Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Vitalities of Çatalhöyük
- Part I Vital Religion: The Evolutionary Context of Religion at Çatalhöyük
- Part II Vital Materials at Çatalhöyük
- 7 Relational Networks and Religious Sodalities at Çatalhöyük
- 8 Using “Magic” to Think from the Material: Tracing Distributed Agency, Revelation, and Concealment at Çatalhöyük
- 9 “Motherbaby”: A Death in Childbirth at Çatalhöyük
- 10 The Hau of the House
- 11 Material Register, Surface, and Form at Çatalhöyük
- 12 The Use of Spatial Order in Çatalhöyük Material Culture
- Part III Vital Data
- Postscript: On Devotion at Çatalhöyük
- Index
- References
8 - Using “Magic” to Think from the Material: Tracing Distributed Agency, Revelation, and Concealment at Çatalhöyük
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Vitalities of Çatalhöyük
- Part I Vital Religion: The Evolutionary Context of Religion at Çatalhöyük
- Part II Vital Materials at Çatalhöyük
- 7 Relational Networks and Religious Sodalities at Çatalhöyük
- 8 Using “Magic” to Think from the Material: Tracing Distributed Agency, Revelation, and Concealment at Çatalhöyük
- 9 “Motherbaby”: A Death in Childbirth at Çatalhöyük
- 10 The Hau of the House
- 11 Material Register, Surface, and Form at Çatalhöyük
- 12 The Use of Spatial Order in Çatalhöyük Material Culture
- Part III Vital Data
- Postscript: On Devotion at Çatalhöyük
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
As the provocative discussions about religious life at Çatalhöyük (Hodder 2006, 2010) have demonstrated, speaking of transcendent forms of sociality in human prehistory is a tricky business. In an earlier volume, Carolyn Nakamura began to address “when” and“where” one can speak of “magic” and whether “magic” could be viewed as something distinct from “religion” in the Neolithic material culture of Çatalhöyük, while Peter Pels elaborated on Webb Keane’s suggestion that we try to speak of “religion” at Çatalhöyük in terms of degrees of material articulation (Keane 2010; Nakamura 2010; Pels 2010). The present chapter takes this task further through the explicit confrontation of certain key anthropological ideas and debates about magic to improve archaeological approaches to material interpretation.
The obstacles to such an effort are twofold. First, there is the threat of ethnocentric classification: Çatalhöyük suggests a largely “entangled” material world where certain convenient Western distinctions between functional and symbolic, sacred and secular, nature and culture cannot be maintained. Discerning the more subtle distinction between magic and religion, then, threatens to be even more fraught. While often viewed by many nonarchaeologists as an interpretive morass, the exclusive testimony of the material record, however, pushes us to consider and articulate a more material approach to magic. Archaeologists and anthropologists alike have recentered and theorized materiality as constituting the social (Graves-Brown 2000; Keane 2008; Miller 1987, 2005; Mills and Walker 2008; Meskell 2004, 2005; Meskell and Preucel 2004; Weiner 1992). Many theoretical frameworks now situate embodied practice and materiality as the very stuff of, rather than a secondary factor in social life, thus placing certain concerns of anthropology, sociology, and cultural studies more in line with the core concerns of archaeological inquiry (Berggren and Nilsson Stutz 2010: 173). We think the confrontation between this attention to materiality and spiritual realms often theorized as intellectual and “immaterial” activities will take these discussions further, even if they may not provide us with straightforward “evidence” of either “religion” or “magic.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Religion at Work in a Neolithic SocietyVital Matters, pp. 187 - 224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
and 2010. From Spectator to Critic and Participant: A New Role of Archaeology in Ritual Studies. Journal of Social Archaeology 10(2):171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. A Life Less Ordinary: The Ritualization of the Domestic Sphere in Later Prehistoric Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13(01):5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. Ritual and Rationality: Some Problems of Interpretation in European Archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology 2:313–344.Google Scholar
2007. Of blanks and burials: Hoarding obsidian at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In Technical Systems and Near Eastern PPN Communities. Proceedings of the 5th International Worlship. Fréjus 2004, eds. , and Antibes: Éditions APDCA, 343–355.Google Scholar
, , and . 2005 Chipped Stone. In Çatalhöyük 2005 Archive Report Çatalhöyük Research Project.
