Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Jones, Benjamin T. and Mattiacci, Eleonora 2017. A Manifesto, in 140 Characters or Fewer: Social Media as a Tool of Rebel Diplomacy. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: October 2015

5 - Rebel Diplomacy: Theorizing Violent Non-State Actors’ Strategic Use of Talk


The practice of rebel diplomacy is essential for violent non-state actors on the verge of new statehood or seeking legitimacy for a new regime. But effective diplomacy can serve a number of critical purposes during wartime as well. In the short term, external ties may provide material resources, training, or otherwise martial support to alter the course of fighting on the ground. Over the longer term, establishing bilateral relations with third parties, concluding trade agreements, or being allowed to participate in cease-fire or settlement negotiations can lock in strategic advantages that are difficult to overturn. Rebels face significant barriers to utilizing diplomacy, however. Some are inherent to the nature of the international system, some are erected by the embattled governing regime, and still others are endemic to rebel organizations themselves. This chapter introduces the important – and so far neglected – topic of rebel diplomacy in wartime. I argue that we can only hope to understand contemporary civil war by better understanding the interplay between violent and non-violent tactics.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Rebel Governance in Civil War
  • Online ISBN: 9781316182468
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Hedley Bull 1977. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Barry Buzan 2004. From international to world society? English School theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Daniel Byman 2006. “The decision to begin talks with terrorists: Lessons for policymakers,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29: 403–14.

J. Chopra 2000. “The UN’s kingdom of East Timor,” Survival 42: 2740.

Christopher Clapham 1996. Africa and the international system: The politics of state survival. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bridget Coggins 2011. “Friends in high places: International politics and the emergence of states from secessionism,” International Organization 65: 433–67.

Kenneth Colegrove 1919. “Diplomatic procedure preliminary to the Congress of Westphalia,” The American Journal of International Law 13: 450–82.

Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler 2004. “Greed and grievance in civil war,” Oxford Economic Papers 56: 563–95.

Kalowatie Deonandan , David Close , and Gary Prevost (eds.) 2007. From revolutionary movements to political parties: Cases from Latin America and Africa. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

William Elison 2000. “Netwar: Studying rebels on the internet,” The Social Studies 91: 127–31.

Guy Olivier Faure 2008. “Negotiating with terrorists: A discrete form of diplomacy,” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 3: 179200.

James D. Fearon 2004. “Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?,” Journal of Peace Research 41: 275301.

Ted Robert Gurr 2000. “Ethnic warfare on the wane,” Foreign Affairs 79: 5264.

Patrick Johnston 2007. “Negotiated settlements and government strategy in civil war: Evidence from Darfur,” Civil Wars 9: 359–77.

Stathis Kalyvas 2001. “New and old civil wars: A valid distinction?,” World Politics 54: 99118.

Stathis Kalyvas 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Roy Licklider 1995. “The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993,” American Political Science Review 89: 681–90.

Roland Portmann 2010. Legal personality in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

William Reno 2001. “How sovereignty matters: International markets and the political economy of local politics in weak states,” in Thomas Callaghy , Ronald Kassimir and Robert Latham (eds.). Intervention and transnationalism in Africa: Global local networks of power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

118 Sandesh Sivakumaran 2009. “Courts of armed opposition groups: Fair trials or summary justice?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7: 489513.

Theda Skocpol 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paul Staniland 2012. “States, insurgents and wartime political orders,” Perspectives on Politics 10: 243–64.

Barbara Walter 1997. “The critical barrier to civil war settlement,” International Organization 51: 335–64.

Alexander Wendt 2004. “The state as person in international theory,” Review of International Studies 30: 289316.