Abdulsamad, F., Florsch, N. and Camerlynck, C. (2017) ‘Spectral induced polarization in a sandy medium containing semiconductor materials: Experimental results and numerical modelling of the polarization mechanism’, Near Surface Geophysics, 15(6), pp. 669–683. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2017052Google Scholar

Abdulsamad, F., Revil, A., Soueid Ahmed, A., Coperey, A., Karaoulis, M., Nicaise, S. and Peyras, L. (2019) ‘Induced polarization tomography applied to the detection and the monitoring of leaks in embankments’, Engineering Geology, 254, pp. 89–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accerboni, E. (1970) ‘Sur la correlation existant entre porosite et fagteur de formation dans les sediments non consolides’, Geophysical Prospecting, 18(4), pp. 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achal, V., Pan, X. and Özyurt, N. (2011) ‘Improved strength and durability of fly ash-amended concrete by microbial calcite precipitation’, Ecological Engineering, 37(4), pp. 554–559.Google Scholar

Ahmed, A. S., Revil, A. and Gross, L. (2019) ‘Multiscale induced polarization tomography in hydrogeophysics: A new approach’, Advances in Water Resources, 134, p. 103451. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103451Google Scholar

Ahmed, A. S., Revil, A., Byrdina, S., Coperey, A., Gailler, L., Grobbe, N., Viveiros, F., Silva, C., Jougnot, D. and Ghorbani, A. (2018) ‘3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes’, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 356, pp. 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aines, R., Nitao, J., Newmark, R., Carle, S., Ramirez, A., Harris, D., Johnson, J., Johnson, V., Ermak, D. and Sugiyama, G. (2002) The stochastic engine initiative: Improving prediction of behavior in geologic environments we cannot directly observe. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US). UCRL-ID-148221. DOI: 10.2172/15002143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aizebeokhai, A. P., Olayinka, A. I., Singh, V. S. and Uhuegbu, C. C. (2011) ‘Effectiveness of 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging using parallel 2D profiles’, Current Science, 101(8), pp. 1036–1052.Google Scholar

Al Hagrey, S. A. (2006) ‘Electrical resistivity imaging of tree trunks’, Near Surface Geophysics, 4(3), pp. 179–187.Google Scholar

Alfano, L. (1962) ‘Geoelectrical prospecting with underground electrodes’, Geophysical Prospecting, 10(3), pp. 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alle, I. C., Descloitres, M., Vouillamoz, J.-M., Yalo, N., Lawson, F. M. A. and Adihou, A. C. (2018) ‘Why 1D electrical resistivity techniques can result in inaccurate siting of boreholes in hard rock aquifers and why electrical resistivity tomography must be preferred: The example of Benin, West Africa’, Journal of African Earth Sciences, 139, pp. 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, D. A. and Merrick, N. P. (2005) ‘Imaging of Aquifers beneath watercourses’, in Where Waters Meet. New Zealand Society of Soil Science, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Allred, B., Daniels, J. J. and Ehsani, M. R. (2008) Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alumbaugh, D. L. and Newman, G. A. (2000) ‘Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion’, Geophysics, 65(5), pp. 1455–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambegaokar, V., Halperin, B. I. and Langer, J. S. (1971) ‘Hopping conductivity in disordered systems’, Physical Review B, 4(8), p. 2612.Google Scholar

Andersen, K. E., Brooks, S. P. and Hansen, M. B. (2003) ‘Bayesian inversion of geoelectrical resistivity data’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 65(3), pp. 619–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, R. (1981) ‘Nonlinear induced polarization spectra’. PhD dissertation thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. L. (1979) ‘Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders 0 and 1 by adaptive digital filtering’, Geophysics, 44(7), pp. 1287–1305.Google Scholar

André, F., van Leeuwen, C., Saussez, S., Van Durmen, R., Bogaert, P., Moghadas, D., de Rességuier, L., Delvaux, B., Vereecken, H. and Lambot, S. (2012) ‘High-resolution imaging of a vineyard in south of France using ground-penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar

Angoran, Y. and Madden, T. R. (1977) ‘Induced polarization: A preliminary of its chemical basis study’, Geophysics, 42(4), pp. 788–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anwar, H. and Kistijantoro, A. I. (2016) ‘Acceleration of finite element method for 3D DC resistivity modeling using multi-GPU’, in 2016 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI). IEEE, pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archie, G. E. (1942) ‘The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics’, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 146, pp. 54–62.Google Scholar

Archie, G. E. (1950) ‘Introduction to petrophysics of reservoir rocks’, AAPG Bulletin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 34(5), pp. 943–961.Google Scholar

Asami, K. (2002) ‘Characterization of heterogeneous systems by dielectric spectroscopy’, Progress in Polymer Science, 27(8), pp. 1617–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asch, T. and Morrison, H. F. (1989) ‘Mapping and monitoring electrical resistivity with surface and subsurface electrode arrays’, Geophysics, 54(2), pp. 235–244.Google Scholar

Aster, R. C., Borchers, B. and Thurber, C. H. (2018) Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Elsevier, p. 383.Google Scholar

Atekwana, E. and Slater, L. D. (2009) ‘Biogeophysics: A New Frontier in Earth Science Research’, Reviews of Geophysics, 47(RG4004/2009), pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.1029/2009RG000285Google Scholar

Atekwana, E. A., Sauck, W. A. and Werkema, D. D. (2000) ‘Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 44(2–3), pp. 167–180. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(98)00033-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atekwana, Estella A. and Atekwana, Eliot A. (2009) ‘Geophysical signatures of microbial activity at hydrocarbon contaminated sites: A review’, Surveys in Geophysics, 31(2), pp. 247–283. DOI: 10.1007/s10712-009-9089-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, R. J. C. (1953) Field Archaeology. Methuen, pp. 1–233.Google Scholar

Auken, E. and Christiansen, A. V. (2004) ‘Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data’, Geophysics, 69(3), pp. 752–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V., Jacobsen, B. H., Foged, N. and Sørensen, K. I. (2005) ‘Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data’, Geophysical Prospecting, 53(4), pp. 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, G. and Gilbert, F. (1970) ‘Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 266(1173), pp. 123–192.Google Scholar

Bairlein, K., Bücker, M., Hördt, A. and Hinze, B. (2016) ‘Temperature dependence of spectral induced polarization data: Experimental results and membrane polarization theory’, Geophysical Journal International, 205(1), pp. 440–453. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggw027CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, D. C. (1989) ‘A review of image reconstruction techniques for electrical impedance tomography’, Medical Physics, 16(2), pp. 162–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barber, D. C. and Brown, B. H. (1984) ‘Applied potential tomography’, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 17(9), p. 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barboza, F. M., Medeiros, W. E. and Santana, J. M. (2019) ‘A user-driven feedback approach for 2D direct current resistivity inversion based on particle swarm optimization’, Geophysics, 84(2), pp. E105–E124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, R. D. (1979) ‘Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies’, Geophysical Journal International, 59(1), pp. 123–129.Google Scholar

Barker, R. D. (1981) ‘The offset system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multicore cable’, Geophysical Prospecting, 29(1), pp. 128–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01015.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, D. C. (1927) ‘Applied geophysical methods in America’, Economic Geology, 22(7), pp. 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barus, C. (1882) ‘On the electrical activity of ore bodies’, in Geology of the Comstock Lode and the Washoe District (Becker, G. F. ed.). U.S. Gological Survey, pp. 309–367.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. and Christensen, N. B. (1998) ‘Analysis and application of a non‐conventional underwater geoelectrical method in Lake Geneva, Switzerland’, Geophysical Prospecting, 46(5), pp. 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayford, R. H. (2006) ‘Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography)’, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 8, pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bear, J. (1972) Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Elsevier Publishing Co., p 764.Google Scholar

Beard, L. P., Hohmann, G. W. and Tripp, A. C. (1996) ‘Fast resistivity/IP inversion using a low-contrast approximation’, Geophysics, 61(1), pp. 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beasley, C. W. and Ward, S. H. (1986) ‘Three-dimensional mise-a-la-masse modeling applied to mapping fracture zones’, Geophysics, 51(1), pp. 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, S., Ghysels, G., Gommers, K., Hermans, T., Nguyen, F. and Huysmans, M. (2019) ‘Characterization of spatially variable riverbed hydraulic conductivity using electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization’, Hydrogeology Journal, 27(1), pp. 395–407.Google Scholar

Bergmann, P., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Kiessling, D., Rücker, C., Labitzke, T., Henninges, J., Baumann, G. and Schütt, H. (2012) ‘Surface-downhole electrical resistivity tomography applied to monitoring of CO2 storage at Ketzin, Germany’, Geophysics, 77(6), pp. B253–B267.Google Scholar

Bergmann, P., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Labitzke, T., Wagner, F. M., Just, A., Flechsig, C. and Rippe, D. (2017) ‘Fluid injection monitoring using electrical resistivity tomography: Five years of CO2 injection at Ketzin, Germany’, Geophysical Prospecting, 65(3), pp. 859–875.Google Scholar

Bernabé, Y. (1995) ‘The transport properties of networks of cracks and pores’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B3), pp. 4231–4241. DOI: 10.1029/94JB02986Google Scholar

