Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:17:55.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Outcome and Cognitive Treatments in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Illness, Past and Present: An Overview

from Part I - The Past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2022

Meaghan Stacy
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Charlie A. Davidson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Through a critical analysis of the peer-reviewed scholarly literature and reliance on primary and secondary historical sources, the current chapter will critically investigate three key aspects of the schizophrenia syndrome as they relate to outcome: 1. the emergence and metamorphosis of the diagnostic category over time beginning with Kraepelin’s and Bleuler’s seminal definitions at the turn of the twentieth century to DSM-5 formulations; 2. an analysis of large-scale, systematic, group studies of outcome beginning with the Iowa 500 study in the 1970s (Tsuang et al., 1979), through contemporary work, and how these findings have influenced thinking about patterns of recovery and disability in the disorder over recent history; and 3. the emergence and metamorphosis of psychosocial treatments for the disorder beginning in the 1890s through current practices. The chapter will seek to illuminate how changes in the ascendancy of conceptual models of schizophrenia in different historical epochs have influenced diagnostic formulations, treatment approaches, and understanding of outcome in the disorder.

Type
Chapter
Information
Recovering the US Mental Healthcare System
The Past, Present, and Future of Psychosocial Interventions for Psychosis
, pp. 78 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM-5: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edition). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system of the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 1123.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Rector, N. A., Stolar, N., Grant, P. (2011). Schizophrenia. Cognitive Theory, Research and Therapy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bellack, A. S., Mueser, K. T., Gingerich, S., & Agresta, J. (2004). Social Skills Training for Schizophrenia: A Step-by-Step Guide. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Berrios, G., & Hauser, R. (1988). The early development of Kraepelin’s ideas on classification: A conceptual history. Psychological Medicine, 18, 813821.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1950). Dementia Praecox or The Groups of Schizophrenias (Zinkin, J., trans.). International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Bond, G. (2004). Supported employment: Evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 345359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brekke, J. S., Kohrt, B., & Green, M. F. (2001). Neuropsychological functioning as a moderator of the relationship between psychosocial functioning and the subjective experience of self and life in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27, 697708.Google Scholar
Choi, J., & Kurtz, M. M. (2009). A comparison of remediation techniques on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 107, 7682.Google Scholar
Couture, S. M., Penn, D. L., & Roberts, D. L. (2006). The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: A review. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, S44S63Google Scholar
Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 11, 1119.Google Scholar
Deegan, P. E. (1996). Recovery as a journey of the heart. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 19, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSisto, M., Harding, C. M., McCormick, R. V., Asikaga, T., & Brooks, G. W. (1995). The Maine and Vermont three decade studies of serious mental illness II. Longitudinal course comparisons. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 338342.Google Scholar
Edmondson, M. Pahwa, R. Lee, K. K., Hoe, M., & Brekke, J. S. (2012). A dual change model of life satisfaction and functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 139, 110115.Google Scholar
Experts in cognitive remediation workshop. 2010, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
Falloon, I., Boyd, J., & McGill, C. (1984). Family Care of Schizophrenia. GuilfordGoogle Scholar
Farkas, M. (2007). The vision of recovery today: What it is and what it means for services. World Psychiatry 6, 410.Google Scholar
Green, M. F. (1997). What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 321330.Google Scholar
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Braff, D. L., & Mintz, J., (2000). Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: Are we measuring the “right stuff”? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(1), 119136.Google Scholar
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., & Heaton, R. K., (2004). Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: Implications for MATRICS. Schizophrenia Research, 72, 4151.Google Scholar
Green, M. F., Llerena, K., & Kern, R. S. (2015). The “Right Stuff” revisited: What have we learned about the determinants of daily function in schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41, 781785.Google Scholar
Halverson, T. F., Orleans-Pobee, M., Merritt, C., Sheeran, P., Fett, A. , K., & Penn, D. L. (2019). Pathways to functional outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of social cognitive and neurocognitive predictors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 212219.Google Scholar
Harding, C. M., Brooks, G. W., Ashikaga, T., Strauss, J., & Breier, A. (1987). The Vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness; II. Long-term outcome of subjects who retrospectively met DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 727735.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrington, A. (2019). Mind Fixers. Psychiatry’s Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Harrow, M., Grossman, L. S., Jobe, T. H., & Herbener, E. S. (2005). Do patients with schizophrenia ever show periods of recovery? A 15-year multi-follow-up study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 144, 727735.Google Scholar
