Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T00:45:24.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Conclusion

Kent F. Schull
Affiliation:
Binghampton University, USA
Get access

Summary

When British Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Sir Stratford Canning, submitted his ‘Memorandum on the Improvement of Prisons in Turkey’ to Sultan Abdülmecid I in 1851, he summarised his observations of Ottoman prison conditions and administration accordingly:

In Turkey where prisons exist in every city and town of a certain extent, and where little attention has hitherto been paid to the science of constructing and administering them, there is ample room for improvement without any considerable out lay. Much unnecessary bodily suffering, much of the evil resulting from moral contagion and from a corrupt and cruel exercise of authority not contemplated by the law, may be removed at once by a few judicious regulations and corresponding arrangements. Even the adoption of these indispensable preliminaries to a more complete system of improvement could hardly be effected without some additional expense. But in the present advanced state of human knowledge and public opinion no government which respects itself and claims a position among civilised communities can shut its eyes to the abuses which prevail, or to the horrors which past ages may have left in that part of its administration which separate the repression of crime and the personal constraint of the guilty or the accused.

His report makes it clear that prison conditions were very poor and that administration was corrupt and inefficient, but he noted that most problems could be solved relatively easily and conditions improved.

Flash forward almost seventy years to 1919 and it appears that little had changed concerning Ottoman prison conditions and administration. A few months after the Ottoman Empire's unconditional surrender to the Entente Powers in the autumn of 1918 and their occupation of Istanbul, British officials undertook an inspection of the city's prison facilities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Prisons in the Late Ottoman Empire
Microcosms of Modernity
, pp. 191 - 200
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Kent F. Schull, Binghampton University, USA
  • Book: Prisons in the Late Ottoman Empire
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Kent F. Schull, Binghampton University, USA
  • Book: Prisons in the Late Ottoman Empire
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Kent F. Schull, Binghampton University, USA
  • Book: Prisons in the Late Ottoman Empire
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
Available formats
×