Bernabé, Y., Li, M. and Maineult, A. (2010) ‘Permeability and pore connectivity: A new model based on network simulations’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 115 (10), pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1029/2010JB007444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernabé, Y., Zamora, M., Li, M., Maineult, A. and Tang, Y. B. (2011) ‘Pore connectivity, permeability, and electrical formation factor: A new model and comparison to experimental data’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 116 (11), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1029/2011JB008543CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, J. and Valla, P. (1991) ‘Groundwater exploration in fissured media with electrical and VLF methods’, Geoexploration, 27(1–2), pp. 81–91.Google Scholar

Berryman, J. G. (1995) ‘Mixture theories for rock properties’, Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants, 3, pp. 205–228, DOI: 10.1029/RF003p0205Google Scholar

Bertin, J. and Loeb, J. (1976) Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Induced Polarization, Vol 1, Presentation and application of the IP method case histories. Gebrüder Borntraeger, p. 250.Google Scholar

Bérubé, C. L., Chouteau, M., Shamsipour, P., Enkin, R. J. and Olivo, G. R. (2017) ‘Bayesian inference of spectral induced polarization parameters for laboratory complex resistivity measurements of rocks and soils’, Computers & Geosciences, 105, pp. 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bérubé, C. L., Olivo, G. R., Chouteau, M. and Perrouty, S. (2018) ‘Mineralogical and textural controls on spectral induced polarization signatures of the Canadian Malartic gold deposit: Applications to mineral exploration’, Geophysics, 84(2), pp. 1–83. DOI: 10.1190/geo2018-0404.1Google Scholar

Bevc, D. and Morrison, H. F. (1991) ‘Borehole-to-surface electrical resistivity monitoring of a salt water injection experiment’, Geophysics, 56(6), pp. 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beven, K. J., Henderson, D. E. and Reeves, A. D. (1993) ‘Dispersion parameters for undisturbed partially saturated soil’, Journal of Hydrology, 143(1–2), pp. 19–43.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, P. K. and Patra, H. P. (1968) Direct Current Geoelectric, Sounding Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 135.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, B. B., Gupta, D., Banerjee, B. and Shalivahan, (2001) ‘Mise-a-la-masse survey for an auriferous sulfide deposit’, Geophysics, 66(1), pp. 70–77.Google Scholar

Bibby, H. M. (1977) ‘The apparent resistivity tensor’, Geophysics, 42(6), pp. 1258–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigelow, E. (1992) Introduction to Wireline Log Analysis. Baker Hughes Inc., Western Atlas International, p. 312Google Scholar

Bing, Z. and Greenhalgh, S. A. (1997) ‘A synthetic study on crosshole resistivity imaging using different electrode arrays’, Exploration Geophysics, 28(1–2), pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bing, Z. and Greenhalgh, S. A. (2000) ‘Cross-hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations’, Geophysical Prospecting, 48(5), pp. 887–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bing, Z. and Greenhalgh, S. A. (2001) ‘Finite element three dimensional direct current resistivity modelling: Accuracy and efficiency considerations’, Geophysical Journal International, 145(3), pp. 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binley, A. and Daily, W. (2003) ‘The performance of electrical methods for assessing the integrity of geomembrane liners in landfill caps and waste storage ponds’, Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 8(4), pp. 227–237.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Ramirez, A. and Daily, W. (1995) ‘Regularised image reconstruction of noisy electrical resistance tomography data’, in Process Tomography – 1995, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop of the European Concerted Action on Process Tomography. Bergen, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Henry-Poulter, S. and Shaw, B. (1996a) ‘Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography’, Water Resources Research, 32(4), pp. 763–769.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Shaw, B. and Henry-Poulter, S. (1996b) ‘Flow pathways in porous media: Electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification’, Measurement Science and Technology, 7(3), pp. 384–390. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/7/3/020Google Scholar

Binley, A., Pinheiro, P. and Dickin, F. (1996c) ‘Finite element based three-dimensional forward and inverse solvers for electrical impedance tomography’, in Colloquium on Advances in Electrical Tomography, Computing and Control Division, IEE, Digest No. 96/143. Manchester, UK, pp. 6/1–6/3.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Daily, W. and Ramirez, A. (1997) ‘Detecting leaks from environmental barriers using electrical current imaging’, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2(1), pp. 11–19.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Slater, L. D., Fukes, M. and Cassiani, G. (2005) ‘Relationship between spectral induced polarization and hydraulic properties of saturated and unsaturated sandstone’, Water Resources Research, 41 (12), DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004202Google Scholar

Binley, A., Winship, P., Middleton, R., Pokar, M. and West, J. (2001) ‘High‐resolution characterization of vadose zone dynamics using cross‐borehole radar’, Water Resources Research, 37(11), pp. 2639–2652.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Winship, P., West, L. J., Pokar, M. and Middleton, R. (2002a) ‘Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles’, Journal of Hydrology, 267(3–4), pp. 160–172.Google Scholar

Binley, A., Cassiani, G., Middleton, R. and Winship, P. (2002b) ‘Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging’, Journal of Hydrology, 267 (3–4), pp. 147–159. DOIDOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00146-4Google Scholar

Binley, A., Hubbard, S. S., Huisman, J. A., Revil, A., Robinson, D. A., Singha, K. and Slater, L. D. (2015) ‘The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales’, Water Resources Research, 51, pp. 3837–3866. DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017016Google Scholar

Binley, A., Keery, J., Slater, L., Barrash, W. and Cardiff, M. (2016) ‘The hydrogeologic information in cross-borehole complex conductivity data from an unconsolidated conglomeratic sedimentary aquifer’, Geophysics, 81(6), pp. E409–E421. DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0608.1Google Scholar

Blanchy, G., Saneiyan, S., Boyd, J., McLachlan, P., Binley, A. (2020) ‘ResIPy, an intuitive open source software for complex geoelectrical inversion/modeling in 2D space’, Computers and Geosciences, 137. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104423CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaschek, R., Hördt, A. and Kemna, A. (2008) ‘A new sensitivity-controlled focusing regularization scheme for the inversion of induced polarization data based on the minimum gradient support’, Geophysics, 73(2). DOI: 10.1190/1.2824820Google Scholar

Bleil, D. F. (1953) ‘Induced polarization: A method of geophysical prospecting’, Geophysics, 18, pp. 605–635. DOI: 10.1190/1.1437917Google Scholar

Blome, M., Maurer, H. and Greenhalgh, S. (2011) ‘Geoelectric experimental design: Efficient acquisition and exploitation of complete pole-bipole data sets’, Geophysics, 76(1), pp. F15–F26.Google Scholar

Blowes, D. W., Ptacek, C. J., Benner, S. G., McRae, C. W. T., Bennett, T. A. and Puls, R. W. (2000) ‘Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers’, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45(1–2), pp. 123–137.Google Scholar

Bobachev, A. A. (2003) Reshenie pryamyh i obratnyh zadach elektrorazvedki metodom soprotivlenij dlya slozhno-postroennyh sred (Direct and inverse problems of electrical prospecting by the resistivity method for difficult-built environments, in Russian). PhD dissertation. Moscow University, Russia.Google Scholar

Bodin, T. and Sambridge, M. (2009) ‘Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm’, Geophysical Journal International, 178(3), pp. 1411–1436.Google Scholar

Bodmer, R., Ward, S. H. and Morrison, H. F. (1968) ‘On induced electrical polarization and groundwater’, Geophysics, 33(5), pp. 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogoslovsky, V. A. and Ogilvy, A. A. (1977) ‘Geophysical methods for the investigation of landslides’, Geophysics, 42(3), pp. 562–571.Google Scholar

Bording, T. S., Fiandaca, G., Maurya, P. K., Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V., Tuxen, N., Klint, K. E. S. and Larsen, T. H. (2019) ‘Cross-borehole tomography with full-decay spectral time-domain induced polarization for mapping of potential contaminant flow-paths’, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Börner, F. (1992) Complex conductivity measurements of reservoir properties. Advances in Core Evaluation III (Reservoir Management). Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, London.Google Scholar

Börner, F. D. and Schön, J. H. (1991) ‘A relation between the quadrature component of electrical conductivity and the specific surface area of sedimentary rocks’, The Log Analyst, 32, pp. 612–613.Google Scholar

Börner, F. Gruhne, M. and Schön, J. (1993) ‘Contamination indications derived from electrical properties in the low frequency range 1’, Geophysical Prospecting, 41(1), pp. 83–98.Google Scholar

Börner, F. D., Schopper, J. R. and Weller, A. (1996) ‘Evaluation of transport and storage properties in the soil and groundwater zone from induced polarization measurements’, Geophysical Prospecting, 44(4), pp. 583–601. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00167.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boryta, D. A. and Nabighian, M. N. (1985) ‘Method for determining a leak in a pond liner of electrically insulating sheet material’, U.S. Patent 4,543,525.Google Scholar

Bouchedda, A., Chouteau, M., Binley, A. and Giroux, B. (2012) ‘2-D joint structural inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground penetrating radar data’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78, pp. 52–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.10.009Google Scholar

Boyd, J., Blanchy, G., Saneiyan, S., McLachlan, P., Binley, A. (2019) ‘3D geoelectrical problems with ResiPy, an open source graphical user interface for geoelectrical data processing’, Fast Times, 24(4), pp. 85–92.Google Scholar

