Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:01:25.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seven - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2022

Kevin Haines
Affiliation:
The University of Trinidad and Tobago
Stephen Case
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Get access

Summary

Society treats children in conflict with the law and the youth justice system in ‘special’ ways, but often with a negative focus, in relation to the perceived threat they present and the problems they may cause others, rather than offering children support and protection due to their vulnerability, lack of maturity and relative lack of power in society. In response to this situation, we have asserted a principled, progressive and positive model of youth justice that can shape the ‘special treatment’ of children in conflict with the law and the youth justice system by adhering to the tenets/touchstones of diversion, inclusion, evidence-based partnership, legitimacy, systems management, partnership with the state and responsibilising adults. Accordingly, this book has laid out the Children First, Offenders Second (CFOS) approach to positive youth justice.

In the opening two chapters we outlined the thinking that underpins the approach and the fundamental elements of CFOS. We argued that CFOS positive youth justice is a modern, economicnormative paradigm driven by a series of principles that sustain and promote child-friendly and child-appropriate policy and practice. As such, CFOS is both reactionary against the negative, correctionalist, reductionist, interventionist and stigmatising approaches that have dominated youth justice and progressive in offering a distinctive, positive youth justice that prioritises the normalisation of childhood behaviour, children's access to their universal entitlements and children's achievement of positive behaviours and outcomes.

In Chapter Three we explored the complex and contentious differences and divergences between Wales and England in terms of their social policy for children generally and in the youth justice arena in particular. We argued that from the end of the 1990s, youth justice policy in England took a neoliberalist, offender-first, punitive turn, predicated on notions of risk and responsibilisation. In contrast, the Welsh government has sought to enshrine a rights- and entitlements-based social policy for children and has placed those children in conflict with the law and the youth justice system at the heart of this approach. While noting that youth justice is not a matter of devolved responsibility – remaining the province of the Westminster government and the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales – we pointed out that many of those employed to provide youth justice services in Wales are employed within organisations for whom the Welsh government does have devolved responsibility.

Type
Chapter
Information
Positive Youth Justice
Children First, Offenders Second
, pp. 283 - 294
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Kevin Haines, The University of Trinidad and Tobago, Stephen Case, Loughborough University
  • Book: Positive Youth Justice
  • Online publication: 11 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447321729.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Kevin Haines, The University of Trinidad and Tobago, Stephen Case, Loughborough University
  • Book: Positive Youth Justice
  • Online publication: 11 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447321729.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Kevin Haines, The University of Trinidad and Tobago, Stephen Case, Loughborough University
  • Book: Positive Youth Justice
  • Online publication: 11 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447321729.008
Available formats
×