Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:19:45.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Chapter 21 - Trauma oral core topics

from Section 7 - The trauma oral

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The following pages give guidance on how to approach the trauma viva section of the FRCS (Tr & Orth) examination. The chapter is not exhaustive and the management principles provided should be used with discretion according to the scenario provided. The first few sentences that you say in each topic should be non-controversial and clear. The aim of the candidate should be to show that he or she will be a confident, safe and sound first year consultant in a district general hospital. There is no need to argue with the examiners – there is a fine line between being confident and arrogant. The aim is to secure as high marks as possible to compensate for areas where the candidate has not performed well. However, to get a 7 or even an 8, the candidate has to get 6 first. So, do not jump to quoting papers before talking about management principles.

Hence, the aim of answering in the trauma oral should be a practical approach with first line management and cannot be fobbed off as ‘needs specialist care’. For example, when faced with a cervical spine bifacetal dislocation at 2 am, if the candidate's answer is ‘will need spinal surgeon's care’, then he or she is digging a deep hole from which it becomes difficult to dig themselves out.

Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
The Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (Tr and Orth) Examination
, pp. 397 - 432
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

http://www.boa.ac.uk/site/showpublications.aspx?id=59
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_088215
Ly, TVSwiontkowski, MF 2008 Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adultsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 90 2254Google ScholarPubMed
Bedi, ARyu, RKN 2009 Accuracy of reduction of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures – an analysis of various internal fixation strategiesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma 23 249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgaertner, MRSolberg, BD 1997 Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hipJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Br] 79 969CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biermann, JSHolt, GELewis, VOSchwartz, HSYaszemski, MJ 2009 Metastatic bone disease: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatmentJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 91 1518Google Scholar
Nieves, JWCosman, , F 2010 Atypical subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures and possible association with bisphosphonatesCurrent Osteoporosis Reports 8 34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindahl, HGarellick, GRegnér, HHerberts, PMalchau, H 2006 Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fracturesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 88 1215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, AKSingh, STrikha, V 2007 Management of floating kneeInternational Orthopaedics 31 271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarmiento, ALatta, LL 2008 Fractures of the middle third of the tibia treated with a functional braceClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 466 3108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dattani, RPatnaik, SKantak, ASrikanth, BSelvan, TP 2008 Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosisJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Br] 90 405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehtonen, HJärvinen, TLHonkonen, S 2003 Use of a cast compared with a functional ankle brace after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. A prospective, randomized studyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 85-A 205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manjoo, ASanders, DWTieszer, C 2010 Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma 24 2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herscovici, DAnglen, JOArchdeacon, M 2008 Avoiding complications in the treatment of pronation-external rotation ankle fractures, syndesmotic injuries, and talar neck fracturesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 90 898Google ScholarPubMed
Khan, RJFick, DKeogh, A 2005 Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trialsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 87 2202Google ScholarPubMed
Bahk, MSKuhn, JEGalatz, LM 2009 Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular injuries and clavicular, glenoid, and scapular fracturesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 91 2492Google ScholarPubMed
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society 2007 Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trialJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 89 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voos, JEDines, JSDines, DM 2010 Arthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerusJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 92 1560Google ScholarPubMed
Ekholm, RAdami, JTidermark, J 2008 The Holstein-Lewis humeral shaft fracture: aspects of radial nerve injury, primary treatment, and outcomeJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma 22 693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leemput, TMahieu, G 2007 Conservative management of minimally displaced isolated fractures of the ulnar shaftActa Orthopaedica Belgica 73 710Google ScholarPubMed
Hove, LMKrukhaug, YRevheim, K 2010 Dynamic compared with static external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius: a prospective, randomized multicenter studyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Am] 92 1687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, CSPape, HCJones, AL 2005 Damage control orthopaedics: evolving concepts in the treatment of patients who have sustained orthopaedic traumaInstructional Course Lectures 54 447Google ScholarPubMed
Rajasekaran, SBabu, NDheenadhayalan, 2006 A score for predicting salvage and outcome in Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB open tibial fracturesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Br] 88 1351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×