Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Moore, Rob
and
Young, Michael
2001.
Knowledge and the Curriculum in the Sociology of Education: Towards a reconceptualisation.
British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
445.
Cahn, Robert W.
2001.
Genesis by definition.
Nature,
Vol. 410,
Issue. 6826,
p.
307.
Cohen, Laurie
McAuley, John
and
Duberley, Joanne
2001.
Continuity in Discontinuity: Changing Discourses of Science in a Market Economy.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
145.
Turney, J.
2001.
Science Communication in Theory and Practice.
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
p.
47.
Ziman, John
2001.
Getting scientists to think about what they are doing.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
165.
de Regt, Henk W
2001.
Spacetime Visualisation and the Intelligibility of Physical Theories.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
2002.
Book reviews.
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
464.
Loasby, Brian J.
2002.
The evolution of knowledge: beyond the biological model.
Research Policy,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 8-9,
p.
1227.
Solomon, Joan
2002.
Science Stories and Science Texts: What can they do for our students?.
Studies in Science Education,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
85.
Spier, Raymond
2002.
Reflections on ‘Real science: What it is, and what it means’ by John Ziman.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
235.
Newson, Malcolm D
2002.
Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
365.
Locke, Simon
2002.
The Public Understanding of Science—A Rhetorical Invention.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Bjarnason, Thoroddur
and
Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora
2002.
Nordic Impact: Article Productivity and Citation Patterns in Sixteen Nordic Sociology Departments.
Acta Sociologica,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
253.
Loasby, Brian J.
2002.
Decision Premises, Institutions and Organisation.
Économie et Institutions,
p.
145.
Lunn, Stephen
2002.
‘What We Think We Can Safely Say…’: Primary teachers’ views of the nature of science.
British Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 5,
p.
649.
Romme, A. Georges L.
2003.
Making a Difference: Organization as Design.
Organization Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 5,
p.
558.
Blaug, Mark
2003.
The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.
Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
145.
MacFarlane, A. G. J.
and
Ziman, John
2003.
Emerging out of nature into history: the plurality of the sciences.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,
Vol. 361,
Issue. 1809,
p.
1617.
Baron, Jeremy Hugh
2003.
What should the Citizen Know about ‘Science’?.
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 10,
p.
509.
Scott, Peter
2003.
The ethical implications of the new research paradigm.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
73.