, P. and Pathinayake, A., Migration and Refugee Law: Principles and Practice in Australia, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Superseding Historic Injustice’, Ethics, 103 (1992), 4–28.Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Special Ties and Natural Duties’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22 (1993), 3–30.Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Settlement, Return and the Supersession Thesis’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 5 (2004), 237–68.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Walzer, M., ‘Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2 (1973), 160–80.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., ‘The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9 (1980), 209–29.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Wellman, C. H., A Theory of Secession: The Case for Political Self-Determination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wellman, C. H., ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, Ethics, 119 (2008), 109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. H., ‘Freedom of Movement and the Rights to Enter and Exit’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 80–104.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., ‘In Defense of Sanctuary Cities’, presented at Northeastern University (2017).Google Scholar
Wolf, S., Meaning in Life and Why It Matters (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Miller, University of Oxford, Christine Straehle, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: The Political Philosophy of Refuge
  • Online publication: 01 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666466.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Miller, University of Oxford, Christine Straehle, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: The Political Philosophy of Refuge
  • Online publication: 01 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666466.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Miller, University of Oxford, Christine Straehle, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: The Political Philosophy of Refuge
  • Online publication: 01 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666466.014
Available formats
×