Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 The Discourse of Argumentation in Totalitarian Language and Post-Soviet Communication Failures
- 2 Russian and Newspeak: Between Myth and Reality
- 3 ‘A Society that Speaks Concordantly’, or Mechanisms of Communication of Government and Society in Old and New Russia
- 4 Legal Literature ‘for the People’ and the Use of Language (Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century)
- 5 ‘How to Write to the Newspaper’: Language and Power at the Birth of Soviet Public Language
- 6 Between the Street and the Kitchen: The Rhetoric of the Social(ist) Meeting in Literature and Cinema
- 7 Was Official Discourse Hegemonic?
- 8 Attempts to Overcome ‘Public Aphasia’: A Study of Public Discussions in Russia at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century
- 9 Allotment Associations in Search of a New Meaning
- 10 ‘Distances of Vast Dimensions …’: Official versus Public Language (Material from Meetings of the Organising Committees of Mass Events, January–February 2012)
- 11 Insides Made Public: Talking Publicly about the Personal in Post-Soviet Media Culture (The Case of The Fashion Verdict)
- 12 Distorted Speech and Aphasia in Satirical Counterdiscourse: Oleg Kozyrev's ‘Rulitiki’ Internet Videos
- 13 The Past and Future of Russian Public Language
- Notes on Contributors
- Subject Index
- Name Index
9 - Allotment Associations in Search of a New Meaning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 The Discourse of Argumentation in Totalitarian Language and Post-Soviet Communication Failures
- 2 Russian and Newspeak: Between Myth and Reality
- 3 ‘A Society that Speaks Concordantly’, or Mechanisms of Communication of Government and Society in Old and New Russia
- 4 Legal Literature ‘for the People’ and the Use of Language (Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century)
- 5 ‘How to Write to the Newspaper’: Language and Power at the Birth of Soviet Public Language
- 6 Between the Street and the Kitchen: The Rhetoric of the Social(ist) Meeting in Literature and Cinema
- 7 Was Official Discourse Hegemonic?
- 8 Attempts to Overcome ‘Public Aphasia’: A Study of Public Discussions in Russia at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century
- 9 Allotment Associations in Search of a New Meaning
- 10 ‘Distances of Vast Dimensions …’: Official versus Public Language (Material from Meetings of the Organising Committees of Mass Events, January–February 2012)
- 11 Insides Made Public: Talking Publicly about the Personal in Post-Soviet Media Culture (The Case of The Fashion Verdict)
- 12 Distorted Speech and Aphasia in Satirical Counterdiscourse: Oleg Kozyrev's ‘Rulitiki’ Internet Videos
- 13 The Past and Future of Russian Public Language
- Notes on Contributors
- Subject Index
- Name Index
Summary
‘This is a meeting, not a debating society!’
(GM 6, voice from the crowd)‘What are we making all this commotion for, we're relaxing! This is supposed to be a place to relax.’
(GM 6, speech)‘There's never been a proper meeting, is it worth going?’
‘We have to go, otherwise they'll award themselves 30,000 rouble salaries.’
(GM 2, conversation in the crowd)INTRODUCTION
The allotment association, as it exists in Russia of the present day, is a form of common land use that first came into being in the Soviet Union. After the war, factories and other employers began, via their trade union committees, to provide for their employees not only housing, kindergarten places and summer holiday arrangements, but also allotments (usually 600 square metres) on so-called collective plots. It was supposed that people would grow fruit and vegetables for themselves there and thus compensate for the food shortages that prevailed in the cities at that time. However, in the big cities the allotments were often so situated that it took a journey of an hour and a half to two hours (or even more) by train to get to them from the city where their holders lived. Therefore they had no choice but to build sheds there to keep their tools in and to spend the night in, since it was too far to travel every day.
The collective plots thus turned into seasonal settlements to which a large number of the townsfolk migrated in the summer, and became a sort of dacha available even to the poorest sections of society. (A ‘real’ dacha remained more or less the privilege of the social elite.)
Soviet law required holders of allotments on collective plots to organise allotment associations – something intermediate between an amateur gardeners’ club, a co-operative and a local authority. Each association's activities were controlled by the trade union committee of the organisation under which it had been created. When, after perestroika, enterprises were privatised, they abandoned their allotments to their fate (as they also often did with their kindergartens, rest-homes, etc.).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Public Debate in RussiaMatters of (Dis)order, pp. 206 - 223Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2016