Bradbury, K. R. and Taylor, R. W. (1984) ‘Determination of the hydrogeologic properties of lakebeds using offshore geophysical surveys’, Groundwater, 22(6), pp. 690–695.Google Scholar

Brindt, N., Rahav, M. and Wallach, R. (2019) ‘ERT and salinity: A method to determine whether ERT-detected preferential pathways in brackish water-irrigated soils are water-induced or an artifact of salinity’, Journal of Hydrology, 574, pp. 35–45.Google Scholar

Brown, B. H. (2001) ‘Medical impedance tomography and process impedance tomography: A brief review’, Measurement Science and Technology, 12(8), p. 991.Google Scholar

Brown, B. H., Barber, D. C., Wang, W., Lu, L., Leathard, A. D., Smallwood, R. H., Hampshire, A. R., Mackay, R. and Hatzigalanis, K. (1994) ‘Multi-frequency imaging and modelling of respiratory related electrical impedance changes’, Physiological Measurement, 15(2A), p. A1.Google Scholar

Brown, F. H. (1900) ‘Process of locating metallic minerals or buried treasures’, U.S. Patent 645,910.Google Scholar

Brown, F. H. (1901) ‘Process of locating metallic minerals’, U.S. Patent 672,309.Google Scholar

Brown, S. R., Lesmes, D., Fourkas, J. and Sorenson, J. R. (2003) Complex Electrical Resistivity for Monitoring DNAPL Contamination. New England Research Inc. (US), p. 29.Google Scholar

Bruggeman, V. D. A. G. (1935) ‘Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen’, Annalen der physik, 416(7), pp. 636–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H. and Teller, E. (1938) ‘Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60(2), pp. 309–319.Google Scholar

Bücker, M. and Hördt, A. (2013a) ‘Analytical modelling of membrane polarization with explicit parametrization of pore radii and the electrical double layer’, Geophysical Journal International, 194 (2), pp. 804–813. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt136Google Scholar

Bücker, M. and Hördt, A. (2013b) ‘Long and short narrow pore models for membrane polarization’, Geophysics, 78(6), pp. E299–E314. DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0548.1Google Scholar

Bücker, M., Bairlein, K., Bielefeld, A., Kuhn, E., Nordsiek, S. and Stebner, H. (2016) ‘The dependence of induced polarization on fluid salinity and pH, studied with an extended model of membrane polarization’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 135, pp. 408–417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.02.007Google Scholar

Bücker, M., Orozco, A. F. and Kemna, A. (2018) ‘Electrochemical polarization around metallic particles – Part 1: The role of diffuse-layer and volume-diffusion relaxation’, Geophysics, 83(4), pp. E203–E217. DOI: 10.1190/geo2017-0401.1Google Scholar

Bücker, M., Flores Orozco, A., Undorf, S. and Kemna, A. (2019) ‘On the role of Stern- and diffuse-layer polarization mechanisms in porous media’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124 (6), pp. 5656–5677. DOI: 10.1029/2019JB017679Google Scholar

Butler, K. E. (2009) ‘Trends in waterborne electrical and EM induction methods for high resolution sub-bottom imaging’, Near Surface Geophysics, 7(4), pp. 241–246.Google Scholar

Cai, J., Wei, W., Hu, X. and Wood, D. A. (2017) ‘Electrical conductivity models in saturated porous media: A review’, Earth-Science Reviews. pp. 419–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.013Google Scholar

Calderón‐Macías, C., Sen, M. K. and Stoffa, P. L. (2000) ‘Artificial neural networks for parameter estimation in geophysics’, Geophysical Prospecting, 48(1), pp. 21–47.Google Scholar

Candansayar, M. E. (2008) ‘Two-dimensional individual and joint inversion of three-and four-electrode array dc resistivity data’, Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 5(3), pp. 290–300.Google Scholar

Carcangiu, S., Fanni, A. and Montisci, A. (2019) ‘Electric capacitance tomography for nondestructive testing of standing trees’, International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 32 (4), pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1002/jnm.2252Google Scholar

Carman, P. C. (1939) ‘Permeability of saturated sands, soils and clays’, The Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(2), pp. 262–273.Google Scholar

Carpenter, E. W. (1955) ‘Some notes concerning the Wenner configuration’, Geophysical Prospecting, 3(4), pp. 388–402.Google Scholar

Carpenter, E. W. and Habberjam, G. M. (1956) ‘A tri-potential method of resistivity prospecting’, Geophysics, 21(2), pp. 455–469.Google Scholar

Cassiani, G., Binley, A., Kemna, A., Wehrer, M., Orozco, A. F., Deiana, R., Boaga, J., Rossi, M., Dietrich, P., Werban, U., Zschornack, L., Godio, A., JafarGandomi, A. and Deidda, G. P. (2014) ‘Noninvasive characterization of the Trecate (Italy) crude-oil contaminated site: Links between contamination and geophysical signals’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(15), pp. 8914–8931. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-2494-7Google Scholar

Caterina, D., Beaujean, J., Robert, T. and Nguyen, F. (2013) ‘A comparison study of different image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography’, Near Surface Geophysics, 11(6), pp. 639–657. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2013022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, J., Ogilvy, R., Kuras, O., Cripps, J. and Meldrum, P. (2002) ‘3D electrical imaging of known targets at a controlled environmental test site’, Environmental Geology, 41(6), pp. 690–704.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. E., Meldrum, P. I., Ogilvy, R. D. and Wilkinson, P. B. (2005) ‘Characterisation of a NAPL-contaminated former quarry site using electrical impedance tomography’, Near Surface Geophysics, 3(2), pp. 81–92. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2005003Google Scholar

Chambers, J. E., Wilkinson, P. B., Uhlemann, S., Sorensen, J. P. R., Roberts, C., Newell, A. J., Ward, W. O. C., Binley, A., Williams, P. J., Gooddy, D. C., Old, G. and Bai, L. (2014) ‘Derivation of lowland riparian wetland deposit architecture using geophysical image analysis and interface detection’, Water Resources Research, 50(7), pp. 5886–5905. DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015643Google Scholar

Chambers, J. E., Wilkinson, P. B., Wardrop, D., Hameed, A., Hill, I., Jeffrey, C., Loke, M. H., Meldrum, P. I., Kuras, O., Cave, M. and Gunn, D. A. (2012) ‘Bedrock detection beneath river terrace deposits using three-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography’, Geomorphology, 177–178, pp. 17–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, J. E., Gunn, D. A., Wilkinson, P. B., Meldrum, P. I., Haslam, E., Holyoake, S., Kirkham, M., Kuras, O., Merritt, A. and Wragg, J. (2014) ‘4D electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of soil moisture dynamics in an operational railway embankment’, Near Surface Geophysics, 12(1), pp. 61–72.Google Scholar

Chambers, J., Meldrum, P., Gunn, D., Wilkinson, P., Uhlemann, S., Kuras, O. and Swift, R. (2015) ‘Proactive infrastructure monitoring and evaluation (PRIME): A new electrical resistivity tomography system for remotely monitoring the internal condition of geotechnical infrastructure assets’, in 3rd International Workshop on Geoelectrical Monitoring (GELMON).Google Scholar

Chave, A. D., Constable, S. C. and Edwards, R. N. (1991) ‘Electrical exploration methods for the seafloor’, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Volume 2, Application, Parts A and B. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 931–966.Google Scholar

Chelidze, T. L. and Gueguen, Y. (1999) ‘Electrical spectroscopy of porous rocks: A review-I. Theoretical models’, Geophysical Journal International, 137(1), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1999.00799.xGoogle Scholar

Chelidze, T. L., Guéguen, Y. and Ruffet, C. (1999) ‘Electrical spectroscopy of porous rocks: A review- II. Experimental results and interpretation’, Geophysical Journal International, 137, pp. 16–34.Google Scholar

Chen, J., Kemna, A. and Hubbard, S. S. (2008) ‘A comparison between Gauss-Newton and Markov-chain Monte Carlo-based methods for inverting spectral induced-polarization data for Cole–Cole parameters’, Geophysics, 73(6). DOI: 10.1190/1.2976115Google Scholar

Chen, Q., Pardo, D., Li, H. and Wang, F. (2011) ‘New post-processing method for interpretation of through casing resistivity (TCR) measurements’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 74(1), pp. 19–25.Google Scholar

Cheng, Q., Chen, X., Tao, M. and Binley, A. (2019a) ‘Characterization of karst structures using quasi-3D electrical resistivity tomography’, Environmental Earth Sciences, 78 (9). DOI: 10.1007/s12665-019-8284-2Google Scholar

Cheng, Q., Tao, M., Chen, X. and Binley, A. (2019b) ‘Evaluation of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) for mapping the soil–rock interface in karstic environments’, Environmental Earth Sciences, 78(15), p. 439.Google Scholar

Cho, Y., Sudduth, K. A. and Chung, S.-O. (2016) ‘Soil physical property estimation from soil strength and apparent electrical conductivity sensor data’, Biosystems Engineering, 152, pp. 68–78.Google Scholar

Christensen, N. B. (1990) ‘Optimized fast Hankel transform filters 1’, Geophysical Prospecting, 38(5), pp. 545–568.Google Scholar

