Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword by Michael Marmura
- Conventions
- Titles and locations of the original articles
- Introduction
- 1 Islamic theology and Muslim philosophy
- 2 Ethics in classical Islam: a conspectus
- 3 Ethical presuppositions of the Qurʾān
- 4 ‘Injuring oneself’ in the Qurʾān, in the light of Aristotle
- 5 Two theories of value in early Islam
- 6 Islamic and non-Islamic origin of Muʿtazilite ethical rationalism
- 7 The rationalist ethics of ʿAbd al-Jabbār
- 8 Deliberation in Aristotle and ʿAbd al-Jabbār
- 9 Ashʿarī
- 10 Juwaynī's criticisms of Muʿtazilite ethics
- 11 Ghazālī on the ethics of action
- 12 Reason and revelation in Ibn Ḥazm's ethical thought
- 13 The basis of authority of consensus in Sunnite Islam
- 14 Ibn Sīnā's ‘Essay on the secret of destiny’
- 15 Averroes on good and evil
- 16 Combinations of reason and tradition in Islamic ethics
- Select bibliography
- Index
3 - Ethical presuppositions of the Qurʾān
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword by Michael Marmura
- Conventions
- Titles and locations of the original articles
- Introduction
- 1 Islamic theology and Muslim philosophy
- 2 Ethics in classical Islam: a conspectus
- 3 Ethical presuppositions of the Qurʾān
- 4 ‘Injuring oneself’ in the Qurʾān, in the light of Aristotle
- 5 Two theories of value in early Islam
- 6 Islamic and non-Islamic origin of Muʿtazilite ethical rationalism
- 7 The rationalist ethics of ʿAbd al-Jabbār
- 8 Deliberation in Aristotle and ʿAbd al-Jabbār
- 9 Ashʿarī
- 10 Juwaynī's criticisms of Muʿtazilite ethics
- 11 Ghazālī on the ethics of action
- 12 Reason and revelation in Ibn Ḥazm's ethical thought
- 13 The basis of authority of consensus in Sunnite Islam
- 14 Ibn Sīnā's ‘Essay on the secret of destiny’
- 15 Averroes on good and evil
- 16 Combinations of reason and tradition in Islamic ethics
- Select bibliography
- Index
Summary
A considerable debate was carried on in classical Islam over two central and related questions of ethics.
A. A question of ontology: What is the nature of ethical value concepts such as the good and the just?
B. A question of epistemology: How can man know the presence and force of these concepts in particular situations? These are philosophical questions, and to some extent they were argued in terms of truths determinable directly by human intellect. But the debate was mainly conducted by Muslim theologians and jurists who did not always distinguish direct arguments from arguments on the corresponding questions of scriptural interpretation: what does the Qurʾān teach on the nature and knowledge of ethical value concepts? The present article attempts to answer the latter questions only, by a study of the Qurʾān in its own context.
As a framework for study it will be useful to set forth in schematic form those answers to the two questions which may be considered historically possible in the age of the Qurʾān, leaving out many modern ethical theories which do not satisfy this condition. (‘Right’ will be taken here as the standard concept, but we shall be dealing also with ‘just’, ‘good’, ‘wrong’, ‘unjust’, ‘evil’.)
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics , pp. 23 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1985