, , . 2005. The chipped stone. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, ed. . Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs and British Institute at Ankara, 221–283 and 467–533.Google Scholar
2007. Neolithic Excavations in the North Area, East Mound, Çatalhöyük. In Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, ed. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs British/Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Series.Google Scholar
, and 1992. Goodly beasts, beastly goods. In and , Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
2008. Building 49 Archive Report 2008. In Çatalhöyük 2008 Archive Report.
, and [1937] 1976. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2007. The Archaeology of Religious Ritual. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2002. Magic Practices and Ritual in the Near Eastern Neolithic: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at the 2nd International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East (ICAANE). Copenhagen University, May 2000, Berlin: Ex oriente.Google Scholar
1992. The enchantment of technology and the technology of enchantment. In Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, eds. and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–63.Google Scholar
2005. What Do Objects Want?Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12(3):193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1999. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology 31(2):168–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Toward An Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The Emergence of the Academic Science of Magic: The Occult Philosophy in Tylor and Frazer. In Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion, eds. and Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2006. The Leopard’s Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
ed. 2010. Religion in in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük As a Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. Daily practice and social memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69(1):17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007b. Writing Texts, Reading Materials: A Response to My Critics. Archaeological Dialogues 14(01):31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Heirlooms and houses: materiality and social memory. In Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies, eds. and Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Signs of Recognition: Powers and Hazards of Representation in an Indonesian Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1998. Calvin in the tropics: Objects and subjects at the religious frontier. In Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Spaces, ed. London: Routledge, 13–34.Google Scholar
2002. Sincerity, “Modernity” and the Protestants. Cultural Anthropology 17(1):65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language and Culture 23:409–425.Google Scholar
2008. The Evidence of the Senses and the Materiality of Religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14(1):110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. Marked, absent, habitual: Approaches to Neolithic religion at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2005. Art. In Çatalhöyük Perspectives. Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, ed. . Cambridge and London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
2002. What is Iconoclash? Or, is there a world beyond the image wars? In Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion and Art, eds. and . Karlsruhe/Cambridge, Mass.: ZKM/MIT Press, 16–38.Google Scholar
2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. Vol. II: The Language of Magic and Gardening. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
[1867]1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume I. London: Penguin Calssics/New Left Review.Google Scholar
2003. Memory’s materiality: Ancestral presence, commemorative practice and disjunctive locales. In Archaeologies of Memory, eds. and Oxford: Blackwell, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Object Worlds from Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
ed. 2005. Archaeologies of Materiality. Oxford: Blackwell.
and 2011. A ‘Curious and Sometimes a Trifle Macabre Artistry’: Some Aspects of the Symbolism of the Neolithic in Anatolia. Current Anthropology 52(2):235–263.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) 2003. Magic and Modernity. Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, 2004. South Summit (Chipped Stone Report). In Çatalhöyük 2004 Archive Report
ed. 1993. Unwrapping Christmas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
ed. 1998. A Theory of Shopping. Cambridge: Polity Press.
, and (eds.), (2008). Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
2001. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
2004. Dedicating Magic: Neo-Assyrian Apotropaic Figurines and the Protection of Assur. World Archaeology 36(1):11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Mastering matters: Magical sense and apotropaic figurines worlds in neo-assyria. In Archaeologies of Materiality, ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 18–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. Magical deposits at Çatalhöyük: A matter of time and place?. In Religion at the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 300–331.Google Scholar
and 2004. Figurines and miniature clay objects. In Çatahöyük 2004 Archive Report.
2009. The Materiality of Representation: A Preface. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 16:157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The spirit of matter: on fetish, rarity, fact and fancy. In Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Places, ed. New York: Routledge, 91–121.Google Scholar
1999. A Politics of Presence. Colonial Contacts between Missionaries and Waluguru in Late Colonial Tanganyika. Reading and Chur: Harwood.Google Scholar
2003. Introduction. In Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment, eds. and Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1–38.Google Scholar
2010. Temporalities of Religion at Çatalhöyük. In ed. Religion at the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 220–267. .Google Scholar
2013. The Sequence of Buildings 75, 65, 56, 69, 44 and 10 and External Spaces 119, 129, 130, 144, 299, 314, 319, 329, 333, 339, 367, 371, and 427. In ed. Çatalhöyük Excavations: the 2000–2008 Seasons. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
, , and eds. 2005. Rethinking Materiality. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeology.Google Scholar
2001. The social life of bone: A preliminary assessment of bone tool manufacture and discard at Çatalhöyük. In Crafting Bone: Skeletal Technologies through Time and Space, eds. and Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 937:241–9.Google Scholar
, and , 2005. Animal representations and animal remains at Çatalhöyük in Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1995–9 Seasons, ed. Ankara: McDonald Institute Monographs/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, 209–230.Google Scholar
, , and 2009. Building memories: Commemorative deposits at Çatalhöyük. In Zooarchaeology and the Reconstruction of Cultural Systems: Case Studies from the Old World, eds. , , and . Anthropozoologica, 1. Paris: L’Homme et l’Animal, Société de Recherche Interdisciplinaire, 103–128.Google Scholar
1998. Viscerality, Faith and Skepticism: Another Theory of Magic. In In Near Ruins: Cultural Theory at the End of the Century, ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 221–256.Google Scholar
2004. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
2002a. Ritual and Ideology in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B of the Levant and Southeast Anatolia. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 12(2):233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002b. The Changing Role of Ritual and Symbolism in the PPNB and the PN in the Levant, Syria and South-East Anatolia. Paléorient 28(1):5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011. The many dimensions of ritual. In Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion, ed. . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 115–132.Google Scholar
2000. Çatal Höyük in context: Ritual at Early Neolithic Sites in Central and Eastern Turkey. In Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation, ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 253–293.Google Scholar
1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21
- Cited by