Christensen, N. B. and Sørensen, K. (2001) ‘Pulled array continuous electrical sounding with an additional inductive source: An experimental design study’, Geophysical Prospecting, 49(2), pp. 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chuprinko, D. and Titov, K. (2017) ‘Influence of mineral composition on spectral induced polarization in sediments’, Geophysical Journal International, pp. 186–191. DOI: 10.1093/GJI/GGX018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claerbout, J. F. and Muir, F. (1973) ‘Robust modeling with erratic data’, Geophysics, 38(5), pp. 826–844.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1990) Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology. Routledge, p. 176.Google Scholar

Clark, A. R. and Salt, D. J. (1951) ‘The investigation of earth resistivities in the vicinity of a diamond drill hole’, Geophysics, 16(4), pp. 659–665.Google Scholar

Clavier, C., Coates, G. and Dumanoir, J. (1984) ‘Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands’, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24(02), pp. 153–168.Google Scholar

Cockett, R., Kang, S., Heagy, L. J., Pidlisecky, A. and Oldenburg, D. W. (2015) ‘SimPEG: An open source framework for simulation and gradient based parameter estimation in geophysical applications’, Computers & Geosciences, 85, pp. 142–154.Google Scholar

Coggon, J. H. (1971) ‘Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by the finite element method’, Geophysics, 36(1), pp. 132–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, K. S. and Cole, R. H. (1941) ‘Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics’, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 9(4), pp. 341–351.Google Scholar

Colton, D. L. and Kress, R. (1992) Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory. Springer-Verlag (Applied Mathematical Sciences), p. 334.Google Scholar

Commer, M., Newman, G. A., Williams, K. H. and Hubbard, S. S. (2011) ‘3D induced-polarization data inversion for complex resistivity’, Geophysics, 76(3). DOI: 10.1190/1.3560156Google Scholar

Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L. and Constable, C. G. (1987) ‘Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data’, Geophysics, 52(3), pp. 289–300.Google Scholar

Crestani, E., Camporese, M. and Salandin, P. (2015) ‘Assessment of hydraulic conductivity distributions through assimilation of travel time data from ERT-monitored tracer tests’, Advances in Water Resources, 84, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar

Crook, N., Musgrave, H. and Binley, A. (2006) ‘Geophysical characterisation of the riparian zone in groundwater fed catchments’, in 19th Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, SAGEEP 2006. Geophysical Applications for Environmental and Engineering Hazards – Advances and Constraints.Google Scholar

Crook, N., Binley, A., Knight, R., Robinson, D. A., Zarnetske, J. and Haggerty, R. (2008) ‘Electrical resistivity imaging of the architecture of substream sediments’, Water Resources Research, 44, W00D13, DOI:10.1029/2008WR006968Google Scholar

Čuma, M. and Zhdanov, M. S. (2014) ‘Massively parallel regularized 3D inversion of potential fields on CPUs and GPUs’, Computers & Geosciences, 62, pp. 80–87.Google Scholar

Dafflon, B., Wu, Y., Hubbard, S. S., Birkholzer, J. T., Daley, T. M., Pugh, J. D., Peterson, J. E. and Trautz, R. C. (2012) ‘Monitoring CO2 intrusion and associated geochemical transformations in a shallow groundwater system using complex electrical methods’, Environmental Science & Technology, 47(1), pp. 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dafflon, B., Hubbard, S., Wainwright, H., Kneafsey, T. J., Ulrich, C., Peterson, J. and Wu, Y. (2016) ‘Geophysical estimation of shallow permafrost distribution and properties in an ice-wedge polygon-dominated Arctic tundra region’, Geophysics, 81 (1), pp. WA247–WA263. DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0175.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daft, L. and Williams, A. (1906) ‘Apparatus for detecting and localizing mineral deposits’, U.S. Patent 817,736.Google Scholar

Dahlin, T. (1995) ‘On the automation of 2D resistivity surveying for engineering and environmental applications’. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden, p. 187.Google Scholar

Dahlin, T. (2000) ‘Short note on electrode charge‐up effects in DC resistivity data acquisition using multi‐electrode arrays’, Geophysical Prospecting, 48(1), pp. 181–187.Google Scholar

Dahlin, T. and Loke, M. H. (1997) ‘Quasi-3D resistivity imaging-mapping of three dimensional structures using two dimensional DC resistivity techniques’, in 3rd EEGS Meeting, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (EAGE). DOI: 10.3997/2214–4609.201407298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlin, T. and Leroux, V. (2012) ‘Improvement in time-domain induced polarization data quality with multi-electrode systems by separating current and potential cables’, Near Surface Geophysics, 10(6), pp. 545–565. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2012028Google Scholar

Dahlin, T. and Loke, M. H. (2015) ‘Negative apparent chargeability in time-domain induced polarisation data’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 123, pp. 322–332.Google Scholar

Dahlin, T. and Zhou, B. (2006) ‘Multiple-gradient array measurements for multichannel 2D resistivity imaging’, Near Surface Geophysics, 4(2), pp. 113–123.Google Scholar

Dahlin, T., Bernstone, C. and Loke, M. H. (2002a) ‘A 3-D resistivity investigation of a contaminated site at Lernacken, Sweden’, Geophysics, 67(6), pp. 1692–1700.Google Scholar

Dahlin, T., Leroux, V. and Nissen, J. (2002b) ‘Measuring techniques in induced polarisation imaging’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 50(3), pp. 279–298. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00148-9Google Scholar

Daily, W. and Owen, E. (1991) ‘Cross-borehole resistivity tomography’, Geophysics, 56(8), pp. 1228–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daily, W. and Ramirez, A. (1995) ‘Electrical resistance tomography during in-situ trichloroethylene remediation at the Savannah River Site’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33(4), pp. 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daily, W. D. and Ramirez, A. L. (1999) ‘Electrical resistance tomography using steel cased boreholes as electrodes’, U.S. Patent 5,914,603.Google Scholar

Daily, W. and Ramirez, A. L. (2000) ‘Electrical imaging of engineered hydraulic barriers’, Geophysics, 65(1), pp. 83–94.Google Scholar

Daily, W., Ramirez, A., LaBrecque, D. and Nitao, J. (1992) ‘Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement’, Water Resources Research, 28(5), pp. 1429–1442.Google Scholar

Daily, W., Ramirez, A. and Binley, A. (2004) ‘Remote monitoring of leaks in storage tanks using electrical resistance tomography: Application at the Hanford Site’, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 9(1), pp. 11–24.Google Scholar

Daniels, J. J. (1977) ‘Three-dimensional resistivity and induced-polarization modeling using buried electrodes’, Geophysics, 42(5), pp. 1006–1019.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. W. and Cole, R. H. (1951) ‘Dielectric relaxation in glycerol, propylene glycol, and n-propanol’, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 19(12), pp. 1484–1490. DOI: 10.1063/1.1748105Google Scholar

Davidson, E., Lefebvre, P. A., Brando, P. M., Ray, D. M., Trumbore, S. E., Solorzano, L. A., Ferreira, J. N., Bustamante, M. M. da C. and Nepstad, D. C. (2011) ‘Carbon inputs and water uptake in deep soils of an eastern Amazon forest’, Forest Science, 57(1), pp. 51–58.Google Scholar

Davis, J. A., James, R. O. and Leckie, J. O. (1978) ‘Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface: I. Computation of electrical double layer properties in simple electrolytes’, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 63(3), pp. 480–499. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(78)80009-5Google Scholar

Day-Lewis, F. D., Singha, K. and Binley, A. M. (2005) ‘Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution-dependent limitations’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(8), pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1029/2004JB003569Google Scholar

Day-Lewis, F. D., White, E. A., Johnson, C. D., Lane, J. W. Jr and Belaval, M. (2006) ‘Continuous resistivity profiling to delineate submarine groundwater discharge: Examples and limitations’, The Leading Edge, 25(6), pp. 724–728.Google Scholar

Day-Lewis, F. D., Linde, N., Haggerty, R., Singha, K. and Briggs, M. A. (2017) ‘Pore network modeling of the electrical signature of solute transport in dual-domain media’, Geophysical Research Letters, 44(10), pp. 4908–4916. DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073326Google Scholar

De Donno, G. and Cardarelli, E. (2011) ‘Assessment of errors from different electrode materials and configurations for electrical resistivity and time-domain IP data on laboratory models’, Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 52(2), pp. 211–223.Google Scholar

de Sosa, L. L., Glanville, H. C., Marshall, M. R., Schnepf, A., Cooper, D. M., Hill, P. W., Binley, A. and Jones, D. L. (2018) ‘Stoichiometric constraints on the microbial processing of carbon with soil depth along a riparian hillslope’, Biology and Fertility of Soils. 54(8), pp. 949–963. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-018-1317-2Google Scholar

De Witt, G. W. (1979) ‘Parametric studies of induced polarization data’. MS disseration thesis, University of Utah, p. 178.Google Scholar

Deceuster, J. and Kaufmann, O. (2012) ‘Improving the delineation of hydrocarbon-impacted soils and water through induced polarization (IP) tomographies: A field study at an industrial waste land’, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 136, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar

Deceuster, J., Etienne, A., Robert, T., Nguyen, F. and Kaufmann, O. (2014) ‘A modified DOI-based method to statistically estimate the depth of investigation of dc resistivity surveys’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 103, pp. 172–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.018Google Scholar

deGroot-Hedlin, C. (1990) ‘Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data’, Geophysics, 55 (12), pp. 1613–1624. DOI: 10.1190/1.1442813Google Scholar

