IN the introduction to his magisterial 1979 overview of the Boer War, Thomas Pakenham noted that the history of the conflict for the past seventy years had been dominated by two contemporary works ; The Times History of the War in South Africa, edited by Leo Amery, and Sir Frederick Maurice's (official) History of the War in South Africa. Indeed, until Pakenham's study, little serious research into the conflict had been undertaken. Although there had been brief revivals of interest in the 1930s, with Ian Hamilton's Anti-Commando and J. F. C. Fuller's The Last of the Gentlemen's Wars, and in the late 1950s, with such populist works as Edgar Holt's The Boer War and Rayne Kruger's Goodbye Dolly Gray: The Story of the Boer War, these books had deviated little from the line established by Amery and Maurice. Pakenham was not alone in dismissing the glut of war-related memoirs and histories released in the first decade of the twentieth century as a ‘barrage’ from which the ‘Long Toms’ of Amery and Maurice stood apart. An anonymous ‘British Officer’, commissioned to survey ‘The Literature of the South African War’ for the American Historical Review in 1907, was equally contemptuous of ‘popular books, which profess to lay before their readers history, red-hot from its making like a baker's rolls’. ‘These works’, he argued: