Crossref Citations
This book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
Turney, J.
2001.
Science Communication in Theory and Practice.
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
p.
47.
Cahn, Robert W.
2001.
Genesis by definition.
Nature,
Vol. 410,
Issue. 6826,
p.
307.
Cohen, Laurie
McAuley, John
and
Duberley, Joanne
2001.
Continuity in Discontinuity: Changing Discourses of Science in a Market Economy.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
145.
de Regt, Henk W
2001.
Spacetime Visualisation and the Intelligibility of Physical Theories.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
Moore, Rob
and
Young, Michael
2001.
Knowledge and the Curriculum in the Sociology of Education: Towards a reconceptualisation.
British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
445.
Ziman, John
2001.
Getting scientists to think about what they are doing.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
165.
Bjarnason, Thoroddur
and
Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora
2002.
Nordic Impact: Article Productivity and Citation Patterns in Sixteen Nordic Sociology Departments.
Acta Sociologica,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
253.
Locke, Simon
2002.
The Public Understanding of Science—A Rhetorical Invention.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Newson, Malcolm D
2002.
Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
365.
2002.
Book reviews.
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
464.
Loasby, Brian J.
2002.
Decision Premises, Institutions and Organisation.
Économie et Institutions,
p.
145.
Solomon, Joan
2002.
Science Stories and Science Texts: What can they do for our students?.
Studies in Science Education,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
85.
Lunn, Stephen
2002.
‘What We Think We Can Safely Say…’: Primary teachers’ views of the nature of science.
British Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 5,
p.
649.
Spier, Raymond
2002.
Reflections on ‘Real science: What it is, and what it means’ by John Ziman.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
235.
Loasby, Brian J.
2002.
The evolution of knowledge: beyond the biological model.
Research Policy,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 8-9,
p.
1227.
Osborne, Jonathan
Collins, Sue
Ratcliffe, Mary
Millar, Robin
and
Duschl, Rick
2003.
What ?ideas-about-science? should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 7,
p.
692.
MacFarlane, A. G. J.
and
Ziman, John
2003.
Emerging out of nature into history: the plurality of the sciences.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,
Vol. 361,
Issue. 1809,
p.
1617.
Szostak, Rick
2003.
Classifying Natural and Social Scientific Theories.
Current Sociology,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Romme, A. Georges L.
2003.
Making a Difference: Organization as Design.
Organization Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 5,
p.
558.
Blaug, Mark
2003.
The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.
Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
145.