Harrow, M., & Jobe, T. H. (2007). Factors involved in outcome and recovery in schizophrenia patients not on antipsychotic medications: A 15-year follow-up study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 406415.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998). Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology, 12, 426445.Google Scholar
Kambeitz-Ilankovic, L, Betz, LT, Dominike, C, Haas, S, Subramaniam, K, Fisher, M, Kambeitz, J. (2019). Multi-outcome meta-analysis (MOMA) of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: Revisiting the relevance of human coaching and elucidating interplay between multiple outcomes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 826845.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. (2008). Being Bleuler: The second century of schizophrenia. Australasian Psychiatry, 16, 305311.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Jablensky, A. (2011). Kraepelin’s concept of psychiatric illness. Psychological Medicine, 41, 11191126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraepelin, E. (1919). Dementia Praecox. Translated by Barclay, R. M.. E. S. Livingstone, Ltd.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. (2015). Schizophrenia and its treatment: Where is the progress? Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, M. M., & Richardson, C. L. (2012). Social cognitive training for schizophrenia: A meta-analytic investigation of controlled research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38, 10921104.Google Scholar
Leff, J., Sartorius, N., Jablensky, A. Korten, A., & Ernberg, G. (1992). The International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Five-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 22, 131145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarlane, W. R. (2002). Multifamily groups in the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mueser, K. T., Deavers, F., Penn, D. L., & Cassisi, J. E. (2013). Psychosocial treatment for schizophrenia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 465497.Google Scholar
Nijman, S. A., Veling, W., van der Stouwe, E. C., & Pijnenborg, G. H. (2020). Social cognition training for people with a psychotic disorder: a network meta-analysis. Schizophrenia bulletin, 46(5), 10861103.Google Scholar
Paul, G. L. & Lentz, R. J. (1977). Psychosocial Treatment of Chronic Mental Patients. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Penn, D. L., Corrigan, P. W., Bentall, R. P., Racenstein, J. M., & Neman, L. (1997). Social cognition in schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 114132.Google Scholar
Penn, D. L., Roberts, D. L., Combs, D., & Sterne, A. (2007). Best practices; the development of the social cognition and interaction training program for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Psychiatric Services, 58, 449451.Google Scholar
Penn, D. L., Sanna, L. J., & Roberts, D. L. (2008). Social cognition in schizophrenia: An overview. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 408411.Google Scholar
Prikken, M., Konings, M. J., Lei, W. U., Begemann, M. J. H., & Sommer, I. E. C. (2019). The efficacy of computerized drill-and-practice training for patients with a schizophrenia –Spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 204, 368374.Google Scholar
Roe, D. (2001). Progressing from patienthood to personhood across the multidimensional outcomes in schizophrenia and related disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 691699.Google Scholar
Sartorius, N., Jablensky, A., & Shapiro, R. (1978). Cross-cultural differences in the short-term prognosis of schizophrenic psychoses. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 4, 102113.Google Scholar
Savla, G., Vella, L., Armstrong, C., Penn, D. L., & Twamley, E. W. (2013). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39, 979992.Google Scholar
Saykin, A. J., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., Mozley, D., Mozley, L. H., Resnick, S. M., Kester, D. B., & Stafiniak, P. (1991). Neuropsychological function in schizophrenia: Selective impairment in learning and memory. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 618624.Google Scholar
Saykin, A. J., Shtasel, D. L., Gur, R. E., Kester, D. B., Mozley, L. H., Stafiniak, P., & Gur, R. C. (1994). Neuropsychological deficits in neuroleptic naive patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51(2), 124131.Google Scholar
Schaefer, J., Giangrande, E., Weinberger, D. R., & Dickinson, D. (2013). The global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: Consistent over decades and around the world. Schizophrenia Research, 150, 4250.Google Scholar
Shakow, D. (1963). Psychological deficit in schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 8, 275305.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1997). A History of Psychiatry. Wiley.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. H. (1978). Long-term prognosis and follow-up in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 4, 2547.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M. T., Woolson, R. F., & Fleming, J. A. (1979). Long-term outcome of major psychoses. I. Schizophrenia and affective disorders compared with psychiatrically symptom free surgical conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 12951301.Google Scholar
Weisman de Mamani, A., & Suro, G. (2016). The effect of a culturally-informed therapy on self-conscious emotions and burden in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. A randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy, 53, 5767. DOI: 10.1037/pst0000038Google Scholar
Wolwer, W., Combs, D., Fromann, N., & Penn, D. L. (2010). Treatment approaches with a special focus on social cognition: Overview and empirical results. In Roder, V., Medalia, A. (Eds). Neurocognition and social cognition in schizophrenia patients. Basic concepts and treatments. Key issues in mental health. Karger 177, 6178.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1973). International pilot study of schizophrenia. New York: Author.Google Scholar
Wykes, T., Huddy, V., Cellard, C., McGurk, S. R., & Czobor, P. (2011). A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: Methodology and effect-sizes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 472485.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×