Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T23:27:19.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - ‘The sex appeal of the inorganic’: seeing, touching and knowing the divine during the Second Sophistic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Julia Kindt
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

What may generate anxiety and constitute an enigma is precisely the coming together of two opposite dimensions in a single phenomenon such as the mode of being of the thing and human sensibility.

Mario Perniola

Feeling implies the union between body and spirit, mind and machine. A thinking thing can also not have a body, but a sentient thing has to have it. Who feels therefore is not God but the I.

Mario Perniola

INTRODUCTION

A fragment from a (now-lost) play entitled A Picture by the poet Alexis features a certain Cleisophus of Selymbria, who got himself locked into a temple at Samos intending to have intercourse with the statue it housed. ‘[A]nd since he found that impossible on account of the frigidity and resistance of the stone (διά τε τὴν ψυχρότητα καὶ τὸ ἀντίτυπον τοῦ λίθου), he then and there desisted from that desire and placing before him a small piece of flesh (προβαλλόμενός τι σαρκίον) he consorted with that.’

One might want to take this curious incident simply as what it purports to be: the product of the poetic imagination of an important advocate of Middle and New Comedy. Alternatively we might consider that the key to this odd passage is to be found in a more general but no less puzzling association between women and food in Athenaeus’ Deiphnosophistae, the work in which it is preserved. In short it might indeed be tempting to dismiss this episode as a strange but ultimately negligible incident but for the fact that Cleisophus’ desire was by no means as singular as one might think. The entire story reverberates with other instances of agalmatophilia (‘statue love’) involving divine statues, and the similarities and differences between Cleisophus’ experience and their accounts of agalmatophilia are as striking as they are revealing.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×