Demirel, C. and Candansayar, M. E. (2017) ‘Two-dimensional joint inversions of cross-hole resistivity data and resolution analysis of combined arrays’, Geophysical Prospecting, 65(3), pp. 876–890. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12432Google Scholar

Dey, A. and Morrison, H. F. (1973) ‘Electromagnetic coupling in frequency and time-domain induced-polarization surveys over a multilayered earth’, Geophysics, 38(2), pp. 380–405.Google Scholar

Dey, A. and Morrison, H. F. (1979) ‘Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures’, Geophysics, 44(4), pp. 753–780.Google Scholar

Dias, C. A. (1972) ‘Analytical model for a polarizable medium at radio and lower frequencies’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 77(26), pp. 4945–4956. DOI: 10.1029/jb077i026p04945Google Scholar

Dias, C. A. (2000) ‘Developments in a model to describe low-frequency electrical polarization of rocks’, Geophysics, 65(2), pp. 437–451. DOI: 10.1190/1.1444738Google Scholar

Dickin, F. and Wang, M. (1996) ‘Electrical resistance tomography for process applications’, Measurement Science and Technology, 7(3), p. 247.Google Scholar

Dissado, L. A. and Hill, R. M. (1984) ‘Anomalous low-frequency dispersion. Near direct current conductivity in disordered low-dimensional materials’, Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2: Molecular and Chemical Physics, 80(3), pp. 291–319.Google Scholar

Doetsch, J. A., Coscia, I., Greenhalgh, S., Linde, N., Green, A. and Günther, T. (2010a) ‘The borehole-fluid effect in electrical resistivity imaging’, Geophysics, 75 (4), pp. F107–F114.Google Scholar

Doetsch, J., Linde, N., Coscia, I., Greenhalgh, S. A. and Green, A. G. (2010b) ‘Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data’, Geophysics, 75(6). DOI: 10.1190/1.3496476Google Scholar

Doetsch, J., Linde, N., Vogt, T., Binley, A. and Green, A. G. (2012a) ‘Imaging and quantifying salt-tracer transport in a riparian groundwater system by means of 3D ERT monitoring’, Geophysics, 77(5). DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0046.1Google Scholar

Doetsch, J., Linde, N., Pessognelli, M., Green, A. G. and Günther, T. (2012b) ‘Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar

Dosso, S. E. and Oldenburg, D. W. (1989) ‘Linear and non-linear appraisal using extremal models of bounded variation’, Geophysical Journal International, 99(3), pp. 483–495.Google Scholar

Draskovits, P. and Fejes, I. (1994) ‘Geophysical methods in drinkwater protection of near-surface reservoirs’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 31(1–4), pp. 53–63.Google Scholar

Draskovits, P., Hobot, J., Vero, L. and Smith, B. D. (1990) ‘Induced-polarization surveys applied to evaluation of groundwater resources, Pannonian Basin, Hungary’, Induced Polarization: Applications and Case Histories, Investigations in Geophysics, 4, pp. 379–410.Google Scholar

Duckworth, K. and Calvert, H. T. (1995) ‘An examination of the relationship between time-domain integral chargeability and the Cole–Cole impedance model’, Geophysics, 60(4), pp. 1249–1252.Google Scholar

Dukhin, S. S. and Shilov, V. N. (1974) Dielectric Phenomena and the Double Layer in Disperse Systems and Polyelectrolytes. Naukova Duma, Kiev, p. 206.Google Scholar

Dunlap, H. F. and Hawthorne, R. R. (1951) ‘The calculation of water resistivities from chemical analyses’, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3(03), p. 17.Google Scholar

Edwards, L. S. (1977) ‘A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP’, Geophysics, 42(5), pp. 1020–1036.Google Scholar

Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press, p. 456.Google Scholar

Ekinci, Y. L. and Demirci, A. (2008) ‘A damped least-squares inversion program for the interpretation of Schlumberger sounding curves’, Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(22), pp. 4070–4078.Google Scholar

Ellis, D. V. and Singer, J. M. (2008) Well Logging for Earth Scientists. Springer Science and Business Media, p. 708.Google Scholar

Everett, M. E. (2013) Near-Surface Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, p. 400.Google Scholar

Evjen, H. M. (1938) ‘Depth factors and resolving power of electrical measurements’, Geophysics, 3(2), pp. 78–95.Google Scholar

Farias, V. J. da, C., Maranhão, C. H. de M., da Rocha, B. R. P. and de Andrade, N. de P. O. (2010) ‘Induced polarization forward modelling using finite element method and the fractal model’, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(7), pp. 1849–1860.Google Scholar

Farquharson, C. G. and Oldenburg, D. W. (1998) ‘Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure’, Geophysical Journal International, 134(1), pp. 213–227.Google Scholar

Fatt, I. (1956) ‘The network model of porous media’. Petroleum Transactions, AIME, Volume 207, pp. 144–181.Google Scholar

Fernandez, P. M., Bloem, E., Binley, A., Philippe, R. S. B. A. and French, H. K. (2019) ‘Monitoring redox sensitive conditions at the groundwater interface using electrical resistivity and self-potential’, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 226, p. 103517.Google Scholar

Fernández-Muñiz, Z., Khaniani, H. and Fernández-Martínez, J. L. (2019) ‘Data kit inversion and uncertainty analysis’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 161, pp. 228–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.12.022Google Scholar

Ferré, T., Bentley, L., Binley, A., Linde, N., Kemna, A., Singha, K., Holliger, K., Huisman, J. A. and Minsley, B. (2009) ‘Critical steps for the continuing advancement of hydrogeophysics’, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90(23), p. 200.Google Scholar

Fiandaca, G., Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V. and Gazoty, A. (2012) ‘Time-domain-induced polarization: Full-decay forward modeling and 1D laterally constrained inversion of Cole-Cole parameters’, Geophysics, 77(3), pp. E213–E225. DOI: 10.1190/geo2011-0217.1Google Scholar

Fiandaca, G., Ramm, J., Binley, A., Gazoty, A., Christiansen, A. V. and Auken, E. (2013) ‘Resolving spectral information from time domain induced polarization data through 2-D inversion’, Geophysical Journal International, 192(2), pp. 631–646. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggs060Google Scholar

Fiandaca, G., Madsen, L. M. and Maurya, P. K. (2018a) ‘Re-parameterisations of the Cole–Cole model for improved spectral inversion of induced polarization data’, Near Surface Geophysics, 16(4), pp. 385–399. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2017065Google Scholar

Fiandaca, G., Maurya, P. K., Balbarini, N., Hördt, A., Christiansen, A. V., Foged, N., Bjerg, P. L. and Auken, E. (2018b) ‘Permeability estimation directly from logging-while-drilling induced polarization data’, Water Resources Research, 54(4), pp. 2851–2870. DOI: 10.1002/2017WR022411Google Scholar

Fixman, M. (1980) ‘Charged macromolecules in external fields. I. The sphere’, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 72(9), pp. 5177–5186. DOI: 10.1063/1.439753Google Scholar

Flathe, H. (1955) ‘A practical method of calculating geoelectrical model graphs for horizontally stratified media’, Geophysical Prospecting, 3(3), pp. 268–294. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1955.tb01377.xGoogle Scholar

Flis, M. F., Newman, G. A. and Hohmann, G. W. (1989) ‘Induced-polarization effects in time-domain electromagnetic measurements’, Geophysics, 54(4), pp. 514–523.Google Scholar

Flores Orozco, A., Kemna, A. and Zimmermann, E. (2012) ‘Data error quantification in spectral induced polarization imaging’, Geophysics, 77(3). DOI: 10.1190/geo2010-0194.1Google Scholar

Flores Orozco, A. F., Williams, K. H. and Kemna, A. (2013) ‘Time-lapse spectral induced polarization imaging of stimulated uranium bioremediation’, Near Surface Geophysics, 11(5), pp. 531–544. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2013020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flores Orozco, A., Velimirovic, M., Tosco, T., Kemna, A., Sapion, H., Klaas, N., Sethi, R. and Bastiaens, L. (2015) ‘Monitoring the injection of microscale zerovalent iron particles for groundwater remediation by means of complex electrical conductivity imaging’, Environmental Science and Technology, 49(9), pp. 5593–5600. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00208Google Scholar

Flores Orozco, A., Micić, V., Bücker, M., Gallistl, J., Hofmann, T. and Nguyen, F. (2019a) ‘Complex-conductivity monitoring to delineate aquifer pore clogging during nanoparticles injection’, Geophysical Journal International, 218(3), pp. 1838–1852. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz255Google Scholar

Flores Orozco, A. F., Kemna, A., Binley, A. and Cassiani, G. (2019b) ‘Analysis of time-lapse data error in complex conductivity imaging to alleviate anthropogenic noise for site characterization’, Geophysics, 84(2), pp. B181–B193. DOI: 10.1190/GEO2017-0755.1Google Scholar

Florsch, N. and Muhlach, F. (2017) Everyday Applied Geophysics 1: Electrical Methods. Elsevier, p. 202.Google Scholar

Frangos, W. (1997) ‘Electrical detection of leaks in lined waste disposal ponds’, Geophysics, 62(6), pp. 1737–1744.Google Scholar

