Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T12:29:14.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Rebel Diplomacy: Theorizing Violent Non-State Actors’ Strategic Use of Talk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Bridget L. Coggins
Edited by
Ana Arjona ,
Nelson Kasfir  and
Zachariah Mampilly
Ana Arjona
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Nelson Kasfir
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Zachariah Mampilly
Affiliation:
Vassar College, New York
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The practice of rebel diplomacy is essential for violent non-state actors on the verge of new statehood or seeking legitimacy for a new regime. But effective diplomacy can serve a number of critical purposes during wartime as well. In the short term, external ties may provide material resources, training, or otherwise martial support to alter the course of fighting on the ground. Over the longer term, establishing bilateral relations with third parties, concluding trade agreements, or being allowed to participate in cease-fire or settlement negotiations can lock in strategic advantages that are difficult to overturn. Rebels face significant barriers to utilizing diplomacy, however. Some are inherent to the nature of the international system, some are erected by the embattled governing regime, and still others are endemic to rebel organizations themselves. This chapter introduces the important – and so far neglected – topic of rebel diplomacy in wartime. I argue that we can only hope to understand contemporary civil war by better understanding the interplay between violent and non-violent tactics.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Rebel Governance in Civil War , pp. 98 - 118
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berridge, G.R. 2002. Diplomacy: Theory and practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bøås, Marten and Dunn, Kevin C. (eds.) 2007. African guerrillas: Raging against the machine. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley 1977. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry 2004. From international to world society? English School theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel 2006. “The decision to begin talks with terrorists: Lessons for policymakers,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29: 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency 2009. Guide to the analysis of insurgency. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, Erica and Stephan, Maria 2011. Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of non-violent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chopra, J. 2000. “The UN’s kingdom of East Timor,” Survival 42: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, Christopher 1996. Africa and the international system: The politics of state survival. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, Christopher (ed.) 1998. African guerrillas. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Coggins, Bridget 2011. “Friends in high places: International politics and the emergence of states from secessionism,” International Organization 65: 433–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colegrove, Kenneth 1919. “Diplomatic procedure preliminary to the Congress of Westphalia,” The American Journal of International Law 13: 450–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Hoeffler, Anke 2004. “Greed and grievance in civil war,” Oxford Economic Papers 56: 563–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, Matthew J. 2002. A diplomatic revolution: Algeria’ s fight for independence and the origins of the post-cold war. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deonandan, Kalowatie, Close, David, and Prevost, Gary (eds.) 2007. From revolutionary movements to political parties: Cases from Latin America and Africa. New York: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elison, William 2000. “Netwar: Studying rebels on the internet,” The Social Studies 91: 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, Guy Olivier 2008. “Negotiating with terrorists: A discrete form of diplomacy,” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 3: 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2004. “Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?,” Journal of Peace Research 41: 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Chas W. Jr. 2006. Arts of power: Statecraft and diplomacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, Robert W. 1988. “International law governing aid to opposition groups during civil war: Resurrecting the standards of belligerency,” University of Washington Law Review 63: 43–68.Google Scholar
Grant, Thomas 1999. The recognition of states: Law and practice in debate and evolution. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert 2000. “Ethnic warfare on the wane,” Foreign Affairs 79: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The concept of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Patrick 2007. “Negotiated settlements and government strategy in civil war: Evidence from Darfur,” Civil Wars 9: 359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis 2001. “New and old civil wars: A valid distinction?,” World Politics 54: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Jesse 2010. “Digital diplomacy,” New York Times Magazine (July 12, 2010).Google Scholar
Licklider, Roy 1995. “The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993,” American Political Science Review 89: 681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Melinda, Cochrane, Joe, and Theil, Stefan 2001. “Holy war on the web,” Newsweek (October 15, 2001): 48.Google Scholar
Lootsteen, Yair 2000. “The concept of belligerency in international law.” Military Law Review 166: 109–41.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah 2011. Rebel rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Aliza 2007. Blood and belief: The PKK and the Kurdish fight for independence. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, John 2004. The remnants of war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
New York Times 2009. “Abkhazia is recognized – by Nauru,” December 15.Google Scholar
New York Times 2010. “Turkey softens terror law that jailed young Kurds,” July 29.Google Scholar
Sir Nicolson, Harold 1963. Diplomacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS) 1933. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States.Google Scholar
Pool, David. 1998. “The Eritrean People’s Liberation Front.” In African Guerrillas. Clapham, Christopher, Ed. Oxford: James Currey Ltd. pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Portmann, Roland 2010. Legal personality in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reagan, Patrick M., Frank, Richard W., and Aydin, Aysegul 2009. “Diplomatic interventions and civil war: A new dataset,” Journal of Peace Research 46: 135–46.Google Scholar
Reno, William 2001. “How sovereignty matters: International markets and the political economy of local politics in weak states,” in Callaghy, Thomas, Kassimir, Ronald and Latham, Robert (eds.). Intervention and transnationalism in Africa: Global local networks of power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas (ed.) 2012. Governance without a state? Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rolandsen, Øystein H. 2005. Guerrilla government: Political changes in Southern Sudan during the 1990s. Sweden: Almqvist & Wiskell Tryckeri AB.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh 2009. “Courts of armed opposition groups: Fair trials or summary justice?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7: 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniland, Paul 2012. “States, insurgents and wartime political orders,” Perspectives on Politics 10: 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Dawn 2009. “Talking to the enemy: State legitimacy concerns with engaging non-state groups,” Texas International Law Journal 45: 297.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy 2003. The geography of ethnic violence: Identity, interests and the indivisibility of territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations 1961. “Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations,” United Nations, Treaty Series 500: 95.Google Scholar
United Nations 1963. “Vienna Convention on Consular Relations,” United Nations, Treaty Series 596: 261.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara 1997. “The critical barrier to civil war settlement,” International Organization 51: 335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara 2002. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Wyndhan Legh 1937. “Recognition of belligerency and grant of belligerent rights,” Transactions of the Grotius Society 23: 177–210.Google Scholar
Watson, Russell, Barry, John, Dickey, Cristopher, and Padgett, Tim 1995. “When words are the best weapon,” Newsweek (February 27, 1995), p.36.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 2004. “The state as person in international theory,” Review of International Studies 30: 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×