Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T19:32:45.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - In Vitro Screening for Antibody Immunogenicity

from PART I - HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Melvyn Little
Affiliation:
Affimed Therapeutics AG
Get access

Summary

A range of factors may contribute to the immunogenicity of therapeutic antibodies in patients but a major driver for immunogenicity is likely to be T cell help. Techniques have thus been developed that screen for MHC Class II restricted T cell epitopes in antibody variable region sequences to assess the potential for immunogenicity in therapeutic antibodies. Three such techniques are binding of peptides to human MHC Class II, binding of peptide-MHC complexes to T cell receptors, and in vitro human T cell assays. The most accurate measurement of T cell epitopes has been achieved using in vitro T cell assays, and these have demonstrated utility in testing antibodies as whole proteins as well as overlapping peptides from variable regions for the potency and location of T cell epitopes. Such in vitro T cell assays are now being used as a preclinical screen for antibody immunogenicity and for testing different formulations and manufacturing batches.

“NONSELF” ANTIBODIES

The evolution of a high affinity antibody response against an antigen in vivo is associated both with rearrangement of the variable and constant region genes as well as somatic hypermutation of the variable regions. The resultant antibody secreted by a fully differentiated B cell (plasma cell) can be considered to be immunologically “nonself” by virtue of unique non-germline mutations introduced into the variable region sequences. However, such “nonself” antibodies are tolerated by the mammalian immune systems through various mechanisms of peripheral tolerance as well as by the fact that the effective concentration of any individual antibody present in the circulation at any given time is relatively low.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Griffiths, GM, Berek, C, Kaartinen, M, and Milstein, C: Somatic mutation and the maturation of the immune response to 2-phenyl-oxazolone. Nature (1984) 312: 271–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haraoui, B, Cameron, L, Ouellet, M, and White, B: Anti-infliximab antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who require higher doses of infliximab to achieve or maintain a clinical response. J Rheumatol (2006) 33(1): 31–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Schonholzer, C, Keusch, G, Nigg, L, Robert, D, and Wauters, JP: High prevalence in Switzerland of pure red-cell aplasia due to anti-erythropoietin antibodies in chronic dialysis patients: report of five cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19(8): 2121–2125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bader, F: Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Proteins: A Case Report. Scientific Considerations Related to Developing Follow-On Protein Products FDA Public Workshop, September 2004 (http://www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/followOn/Bader.ppt-670,3).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, AS: Effects of protein aggregates: an immunologic perspective. AAPS J (2006) 8(3): E501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howman, R and Kulkarni, H: Antibody-mediated acquired pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) after treatment with darbepoetin. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2007) 22(5): 1462–1464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidney, J, Southwood, S, Oseroff, C, del Guercio, M-F, Grey, HM, and Sette, A: Measurement of peptide/MHC interactions by gel filtration. Current Protocols in Immunology, Wiley, New York (1988): 18.13.11.Google Scholar
Tangri, S, Mothé, BF, Eisenbraun, J, Sidney, J, Southwood, S, Briggs, K, Zinckgraf, J, Bilsel, P, Newman, M, Chesnut, R, LiCalsi, C, and Sette, A: Rationally engineered therapeutic proteins with reduced immunogenicity. J Immunol (2005) 174(6): 3187–3196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southwood, C, Sidney, J, Kondo, A, Chesnut, RW, Grey, HM, and Sette, A: J Immunol (1998) 160: 3363–3369.
Barbosa, MDFS and Celis, E. Immunogenicity of protein therapeutics and the interplay between tolerance and antibody responses. Drug Discov Today (2007) 12: 674–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Röhn, TA, Reitz, A, Paschen, A, Nguyen, XD, Schadendorf, D, Vogt, AB, and Kropshofer, H: A novel strategy for the discovery of MHC class II–restricted tumor antigens: identification of a melanotransferrin helper T-cell epitope. Cancer Res (2005) 65: 10068–10078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, F, Kozono, H, White, J, Marrack, P, and Kappler, J: Detection of antigen-specific T cells with multivalent soluble class II MHC covalent peptide complexes. Immunity (1998) 8: 675–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novak, EJ, Liu, AW, Gebe, JA, Falk, BA, Nepom, GT, Koelle, DM, and Kwok, WW: Tetramer-guided epitope mapping: rapid identification and characterization of immunodominant CD4+ T cell epitopes from complex antigens. J Immunol (2001) 166: 6665–6670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stickler, M, Valdes, AM, Gebel, W, Razo, OJ, Faravashi, N, Chin, R, Rochanayon, N, and Harding, FA: The HLA-DR2 haplotype is associated with an increased proliferative response to the immunodominant CD4(+) T-cell epitope in human interferon-beta. Genes Immun (2004) 5(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, TD, Phillips, WJ, Smith, BJ, Bamford, CA, Nayee, PD, Baglin, TP, Gaston, JS, and Baker, MP: Identification and removal of a promiscuous CD4+ T cell epitope from the C1 domain of factor VIII. J Thromb Haemost (2005) 3(5): 991–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, MP and Jones, TD: Identification and removal of immunogenicity in therapeutic proteins. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel (2007) 18(2): 219–227.Google Scholar
Jaber, A and Baker, M: Assessment of the immunogenicity of different interferon beta-1a formulations using ex vivo T-cell assays. J Pharm Biomed Anal (2007) 43(4): 1256–1261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaber, A, Driebergen, R, Giovannoni, G, Schellekens, H, Simsarian, J, and Antonelli, M: The Rebif® new formulation story. Drugs R D (2007) 8(6): 335–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bander, NH, Milowsky, MI, Nanus, DM, Kostakoglu, L, Vallabhajosula, S, and Goldsmith, SJ: Phase I trial of 177lutetium-labeled J591, a monoclonal antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(21): 4591–4601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, TD, Hanlon, M, Smith, BJ, Heise, CT, Nayee, PD, Sanders, DA, Hamilton, A, Sweet, C, Unitt, E, Alexander, G, Lo, K-M, Gillies, SD, Carr, FJ, and Baker, MP: The development of a modified human IFN-α2b linked to the Fc portion of human IgG1 as a novel potential therapeutic for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. J Interferon Cytokine Res (2004) 24: 560–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeung, VP, Chang, J, Miller, J, Barnett, C, Stickler, M, and Harding, FA: Elimination of an immunodominant CD4 T cell epitope in human IFN-β does not result in an in vivo response directed at the subdominant epitope. J Immunol (2004), 172: 6658–6665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbosa, MDFS, Vielmetter, J, Chu, S, Smith, DD, and Jacinto, J: Clinical link between MHC class II haplotype and interferon-beta (IFN-β) immunogenicity. Clinical Immunol (2006) 118(1): 42–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachmann, M and Zinkernagel, R: Neutralizing antiviral B-cell responses. Annu Rev Immunol (1997) 15: 235–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stickler, M, Valdes, AM, Gebel, W, Razo, OJ, Faravashi, N, Chin, R, Rochanayon, N, and Harding, FA: The HLA-DR2 haplotype is associated with an increased proliferative response to the immunodominant CD4(+) T-cell epitope in human interferon-beta. Genes Immun (2004) 5(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schellekens, H and Casadevall, N: Immunogenicity of recombinant human proteins: causes and consequences. J Neurol (2004) 251(Suppl 2): II4–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×