Freedman, R. and Vogiatzis, J. P. (1986) ‘Theory of induced-polarization logging in a borehole’, Geophysics, 51(9), pp. 1830–1849.Google Scholar

Fujita, Y., Ferris, F. G., Lawson, R. D., Colwell, F. S. and Smith, R. W. (2000) ‘Subscribed content calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria’, Geomicrobiology Journal, 17(4), pp. 305–318.Google Scholar

Fuller, B. D. and Ward, S. H. (1970) ‘Linear system description of the electrical parameters of rocks’, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics, 8(1), pp. 7–18.Google Scholar

Fuoss, R. M. and Kirkwood, J. G. (1941) ‘Electrical properties of solids. VIII. Dipole moments in polyvinyl chloride-diphenyl systems*’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 63(2), pp. 385–394. DOI: 10.1021/ja01847a013Google Scholar

Furman, A., Ferré, T. P. and Heath, G. L. (2007) ‘Spatial focusing of electrical resistivity surveys considering geologic and hydrologic layering’, Geophysics, 72(2), pp. F65–F73.Google Scholar

Gaffney, C. F. and Gater, J. (2003) Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for Archaeologists. Tempus, p. 192.Google Scholar

Gaffney, C., Harris, C., Pope-Carter, F., Bonsall, J., Fry, R. and Parkyn, A. (2015) ‘Still searching for graves: An analytical strategy for interpreting geophysical data used in the search for “unmarked” graves’, Near Surface Geophysics, 13(6), pp. 557–569.Google Scholar

Galetti, E. and Curtis, A. (2018) ‘Transdimensional electrical resistivity tomography’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(8), pp. 6347–6377.Google Scholar

Gallardo, L. A. and Meju, M. A. (2003) ‘Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data’, Geophysical Research Letters, 30(13). DOI: 10.1029/2003GL017370Google Scholar

Gallardo, L. A. and Meju, M. A. (2011) ‘Structure-coupled multiphysics imaging in geophysical sciences’, Reviews of Geophysics, 49(1). DOI: 10.1029/2010RG000330Google Scholar

Gan, F., Han, K., Lan, F., Chen, Y. and Zhang, W. (2017) ‘Multi-geophysical approaches to detect karst channels underground: A case study in Mengzi of Yunnan Province, China’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 136, pp. 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, F. D. (1897) ‘The electrical method of moisture determination in soils: Results and modifications in 1897’, in Bulletin No. 12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Soils, Washington, D.C., p. 24.Google Scholar

Gardner, F. D. (1898) The Electrical Method of Moisture Determination in Soils, Results and Modifications in 1897. US Government Printing Office, p. 38.Google Scholar

Garré, S., Javaux, M., Vanderborght, J. and Vereecken, H. (2011) ‘Three-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography to monitor root zone water dynamics’, Vadose Zone Journal, 10(1), pp. 412–424.Google Scholar

Gazoty, A., Fiandaca, G., Pedersen, J., Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V. and Pedersen, J. K. (2012) ‘Application of time domain induced polarization to the mapping of lithotypes in a landfill site’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(6), pp. 1793–1804. DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-1793-2012Google Scholar

Gazoty, A., Fiandaca, G., Pedersen, J., Auken, E. and Christiansen, A. V. (2013) ‘Data repeatability and acquisition techniques for Time-Domain spectral Induced Polarization’, Near Surface Geophysics, 11(1983), pp. 391–406. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2013013Google Scholar

Gebbers, R., Lück, E., Dabas, M. and Domsch, H. (2009) ‘Comparison of instruments for geoelectrical soil mapping at the field scale’, Near Surface Geophysics, 7(3), pp. 179–190.Google Scholar

Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. (1992) ‘Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences’, Statistical Science, 7(4), pp. 457–472.Google Scholar

Geometrics (2001) OhmMapper TR1 29005–01 REV.F Operation Manual. Geometrics Inc.Google Scholar

Gernez, S., Bouchedda, A., Gloaguen, E. and Paradis, D. (2020) ‘AIM4RES, an open-source 2.5D finite differences MATLAB library for anisotropic electrical resistivity modeling’, Computers and Geosciences, 135, p. 104401. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104401Google Scholar

Geselowitz, D. B. (1971) ‘An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography’, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar

Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J. (2009) ‘Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐and post‐processing facilities’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79(11), pp. 1309–1331.Google Scholar

Ghorbani, A., Camerlynck, C., Florsch, N., Cosenza, P. and Revil, A. (2007) ‘Bayesian inference of the Cole–Cole parameters from time-and frequency-domain induced polarization’, Geophysical Prospecting, 55(4), pp. 589–605.Google Scholar

Ghorbani, A., Camerlynck, C. and Florsch, N. (2009) ‘CR1Dinv: A Matlab program to invert 1D spectral induced polarization data for the Cole–Cole model including electromagnetic effects’, Computers & Geosciences, 35(2), pp. 255–266.Google Scholar

Ghosh, D. P. (1971a) ‘Inverse filter coefficients for the computation of apparent resistivity standard curves for a horizontally stratified earth’, Geophysical Prospecting, 19(4), pp. 769–775.Google Scholar

Ghosh, D. P. (1971b) ‘The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity sounding measurements’, Geophysical Prospecting, 19(2), pp. 192–217.Google Scholar

Gish, O. H. and Rooney, W. J. (1925) ‘Measurement of resistivity of large masses of undisturbed earth’, Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 30(4), pp. 161–188.Google Scholar

Gisser, D. G., Isaacson, D. and Newell, J. C. (1987) ‘Current topics in impedance imaging’, Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 8(4A), pp. 39–46. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/005Google Scholar

Glover, P. W. J. (2009) ‘What is the cementation exponent? A new interpretation’, The Leading Edge, 28(1), pp. 82–85.Google Scholar

Glover, P. W. J. (2010) ‘A generalized Archie’s law for n phases’, Geophysics, 75(6), pp. E247–E265.Google Scholar

Glover, P. W. J. (2015) ‘Geophysical properties of the near surface earth: Electrical properties’, in Treatise on Geophysics (Schubert, G. ed.). Elsevier B.V. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00189-5Google Scholar

Glover, P. W. J. (2016) ‘Archie’s law: A reappraisal’, Solid Earth, 7(4), pp. 1157–1169. DOI: 10.5194/se-7-1157-2016Google Scholar

Gómez-Treviño, E. and Esparza, F. J. (2014) ‘What is the depth of investigation of a resistivity measurement?’, Geophysics, 79(2), pp. W1–W10.Google Scholar

Grahame, D. C. (1952) ‘Mathematical theory of the faradaic admittance’, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 99(12), pp. 370–385.Google Scholar

Green, P. J. (1995) ‘Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination’, Biometrika, 82(4), pp. 711–732.Google Scholar

Greenberg, R. J. and Brace, W. F. (1969) ‘Archie’s law for rocks modeled by simple networks’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(8), pp. 2099–2102. DOI: 10.1029/JB074i008p02099Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, S. A., Zhou, B., Greenhalgh, M., Marescot, L. and Wiese, T. (2009) ‘Explicit expressions for the Fréchet derivatives in 3D anisotropic resistivity inversion’, Geophysics, 74(3), pp. F31–F43.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, S., Wiese, T. and Marescot, L. (2010) ‘Comparison of DC sensitivity patterns for anisotropic and isotropic media’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 70(2), pp. 103–112.Google Scholar

Griffiths, D. H. and Turnbull, J. (1985) ‘A multi-electrode array for resistivity surveying’, First Break, 3(7), pp. 16–20.Google Scholar

Griffiths, D. H., Turnbull, J. and Olayinka, A. I. (1990) ‘Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer-controlled array’, First Break, 8(4), pp. 121–129.Google Scholar

Guillemoteau, J., Lück, E. and Tronicke, J. (2017) ‘1D inversion of direct current data acquired with a rolling electrode system’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 146, pp. 167–177.Google Scholar

Günther, T., Rücker, C. and Spitzer, K. (2006) ‘Three-dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II. Inversion’, Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), pp. 506–517. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03011.xGoogle Scholar

Gupta, P. K., Niwas, S. and Gaur, V. K. (1997) ‘Straightforward inversion of vertical electrical sounding data’, Geophysics, 62(3), pp. 775–785.Google Scholar

Guptasarma, D. (1982) ‘Optimization of short digital linear filters for increased accuracy’, Geophysical Prospecting, 30(4), pp. 501–514.Google Scholar

Gurin, G., Ilyin, Y., Nilov, S., Ivanov, D., Kozlov, E. and Titov, K. (2018) ‘Induced polarization of rocks containing pyrite: Interpretation based on X-ray computed tomography’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 154, pp. 50–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.04.019Google Scholar

Gurin, G., Tarasov, A., Ilyin, Y. and Titov, K. (2013) ‘Time domain spectral induced polarization of disseminated electronic conductors: Laboratory data analysis through the Debye decomposition approach’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 98, pp. 44–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.07.008Google Scholar

Gurin, G., Titov, K., Ilyin, Y. and Tarasov, A. (2015) ‘Induced polarization of disseminated electronically conductive minerals: A semi-empirical model’, Geophysical Journal International, 200, pp. 1555–1565. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu490Google Scholar

Guyot, A., Ostergaard, K. T., Lenkopane, M., Fan, J. and Lockington, D. A. (2013) ‘Using electrical resistivity tomography to differentiate sapwood from heartwood: Application to conifers’, Tree Physiology, 33(2), pp. 187–194. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps128Google Scholar

Habberjam, G. M. (1972) ‘The effects of anisotropy on square array resistivity measurements’, Geophysical Prospecting, 20(2), pp. 249–266.Google Scholar

Hallbauer-Zadorozhnaya, V., Santarato, G. and Abu Zeid, N. (2015) ‘Non-linear behaviour of electrical parameters in porous, water-saturated rocks: A model to predict pore size distribution’, Geophysical Journal International, 202(2), pp. 871–886. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv161Google Scholar

Hallof, P. G. (1957) ‘On the interpretation of resistivity and induced polarization field measurements’. PhD dissertation thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, p. 200.Google Scholar

Hamdan, H. A. and Vafidis, A. (2013) ‘Joint inversion of 2D resistivity and seismic travel time data to image saltwater intrusion over karstic areas’, Environmental Earth Sciences, 68(7), pp. 1877–1885. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-1875-9Google Scholar

Hanai, T. (1960) ‘Theory of the dielectric dispersion due to the interfacial polarization and its application to emulsions’, Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 171(1), pp. 23–31.Google Scholar

Hanai, T. (1968) ‘Electrical properties of emulsions’, in Emulsion Science (Sherman, P. ed.). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Hansen, P. C. (1992) ‘Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve’, SIAM Review, 34(4), pp. 561–580.Google Scholar

Hao, N., Moysey, S. M. J., Powell, B. A. and Ntarlagiannis, D. (2015) ‘Evaluation of surface sorption processes using spectral induced pPolarization and a 22 Na tracer’, Environmental Science & Technology, 49(16), pp. 9866–9873. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01327Google Scholar

Hauck, C. and Kneisel, C. (2006) ‘Application of capacitively-coupled and DC electrical resistivity imaging for mountain permafrost studies’, Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 17(2), pp. 169–177. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.555Google Scholar

Hayley, K., Pidlisecky, A. and Bentley, L. R. (2011) ‘Simultaneous time-lapse electrical resistivity inversion’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 75(2), pp. 401–411.Google Scholar

Heenan, J., Slater, L., Ntarlagiannis, D., Atekwana, E. A., Fathepure, B. Z., Dalvi, S., Ross, C., Werkema, D. D. and Atekwana, , Estella, E. A. (2014) ‘Electrical resistivity imaging for long-term autonomous monitoring of hydrocarbon degradation: Lessons from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill’, Geophysics, 80(1), pp. B1–B11. DOI: 10.1190/geo2013-0468.1Google Scholar

Henderson, R. D., Day-Lewis, F. D., Abarca, E., Harvey, C. F., Karam, H. N., Liu, L. and Lane, J. W. (2010) ‘Marine electrical resistivity imaging of submarine groundwater discharge: Sensitivity analysis and application in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts, USA’, Hydrogeology Journal, 18(1), pp. 173–185.Google Scholar

Hennig, T., Weller, A. and Möller, M. (2008) ‘Object orientated focussing of geoelectrical multielectrode measurements’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65(2), pp. 57–64.Google Scholar

Henry-Poulter, S. (1996) ‘An investigation of transport properties in natural soils using electrical resistance tomography’. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK, p. 237.Google Scholar

Hering, A., Misiek, R., Gyulai, A., Ormos, T., Dobroka, M. and Dresen, L. (1995) ‘A joint inversion algorithm to process geoelectric and sutface wave seismic data. Part I: Basic ideas1’, Geophysical Prospecting, 43(2), pp. 135–156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00128.xGoogle Scholar

Herwanger, J. V., Worthington, M. H., Lubbe, R., Binley, A. and Khazanehdari, J. (2004a) ‘A comparison of cross-hole electrical and seismic data in fractured rock’, Geophysical Prospecting, 52(2), pp. 109–121.Google Scholar

Herwanger, J. V., Pain, C. C., Binley, A., De Oliveira, C. R. E. and Worthington, M. H. (2004b) ‘Anisotropic resistivity tomography’, Geophysical Journal International, 158(2), pp. 409–425.Google Scholar

Hilbich, C., Hauck, C., Hoelzle, M., Scherler, M., Schudel, L., Völksch, I., Vonder Mühll, D. and Mäusbacher, R. (2008) ‘Monitoring mountain permafrost evolution using electrical resistivity tomography: A 7-year study of seasonal, annual, and long-term variations at Schilthorn, Swiss Alps’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 113 (1), pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1029/2007JF000799Google Scholar

Hilbich, C., Marescot, L., Hauck, C., Loke, M. H. and Mausbacher, R. (2009) ‘Applicability of electrical resistivity tomography monitoring to coarse blocky and ice-rich permafrost landforms’, Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 20(3), pp. 269–284. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.652Google Scholar

Hilchie, D. W. (1984) ‘A new water resistivity versus temperature equation; Technical notes’, The Log Analyst, 25 (04).SPWLA-1984-vXXVn4a3.Google Scholar

Hill, H. J. and Milburn, J. D. (1956) ‘Effect of clay and water salinity on electrochemical behavior of reservoir rocks’, Transactions, AIME, 207, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar

Hinnell, A. C., Ferré, T. P. A., Vrugt, J. A., Huisman, J. A., Moysey, S., Rings, J. and Kowalsky, M. B. (2010) ‘Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion’, Water Resources Research, 46, W00D40, DOI:10.1029/2008WR007060CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hohmann, G. W. (1973) ‘Electromagnetic coupling between grounded wires at the surface of a two-layer earth’, Geophysics, 38(5), pp. 854–863.Google Scholar

Hohmann, G. W. (1975) ‘Three-dimensional induced polarization and electromagnetic modeling’, Geophysics, 40(2), pp. 309–324.Google Scholar

Hohmann, G. W. (1988) ‘Numerical modeling for electromagnetic methods of geophysics’, Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, 1, pp. 313–363.Google Scholar

Hördt, A., Hanstein, T., Hönig, M. and Neubauer, F. M. (2006) ‘Efficient spectral IP-modelling in the time domain’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 59(2), pp. 152–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.09.003Google Scholar

Hördt, A., Blaschek, R., Kemna, A. and Zisser, N. (2007) ‘Hydraulic conductivity estimation from induced polarisation data at the field scale: The Krauthausen case history’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 62(1), pp. 33–46.Google Scholar

Hua, P., Woo, E. J., Webster, J. G. and Tompkins, W. J. (1991) ‘Iterative reconstruction methods using regularization and optimal current patterns in electrical impedance tomography’, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(4), pp. 621–628.Google Scholar

Huisman, J. A., Rings, J., Vrugt, J. A., Sorg, J. and Vereecken, H. (2010) ‘Hydraulic properties of a model dike from coupled Bayesian and multi-criteria hydrogeophysical inversion’, Journal of Hydrology, 380(1–2), pp. 62–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.023Google Scholar

Hunkel, H. (1924) ‘Verfahren zur Feststellung und Lokalisierung von Koerpern im Untergrunde’, German Patent 442,832.Google Scholar

Huntley, D. (1986) ‘Relations between permeability and electrical resistivity in granular aquifers’, Groundwater, 24(4), pp. 466–474.Google Scholar

Huntley, D., Bobrowsky, P., Hendry, M., Macciotta, R., Elwood, D., Sattler, K., Best, M., Chambers, J. and Meldrum, P. (2019) ‘Application of multi-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography datasets to investigate a very slow-moving landslide near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada’, Landslides, 16, pp. 1033–1042.Google Scholar

Hupfer, S., Martin, T., Weller, A., Günther, T., Kuhn, K., Djotsa Nguimeya Ngninjio, V. and Noell, U. (2016) ‘Polarization effects of unconsolidated sulphide-sand-mixtures’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 135, pp. 456–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.12.003Google Scholar

Ingeman-Nielsen, T. and Baumgartner, F. (2006) ‘CR1Dmod: A Matlab program to model 1D complex resistivity effects in electrical and electromagnetic surveys’, Computers & Geosciences, 32(9), pp. 1411–1419.Google Scholar

Inman, J. R. Jr, Ryu, J. and Ward, S. H. (1973) ‘Resistivity inversion’, Geophysics, 38 (6), pp. 1088–1108.Google Scholar

Inman, J. R. (1975) ‘Resistivity inversion with ridge regression’, Geophysics, 40(5), pp. 798–817.Google Scholar

Iseki, S. and Shima, H. (1992) ‘Induced-polarization tomography: A crosshole imaging technique using chargeability and resistivity’, in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 439–442.Google Scholar

Ishizu, K., Goto, T., Ohta, Y., Kasaya, T., Iwamoto, H., Vachiratienchai, C., Siripunvaraporn, W., Tsuji, T., Kumagai, H. and Koike, K. (2019) ‘Internal structure of a seafloor massive sulfide deposit by electrical resistivity tomography, Okinawa Trough’, Geophysical Research Letters, 46(20), pp. 11025–11034.Google Scholar

Jackson, P., Smith, D. and Stanford, P. (1978) ‘Resistivity‐porosity‐particle shape relationships for marine sands’, Geophysics, 43(6), pp. 1250–1268. DOI: 10.1190/1.1440891Google Scholar

JafarGandomi, A. and Binley, A. (2013) ‘A Bayesian trans-dimensional approach for the fusion of multiple geophysical datasets’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 96, pp. 38–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.06.004Google Scholar

Jayawickreme, D. H., Van Dam, R. L. and Hyndman, D. W. (2008) ‘Subsurface imaging of vegetation, climate, and root‐zone moisture interactions’, Geophysical Research Letters, L18404, DOI:10.1029/2008GL034690Google Scholar

Jha, M. K., Kumar, S. and Chowdhury, A. (2008) ‘Vertical electrical sounding survey and resistivity inversion using genetic algorithm optimization technique’, Journal of Hydrology, 359(1–2), pp. 71–87.Google Scholar

Johansen, H. K. (1975) ‘An interactive computer/graphic-display-terminal system for interpretation of resistivity soundings’, Geophysical Prospecting, 23(3), pp. 449–458.Google Scholar

Johansen, H. K. (1977) ‘A man/computer interpretation system for resistivity soundings over a horizontally strafified earth’, Geophysical Prospecting, 25(4), pp. 667–691.Google Scholar

Johansen, H. K. and Sørensen, K. (1979) ‘Fast hankel transforms’, Geophysical Prospecting, 27(4), pp. 876–901.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. L., Koplik, J. and Schwartz, L. M. (1986) ‘New pore-size parameter characterizing transport in porous media’, Physical Review Letters, 57(20), pp. 2564–2567. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2564Google Scholar

Johnson, H. M. (1962) ‘A history of well logging’, Geophysics, 27(4), pp. 507–527.Google Scholar

Johnson, I. M. (1984) ‘Spectral induced polarization parameters as determined through time-domain measurements’, Geophysics, 49(11), pp. 1993–2003.Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C. and Wellman, D. (2015) ‘Accurate modelling and inversion of electrical resistivity data in the presence of metallic infrastructure with known location and dimension’, Geophysical Journal International, 202(2), pp. 1096–1108. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv206Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C. and Thomle, J. (2018) ‘3-D decoupled inversion of complex conductivity data in the real number domain’, Geophysical Journal International, 212(1), pp. 284–296. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx416Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C., Versteeg, R. J., Huang, H. and Routh, P. S. (2009) ‘Data-domain correlation approach for joint hydrogeologic inversion of time-lapse hydrogeologic and geophysical data’, Geophysics, 74(6). DOI: 10.1190/1.3237087Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C., Versteeg, R. J., Ward, A., Day-Lewis, F. D. and Revil, A. (2010) ‘Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time-domain resistivity and induced-polarization data’, Geophysics, 75(4), pp. WA27–WA41.Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C., Slater, L. D., Ntarlagiannis, D., Day-Lewis, F. D. and Elwaseif, M. (2012a) ‘Monitoring groundwater-surface water interaction using time-series and time-frequency analysis of transient three-dimensional electrical resistivity changes’, Water Resources Research, 48(7), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1029/2012WR011893Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C., Versteeg, R. J., Rockhold, M., Slater, L. D., Ntarlagiannis, D., Greenwood, W. J. and Zachara, J. (2012b) ‘Characterization of a contaminated wellfield using 3D electrical resistivity tomography implemented with geostatistical, discontinuous boundary, and known conductivity constraints’, Geophysics, 77 (6), pp. EN85–EN96.Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C., Versteeg, R. J., Day‐Lewis, F. D., Major, W. and Lane, J. W. (2015). ‘Time-lapse electrical geophysical monitoring of amendment-based biostimulation’, Groundwater, 53(6), pp. 920–932.Google Scholar

Johnson, T. C., Hammond, G. E. and Chen, X. (2017) ‘PFLOTRAN-E4D: A parallel open source PFLOTRAN module for simulating time-lapse electrical resistivity data’, Computers and Geosciences, 99, pp. 72–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.09.006Google Scholar

Jol, H. M. (2008) Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications. Elsevier, p. 544.Google Scholar

Jongmans, D. and Garambois, S. (2007) ‘Geophysical investigation of landslides: A review’, Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 178(2), pp. 101–112.Google Scholar

Kaipio, J. P., Kolehmainen, V., Somersalo, E. and Vauhkonen, M. (2000) ‘Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography’, Inverse Problems, 16(5), p. 1487. DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/16/5/321Google Scholar

Kang, X., Shi, X., Revil, A., Cao, Z., Li, L., Lan, T. and Wu, J. (2019) ‘Coupled hydrogeophysical inversion to identify non-Gaussian hydraulic conductivity field by jointly assimilating geochemical and time-lapse geophysical data’, Journal of Hydrology, 578, p. 124092. DOI: /10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124092Google Scholar

Karaoulis, M. C., Kim, J.-H. and Tsourlos, P. I. (2011) ‘4D active time constrained resistivity inversion’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 73(1), pp. 25–34.Google Scholar

Karaoulis, M., Revil, A., Zhang, J. and Werkema, D. D. (2012) ‘Time-lapse joint inversion of crosswell DC resistivity and seismic data: A numerical investigation’, Geophysics, 77(4). DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0011.1Google Scholar

Karaoulis, M., Revil, A., Tsourlos, P., Werkema, D. D. and Minsley, B. J. (2013) ‘IP4DI: A software for time-lapse 2D/3D DC-resistivity and induced polarization tomography’, Computers and Geosciences, 54, pp. 164–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.01.008Google Scholar

Karaoulis, M., Tsourlos, P., Kim, J.-H. and Revil, A. (2014) ‘4D time-lapse ERT inversion: introducing combined time and space constraints’, Near Surface Geophysics, 12(1), pp. 25–34.Google Scholar

Karhunen, K., Seppänen, A., Lehikoinen, A., Monteiro, P. J. M. and Kaipio, J. P. (2010) ‘Electrical resistance tomography imaging of concrete’, Cement and Concrete Research, 40(1), pp. 137–145.Google Scholar

Katz, A. J. and Thompson, A. H. (1986) ‘Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock’, Physical Review B, 34(11), pp. 8179–8181. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.8179Google Scholar

Katz, A. J. and Thompson, A. H. (1987) ‘Prediction of rock electrical-conductivity from mercury injection measurements’, Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth and Planets, 92(B1), pp. 599–607. DOI: 10.1029/JB092iB01p00599Google Scholar

Kauahikaua, J., Mattice, M. and Jackson, D. (1980) ‘Mise-a-la-masse mapping of the HGP-A geothermal reservoir, Hawaii’, Proc. Geothermal Resources Council 1980 Annual Meeting, September 9–11,1980, Salt Lake City, Utah. Vol. 4. pp. 65–68.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. A. and Wightman, W. E. (1993) ‘A transmission-line model for electrical logging through casing’, Geophysics, 58(12), pp. 1739–1747.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. A., Alekseev, D. and Oristaglio, M. (2014) Principles of Electromagnetic Methods in Surface Geophysics. Newnes, p. 794.Google Scholar

Keery, J., Binley, A., Elshenawy, A. and Clifford, J. (2012) ‘Markov-chain Monte Carlo estimation of distributed Debye relaxations in spectral induced polarization’, Geophysics, 77(2). DOI: 10.1190/geo2011-0244.1Google Scholar

Keller, C. (2012) ‘Hydro-geologic spatial resolution using flexible Liners’, The Professional Geologist, 49(3), pp. 45–51.Google Scholar

Keller, G. V. and Frischknecht, F. C. (1966) Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 517.Google Scholar

Kelter, M., Huisman, J. A., Zimmermann, E. and Vereecken, H. (2018) ‘Field evaluation of broadband spectral electrical imaging for soil and aquifer characterization’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 159, pp. 484–496.Google Scholar

Kelter, M., Huisman, J. A., Zimmermann, E., Kemna, A. and Vereecken, H. (2015) ‘Quantitative imaging of spectral electrical properties of variably saturated soil columns’, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 123, pp. 333–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.09.001Google Scholar

Kemna, A. (2000) Tomographic Inversion of Complex Resistivity: Theory and Application. Der Andere Verlag Osnabrück, p. 196.Google Scholar

Kemna, A., Rakers, E. and Binley, A. (1997) ‘Application of complex resistivity tomography to field data from a kerosene-contaminated site’, in Environmental and Engineering Geophysics (EEGS). European Section, pp. 151–154.Google Scholar

Kemna, A., Binley, A., Ramirez, A. and Daily, W. (2000) ‘Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications’, Chemical Engineering Journal, 77(1–2), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar

Kemna, A., Vanderborght, J., Kulessa, B. and Vereecken, H. (2002) ‘Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models’, Journal of Hydrology, 267(3–4), pp. 125–146.Google Scholar

Kemna, A., Binley, A. and Slater, L. (2004) ‘Crosshole IP imaging for engineering and environmental applications’, Geophysics, 69(1), pp. 97–107. DOI: 10.1190/1.1649379Google Scholar

Kemna, A., Binley, A., Cassiani, G., Niederleithinger, E., Revil, A., Slater, L., Williams, K. H., Orozco, A. F., Haegel, F. H., Hördt, A., Kruschwitz, S., Leroux, V., Titov, K. and Zimmermann, E. (2012) ‘An overview of the spectral induced polarization method for near-surface applications’, Near Surface Geophysics, 10(6), pp. 453–468. DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2012027Google Scholar